Merisol Care Home.
Merisol Care Home is Ranked in the top 39% of California memory care with 12 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.
Small-Home Memory Care in Union City's Pleiades Neighborhood, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 152 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Merisol Care Home has 12 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
12 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
12 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Merisol Care Home's record and state requirements.
The operator advertises memory care but CDSS records do not show a formal memory care designation — can you explain what dementia-specific training staff receive and how you document compliance with Title 22 §87705 requirements?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With only 6 licensed beds, how do you staff overnight shifts, and what is your protocol when the primary caregiver is unavailable?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
CDSS records show no deficiencies across 10 inspections — can you walk me through a recent inspection visit and what areas the surveyor reviewed?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-22Other VisitType A · 5 findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection on April 27, 2026. The inspector found several maintenance and storage issues: improperly stored food, medications left in bathrooms, ants in the shared bathroom, a broken bathroom drawer, and clutter around the facility including equipment and metal racks. The facility also did not have complete tuberculosis test records for some residents or a bedrail order for one resident, and the facility was assessed a $250 civil penalty because one of these issues (medication storage in bathrooms) was also cited during an inspection the previous year.
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having medication/cream/ ointment observed in shared bathroom, and in RM 2 and 3 which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/23/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrators agree to lock all medication/ cream/ and ointment and check all rooms to ensure that all medication is locked away. The administrator will conduct an in-service training on the cited reg. The Administrator will submit proof of correction to CCLD by the POC date. Training will be submitted within a week of the POC date.”
“Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in observation in shared bathroom drawer is broken. Observed objects such as an electric mattress, a Hoyer lift, multiple metal racks, and a broken drawer around the facility. which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.Observed shared bathroom drawer is broken. POC Due Date: 05/04/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrators agree to have all items removed from the clean shared bathroom and to submit proof of correction to CCLD by the POC date via photo and email.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited by observation that the food transfer is not properly stored which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/30/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrators agree to label, clean, and store the refrigerator, and to submit proof of correction to CCLD by the POC date via photo and email.”
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having resident 1 (R1) and R2 without a TB clearance which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/30/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrators agree to obtain R1 and R2 TB clearance and to submit proof of correction to CCLD by the POC date via email.”
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in files review R3 do not have a bedrail order which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/30/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrators agree to obtain the R3 bedrail and to submit proof of correction to CCLD by the POC date via email.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On this day, at around 10:30 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection and met with direct care staff Teresita Collong. Administrator Soledad Bacani, Certificate 7011133740 dated 12/21/25 to 12/20/2027, arrived later. During the visit, LPA inspected the facility inside and out, including, but not limited to, bedrooms, bathrooms, the dining area, kitchen, garage, and backyard. Hot water is measured at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. There was a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods. Supply of linen, warm blankets, and towels was observed. The first aid kit was observed to be complete. was observed to be complete. LPA observed a fire extinguisher charge with the receipt attached, dated 4/22/26. The last fire and earthquake drill was conducted on 4/2/26. Liability Policy: PCI33893478-02 effective 4/8/26 to 4/8/27. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were tested and observed to be functional. LPA reviewed 4 resident files and 3 staff files. Report continues on LIC 809c… 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The following deficiencies were observed: - Observed that the food transfer is not properly stored - Medication/cream/ ointment observed in shared bathroom, and in RM 2 and 3 (repeat dated 4/26/25) - Observed ants inside the shared bathroom - Observed resident 1 (R1) and R2 did not have TB - Files review R3 do not have a bedrail order - Observed shared bathroom drawer is broken. Observed objects such as an electric mattress, a Hoyer lift, multiple metal racks, and a broken drawer around the facility. *Civil penalty of $250 is being assessed on today's date by having a repeat of the citation within 12 months* Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by the plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights, LIC421IM, and this report are provided to the Administrator.
