Bethany Home Senior Living, Llc.
Bethany Home Senior Living, Llc is Ranked in the top 27% of California memory care with 7 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.




Memory Care Facility in Livermore with 58 Licensed Beds, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 26 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Bethany Home Senior Living, Llc has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
RCFEs must maintain awake staff at all times, with the ratio scaled to resident count and acuity. Facilities with 15 or fewer beds must have one qualified staff member on call and physically on premises at all times overnight. Facilities with 16–100 beds must have one awake caregiver on duty plus one on call who can respond within 10 minutes. Larger facilities add further staffing tiers per regulation. The facility's approved staffing plan is on file with CDSS and must be available on request.
Ask on tour
“How many awake staff are on the floor between 11 pm and 7 am, and where can I see your approved staffing plan?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Bethany Home Senior Living, Llc's record and state requirements.
Your facility has two Type A deficiencies on file, indicating actual harm occurred — what were the circumstances of each citation, and what corrective actions were implemented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Eleven complaints have been filed with CDSS — how many were substantiated, what were the primary concerns raised, and what changes resulted from the investigations?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
CDSS cited the facility under §87705 or §87706 for dementia care requirements — what was the specific nature of this citation, and how has the facility addressed it?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
15 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-22Other VisitNo findings
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 04/22/2026 at 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrew Christy arrived unannounced to conduct the 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Rachell Paniagua, and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility currently houses 28 residents with a max capacity of 58 residents. LPA toured facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and backyard. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. No bodies of water were observed. A comfortable indoor temperature is maintained at 69.0 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 107.8 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of non-perishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medication and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 05/27/2025. At 11:30AM, LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and six (6) staff files, all found to be complete. The emergency disaster plan was last reviewed 06/26/2025. Quarterly emergency drills were last conducted 01/27/2026 with an upcoming drill 04/24/2026. A review of resident medications and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found no outstanding errors. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the administrator.
2026-03-25Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On March 25, 2026, inspectors conducted an unannounced health and safety check following a complaint. The facility was found to be safe with no violations, and residents appeared comfortable in their surroundings.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 03/25/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger conducted an unannounced Health and Safety check due to the department receiving a priority 2 complaint. During the health and safety check, LPA observed a total of 6 staff members and 10 residents at the facility through out the shared spaces. LPA toured facility with Executive Director, including but not limited to bedrooms, kitchen, dining rooms, activities rooms. LPA observed residents comfortable in their surroundings. Residents in care appear to be safe and there are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. No deficiencies cited during the health and safety check. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-10-08Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation into whether the facility failed to meet a resident's hygiene needs. Staff reported the resident receives showers weekly and daily sponge baths with incontinence checks every two hours, and care notes showed the resident has refused care from caregivers—a pattern also observed by a witness—so the allegation was not substantiated.
“Based on observation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having R1's toilet in disrepair and clutter in R1's bathroom which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff did not ensure residents hygiene needs are being met Interview with staff indicated that R1 is getting showers once a week, sponge baths daily, and incontinence checks/changes every 2 hours. R1's care notes revealed that R1 has refused care from caregivers. Witness (W1) stated that R1 have refused care and food services from caregivers when W1 was present. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted with Rachell Paniagua. A copy of this report provided.
2025-09-04Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 1 finding
“This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having an awake staff at night shift which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.”
2025-05-15Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An unannounced routine annual inspection was conducted on May 15, 2025, where the inspector reviewed the facility's infection control plan, licensing forms, and fire drill records, and interviewed three residents and three staff members. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 5/15/2025 at 10:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct Case Management - Annual Continuation. LPA met with Manager, Rachell Paniagua and explained the purpose of the visit. During visit, LPA reviewed infection control plan, LIC500, and fire drill logs. Last fire drill was conducted on 4/29/2025. LPA interviewed 3 residents and 3 staff during inspection. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted with Rachell Paniagua. A copy of this report provided.
2025-05-15Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation into whether the facility misrepresented its staffing ratio to the resident's family and refused a refund. The facility stated no staffing ratio was promised, and while inspectors found the actual ratio was 15 residents to 1 staff member (with call button response times of 5-15 minutes), there was not enough evidence to prove the facility made the specific 3:1 promise alleged; the facility did issue a $4,500 refund despite its admission agreement stating no refunds would be given.
