Oregon · Eugene

Footsteps at Greer Gardens.

ALF · Memory Care32 bedsDementia-trained staff
Endorsed Memory Care Community
Peer rank
Top 65% of Oregon memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Eugene
A 32-bed ALF · Memory Care with 16 citations on file.
Licensed beds
32
Last inspection
Oct 2025
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Phone
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Footsteps at Greer Gardens

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Footsteps at Greer Gardens
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 56 Oregon facilities with a similar number of beds.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.

Severity rank
35th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
2nd%
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
69th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month OR-DHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Footsteps at Greer Gardens has 16 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

16 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2025
Aug 2024as of Jul 2026

Finding distribution

16 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A16
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

5
reports on file
16
total deficiencies
2025-10-21
Annual Compliance Visit
OR-cited · 2 findings

Plain-language summary

A routine kitchen inspection found the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner according to Oregon Food Sanitation Rules. The facility also failed to comply with licensing rules for resident care and Assisted Living Facilities, and did not meet memory care community compliance requirements under OAR 411-057-0140(2). Specific details of the violations are referenced in the inspection report under citation C240.

OR-citedOAR §C0240
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0240

Based on observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to:

OR-citedOAR §Z0142
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0142

Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Resident care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C240 see C 240 OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:

Read raw inspector notes

Based on observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Resident care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C240 see C 240 OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:

2025-03-13
Annual Compliance Visit
OR-cited · 5 findings

Plain-language summary

During a re-licensure inspection on March 11-13, 2025, the facility was found to have violated multiple licensing rules, including failing to immediately report three resident-to-resident altercations involving one resident to the adult protective services office (the altercations occurred in late December 2024 and January 2025 but were not reported until March 2025), failing to maintain sufficient direct care staffing on night shifts to meet resident needs and fire safety requirements, and failing to document that residents received required fire and life safety instruction. The facility administrator acknowledged each of these findings during the inspection.

OR-citedOAR §C0231
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0231

Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to immediately report abuse and/or suspected abuse to the local SPD office for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) whose record was reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of Resident 1’s clinical record identified the following: * On 12/22/24, Resident 1 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The altercation was investigated, however was not reported to the local SPD office until 03/12/25. * On 01/15/25, Resident 1 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The altercation was investigated, however was not reported to the local SPD office until 03/11/25. * On 01/26/25, Resident 1 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The altercation was investigated, however was not reported to the local SPD office until 03/11/25. On 03/13/25, the need to ensure incidents of abuse or suspected abuse were promptly reported to the local SPD office was discussed with Staff 1 (Administrator). She acknowledged the findings.

OR-citedOAR §C0360
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0360

based on acuity, complaint investigation or survey inspection.(e) Based on resident acuity and facility structural design there must be adequate direct care staff present at all times, to meet the fire safety evacuation standards as required by the fire authority or the Department.(f) The licensee is responsible for assuring that staffing is increased to compensate for the evaluated care and service needs of residents at move-in and for the changing physical or mental needs of the residents.(g) A minimum of two direct care staff must be scheduled and available at all times whenever a resident requires the assistance of two direct care staff for scheduled and unscheduled needs.(h) In facilities where residents are hosed in two or more detached buildings, or if a building has distinct and segregated areas, a designated caregiver must be awake and available in each building and each segregated area at all times.(i) Facilities must have a written, defined system to determine appropriate numbers of direct care staff and general staffing based on resident acuity and service needs. Such systems may be either manual or electronic.(A) Guidelines for systems must also consider physical elements of a building, use of technology if applicable and staff experience.(B) Facilities must be able to demonstrate how their staffing systems work. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have a sufficient number of direct care staff to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of each resident and to meet the fire safety evacuation standards during the night shift. Findings include, but are not limited to: During the entrance conference on 03/11/25 with Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 5 (CG) the following was identified: * The memory care community was home to 21 residents at the time of the re-licensure survey; * Three residents who required two-person assistance for transfers and/or ADL care, including the use of a mechanical lift; * Three residents who required assistance in the dining room (observations, cueing, hand over hand, or physical assistance with eating); * Two residents who required support for behavioral symptoms; and * Two residents who required support for cognitive impairments. The facility's posted staffing plan and the staffing schedule from 02/01/25 through 03/11/25 were reviewed. The facility's posted staffing plan indicated the following: * Day Shift: 6:00 am - 2:30 pm - Three CGs and one MT; * Swing Shift: 2:00 pm - 10:30 pm - Three CGs and one MT; and * Night Shift: 10:00 pm - 6:30 am - Two CGs and one MT. The staffing schedule from 02/01/25 through 03/11/25 showed 23-night shifts, the facility failed to follow their staffing plan. This was confirmed in an interview with Staff 1 (Administrator) on 03/13/25 at 1:50pm. The facility failed to have sufficient night shift staff to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of the residents and adequate direct care staff to meet the fire safety evacuation standards as required by the Department. The need to have a sufficient number of staff to meet all scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents on the night shift was discussed with Staff 1 on 03/13/25. She acknowledged the findings.

OR-citedOAR §C0422
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0422

Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were instructed on fire and life safety procedures within 24 hours of admission and annually. Findings include, but are not limited to: On 03/13/25, facility fire and life safety records were reviewed and lacked documented evidence the following required elements were completed: * Instruction to Resident 5 on fire and life safety procedures within 24 hours of admission; and * Annual instruction on general safety procedures, evacuation methods, responsibilities during fire drills, and designated meeting places inside or outside the building in the event of an actual fire for Resident 1. On 03/13/25, the need to ensure residents were provided instruction per the Oregon Fire Code was discussed with Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 3 (Health Services Quality Coordinator), and Staff 4 (Maintenance Director). They acknowledged the findings.

OR-citedOAR §Z0142
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0142

Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 231, C 360 and C 422.

OR-citedOAR §Z0155
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0155

Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 long term staff completed 16 hours of annual in-service training including at least six hours of dementia care. Findings include, but are not limited to: Staff training records were reviewed on 03/13/25 with Staff 3 (Health Services Quality Coordinator). There was no documented evidence Staff 5 (CG) hired 05/28/23 and Staff 6 (CG) hired 06/07/23, had completed the required 10 hours of annual training related to provision of care in community-based care or the required 6 hours related to dementia care. On 03/13/25, the need to ensure staff completed annual in-service training was discussed with Staff 1 (Administrator). She acknowledged the findings.