2025-11-05Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On November 5, 2025, inspectors made an unannounced visit to verify that a bedridden resident had moved out of the facility. They found the resident was still there and observed she could move her legs, hands, and head, and could turn from side to side with staff assistance—her medical records indicated she was ambulatory with Alzheimer's dementia. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 11/05/2025 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P .Manalo arrived unannounced to conduct case management to verify that Resident 1 (R1) who is bedridden has moved out of the facility. During the visit, LPAs observation and interview revealed that Resident 1 (R1) was able to move both legs from left right and moved both hands. With the assistance of the Direct Care Staff, Milagros Bumatay, R1 was able to turn from one side to the other holding onto the bed rail. R1 was also able to move her head up while in a laying down position. Record review of the LIC602A dated 10/24/2025 showed that R1 is ambulatory and diagnosed with Alzheimer’s dementia. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-10-22Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
On October 22, 2025, inspectors conducted a follow-up visit and found that a bedridden resident was placed in Room #3, but the facility's fire safety approval only permits one bedridden resident in Room #2. The resident had recently been discharged from hospice care and was unable to move independently. The facility was cited for this violation of state regulations.
“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having R1 in Room# 3 that is not approved for bedridden which poses an immediate safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/22/2025 at 9:45 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P.Manalo and arrived unannounced to conduct case management following up on R1 status. Upon the visit LPAs met with Direct Care Staff, Milagros Bumatay and explained the purpose of the visit. The Administrator (ADM) Soledad Bacani was unavailable to come. ADM gave authorization on the phone for Care Staff to sign the report. While at the facility, LPA observed the following deficiencies: During the visit, LPAs observed that Resident 1 (R1) who is bedridden per Physician's Report and is staying in an approved non-ambulatory room. The facility has an approved one bedridden fire clearance for Room #2 only. However, R1 is occupying Room #3. Interview with Direct Care Staff, Teresita, stated that the R1 was discharged from hospice on September 09, 2025. However, interview with Staff 1 (S1) revealed that R1 is unable to move side to side. The Facility was cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview was conducted and Appeal Rights was provided to Bumatay.
2025-10-03Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On October 3, 2025, inspectors conducted an unannounced visit to verify that a bedridden resident had moved out of the facility as required. Staff confirmed the resident had relocated to another facility at the direction of their conservator. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/03/2025 at 8:20 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P .Manalo and arrived unannounced to conduct case management to verify that Resident 1 (R1) who is bedridden has moved out of the facility. During the visit, LPAs observation and interview revealed that Resident 1 (R1) has been moved out of the facility. Staff 1 (S1) stated that the resident moved to a different facility per conservator. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-09-04Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a follow-up visit on September 4, 2025, inspectors confirmed that the facility had corrected all previously cited deficiencies related to staffing and resident care requirements. The facility was assessed a total civil penalty of $2,100 for not submitting corrections by the required deadlines.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luisa Fontanilla conducted a proof of correction (POC) visit. LPA met with Soledad Bacani, Administrator and informed her about the purpose of visit. On this day, 9/4/25 civil penalty is assessed as follows: Sec. 87611 (a)(3) 13 days x 100 = 1300 - Cleared on 9/4/25 Sec. 87611(c) 5 days x 100 = 500 - Cleared on 9/4/25 Sec 87457 (c) 3 days x 100 = 300 - Cleared on 8/25/25 The civil penalty was discussed with the Bacani . Civil Penalties in the total amount of $2,100.00 is assessed today for failure to meet/submit POCs date for deficiencies. All deficiencies have been cleared as of 9/4/2025.
2025-08-22Other VisitIJ · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A state inspector visited the facility to check on compliance with regulations and found that auditory monitoring devices in two resident rooms were turned off without authorization. Staff members said they had turned the devices off on their own decision. The facility was cited for this violation and assessed a $250 penalty for repeating this problem.