“Based on observation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having the 3rd level flooring in disrepair which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensee did not ensure that resident was provided the care and supervision as promised. Interview with complainant indicated that the facility staff informed R1's family there was a 3:1 residents to staff ratio, but later observed the ratio was 15 residents to 1 staff. Interview with staff revealed residents have call buttons and response time is around 5-15 minutes. S2 stated there was no staff ratios discussed with R1's family and no promises were made. Facility failed to provide refund to responsible party. R1's admission agreement stated "no part of any monthly rate payment will be refunded..." LPA observed the facility issued a refund of $4500 to R1. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted with Rachell Paniagua. A copy of this report provided.
2025-04-23Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An inspector visited this facility unannounced on April 23, 2025 for a routine annual inspection, touring the building and reviewing resident and staff records. The facility met standards for medication storage, fire safety equipment, food storage and temperatures, water temperature, and accessibility features like grab bars and non-skid mats. No violations were found during this visit, though the inspector noted they will return at a later time to complete the full annual inspection.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/23/2025 at 10:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Manager, Rachell Paniagua and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Centrally stored medications were locked in the med room. First Aid kit is complete. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 5/17/2024. Evacuation chairs were observed in both stairwell on the third floor. One week supply of nonperishable and 2-day supply of perishable foods were available. Facility orders food once a week. Freezer’s temperature was registered at 0 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 37 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 112.6 degrees F in a resident's bathroom. Grab bars for each toilet and shower were installed. Non-skid mats were observed. LPA reviewed 5 resident records and 5 staff records starting at 11:42AM. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications during inspection. LPA will return at a later time to complete annual inspection. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted with Rachell Paniagua. A copy of this report provided.
2025-04-23Complaint InvestigationMixedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
An investigator looked into a complaint about a resident's room not being cleaned. The facility's staff said rooms are cleaned daily, and the investigator found the resident's room and bathroom to be clean when visited, so that allegation was not substantiated. However, another allegation in the complaint was found to be substantiated, though the specific violation is not clearly detailed in this summary.
“Based on record review and observation, licensee did not comply with section cited above by not following physician's order for R1's medication which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Based on LPA's information obtained during investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview conducted with Rachell Paniagua. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Resident’s room is not cleaned Interview with staff revealed that resident's rooms are cleaned daily including the floors. LPA observed R1's room and bathroom to be overall clean. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted with Rachell Paniagua. A copy of this report provided.
2024-12-06Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated regarding pressure injuries and care for a resident who required assistance with mobility. The facility's medical records, staff interviews, and witness statements did not provide enough evidence to substantiate the complaint—the resident's pressure injuries appeared to have developed before admission, medical records did not indicate mobility equipment was required, and staff were documented as assisting with repositioning and frequent care checks.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Interview with W1 indicated that R1’s pressure injuries developed prior to admission to the facility. W1 believed that R1’s prior placement was responsible for R1’s pressure injuries. Incident report dated 3/23/2022 revealed that the facility reported R1 had two pressure injuries during admission. Interview with staff and residents indicates consistent statements of staff being attentive to the resident’s care needs. Staff knew to assist R1 with rotating and check on R1 frequently. R1 stated that he was receiving hospice care for coccyx pressure injury. Staff failed to provide mobility equipment required to move bedridden resident in care R1’s physician’s report dated 3/2/2022 indicated that R1 is non-ambulatory. R1’s functional capability assessment dated 3/7/2022 revealed that R1 requires assistance with transferring, but able to reposition from side to side. R1’s medical and hospice records did not indicate that R1 required mobility equipment for transfers. Interview with witness revealed that facility staff was assisting R1 in repositioning. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted with Chearamy Evangelista. A copy of this report provided.
2024-09-18Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an investigation into a complaint, the state found that the facility failed to update a resident's care plan after the resident sustained a fracture from a fall in October 2022. Staff confirmed the care plan was not revised to reflect the resident's changed condition. The facility must submit proof that it has corrected this issue or may face civil penalties.
“-Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section above for not doing reappraisal when R1's condtion changed which posed a potential health, safety and/or personal rights risks.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
While conducting an investigation of a complaint (Control # 15-AS-20221107163346), the Department learned that the facility did not do reappraisal and update Care Plan when R1's conditions changed. Medical records revealed R1 sustained fracture as a result of fall on October 10, 2022, and S1 stated R1's Care Plan was not updated. Deficiency is cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on 809D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date and any repeat violation within 12 month period may result in civil penalty. Deficiency and plan and proof of correction were discussed with Rachell Paniagua. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights, LIC9098 Proof of Correction form and copy of this report provided.
