Redmond Heights Senior Living.
Redmond Heights Senior Living is Ranked in the top 35% of Washington memory care with 11 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Jun 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Redmond Heights Senior Living has 11 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
11 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
11 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Redmond Heights Senior Living's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on May 1, 2025 found 7 deficiencies across 6 reports — can you walk us through the corrective action plans you submitted to DSHS and show documentation that each deficiency has been resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Four complaints were filed with DSHS Residential Care Services during the period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what specific changes did the facility make in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This facility holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of your written dementia care program and explain how staff training requirements under that contract differ from standard assisted living training?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-06-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-05-01Annual Compliance Visit4 findings
“Facility staff failed to monitor and document resident injuries. A resident with memory care needs and history of falls sustained a dark purple bruise on breast and abdomen and a one-inch by one-and-a-half inch wound on right elbow, but there was no documentation of these injuries or incident reports.”
“Facility failed to document wound management for resident's right elbow wound. No care plan or treatment documentation was provided for the identified wound.”
“Facility staff failed to communicate resident injuries to nursing staff and failed to report the injury to the Department. Care staff observed injuries several days before the investigation but did not notify the nurse or report to authorities.”
“Facility failed to document a significant change in resident condition that increased the need for staff assistance with personal care. Despite identified injuries and fall history, no documentation reflected a change in the resident's care needs.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility staff failed to monitor and document resident injuries. A resident with memory care needs and history of falls sustained a dark purple bruise on breast and abdomen and a one-inch by one-and-a-half inch wound on right elbow, but there was no documentation of these injuries or incident reports. —: Facility failed to document wound management for resident's right elbow wound. No care plan or treatment documentation was provided for the identified wound. —: Facility staff failed to communicate resident injuries to nursing staff and failed to report the injury to the Department. Care staff observed injuries several days before the investigation but did not notify the nurse or report to authorities. —: Facility failed to document a significant change in resident condition that increased the need for staff assistance with personal care. Despite identified injuries and fall history, no documentation reflected a change in the resident's care needs.
2025-04-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation of Redmond Heights Senior Living on March 17-18, 2025 found that the facility failed to notify the state within 10 days of two changes in administrator, as required by law. The facility did not submit the required written notification forms to the Department of Social and Health Services, even though staff believed the corporate office had done so. This failure placed all 68 residents at risk by leaving the state's records listing an outdated administrator.
“The facility failed to notify the Department of a change in the assisted living facility administrator within 10 days of the effective date. Staff Q became administrator on 02/01/2025, but the change of administrator attestation form was not submitted until 03/18/2025, which was 46 days late.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2570: The facility failed to notify the Department of a change in the assisted living facility administrator within 10 days of the effective date. Staff Q became administrator on 02/01/2025, but the change of administrator attestation form was not submitted until 03/18/2025, which was 46 days late.
2025-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Redmond Heights Senior Living was conducted on December 23, 2024, January 6, 2025, and December 23, 2024, and the facility was found not in compliance with licensing regulations. The investigation found that one sampled resident was smoking in their apartment rather than in the designated outdoor smoking area, which placed all 57 residents at risk from potential fire, smoke inhalation, and compromised health. A deficiency was cited because the facility's smoking policy and designated outdoor smoking area were not being enforced.
“The facility failed to maintain premises free of hazards by not ensuring that Resident 8 did not smoke in their apartment, in violation of the facility's smoke-free community policy. This created a fire hazard and health risk (smoke inhalation) for all 57 residents, with secondhand smoke entering adjacent apartments.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2700: The facility failed to maintain premises free of hazards by not ensuring that Resident 8 did not smoke in their apartment, in violation of the facility's smoke-free community policy. This created a fire hazard and health risk (smoke inhalation) for all 57 residents, with secondhand smoke entering adjacent apartments.
2024-08-01Complaint InvestigationType C · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted at this facility. The investigation did not identify a failed provider practice, and no citation was written.
“Facility failed to notify Residential Care Services of a disruption in services to residents. A plumbing issue with the dishwasher caused a three-day food service disruption, but the facility did not report this incident to the department as required.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2650: Facility failed to notify Residential Care Services of a disruption in services to residents. A plumbing issue with the dishwasher caused a three-day food service disruption, but the facility did not report this incident to the department as required.
2023-11-01Annual Compliance Visit4 findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection on June 15, 2023, Redmond Heights Senior Living was cited for deficiencies including insufficient staffing in the memory care unit (only one caregiver per shift when five residents required two-person assistance), incomplete resident assessments lacking baseline cognitive and personal preference documentation, expired license posting, inaccessible first-aid supplies, and water temperature in bathrooms below required levels. The facility corrected the license posting, first-aid kit placement, and water temperature issues during the inspection and committed to updating all memory care assessments and hiring additional staff within 45 days. The Department also provided consultation on improving dementia screening and assessment practices, though this did not result in a formal deficiency citation.
“The facility failed to provide sufficient staff on each shift to meet the needs of Memory Care residents. Five memory care residents required two caregivers for assistance with mobility, transfers, and personal care, but only one caregiver per shift was provided in the memory care unit due to staffing shortage.”
“First aid kits throughout the facility were not readily available and their locations were not identified. Kits were not clearly marked as required.”
“The facility posted an expired assisted living facility license (expired 12/31/2022) instead of a current license in a conspicuous place on the premises.”
“Water temperature in three bathroom sinks used by residents and visitors measured below the required 105 degrees Fahrenheit, failing to meet the regulation requirement of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2450: The facility failed to provide sufficient staff on each shift to meet the needs of Memory Care residents. Five memory care residents required two caregivers for assistance with mobility, transfers, and personal care, but only one caregiver per shift was provided in the memory care unit due to staffing shortage. WAC 388-78A-2700: First aid kits throughout the facility were not readily available and their locations were not identified. Kits were not clearly marked as required. WAC 388-78A-2730: The facility posted an expired assisted living facility license (expired 12/31/2022) instead of a current license in a conspicuous place on the premises. WAC 388-78A-2950: Water temperature in three bathroom sinks used by residents and visitors measured below the required 105 degrees Fahrenheit, failing to meet the regulation requirement of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit.
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