“Based on observation, the auditory devices in Rooms 3 and 4 were off which poses an immediate risk to health and safety of clients under care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
At around 1pm, LPA Luisa Fontanilla conducted a case management-legal/non-compliance visit and met with staff Gloriosa Mamauag and Milagros Bumatay. LPA explained to Mamauag the purpose of visit. The Administrator was notified on the phone about LPA presence. Administrator authorized Collong to sign the report. During the visit, LPA checked all doors with auditory devices and observed devices in Rooms 3 and 4 were turned off. LPA asked staff Milagros why the devices were off and who instructed staff to turn the off. She states that they decided to turn it off and that no one gave them the instruction. Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations (see Lic 809D). Civil penalty of $250.00 is assessed for repeat violation. Exit interview was conducted and Appeal Rights was provided.
2025-08-22Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a follow-up visit on August 22, 2025 to check whether the facility had corrected violations found in an earlier inspection related to case management and legal compliance. The facility submitted an incomplete correction plan for one violation and failed to submit correction plans for two others, so the state assessed a $2,800 civil penalty and warned that daily penalties will continue until all deficiencies are corrected.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luisa Fontanilla conducted a proof of correction (POC) visit. LPA met with Soledad Bacani, Administrator and informed her about the purpose of visit. On 8/7/25, LPA issued a citation deficiency section # 87611(a)(3) with due date 8/8/25 and 87611(c) and Sec 87457 (c) with due date 8/15/25 under case management legal-non compliance visit Administrator submitted an incomplete POC for sec 87611(a)(3) and failed to submit POC for sec 87611(c). On this day, 8/22/25 civil penalty is assessed as follows: Sec. 87611 (a)(3) 14 days x 100 = 1400 Sec. 87611(c) 7 days x 100 = 700 Sec 87457 (c) 7 days x 100 = 700 The civil penalty was discussed with the Collong . Civil Penalties in the total amount of $2,800.00 is assessed today for failure to meet/submit POCs date for deficiencies. Facility is subject to ongoing daily civil penalties until deficiencies are corrected. Exit interview was conducted with Bacani. Appeal Rights, LIC421FC Civil Penalty Assessment, and copy of this report provided.
2025-08-07Other VisitType A · 5 findings
Plain-language summary
A licensing analyst made an unannounced visit and found several violations: the facility admitted a resident with a severe leg contracture without required approval, has that resident sleeping in a staff room rather than a proper bedroom, has not trained staff on how to care for this resident's condition, and failed to complete required assessment paperwork before admission. The facility also has a non-functional safety alarm in the kitchen and is already under a compliance plan for prior violations. The state assessed a $500 civil penalty.
“LPA observed auditory device in the kitchen sliding door is not functional which poses an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care.”
“Based on interview conducted, R2 has been sleeping in the staff room which poses an immediate health and safety risk.”
“The facility admitted R1 who has contracture of the right leg without approval from CCL. The facility is in a non-compliance correction plan. R1 is not able to care for own needs, and has Dementia.”
“There is no proof of staff training on file in regards to how to care for R1's contracted right leg. R1 is not able to care for own needs.”
“R1 has right leg contracture but no preplacement appraisal was conducted. ANS is observed incomplete.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luisa Fontanilla arrived unannounced to conduct case management legal/non-compliance visit. LPA was met by staff Gloriosa Mamauag. The Administrator was informed about the visit over the phone. Staff Teresita Olong was authorized by Bacani to sign the report. Soledad Bacani arrived at the facility at around 2:15 pm. During the visit, LPA observed the following deficiencies: auditory device in the kitchen sliding door is not functional facility admitted Resident 1 (R1) with right leg contracture without approval from CCL; facility is in an NCC compliance plan R1 has been sleeping in the staff room which is not approved by the Fire Department as resident room no staff training on how to care for R1's contracted leg R1's Appraisal Needs and Services Plan incomplete, no preplacement appraisal Civil penalty of $500 assessed for today's visit. Exit interview was conducted with Olong/Bacani and Appeal Rights was provided.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
Other facilities under this operator
Mari, Antonia B & Bacani, Soledad F — as recorded on state license extracts. Each facility still has its own inspection history.