Read raw inspector notes

Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to immediately report abuse and/or suspected abuse to the local SPD office for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) whose record was reviewed. Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of Resident 1’s clinical record identified the following: * On 12/22/24, Resident 1 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The altercation was investigated, however was not reported to the local SPD office until 03/12/25. * On 01/15/25, Resident 1 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The altercation was investigated, however was not reported to the local SPD office until 03/11/25. * On 01/26/25, Resident 1 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. The altercation was investigated, however was not reported to the local SPD office until 03/11/25. On 03/13/25, the need to ensure incidents of abuse or suspected abuse were promptly reported to the local SPD office was discussed with Staff 1 (Administrator). She acknowledged the findings. based on acuity, complaint investigation or survey inspection.(e) Based on resident acuity and facility structural design there must be adequate direct care staff present at all times, to meet the fire safety evacuation standards as required by the fire authority or the Department.(f) The licensee is responsible for assuring that staffing is increased to compensate for the evaluated care and service needs of residents at move-in and for the changing physical or mental needs of the residents.(g) A minimum of two direct care staff must be scheduled and available at all times whenever a resident requires the assistance of two direct care staff for scheduled and unscheduled needs.(h) In facilities where residents are hosed in two or more detached buildings, or if a building has distinct and segregated areas, a designated caregiver must be awake and available in each building and each segregated area at all times.(i) Facilities must have a written, defined system to determine appropriate numbers of direct care staff and general staffing based on resident acuity and service needs. Such systems may be either manual or electronic.(A) Guidelines for systems must also consider physical elements of a building, use of technology if applicable and staff experience.(B) Facilities must be able to demonstrate how their staffing systems work. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have a sufficient number of direct care staff to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of each resident and to meet the fire safety evacuation standards during the night shift. Findings include, but are not limited to: During the entrance conference on 03/11/25 with Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 5 (CG) the following was identified: * The memory care community was home to 21 residents at the time of the re-licensure survey; * Three residents who required two-person assistance for transfers and/or ADL care, including the use of a mechanical lift; * Three residents who required assistance in the dining room (observations, cueing, hand over hand, or physical assistance with eating); * Two residents who required support for behavioral symptoms; and * Two residents who required support for cognitive impairments. The facility's posted staffing plan and the staffing schedule from 02/01/25 through 03/11/25 were reviewed. The facility's posted staffing plan indicated the following: * Day Shift: 6:00 am - 2:30 pm - Three CGs and one MT; * Swing Shift: 2:00 pm - 10:30 pm - Three CGs and one MT; and * Night Shift: 10:00 pm - 6:30 am - Two CGs and one MT. The staffing schedule from 02/01/25 through 03/11/25 showed 23-night shifts, the facility failed to follow their staffing plan. This was confirmed in an interview with Staff 1 (Administrator) on 03/13/25 at 1:50pm. The facility failed to have sufficient night shift staff to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of the residents and adequate direct care staff to meet the fire safety evacuation standards as required by the Department. The need to have a sufficient number of staff to meet all scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents on the night shift was discussed with Staff 1 on 03/13/25. She acknowledged the findings. Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were instructed on fire and life safety procedures within 24 hours of admission and annually. Findings include, but are not limited to: On 03/13/25, facility fire and life safety records were reviewed and lacked documented evidence the following required elements were completed: * Instruction to Resident 5 on fire and life safety procedures within 24 hours of admission; and * Annual instruction on general safety procedures, evacuation methods, responsibilities during fire drills, and designated meeting places inside or outside the building in the event of an actual fire for Resident 1. On 03/13/25, the need to ensure residents were provided instruction per the Oregon Fire Code was discussed with Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 3 (Health Services Quality Coordinator), and Staff 4 (Maintenance Director). They acknowledged the findings. Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 231, C 360 and C 422. Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 long term staff completed 16 hours of annual in-service training including at least six hours of dementia care. Findings include, but are not limited to: Staff training records were reviewed on 03/13/25 with Staff 3 (Health Services Quality Coordinator). There was no documented evidence Staff 5 (CG) hired 05/28/23 and Staff 6 (CG) hired 06/07/23, had completed the required 10 hours of annual training related to provision of care in community-based care or the required 6 hours related to dementia care. On 03/13/25, the need to ensure staff completed annual in-service training was discussed with Staff 1 (Administrator). She acknowledged the findings.

2024-10-09
Annual Compliance Visit
OR-cited · 3 findings

Plain-language summary

A routine kitchen inspection on October 8-9, 2024 found the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in sanitary condition and in good repair under Oregon food sanitation rules, with findings including accumulation of food spills, dirt, and debris on refrigeration equipment, cooking surfaces, floors, and storage areas; improperly stored and expired food items; staff not following facial hair and beverage storage requirements; and a cook serving meat without verifying safe internal temperatures. The memory care kitchenette had similar issues with contaminated food contact surfaces and expired food. The facility developed corrective action plans including daily cleaning schedules with staff sign-offs, equipment repairs, food handling procedure updates, and staff retraining.

OR-citedOAR §C0240
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0240

Based on observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observation of the facility kitchen was reviewed on 10/08/24 from 10:30 am through 1:45pm and again on 10/09/24 from 10:45 through 1:30 pm and found the following: a. An accumulation of food spills, splatters, loose food and trash debris, dirt, dust, and/or black matter was visible on or underneath the following: * All reach in coolers and freezers; * Sliding refrigerated drawers; * Walk in freezer floor; * Plastic and metal racks in walk in cooler; * Wood shelving pieces in walk in cooler; * Interior of ice machine; * Kitchen drains; * Floors under, behind and between equipment; * Legs and wheels of large equipment; * Interior and exterior of microwaves; * Industrial can opener housing; * Grill top and sides; * Griddle top and sides; * Interior of cabinet where clean plates were stored; * Ceiling vents above food prep area; * Vents above clean dish storage area; * Floors throughout kitchen in corners and edges; * Interior and exterior of hot box/warming containers; * Interior of food transportation carts; * Walls behind cooking areas; * Walls where knives were stored; * Mandolin; * Interior of drawers; * Sprinkler heads; * Exterior and interior of stainless steel drawers; * Under metal racks in dry storage; b. The following areas were in need of repair: *Multiple reach in coolers with damage to seals; * Caulking in the dirty side of dish machine area with black debris build up. c. Multiple food items found in walk in cooler and reach in coolers not covered and exposed to potential contamination. d. Multiple prepared food items found past seven days. Multiple potentially hazardous food items not dated when opened and/or prepared. Multiple food items found past manufactures use by dates. e. Multiple staff noted to be handling clean dishes and/or preparing food without facial hair restraints as required. f. Line cook observed to serve cheeseburger patties to residents without checking proper cook to temperatures were met to ensure safety. g. Multiple plastic spatulas for cooking were noted to have chips and other integrity concerns and in need of replacement. h. Multiple hot mitts/potholders were noted to have holes and other integrity concerns and in need of replacement. i. Staff drinks were observed stored in food preparation areas and did not contain lids/straws to minimize hand/lip contact as required. On 10/08/24 at 11:45am, the Memory care kitchenette area was reviewed and noted the following: * Food splatter/spills in reach in refrigerators * Food, dust, dirt debris in food delivery carts; * Food splatter/debris on walls near trash can; * Drips/splatters/spills on exterior and interior of cabinets: * Blender with food and dust/dirt debris; * Microwave with food splatter debris on interior; * Food contact surfaces of blender/mixer stored open/exposed to potential contamination; * Cabinet under sink with visible water damage needing repair; * Staff drinks stored in food service area and observed without lids/straws as required. * Multiple food items in reach in refrigerator several weeks past their printed manufactured use by dates. On 10/08/24 at 11:15am and again on 10/09/24 at 1:00 Staff 1 (Assistant Executive Director) and Staff 2 (Food and Beverage director) were interviewed and acknowledged identified deficient areas/practices. On 10/09/24 at 12:00 pm Staff 3 (Executive Chef) was informed of areas in need of attention. They acknowledged identified areas. a. Food spills cleaned and sanitized; added to the per shift daily cleaning duties to be initialed by employee once complete. Floors, corners and edges scrubbed and sanitized on per shift cleaning duties to be initialed by employee once complete. Hot box, warming containers scrubbed, cleaned and sanitized on a daily, per-shift basis to be initialed by employee once complete. Food transportation carts scrubbed and santized on a daily per-shift cleaning schedule to be initialed by employee once complete. All reach in coolers and freezers have been scrubbed and sanitized; procedure posted, including proper chemical usage for separate areas. Cooler & freezer cleaning calendar posted; Executive Chef to hold employees accountable for proper and time sensitive cleaning tasks via per-shift, daily, weekly and monthly cleaning lists, to be initialed by individual staff once completed. Plastic and metal racks have been power washed, cleaned, santized and organized with weekly cleaning sign off sheet posted. Wood shelving was disposed of and replaced with metal trays and shelves. Interior ice machine cleaned and sanitized with "How To Clean Ice Machine" guide posted with sign off sheet; dedicated scrub brush purchased. Legs, wheels of large equipment washed, scrubbed and sanitized; listed on daily checklist to be initialed by employee once complete. Microwaves, grill tops and sides, griddle top and sides cleaned and sanitized; added to per shift duties to be initialed by employee once complete. Industrial can opener cleaned and sanitzed; added to the station daily cleaning tasks to be intialized by employee once complete. Ceiling vents above food prep area and clean dish area cleaned; added to the weekly cleaning duties to be initialed by employee once complete. All walls including those where the knives are kept and behind cooking areas scrubbed and sanitized; added to the the per shift daily cleaning duties to be initialed once complete. Exterior and interior of both tool and food drawers emptied, scrubbed and sanitized; added to daily per shift duties to be initialed by employee once finished. Sprinkler heads: we have reached out to Harvey & Price, they added a recurring bi-annual task to clean all 19 sprinkler heads in the front & back kitchen, pantry, dry stock and dish areas. The next service date is in December. Metal racks emptied and scrubbed, floors sanitized and scrubbed; added to daily cleaning tasks to be initialed by employee once complete. b. Fridge and hot box seals have been replaced: cooler #2 door gaskets were replaced 10/29/24, cooler #4 all door gaskets will be replaced on 11/8/24 Hot box seals have been replaced and are to be inspected daily by Sous Chef and Executive Chef as described in job description. Caulking in dish area is scheduled to be resealed 11/8/24 and has been added to the weekly cleaning list. c. Food items not covered were disposed of; followed by proper training and posting of 'how to' store perishable items. d. Lead is assigned to check dates and proper storage daily, supervised by Sous Chef. Stocking employee is trained to inspect product best by dates as delivered, returning past dated items to distributor. Facial hair restraints have been stocked and implemented with posting of proper usage; supervisor on team responsible for ensuring protocol per job description. f. Food safety demonstration training provided (10/30/24); thermometers ordered, one on each station and one per cook as a required part of their uniform. Thermometers tested and calibrated per manufactures guidelines. Dates are to be checked weekly, as listed in weekly station duties to be initialed by employee once complete. g. Plastic spatulas have been disposed of and replacements ordered; integrity checked daily h. Pot holders/hot mitts with holes and integrity concerns have been disposed of and replaced. Executive Chef to inspect daily, per job description. i. Staff drink area has been designated, below counter level, with lids and straws mandatory. Executive Chef to ensure proper storage. A review of written job positions reviewed at 10/30/24 employee meeting. Oregon State Food Handler's cards are active, updated and properly filed. Additionally, Executive Chef will be held responsible for upkeep of equipme

