Clearwater Beaverton.
Clearwater Beaverton is Ranked in the top 1% of Oregon memory care with 6 OR DHS citations on record; last inspected May 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 15 Oregon facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month OR-DHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Clearwater Beaverton has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-05-19Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2026-01-14Annual Compliance VisitOR-cited · 6 findings
Plain-language summary
During an initial inspection in January 2026, inspectors found that the facility's move-in evaluations for one sampled resident with congestive heart failure did not address required elements including mental health issues, pain management, emergency evacuation ability, decision-making capacity, recent losses, prior placement history, smoking safety, drug use, environmental factors affecting behavior, or gender identity and pronouns. The facility acknowledged these findings and stated it would come into compliance by March 15, 2026.
“Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure move-in evaluations addressed all required elements for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 4) whose move-in evaluation was reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 4 moved into the assisted living community in 01/2026 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. On 01/13/26 at 9:57 am, the resident’s move-in evaluations, dated 12/24/25 and 01/02/26, were reviewed with Staff 1 (Executive Director) and Staff 2 (Health Services Director), and the following required elements were not addressed: * Mental health issues, including presence of depression, thought disorders or mood problems, and effective non-drug interventions; * Pain, including non-pharmaceutical interventions; * Emergency evacuation ability; * Decision making ability; * Recent losses; * Unsuccessful prior placements; * Ability to smoke safely; * Drug use; * Environmental factors that impact the resident’s behavior including but not limited to noise and room temperature; and * Gender identity. The need to ensure move-in evaluations addressed each required element was reviewed with Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3 (Memory Support Director), and Staff 6 (Health Services Assistant) on 01/14/26 at 2:37 pm. They acknowledged the findings.”
“Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pronouns and gender identity were evaluated prior to or upon move-in. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C252. Please refer to C0252 above. Facility alleges compliance by March 15, 2026. OAR 411-054-0034 (1)(c)(B)&(5)(a)(A-C) Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation (1) INITIAL SCREENING AND MOVE-IN. (c) Each resident record must, before move-in and when updated, include the following information: (B) To promote person-centered care, any variance from legal records, as indicated by the resident, regarding: (i) Name. (ii) Pronouns. (iii) Gender identity. (5) The resident evaluation must address the following elements: (a) For service planning purposes, if indicated by the resident, (A) Name (B) Pronouns. (C) Gender identity. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:”
“Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure move-in evaluations addressed all required elements for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 4) whose move-in evaluation was reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 4 moved into the assisted living community in 01/2026 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. On 01/13/26 at 9:57 am, the resident’s move-in evaluations, dated 12/24/25 and 01/02/26, were reviewed with Staff 1 (Executive Director) and Staff 2 (Health Services Director), and the following required elements were not addressed: * Mental health issues, including presence of depression, thought disorders or mood problems, and effective non-drug interventions; * Pain, including non-pharmaceutical interventions; * Emergency evacuation ability; * Decision making ability; * Recent losses; * Unsuccessful prior placements; * Ability to smoke safely; * Drug use; * Environmental factors that impact the resident’s behavior including but not limited to noise and room temperature; and * Gender identity. The need to ensure move-in evaluations addressed each required element was reviewed with Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3 (Memory Support Director), and Staff 6 (Health Services Assistant) on 01/14/26 at 2:37 pm. They acknowledged the findings.”
“Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pronouns and gender identity were evaluated prior to or upon move-in. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C252. Please refer to C0252 above. Facility alleges compliance by March 15, 2026. OAR 411-054-0034 (1)(c)(B)&(5)(a)(A-C) Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation (1) INITIAL SCREENING AND MOVE-IN. (c) Each resident record must, before move-in and when updated, include the following information: (B) To promote person-centered care, any variance from legal records, as indicated by the resident, regarding: (i) Name. (ii) Pronouns. (iii) Gender identity. (5) The resident evaluation must address the following elements: (a) For service planning purposes, if indicated by the resident, (A) Name (B) Pronouns. (C) Gender identity. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:”
“Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure move-in evaluations addressed all required elements for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 4) whose move-in evaluation was reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 4 moved into the assisted living community in 01/2026 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. On 01/13/26 at 9:57 am, the resident’s move-in evaluations, dated 12/24/25 and 01/02/26, were reviewed with Staff 1 (Executive Director) and Staff 2 (Health Services Director), and the following required elements were not addressed: * Mental health issues, including presence of depression, thought disorders or mood problems, and effective non-drug interventions; * Pain, including non-pharmaceutical interventions; * Emergency evacuation ability; * Decision making ability; * Recent losses; * Unsuccessful prior placements; * Ability to smoke safely; * Drug use; * Environmental factors that impact the resident’s behavior including but not limited to noise and room temperature; and * Gender identity. The need to ensure move-in evaluations addressed each required element was reviewed with Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3 (Memory Support Director), and Staff 6 (Health Services Assistant) on 01/14/26 at 2:37 pm. They acknowledged the findings.”
“Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pronouns and gender identity were evaluated prior to or upon move-in. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C252. Please refer to C0252 above. Facility alleges compliance by March 15, 2026. OAR 411-054-0034 (1)(c)(B)&(5)(a)(A-C) Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation (1) INITIAL SCREENING AND MOVE-IN. (c) Each resident record must, before move-in and when updated, include the following information: (B) To promote person-centered care, any variance from legal records, as indicated by the resident, regarding: (i) Name. (ii) Pronouns. (iii) Gender identity. (5) The resident evaluation must address the following elements: (a) For service planning purposes, if indicated by the resident, (A) Name (B) Pronouns. (C) Gender identity. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure move-in evaluations addressed all required elements for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 4) whose move-in evaluation was reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 4 moved into the assisted living community in 01/2026 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. On 01/13/26 at 9:57 am, the resident’s move-in evaluations, dated 12/24/25 and 01/02/26, were reviewed with Staff 1 (Executive Director) and Staff 2 (Health Services Director), and the following required elements were not addressed: * Mental health issues, including presence of depression, thought disorders or mood problems, and effective non-drug interventions; * Pain, including non-pharmaceutical interventions; * Emergency evacuation ability; * Decision making ability; * Recent losses; * Unsuccessful prior placements; * Ability to smoke safely; * Drug use; * Environmental factors that impact the resident’s behavior including but not limited to noise and room temperature; and * Gender identity. The need to ensure move-in evaluations addressed each required element was reviewed with Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3 (Memory Support Director), and Staff 6 (Health Services Assistant) on 01/14/26 at 2:37 pm. They acknowledged the findings. Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pronouns and gender identity were evaluated prior to or upon move-in. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C252. Please refer to C0252 above. Facility alleges compliance by March 15, 2026. OAR 411-054-0034 (1)(c)(B)&(5)(a)(A-C) Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation (1) INITIAL SCREENING AND MOVE-IN. (c) Each resident record must, before move-in and when updated, include the following information: (B) To promote person-centered care, any variance from legal records, as indicated by the resident, regarding: (i) Name. (ii) Pronouns. (iii) Gender identity. (5) The resident evaluation must address the following elements: (a) For service planning purposes, if indicated by the resident, (A) Name (B) Pronouns. (C) Gender identity. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:
Other facilities in Washington County.
Other memory care facilities in Washington County with similar care offerings.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.