2024-09-18Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a resident fell from her bed in October 2022 and sustained a hip fracture requiring surgery; the facility was not found to have violated care plan requirements, as staff followed home health instructions for wound care and pressure injury prevention, including rotating the resident and using pillows and booties to keep heels elevated despite the resident's resistance to these measures. Two other allegations—that the resident developed pressure injuries while in care and that the facility failed to follow the care plan—were also found to be unsubstantiated based on interviews with staff and home health providers showing the facility carried out prescribed treatments. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Page 2 The Department interviewed the following: staff members on 5/31/23, 6/19/23 and 7/11/23; home health staff (HH1 and HH2) on 4/19/23, 5/04/23 and 6/20/23; residents (R2 and R3) on 5/31/23. Allegation: Resident (R1) developed pressure injuries while in care. On 10/10/22, R1 fell from the bed, was transferred to hospital, and diagnosed with hip fracture. R1 had hip surgery and was discharged back to the facility. R1 was followed by home health for her wound care and to remove staples from surgery. R1 developed pressure injuries while with home health care. Home Health (HH1 and HH2) provided instructions to caregivers on how to care for the pressure injuries and instructed the caregivers to elevate R1’s legs and heels so the pressure injury could heal. HH1 stated that R1 was known to refuse to be turned, refuse to have the dressings changed, and that R1 was combative towards HH1. Interviews with staff (S3 and S4) confirmed that they were rotating R1 as directed by R1’s doctor’s and home health orders. Staff were also changing R1’s bandages in-between home health visits, when R1’s bandages became soiled or were coming off. Staff were using booties and pillows to float R1’s heels off the bed to further prevent the pressure injuries from getting bigger. An interview with facility manager, S1, revealed that staff were cleaning R1’s injures with saline solution as directed by home health to keep the wounds clean. The facility also provided R1 with booties for her heels when the equipment was not available from the home health agency. Based on all information obtained, the allegation is closed as unsubstantiated. A finding that a complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. ....continued on 9099C (page 3) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Page 3 Allegation: Facility did not follow resident's care plan On 07/11/2023, a follow up interview with facility manager, S1, and caregiver, S4, revealed that the facility followed the instructions provided by the home health nurses regarding the use of pillows and booties to float R1’s feet off the bed. R1 would kick the pillows off the bed and kick the booties off. Staff would check to make sure that pillows and booties were put back on R1’s feet to prevent the pressure injuries from becoming worse. As directed by home health, the facility staff would also change R1’s bandages and clean R1’s pressure injuries with saline solution in between home health visits. Based on all information obtained, the allegation is closed as unsubstantiated. A finding that a complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Allegation: Resident sustained fracture resulting from fall. On 10/10/2022, caregiver S2 was in R2’s room and witnessed R1 fall from her bed to the floor. R1 was in extreme pain and could not stand. Other caregivers came to the room and helped S2 lift R1off of the floor and onto the bed. 9-1-1 was called and R1 taken to the hospital. It was confirmed that R1’s hip was fractured from the fall. R1 did not have any injuries or hip problems before R1 fell off the bed. R1 was not a fall risk, did not have any prior falls, was able to walk on her own with the assistance of a walker, and was not required to have two or more staff help with transfers in and out of the bed. Two residents (R2 and R3) were interviewed on 5/31/23 who both stated they were never hurt by staff. Both stated staff check them but were not able to provide the timetable on how often they are checked. Based on all information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that a complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report provided.
2024-04-23Other VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
On April 23, 2024, inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection and found the facility's safety features—including fire suppression, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, grab bars, and food storage—were in good order. However, inspectors identified violations: two staff members did not have completed health screening or tuberculosis test documentation on file, and a resident was given a higher dose of calcium supplement (600mg) than prescribed (500mg), while another resident's vitamin D3 ran out. The facility was cited and notified that failure to correct these issues may result in civil penalties.
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having health screening and TB test for staff which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 05/14/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Facility has agreed to obtain health screening for S2 and S3 and TB test results for S2. Facility will submit copies of documents to CCLD by POC date. Civil penalty of $250 is being assessed for a repeat violation.”
“Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not following doctor's order for R2's medication which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/24/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Facility purchased Calcium Carbonate 500mg and Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3) during inspection. Deficiency cleared. Civil penalty of $250 is being assessed for a repeat violation.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/23/2024 at 9:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with receptionist, Eszter Ujvari and explained the purpose of the visit. Manager, Rachell Paniagua arrived an hour later. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Centrally stored medications were locked in the med room. First Aid kit is complete. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 5/10/2023. Evacuation chairs were observed in both stairwell on the third floor. One week supply of nonperishable and 2-day supply of perishable foods were available. Facility orders food once a week. Freezer’s temperature was registered at 0 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 37 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 112.6 degrees F in a resident's bathroom. Grab bars for each toilet and shower were installed. Non-skid mats were observed. LPA reviewed 5 resident records and 5 staff records starting at 10:15AM. LPA conducted interviews with 3 residents and 3 staff during inspection. LPA also reviewed a sample of resident's medications. At 2:00PM, LPA observed S2 and S3 does not have completed health screening on file. S2 does not have TB test on file. At 4:00PM, LPA observed R2's Calcium Carbonate was ordered 500mg one tab by mouth 2 times a day. However, LPA observed facility has a bottle of Calcium Carbonate 600mg that was given to R2. Also, R2 ran out of Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3). The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, civil penalty, and appeal rights were provided.
2023-10-04Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was an unannounced health and safety inspection on October 4, 2023, conducted in response to a priority complaint. The inspector checked the facility's hot water temperature, food storage, medication security, and safety equipment (smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, fire extinguisher, and first-aid kit), and found no violations.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/4/2023 at 10:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a health and safety check as a result of a priority 2 complaint. LPA met with Manager, Rachell Paniagua and informed her the reason for visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the bedrooms, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and outdoor area. Hot water temperature was measured at 108.9 degrees F in a hallway bathroom sink. 7-day of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were sufficient. Facility purchase food once a week. Freezer temperature was measured at 0 degrees F and refrigerator temperature was measured at 39 degrees F. Resident's medications were kept locked in the medication cart located in the medication room. Medication room is locked and require security code to enter. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors observe. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 5/10/2023. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.
2023-08-03Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On August 3, 2023, a state inspector conducted a follow-up visit after receiving an incident report that a resident had climbed out a third-floor bedroom window and onto the roof on July 24, 2023; staff held the resident's feet until police and fire arrived within five minutes. The inspector confirmed that the windows have functioning alarms that alert when opened and are equipped with screens. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 8/3/2023 at 6:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit in regards to incident report received on 7/24/2023. LPA met with Manager, Rachell Paniagua. LPA received incident report on 7/24/2023 for resident (R1). Incident report revealed that R1 was caught climbing out the bedroom window and caregivers tried to stop R1. However, R1 was aggressive and layed down on the roof. Caregiver held R1's feet until police and fire department arrived. LPA interviewed staff. LPA was informed that R1 climbed out of the window on the third floor and was on the roof. R1 laid down with a pillow on the ledge of the roof right outside the bedroom window. Staff called 911 and police/fire department arrived less than 5 minutes. LPA observed window had alarms and would signal when windows are open. Windows have window screen. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided.
2023-08-03Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff were unqualified and failed to supervise residents properly, including claims that residents climbed on the roof, left windows unsupervised, wandered off the property, and were not checked on regularly. The investigation found no evidence supporting these allegations: staff had received required training, one resident who attempted to climb out a second-floor window was stopped by staff, a resident who wandered outside was redirected back inside, and residents are checked every two hours with emergency pendents available. The complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Unqualified staff providing care to residents Staff did not receive on the job training LPA reviewed a sample of staff training for year 2022 and observed that staff have initial and/or annual training including dementia, medication administration, and caregiver shadowing. Staff did not prevent resident from engaging in dangerous activities Interview with staff indicated there was no residents that left the facility and climb on the roof in summer of 2022. Staff stated that R5 attempted to climb out of the bedroom window from the second floor last year, but staff was able to intervene and prevented R5 from climbing out of the window. Facility windows have window screens. Staff did not prevent residents from wandering from the facility Interview with residents and staff indicated that no resident wandered outside of the facility and was found on the street in summer of 2022. Staff stated that a resident wandered outside the building, but staff followed the resident and redirected them back inside the facility. Staff did not check on residents in a timely manner Interview with staff revealed that residents are checked every 2 hours for incontinence care. Staff stated that residents have pendents and response time is 5-10 minutes. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided.
6 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
6 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