OR-citedOAR §C0370
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0370

Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 7 of 16 staff (#3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) who prepared and served food had active food handlers certificates. Findings include, but are not limited to: On 10/08/24 employee records were requested and reviewed to ensure staff had active food handlers certifications. There were six employees who's food cards could not be located and one staff (staff #4) who's card was expired. Staff 1 (Assistant Executive Director) indicated the facility had recently switched over to a new system and would attempt to retrieve copies of cards from corporate offices. On 10/09/24 at 10:45am, Staff 1 provided a report provided from corporate offices validating that the additional six staff (cooks and Sous Chefs) had expired food handler cards. Staff 1 stated that the switch over of computer programs contributed to a lack of oversite on expired cards. The facility scheduled all expired staff to get their cards updated the following week. Staff 1, 2 and 3 acknowledged that all staff preparing food must have active food handlers cards and that seven of their staff's cards were not active. Food splatter/spills in the reach in refrigerators, on walls near trash can, exterior and interior of cabinets and interior microwave have been scrubbed and sanitized; a shift cleaning list has been posted and will be initialed by employee once completed. Food delivery carts have been scrubbed and sanitized; duties have been added to the per shift cleaning list. Small kitchen equipment including the blender have been cleaned and covered to limit contamination; postage has been placed for proper sanitaztion after every use. Water damage under the sink cabinet is scheduled to be completed by 11/15/24 by in house maintenance team. All drinks are kept in a designated area with lids and straws with a 'friendly reminder' posting. All expired food has been discarded and will be evaulated daily as listed in the daily duties, posted in the back hallway An outline of cleaning descriptions and expectations have been posted. OAR 411-054-0070 (3-4) Staffing Requirements and Training – Pre-service (3) PRE-SERVICE ORIENTATION FOR ALL EMPLOYEES. Prior to beginning their job responsibilities, all employees must complete orientation training regarding: (a) A review of their written position description with their job responsibilities. (b) RESIDENTS’ RIGHTS. Residents' rights and the values of community-based care, including the Department-approved LGBTQIA2S+ trainings. (A) Effective December 31, 2024, all staff must have completed the required training. All new staff, hired on and after January 1, 2025, must complete the required training prior to beginning job responsibilities. (B) The Department-approved LGBTQIA2S+ trainings shall address the elements described in paragraph (6)(b) of this rule. (c) Abuse and reporting requirements. (d) Fire safety and emergency procedures. (e) INFECTIOUS DISEASE PREVENTION. Prior to beginning their job responsibilities, unless the employee received the training described below within the 24-month period prior to the time of hiring, all employees must complete training addressing the prevention, recognition, control and reporting of the spread of infectious disease. (A) The Department, in consultation with the Oregon Health Authority, has determined this training must address the following curricula: (i) Transmission of communicable disease and infections, including development of a policy with criteria directing staff to stay home when ill with a communicable disease, so as not to transmit disease. (ii) Policy addressing respiratory hygiene and coughing etiquette. (iii) Standard precautions. (iv) Hand hygiene. (v) Use of personal protective equipment. (vi) Cleaning of physical environment, including, but not limited to disinfecting high-touch surfaces and equipment, and handling, storing, processing and transporting linens to prevent the spread of infection. (vii) Isolating and cohorting of residents during a disease outbreak. (viii) Employees must also receive training on the rights and responsibilities of employees to report disease outbreaks under ORS 433.004 and safeguards for employees who report disease outbreaks. (B) INFECTIOUS DISEASE TRAINING CURRICULUM. Pre-service infectious disease training curriculum must be approved by the Department before facilities may offer training to staff. (i) The pre-service training may be provided in person, in writing, by webinar or by other electronic means. (ii) Facilities or other entities that want to provide training curriculum to facilities must first present that curriculum to the Department for review and approval. (f) HOME AND COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES (HCBS) TRAINING. All staff are required to complete the Department-approved HCBS training, as provided below: (A) Effective March 31, 2024, all staff must have completed the required training. (B) All new staff, hired on or after April 1, 2024, must complete the required training prior to beginning job responsibilities. (g) FOOD HANDLING. If the staff member's duties include preparing food, they must have a food handler's certificate. (4) PRE-SERVICE TRAINING FOR ALL DIRECT CARE STAFF. (a) DEMENTIA. Prior to providing care to residents, all direct care staff must complete an approved pre-service dementia training. (A) Documentation of dementia training: (i) A certificate of completion shall be issued to direct care staff who satisfactorily complete approved dementia training. Facilities shall also maintain records of all direct care staff who have successfully completed pre-service dementia training. (ii) Each facility shall maintain written documentation of continuing education completed, including required pre-service dementia training, for all direct care staff. (B) Portability of pre-service dementia training: After completing the pre-service training, if a direct care staff person is hired within 24 months by a different facility, the hiring facility may choose to accept the previous training or require the direct care staff to complete the hiring facility’s pre-service dementia training. (C) A certificate of completion must be made available to the Department upon request. (D) Pre-service dementia care training must include the following subject areas: (i) Education on the dementia disease process, including the progression of the disease, memory loss, and psychiatric and behavioral symptoms. (ii) Techniques for understanding, communicating, and responding to distressful behavioral symptoms, including, but not limited to, reducing the use of antipsychotic medications for non-standard uses. (iii) Strategies for addressing social needs of persons with dementia and engaging them with meaningful activities. (iv) Information concerning specific aspects of dementia care and ensuring the safety of residents with dementia, including, but not limited to, how to: (I) Identify and address pain. (II) Provide food and fluids. (III) Prevent wandering and elopement. (IV) Use a person-centered approach. (b) ORIENTATION TO RESIDENT. Pre-service orientation to resident: (A) Prior to providing personal care services for a resident, direct care staff must receive an orientation to the resident, including the resident’s service plan. (B) Direct care staff members must be directly supervised by a qualified person until they have successfully demonstrated satisfactory performance in any task assigned and the provision of individualized resident services, as applicable This Rule is not met as evidenced by:

OR-citedOAR §Z0142
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0142

Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C240. Refer to C370 Please refer to the plan of correction for C240 and C370 for this tag. OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:

Read raw inspector notes

Based on observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observation of the facility kitchen was reviewed on 10/08/24 from 10:30 am through 1:45pm and again on 10/09/24 from 10:45 through 1:30 pm and found the following: a. An accumulation of food spills, splatters, loose food and trash debris, dirt, dust, and/or black matter was visible on or underneath the following: * All reach in coolers and freezers; * Sliding refrigerated drawers; * Walk in freezer floor; * Plastic and metal racks in walk in cooler; * Wood shelving pieces in walk in cooler; * Interior of ice machine; * Kitchen drains; * Floors under, behind and between equipment; * Legs and wheels of large equipment; * Interior and exterior of microwaves; * Industrial can opener housing; * Grill top and sides; * Griddle top and sides; * Interior of cabinet where clean plates were stored; * Ceiling vents above food prep area; * Vents above clean dish storage area; * Floors throughout kitchen in corners and edges; * Interior and exterior of hot box/warming containers; * Interior of food transportation carts; * Walls behind cooking areas; * Walls where knives were stored; * Mandolin; * Interior of drawers; * Sprinkler heads; * Exterior and interior of stainless steel drawers; * Under metal racks in dry storage; b. The following areas were in need of repair: *Multiple reach in coolers with damage to seals; * Caulking in the dirty side of dish machine area with black debris build up. c. Multiple food items found in walk in cooler and reach in coolers not covered and exposed to potential contamination. d. Multiple prepared food items found past seven days. Multiple potentially hazardous food items not dated when opened and/or prepared. Multiple food items found past manufactures use by dates. e. Multiple staff noted to be handling clean dishes and/or preparing food without facial hair restraints as required. f. Line cook observed to serve cheeseburger patties to residents without checking proper cook to temperatures were met to ensure safety. g. Multiple plastic spatulas for cooking were noted to have chips and other integrity concerns and in need of replacement. h. Multiple hot mitts/potholders were noted to have holes and other integrity concerns and in need of replacement. i. Staff drinks were observed stored in food preparation areas and did not contain lids/straws to minimize hand/lip contact as required. On 10/08/24 at 11:45am, the Memory care kitchenette area was reviewed and noted the following: * Food splatter/spills in reach in refrigerators * Food, dust, dirt debris in food delivery carts; * Food splatter/debris on walls near trash can; * Drips/splatters/spills on exterior and interior of cabinets: * Blender with food and dust/dirt debris; * Microwave with food splatter debris on interior; * Food contact surfaces of blender/mixer stored open/exposed to potential contamination; * Cabinet under sink with visible water damage needing repair; * Staff drinks stored in food service area and observed without lids/straws as required. * Multiple food items in reach in refrigerator several weeks past their printed manufactured use by dates. On 10/08/24 at 11:15am and again on 10/09/24 at 1:00 Staff 1 (Assistant Executive Director) and Staff 2 (Food and Beverage director) were interviewed and acknowledged identified deficient areas/practices. On 10/09/24 at 12:00 pm Staff 3 (Executive Chef) was informed of areas in need of attention. They acknowledged identified areas. a. Food spills cleaned and sanitized; added to the per shift daily cleaning duties to be initialed by employee once complete. Floors, corners and edges scrubbed and sanitized on per shift cleaning duties to be initialed by employee once complete. Hot box, warming containers scrubbed, cleaned and sanitized on a daily, per-shift basis to be initialed by employee once complete. Food transportation carts scrubbed and santized on a daily per-shift cleaning schedule to be initialed by employee once complete. All reach in coolers and freezers have been scrubbed and sanitized; procedure posted, including proper chemical usage for separate areas. Cooler & freezer cleaning calendar posted; Executive Chef to hold employees accountable for proper and time sensitive cleaning tasks via per-shift, daily, weekly and monthly cleaning lists, to be initialed by individual staff once completed. Plastic and metal racks have been power washed, cleaned, santized and organized with weekly cleaning sign off sheet posted. Wood shelving was disposed of and replaced with metal trays and shelves. Interior ice machine cleaned and sanitized with "How To Clean Ice Machine" guide posted with sign off sheet; dedicated scrub brush purchased. Legs, wheels of large equipment washed, scrubbed and sanitized; listed on daily checklist to be initialed by employee once complete. Microwaves, grill tops and sides, griddle top and sides cleaned and sanitized; added to per shift duties to be initialed by employee once complete. Industrial can opener cleaned and sanitzed; added to the station daily cleaning tasks to be intialized by employee once complete. Ceiling vents above food prep area and clean dish area cleaned; added to the weekly cleaning duties to be initialed by employee once complete. All walls including those where the knives are kept and behind cooking areas scrubbed and sanitized; added to the the per shift daily cleaning duties to be initialed once complete. Exterior and interior of both tool and food drawers emptied, scrubbed and sanitized; added to daily per shift duties to be initialed by employee once finished. Sprinkler heads: we have reached out to Harvey & Price, they added a recurring bi-annual task to clean all 19 sprinkler heads in the front & back kitchen, pantry, dry stock and dish areas. The next service date is in December. Metal racks emptied and scrubbed, floors sanitized and scrubbed; added to daily cleaning tasks to be initialed by employee once complete. b. Fridge and hot box seals have been replaced: cooler #2 door gaskets were replaced 10/29/24, cooler #4 all door gaskets will be replaced on 11/8/24 Hot box seals have been replaced and are to be inspected daily by Sous Chef and Executive Chef as described in job description. Caulking in dish area is scheduled to be resealed 11/8/24 and has been added to the weekly cleaning list. c. Food items not covered were disposed of; followed by proper training and posting of 'how to' store perishable items. d. Lead is assigned to check dates and proper storage daily, supervised by Sous Chef. Stocking employee is trained to inspect product best by dates as delivered, returning past dated items to distributor. Facial hair restraints have been stocked and implemented with posting of proper usage; supervisor on team responsible for ensuring protocol per job description. f. Food safety demonstration training provided (10/30/24); thermometers ordered, one on each station and one per cook as a required part of their uniform. Thermometers tested and calibrated per manufactures guidelines. Dates are to be checked weekly, as listed in weekly station duties to be initialed by employee once complete. g. Plastic spatulas have been disposed of and replacements ordered; integrity checked daily h. Pot holders/hot mitts with holes and integrity concerns have been disposed of and replaced. Executive Chef to inspect daily, per job description. i. Staff drink area has been designated, below counter level, with lids and straws mandatory. Executive Chef to ensure proper storage. A review of written job positions reviewed at 10/30/24 employee meeting. Oregon State Food Handler's cards are active, updated and properly filed. Additionally, Executive Chef will be held responsible for upkeep of equipme Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 7 of 16 staff (#3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) who prepared and served food had active food handlers certificates. Findings include, but are not limited to: On 10/08/24 employee records were requested and reviewed to ensure staff had active food handlers certifications. There were six employees who's food cards could not be located and one staff (staff #4) who's card was expired. Staff 1 (Assistant Executive Director) indicated the facility had recently switched over to a new system and would attempt to retrieve copies of cards from corporate offices. On 10/09/24 at 10:45am, Staff 1 provided a report provided from corporate offices validating that the additional six staff (cooks and Sous Chefs) had expired food handler cards. Staff 1 stated that the switch over of computer programs contributed to a lack of oversite on expired cards. The facility scheduled all expired staff to get their cards updated the following week. Staff 1, 2 and 3 acknowledged that all staff preparing food must have active food handlers cards and that seven of their staff's cards were not active. Food splatter/spills in the reach in refrigerators, on walls near trash can, exterior and interior of cabinets and interior microwave have been scrubbed and sanitized; a shift cleaning list has been posted and will be initialed by employee once completed. Food delivery carts have been scrubbed and sanitized; duties have been added to the per shift cleaning list. Small kitchen equipment including the blender have been cleaned and covered to limit contamination; postage has been placed for proper sanitaztion after every use. Water damage under the sink cabinet is scheduled to be completed by 11/15/24 by in house maintenance team. All drinks are kept in a designated area with lids and straws with a 'friendly reminder' posting. All expired food has been discarded and will be evaulated daily as listed in the daily duties, posted in the back hallway An outline of cleaning descriptions and expectations have been posted. OAR 411-054-0070 (3-4) Staffing Requirements and Training – Pre-service (3) PRE-SERVICE ORIENTATION FOR ALL EMPLOYEES. Prior to beginning their job responsibilities, all employees must complete orientation training regarding: (a) A review of their written position description with their job responsibilities. (b) RESIDENTS’ RIGHTS. Residents' rights and the values of community-based care, including the Department-approved LGBTQIA2S+ trainings. (A) Effective December 31, 2024, all staff must have completed the required training. All new staff, hired on and after January 1, 2025, must complete the required training prior to beginning job responsibilities. (B) The Department-approved LGBTQIA2S+ trainings shall address the elements described in paragraph (6)(b) of this rule. (c) Abuse and reporting requirements. (d) Fire safety and emergency procedures. (e) INFECTIOUS DISEASE PREVENTION. Prior to beginning their job responsibilities, unless the employee received the training described below within the 24-month period prior to the time of hiring, all employees must complete training addressing the prevention, recognition, control and reporting of the spread of infectious disease. (A) The Department, in consultation with the Oregon Health Authority, has determined this training must address the following curricula: (i) Transmission of communicable disease and infections, including development of a policy with criteria directing staff to stay home when ill with a communicable disease, so as not to transmit disease. (ii) Policy addressing respiratory hygiene and coughing etiquette. (iii) Standard precautions. (iv) Hand hygiene. (v) Use of personal protective equipment. (vi) Cleaning of physical environment, including, but not limited to disinfecting high-touch surfaces and equipment, and handling, storing, processing and transporting linens to prevent the spread of infection. (vii) Isolating and cohorting of residents during a disease outbreak. (viii) Employees must also receive training on the rights and responsibilities of employees to report disease outbreaks under ORS 433.004 and safeguards for employees who report disease outbreaks. (B) INFECTIOUS DISEASE TRAINING CURRICULUM. Pre-service infectious disease training curriculum must be approved by the Department before facilities may offer training to staff. (i) The pre-service training may be provided in person, in writing, by webinar or by other electronic means. (ii) Facilities or other entities that want to provide training curriculum to facilities must first present that curriculum to the Department for review and approval. (f) HOME AND COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES (HCBS) TRAINING. All staff are required to complete the Department-approved HCBS training, as provided below: (A) Effective March 31, 2024, all staff must have completed the required training. (B) All new staff, hired on or after April 1, 2024, must complete the required training prior to beginning job responsibilities. (g) FOOD HANDLING. If the staff member's duties include preparing food, they must have a food handler's certificate. (4) PRE-SERVICE TRAINING FOR ALL DIRECT CARE STAFF. (a) DEMENTIA. Prior to providing care to residents, all direct care staff must complete an approved pre-service dementia training. (A) Documentation of dementia training: (i) A certificate of completion shall be issued to direct care staff who satisfactorily complete approved dementia training. Facilities shall also maintain records of all direct care staff who have successfully completed pre-service dementia training. (ii) Each facility shall maintain written documentation of continuing education completed, including required pre-service dementia training, for all direct care staff. (B) Portability of pre-service dementia training: After completing the pre-service training, if a direct care staff person is hired within 24 months by a different facility, the hiring facility may choose to accept the previous training or require the direct care staff to complete the hiring facility’s pre-service dementia training. (C) A certificate of completion must be made available to the Department upon request. (D) Pre-service dementia care training must include the following subject areas: (i) Education on the dementia disease process, including the progression of the disease, memory loss, and psychiatric and behavioral symptoms. (ii) Techniques for understanding, communicating, and responding to distressful behavioral symptoms, including, but not limited to, reducing the use of antipsychotic medications for non-standard uses. (iii) Strategies for addressing social needs of persons with dementia and engaging them with meaningful activities. (iv) Information concerning specific aspects of dementia care and ensuring the safety of residents with dementia, including, but not limited to, how to: (I) Identify and address pain. (II) Provide food and fluids. (III) Prevent wandering and elopement. (IV) Use a person-centered approach. (b) ORIENTATION TO RESIDENT. Pre-service orientation to resident: (A) Prior to providing personal care services for a resident, direct care staff must receive an orientation to the resident, including the resident’s service plan. (B) Direct care staff members must be directly supervised by a qualified person until they have successfully demonstrated satisfactory performance in any task assigned and the provision of individualized resident services, as applicable This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C240. Refer to C370 Please refer to the plan of correction for C240 and C370 for this tag. OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:

2023-09-06
Complaint Investigation
OR-cited · 2 findings

Plain-language summary

During a complaint investigation on September 6, 2023, inspectors found that the facility failed to fully implement and update an Acuity Based Staffing Tool as required by Oregon rules. The facility was using a software system that did not clearly show individual resident names with their care tasks, did not track when staffing information was updated, and it was unclear how many of the 30 residents were actually entered into the tool. The facility acknowledged these findings and was in the process of switching to the Oregon Department of Human Services tool.

OR-citedOAR §C0010
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0010

The findings of the on-site investigation, conducted on 09/06/23, are documented in this report. The investigation was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411 Division 54 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Abbreviations possibly used in this document: ADL: activities of daily living CBG: capillary blood glucose or blood sugar CG: caregiver CS: Compliance Specialist cm: centimeter ED: Executive Director F: Fahrenheit HH: Home Health LPN: Licensed Practical Nurse MT: Medication Tech MAR: Medication Administration Record MCC: Memory Care Community OT: Occupational Therapist PT: Physical Therapist PRN: as needed RCC: Resident Care Coordinator RN: Registered Nurse The findings of the on-site investigation, conducted on 09/06/23, are documented in this report. The investigation was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411 Division 54 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Abbreviations possibly used in this document: ADL: activities of daily living CBG: capillary blood glucose or blood sugar CG: caregiver CS: Compliance Specialist cm: centimeter ED: Executive Director F: Fahrenheit HH: Home Health LPN: Licensed Practical Nurse MT: Medication Tech MAR: Medication Administration Record MCC: Memory Care Community OT: Occupational Therapist PT: Physical Therapist PRN: as needed RCC: Resident Care Coordinator RN: Registered Nurse

