Oregon · Woodburn

Heartwood Place.

ALF · Memory Care48 bedsDementia-trained staff
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Endorsed Memory Care Community
Peer rank
Top 25% of Oregon memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Woodburn
A 48-bed ALF · Memory Care with 9 citations on file.
Licensed beds
48
Last inspection
Apr 2026
Last citation
Apr 2026
Operated by
Phone
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Heartwood Place

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Heartwood Place
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 56 Oregon facilities with a similar number of beds.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.

Severity rank
69th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
55th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month OR-DHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Heartwood Place has 9 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

9 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: APR 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
APR 2026
Aug 2024as of Jul 2026

Finding distribution

9 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A9
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

3
reports on file
9
total deficiencies
2026-04-02
Annual Compliance Visit
OR-cited · 5 findings

Plain-language summary

During a re-licensure inspection from March 31 to April 2, 2026, inspectors observed caregivers failing to follow proper hand hygiene and glove protocols during toileting and personal care for a resident with dementia, including placing soiled gloves in pockets, not washing hands between dirty and clean tasks, and donning gloves without hand hygiene first. The facility also failed to ensure medication and treatment orders were carried out as prescribed for two residents and failed to accurately document care time and staffing levels for three residents on their acuity assessments. The facility has committed to retraining all direct care staff on infection control practices and implementing monthly audits and hand hygiene observations.

OR-citedOAR §Z0162
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0162

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide health care services in accordance with the licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C303 and C362. Refer to C303

OR-citedOAR §C0295
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0295

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control protocols to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 1) who received assistance with toileting. Findings include, but are not limited to: Throughout the re-licensure survey, from 03/31/26 through 04/02/26, the following observations were made to determine adherence to universal precautions for infection control: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including vascular dementia. Per the service plan, dated 03/23/26, Resident 1 required two-person physical assistance with a gait belt and walker for transfer to the toilet, disposable briefs, and staff were to ensure perineal care (peri care) was provided. Two observations were made of caregivers transferring the resident to the toilet and providing peri care. On 03/31/26 at 11:05 am, Staff 14 (CG) assisted Resident 1 to the toilet, then removed the soiled gloves and placed them in her pocket. She then removed a clean brief from the closet, donned new gloves, and removed the soiled brief. Without changing gloves, she put the clean brief on the resident while s/he was sitting on the toilet. After providing peri care, she doffed her gloves and assisted the resident into the wheelchair, then into his/her recliner. She did not perform any hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks. In an interview with Staff 14 on 03/31/26 at 11:14 am, she acknowledged placing the soiled gloves in her pocket was unsanitary. On 04/01/26 at 10:30am, Staff 10 (CG) and Staff 12 (CG) assisted Resident 1 to the bathroom then doffed their gloves without performing hand hygiene. Staff 10 remained in the room and Staff 12 left the room. Staff 12 returned to assist with transferring the resident from the toilet and did not perform hand hygiene prior to assisting. Staff 10 donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, then provided peri care. Both caregivers assisted the resident to ambulate to the sink. Staff 10 held the gait belt and guided the resident with his/her walker to the reclining chair, then doffed the soiled gloves. During both observations, Staff 10, Staff 12, and Staff 14 entered the resident’s room and donned gloves without first performing hand hygiene and did not perform hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks. The need to maintain infection prevention and control protocols to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment during ADL care was discussed with Staff 1 (ED) and Staff 2 (RN) on 04/02/26 at 2:00 pm. They acknowledged the findings. All direct care staff and med techs will be re-trained on donning and doffing of gloves between dirty and clean tasks handwashing and review of all infection control policies. Upon hire infection control courses are completed. Return demenstration of hand washing and donning and doffing of gloves will be observed. Current employees will receive on going monthly training/audits of all infection control requirements. Monthly audits and return demontration will be conducted to all direct care staff on hand washing and donning and doffing of gloves during resident care. Adminstrator, RN and RCC

OR-citedOAR §C0303
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0303

Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment orders were carried out as prescribed for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1 and 4) whose MARs and physician orders were reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to:

OR-citedOAR §C0362
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0362

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident’s Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) accurately captured care time and care elements that staff were providing to each resident as outlined in each individual service plan, for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, and 4) whose ABST evaluations were reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 1, 2, and 4’s current service plans and ABST evaluations were reviewed during the survey. Observations were made of the residents, and staff were interviewed regarding each resident’s care needs. The following was identified:

OR-citedOAR §Z0142
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0142

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C295. Refer to C 295 and C 362

Read raw inspector notes

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control protocols to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 1) who received assistance with toileting. Findings include, but are not limited to: Throughout the re-licensure survey, from 03/31/26 through 04/02/26, the following observations were made to determine adherence to universal precautions for infection control: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including vascular dementia. Per the service plan, dated 03/23/26, Resident 1 required two-person physical assistance with a gait belt and walker for transfer to the toilet, disposable briefs, and staff were to ensure perineal care (peri care) was provided. Two observations were made of caregivers transferring the resident to the toilet and providing peri care. On 03/31/26 at 11:05 am, Staff 14 (CG) assisted Resident 1 to the toilet, then removed the soiled gloves and placed them in her pocket. She then removed a clean brief from the closet, donned new gloves, and removed the soiled brief. Without changing gloves, she put the clean brief on the resident while s/he was sitting on the toilet. After providing peri care, she doffed her gloves and assisted the resident into the wheelchair, then into his/her recliner. She did not perform any hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks. In an interview with Staff 14 on 03/31/26 at 11:14 am, she acknowledged placing the soiled gloves in her pocket was unsanitary. On 04/01/26 at 10:30am, Staff 10 (CG) and Staff 12 (CG) assisted Resident 1 to the bathroom then doffed their gloves without performing hand hygiene. Staff 10 remained in the room and Staff 12 left the room. Staff 12 returned to assist with transferring the resident from the toilet and did not perform hand hygiene prior to assisting. Staff 10 donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, then provided peri care. Both caregivers assisted the resident to ambulate to the sink. Staff 10 held the gait belt and guided the resident with his/her walker to the reclining chair, then doffed the soiled gloves. During both observations, Staff 10, Staff 12, and Staff 14 entered the resident’s room and donned gloves without first performing hand hygiene and did not perform hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks. The need to maintain infection prevention and control protocols to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment during ADL care was discussed with Staff 1 (ED) and Staff 2 (RN) on 04/02/26 at 2:00 pm. They acknowledged the findings. All direct care staff and med techs will be re-trained on donning and doffing of gloves between dirty and clean tasks handwashing and review of all infection control policies. Upon hire infection control courses are completed. Return demenstration of hand washing and donning and doffing of gloves will be observed. Current employees will receive on going monthly training/audits of all infection control requirements. Monthly audits and return demontration will be conducted to all direct care staff on hand washing and donning and doffing of gloves during resident care. Adminstrator, RN and RCC Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment orders were carried out as prescribed for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1 and 4) whose MARs and physician orders were reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident’s Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) accurately captured care time and care elements that staff were providing to each resident as outlined in each individual service plan, for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, and 4) whose ABST evaluations were reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 1, 2, and 4’s current service plans and ABST evaluations were reviewed during the survey. Observations were made of the residents, and staff were interviewed regarding each resident’s care needs. The following was identified: Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C295. Refer to C 295 and C 362 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide health care services in accordance with the licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C303 and C362. Refer to C303

2025-04-24
Complaint Investigation
OR-cited · 3 findings
OR-citedOAR §C0360
OR-citedOAR §C0361
OR-citedOAR §C0363
2024-03-07
Annual Compliance Visit
OR-cited · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During a kitchen inspection on March 7, 2024, the facility was found to be in substantial compliance with Oregon rules governing meal service and food sanitation for residential care and assisted living facilities. No violations were identified in the areas of resident meals, food handling, or sanitation practices.

OR-citedOAR §C0000
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0000

The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 03/07/24, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services - Meals and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 03/07/24, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services - Meals and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000.

Read raw inspector notes

The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 03/07/24, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services - Meals and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 03/07/24, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services - Meals and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000.

3 older inspections from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Nearby

Other facilities in Marion County.

Other memory care facilities in Marion County with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.