OR-citedOAR §C0361
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0361

Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 09/06/23, it was confirmed the facility failed to fully implement and update an Acuity Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Findings include, but are not limited to: In review of the facility's ABST and resident roster on 09/06/23, it was unclear how many of the 30 residents were entered into the tool. The facility was using their own tool, Point Click Care (PCC), which automatically pulled all the information from the service plans and generated a 24-hour staffing plan. PCC did not list the residents'  names next to the tasks and was not capable of generating a report for individual residents to show their care needs and times. There was also no way to determine when or how often the tool was being updated with any changes to the service plans. In an interview on 09/06/23, Staff 2 (Health Services Administrator) stated the current census was 30 residents. S/he also stated that the facility was in the process of switching from PCC to the ODHS tool. Staff 2 stated the 22 ADLs are clumped together with the planned and unplanned needs. On 09/06/23, findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 2. The facility failed to fully implement and update an ABST. Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 09/06/23, it was confirmed the facility failed to fully implement and update an Acuity Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Findings include, but are not limited to: In review of the facility's ABST and resident roster on 09/06/23, it was unclear how many of the 30 residents were entered into the tool. The facility was using their own tool, Point Click Care (PCC), which automatically pulled all the information from the service plans and generated a 24-hour staffing plan. PCC did not list the residents'  names next to the tasks and was not capable of generating a report for individual residents to show their care needs and times. There was also no way to determine when or how often the tool was being updated with any changes to the service plans. In an interview on 09/06/23, Staff 2 (Health Services Administrator) stated the current census was 30 residents. S/he also stated that the facility was in the process of switching from PCC to the ODHS tool. Staff 2 stated the 22 ADLs are clumped together with the planned and unplanned needs. On 09/06/23, findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 2. The facility failed to fully implement and update an ABST.

Read raw inspector notes

The findings of the on-site investigation, conducted on 09/06/23, are documented in this report. The investigation was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411 Division 54 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Abbreviations possibly used in this document: ADL: activities of daily living CBG: capillary blood glucose or blood sugar CG: caregiver CS: Compliance Specialist cm: centimeter ED: Executive Director F: Fahrenheit HH: Home Health LPN: Licensed Practical Nurse MT: Medication Tech MAR: Medication Administration Record MCC: Memory Care Community OT: Occupational Therapist PT: Physical Therapist PRN: as needed RCC: Resident Care Coordinator RN: Registered Nurse The findings of the on-site investigation, conducted on 09/06/23, are documented in this report. The investigation was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411 Division 54 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Abbreviations possibly used in this document: ADL: activities of daily living CBG: capillary blood glucose or blood sugar CG: caregiver CS: Compliance Specialist cm: centimeter ED: Executive Director F: Fahrenheit HH: Home Health LPN: Licensed Practical Nurse MT: Medication Tech MAR: Medication Administration Record MCC: Memory Care Community OT: Occupational Therapist PT: Physical Therapist PRN: as needed RCC: Resident Care Coordinator RN: Registered Nurse Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 09/06/23, it was confirmed the facility failed to fully implement and update an Acuity Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Findings include, but are not limited to: In review of the facility's ABST and resident roster on 09/06/23, it was unclear how many of the 30 residents were entered into the tool. The facility was using their own tool, Point Click Care (PCC), which automatically pulled all the information from the service plans and generated a 24-hour staffing plan. PCC did not list the residents'  names next to the tasks and was not capable of generating a report for individual residents to show their care needs and times. There was also no way to determine when or how often the tool was being updated with any changes to the service plans. In an interview on 09/06/23, Staff 2 (Health Services Administrator) stated the current census was 30 residents. S/he also stated that the facility was in the process of switching from PCC to the ODHS tool. Staff 2 stated the 22 ADLs are clumped together with the planned and unplanned needs. On 09/06/23, findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 2. The facility failed to fully implement and update an ABST. Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 09/06/23, it was confirmed the facility failed to fully implement and update an Acuity Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Findings include, but are not limited to: In review of the facility's ABST and resident roster on 09/06/23, it was unclear how many of the 30 residents were entered into the tool. The facility was using their own tool, Point Click Care (PCC), which automatically pulled all the information from the service plans and generated a 24-hour staffing plan. PCC did not list the residents'  names next to the tasks and was not capable of generating a report for individual residents to show their care needs and times. There was also no way to determine when or how often the tool was being updated with any changes to the service plans. In an interview on 09/06/23, Staff 2 (Health Services Administrator) stated the current census was 30 residents. S/he also stated that the facility was in the process of switching from PCC to the ODHS tool. Staff 2 stated the 22 ADLs are clumped together with the planned and unplanned needs. On 09/06/23, findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 2. The facility failed to fully implement and update an ABST.

2023-07-25
Annual Compliance Visit
OR-cited · 4 findings

Plain-language summary

A routine kitchen inspection on July 25, 2023 found the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in sanitary condition, with accumulation of food debris and dust on equipment, uncovered prepared foods exposed to contamination, improper food storage and labeling, staff handling food with contaminated gloves without changing them between tasks, and memory care staff not checking food temperatures before serving meals to residents. Follow-up inspections were conducted on October 11, 2023 and December 20, 2023, at which point the facility was found to be in substantial compliance with meal service and food sanitation rules.

OR-citedOAR §C0000
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0000

The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 07/25/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000 The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 07/25/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000 The findings of the revisit to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 10/11/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the revisit to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 10/11/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the second revisit, to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 12/20/23, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the second revisit, to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 12/20/23, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000.

OR-citedOAR §C0240
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0240

Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observations of the main kitchen and memory care kitchenette were reviewed on 07-25-23 from 10:45 am through 2:50 pm and the following was observed: a. An accumulation of food spills, splatters, loose food and trash debris, dirt, dust, and/or black matter was visible on or underneath the following: * Waffle maker; * Reach in coolers and freezers; * Walk in freezer floor; * Plastic and metal racks in walk in cooler; * Cooling fans and cages in walk in and ceiling with dust accumulation; * Bottom two plastic shelves storing potatoes; * Interior of ice machine; * Interior and exterior of microwave; * Industrial can opener; and * Box fan and oscillating fan blades and cages. b. The following areas were in need of repair: * Metal racks in reach in coolers with rust and peeling paint; and * Caulking behind hand washing sink with black mold like substance. c. Commercial observed slicer not covered when not in use. Staff 3 (Executive Chef) verified slicer did not have a cover. d. Multiple cutting boards and cutting surfaces were found heavily stained and scored. e. Prepared salads were observed stored in coolers without covers and open to potential contamination. A tray of salads was sitting on top of tray cart for memory care delivery. Two trays of dessert items found in walk in freezer uncovered. Staff 2 (Food and Beverage Director) stated everything prepared should be covered before placing in coolers to protect from potential contamination. f. Multiple food packages were found open in dry storage. Pipes and vents in dry storage had heavy dust accumulation posing potential contamination risk to open packages. g. Multiple bulk food bins or packages were found with scoops stored inside/on food product exposing it to potential contamination. h. Multiple dishwashing racks were observed stored on the floor. i. Multiple kitchen staff were observed during tray line service to use single service gloves incorrectly. Multiple ready to eat items were handled with gloves that had been used for other tasks including touching handles of ovens, fryer baskets, and cooler handles. Gloves were not removed after touching face, hair, glasses or clothing then observed to make sandwiches and/or handle fresh basil, garlic bread and shredded parmesan. j. The memory care kitchenette and meal service was observed for lunch and the following was found: * Fruit cups stored in counter cooler uncovered; * Container of deli sandwiches and multiple prepared cinnamon butter containers were observed stored in reach in refrigerator not labeled or dated as required; * Clean dishes were put away in cupboards wet with visible moisture accumulation in and under dishes (cups and mugs); * Black matter found in grout behind sink; * Trash can did not have a lid for when not in use; * Container of flour and coffee were observed with scoop stored with food product; * Light fixture and vents with large dust accumulation; * Salads stored uncovered on counter from 11:20 am until meal service at 12:20 pm; * Meal trays delivered to memory care from ALF kitchen at 11:20 am and were not served until 12:20 pm. Memory care staff did not check the temperature of food items prior to service to resident to ensure they were at appropriate and safe temperatures after sitting for an hour. Memory care staff indicated they did not have a thermometer and had not ever checked the temperature of food. Memory care staff were not aware of the temperature requirements needed to safely reheat food items. * Memory care staff were observed to potentially contaminate hands doing multiple tasks and touching multiple potentially contaminated items and did not wash their hands as required. At approximately 2:00 pm, the surveyor reviewed above areas with Staff 2 (Food and Beverage Director) and Staff 3 (Executive Chef), who acknowledged the identified areas. At 2:45 pm, the areas were reviewed with Staff 1 (Executive Director) and he acknowledged the concerns. Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observations of the main kitchen and memory care kitchenette were reviewed on 07-25-23 from 10:45 am through 2:50 pm and the following was observed: a. An accumulation of food spills, splatters, loose food and trash debris, dirt, dust, and/or black matter was visible on or underneath the following: * Waffle maker; * Reach in coolers and freezers; * Walk in freezer floor; * Plastic and metal racks in walk in cooler; * Cooling fans and cages in walk in and ceiling with dust accumulation; * Bottom two plastic shelves storing potatoes; * Interior of ice machine; * Interior and exterior of microwave; * Industrial can opener; and * Box fan and oscillating fan blades and cages. b. The following areas were in need of repair: * Metal racks in reach in coolers with rust and peeling paint; and * Caulking behind hand washing sink with black mold like substance. c. Commercial observed slicer not covered when not in use. Staff 3 (Executive Chef) verified slicer did not have a cover. d. Multiple cutting boards and cutting surfaces were found heavily stained and scored. e. Prepared salads were observed stored in coolers without covers and open to potential contamination. A tray of salads was sitting on top of tray cart for memory care delivery. Two trays of dessert items found in walk in freezer uncovered. Staff 2 (Food and Beverage Director) stated everything prepared should be covered before placing in coolers to protect from potential contamination. f. Multiple food packages were found open in dry storage. Pipes and vents in dry storage had heavy dust accumulation posing potential contamination risk to open packages. g. Multiple bulk food bins or packages were found with scoops stored inside/on food product exposing it to potential contamination. h. Multiple dishwashing racks were observed stored on the floor. i. Multiple kitchen staff were observed during tray line service to use single service gloves incorrectly. Multiple ready to eat items were handled with gloves that had been used for other tasks including touching handles of ovens, fryer baskets, and cooler handles. Gloves were not removed after touching face, hair, glasses or clothing then observed to make sandwiches and/or handle fresh basil, garlic bread and shredded parmesan. j. The memory care kitchenette and meal service was observed for lunch and the following was found: * Fruit cups stored in counter cooler uncovered; * Container of deli sandwiches and multiple prepared cinnamon butter containers were observed stored in reach in refrigerator not labeled or dated as required; * Clean dishes were put away in cupboards wet with visible moisture accumulation in and under dishes (cups and mugs); * Black matter found in grout behind sink; * Trash can did not have a lid for when not in use; * Container of flour and coffee were observed with scoop stored with food product; * Light fixture and vents with large dust accumulation; * Salads stored uncovered on counter from 11:20 am until meal service at 12:20 pm; * Meal trays delivered to memory care from ALF kitchen at 11:20 am and were not served until 12:20 pm. Memory care staff did not check the temperature of food items prior to service to resident to ensure they were at appropriate and safe temperatures after sitting for an hour. Memory care staff indicated they did not have a thermometer and had not ever checked the temperature of food. Memory care staff were not aware of the temperature requirements needed to safely reheat food items. * Memory car

OR-citedOAR §C0455
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0455

Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. OAR 411-054-0105 (2-4) Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval: (2) The facility "Footsteps" shall not interfere with a good faith disclosure of information by an employee or volunteer concerning abuse or other action affecting a resident ' s safety or welfare, as described in OAR 411-054-0028(4). (3) Staff of the Department shall visit and inspect every facility at least but not limited to once every two years for a full in-person survey to determine whether the facility is maintained and operated in accordance with these rules. (a) For each year during which a facility does not have a full survey, the Department shall conduct an in-person inspection of the kitchen and other areas where food is prepared for residents. (b) Subsection (a) will not go into effect until July 1, 2022. (c) Facilities not in compliance with these rules must submit, within ten days of receipt of the inspection report, a plan of correction that satisfies the Department. (d) The Department may impose sanctions for failure to comply with these rules. (4) Department staff may consult with and advise the facility administrator concerning methods of care, records, housing, equipment, and other areas of operation. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. OAR 411-054-0105 (2-4) Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval: (2) The facility "Footsteps" shall not interfere with a good faith disclosure of information by an employee or volunteer concerning abuse or other action affecting a resident ' s safety or welfare, as described in OAR 411-054-0028(4). (3) Staff of the Department shall visit and inspect every facility at least but not limited to once every two years for a full in-person survey to determine whether the facility is maintained and operated in accordance with these rules. (a) For each year during which a facility does not have a full survey, the Department shall conduct an in-person inspection of the kitchen and other areas where food is prepared for residents. (b) Subsection (a) will not go into effect until July 1, 2022. (c) Facilities not in compliance with these rules must submit, within ten days of receipt of the inspection report, a plan of correction that satisfies the Department. (d) The Department may impose sanctions for failure to comply with these rules. (4) Department staff may consult with and advise the facility administrator concerning methods of care, records, housing, equipment, and other areas of operation. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. There are no detail notes for this visit.

OR-citedOAR §Z0142
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0142

Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. See C 240 See C 240 Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. {Z 142} SS=F OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Staff will read survey for ALF as well as Footsteps to remain in compliance with OAR'S for Assisted Living and Footsteps. {Z 142} SS=F OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Staff will read survey for ALF as well as Footsteps to remain in compliance with OAR'S for Assisted Living and Footsteps. There are no detail notes for this visit.

Read raw inspector notes

The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 07/25/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000 The findings of the kitchen inspection, conducted 07/25/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000 The findings of the revisit to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 10/11/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the revisit to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 10/11/23, are documented in this report. The survey was conducted to determine compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the second revisit, to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 12/20/23, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. The findings of the second revisit, to the kitchen inspection of 07/25/23, conducted 12/20/23, are documented in this report. It was determined the facility was in substantial compliance with the OARs 411-054-0030 for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities for Resident Services- Meals, and Oregon Health Service Food Sanitation Rules OARs 333-150-0000. Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observations of the main kitchen and memory care kitchenette were reviewed on 07-25-23 from 10:45 am through 2:50 pm and the following was observed: a. An accumulation of food spills, splatters, loose food and trash debris, dirt, dust, and/or black matter was visible on or underneath the following: * Waffle maker; * Reach in coolers and freezers; * Walk in freezer floor; * Plastic and metal racks in walk in cooler; * Cooling fans and cages in walk in and ceiling with dust accumulation; * Bottom two plastic shelves storing potatoes; * Interior of ice machine; * Interior and exterior of microwave; * Industrial can opener; and * Box fan and oscillating fan blades and cages. b. The following areas were in need of repair: * Metal racks in reach in coolers with rust and peeling paint; and * Caulking behind hand washing sink with black mold like substance. c. Commercial observed slicer not covered when not in use. Staff 3 (Executive Chef) verified slicer did not have a cover. d. Multiple cutting boards and cutting surfaces were found heavily stained and scored. e. Prepared salads were observed stored in coolers without covers and open to potential contamination. A tray of salads was sitting on top of tray cart for memory care delivery. Two trays of dessert items found in walk in freezer uncovered. Staff 2 (Food and Beverage Director) stated everything prepared should be covered before placing in coolers to protect from potential contamination. f. Multiple food packages were found open in dry storage. Pipes and vents in dry storage had heavy dust accumulation posing potential contamination risk to open packages. g. Multiple bulk food bins or packages were found with scoops stored inside/on food product exposing it to potential contamination. h. Multiple dishwashing racks were observed stored on the floor. i. Multiple kitchen staff were observed during tray line service to use single service gloves incorrectly. Multiple ready to eat items were handled with gloves that had been used for other tasks including touching handles of ovens, fryer baskets, and cooler handles. Gloves were not removed after touching face, hair, glasses or clothing then observed to make sandwiches and/or handle fresh basil, garlic bread and shredded parmesan. j. The memory care kitchenette and meal service was observed for lunch and the following was found: * Fruit cups stored in counter cooler uncovered; * Container of deli sandwiches and multiple prepared cinnamon butter containers were observed stored in reach in refrigerator not labeled or dated as required; * Clean dishes were put away in cupboards wet with visible moisture accumulation in and under dishes (cups and mugs); * Black matter found in grout behind sink; * Trash can did not have a lid for when not in use; * Container of flour and coffee were observed with scoop stored with food product; * Light fixture and vents with large dust accumulation; * Salads stored uncovered on counter from 11:20 am until meal service at 12:20 pm; * Meal trays delivered to memory care from ALF kitchen at 11:20 am and were not served until 12:20 pm. Memory care staff did not check the temperature of food items prior to service to resident to ensure they were at appropriate and safe temperatures after sitting for an hour. Memory care staff indicated they did not have a thermometer and had not ever checked the temperature of food. Memory care staff were not aware of the temperature requirements needed to safely reheat food items. * Memory care staff were observed to potentially contaminate hands doing multiple tasks and touching multiple potentially contaminated items and did not wash their hands as required. At approximately 2:00 pm, the surveyor reviewed above areas with Staff 2 (Food and Beverage Director) and Staff 3 (Executive Chef), who acknowledged the identified areas. At 2:45 pm, the areas were reviewed with Staff 1 (Executive Director) and he acknowledged the concerns. Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and in a sanitary manner in accordance with Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observations of the main kitchen and memory care kitchenette were reviewed on 07-25-23 from 10:45 am through 2:50 pm and the following was observed: a. An accumulation of food spills, splatters, loose food and trash debris, dirt, dust, and/or black matter was visible on or underneath the following: * Waffle maker; * Reach in coolers and freezers; * Walk in freezer floor; * Plastic and metal racks in walk in cooler; * Cooling fans and cages in walk in and ceiling with dust accumulation; * Bottom two plastic shelves storing potatoes; * Interior of ice machine; * Interior and exterior of microwave; * Industrial can opener; and * Box fan and oscillating fan blades and cages. b. The following areas were in need of repair: * Metal racks in reach in coolers with rust and peeling paint; and * Caulking behind hand washing sink with black mold like substance. c. Commercial observed slicer not covered when not in use. Staff 3 (Executive Chef) verified slicer did not have a cover. d. Multiple cutting boards and cutting surfaces were found heavily stained and scored. e. Prepared salads were observed stored in coolers without covers and open to potential contamination. A tray of salads was sitting on top of tray cart for memory care delivery. Two trays of dessert items found in walk in freezer uncovered. Staff 2 (Food and Beverage Director) stated everything prepared should be covered before placing in coolers to protect from potential contamination. f. Multiple food packages were found open in dry storage. Pipes and vents in dry storage had heavy dust accumulation posing potential contamination risk to open packages. g. Multiple bulk food bins or packages were found with scoops stored inside/on food product exposing it to potential contamination. h. Multiple dishwashing racks were observed stored on the floor. i. Multiple kitchen staff were observed during tray line service to use single service gloves incorrectly. Multiple ready to eat items were handled with gloves that had been used for other tasks including touching handles of ovens, fryer baskets, and cooler handles. Gloves were not removed after touching face, hair, glasses or clothing then observed to make sandwiches and/or handle fresh basil, garlic bread and shredded parmesan. j. The memory care kitchenette and meal service was observed for lunch and the following was found: * Fruit cups stored in counter cooler uncovered; * Container of deli sandwiches and multiple prepared cinnamon butter containers were observed stored in reach in refrigerator not labeled or dated as required; * Clean dishes were put away in cupboards wet with visible moisture accumulation in and under dishes (cups and mugs); * Black matter found in grout behind sink; * Trash can did not have a lid for when not in use; * Container of flour and coffee were observed with scoop stored with food product; * Light fixture and vents with large dust accumulation; * Salads stored uncovered on counter from 11:20 am until meal service at 12:20 pm; * Meal trays delivered to memory care from ALF kitchen at 11:20 am and were not served until 12:20 pm. Memory care staff did not check the temperature of food items prior to service to resident to ensure they were at appropriate and safe temperatures after sitting for an hour. Memory care staff indicated they did not have a thermometer and had not ever checked the temperature of food. Memory care staff were not aware of the temperature requirements needed to safely reheat food items. * Memory car Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. OAR 411-054-0105 (2-4) Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval: (2) The facility "Footsteps" shall not interfere with a good faith disclosure of information by an employee or volunteer concerning abuse or other action affecting a resident ' s safety or welfare, as described in OAR 411-054-0028(4). (3) Staff of the Department shall visit and inspect every facility at least but not limited to once every two years for a full in-person survey to determine whether the facility is maintained and operated in accordance with these rules. (a) For each year during which a facility does not have a full survey, the Department shall conduct an in-person inspection of the kitchen and other areas where food is prepared for residents. (b) Subsection (a) will not go into effect until July 1, 2022. (c) Facilities not in compliance with these rules must submit, within ten days of receipt of the inspection report, a plan of correction that satisfies the Department. (d) The Department may impose sanctions for failure to comply with these rules. (4) Department staff may consult with and advise the facility administrator concerning methods of care, records, housing, equipment, and other areas of operation. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. OAR 411-054-0105 (2-4) Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval: (2) The facility "Footsteps" shall not interfere with a good faith disclosure of information by an employee or volunteer concerning abuse or other action affecting a resident ' s safety or welfare, as described in OAR 411-054-0028(4). (3) Staff of the Department shall visit and inspect every facility at least but not limited to once every two years for a full in-person survey to determine whether the facility is maintained and operated in accordance with these rules. (a) For each year during which a facility does not have a full survey, the Department shall conduct an in-person inspection of the kitchen and other areas where food is prepared for residents. (b) Subsection (a) will not go into effect until July 1, 2022. (c) Facilities not in compliance with these rules must submit, within ten days of receipt of the inspection report, a plan of correction that satisfies the Department. (d) The Department may impose sanctions for failure to comply with these rules. (4) Department staff may consult with and advise the facility administrator concerning methods of care, records, housing, equipment, and other areas of operation. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, observation and review of records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their Kitchen survey plan of correction was implemented and satisfied the Department. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. There are no detail notes for this visit. Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. See C 240 See C 240 Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. {Z 142} SS=F OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Staff will read survey for ALF as well as Footsteps to remain in compliance with OAR'S for Assisted Living and Footsteps. {Z 142} SS=F OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Staff will read survey for ALF as well as Footsteps to remain in compliance with OAR'S for Assisted Living and Footsteps. There are no detail notes for this visit.

4 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.