Aegis of Marymoor.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 35 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-11-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in November 2025, but the provided information does not include details about the allegation, findings, or outcome. To understand what was investigated and whether any violation was substantiated, you would need to request the full inspection report from Washington DSHS.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to ensure a resident received medications as prescribed when the resident was out of the facility with family. The facility provided incorrect medication orders and dosages on the Medication Release Record given to the family on 08/27/2025, resulting in medication errors.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2210: The facility failed to ensure a resident received medications as prescribed when the resident was out of the facility with family. The facility provided incorrect medication orders and dosages on the Medication Release Record given to the family on 08/27/2025, resulting in medication errors.
2025-02-01Annual Compliance VisitType B · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in February 2025. The report does not specify deficiencies or violations in the provided narrative text. For detailed findings, families should request the full inspection report from Washington DSHS.
Read full citation text (3)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to implement the Individualized Service Plan for a Memory Care resident (Resident 8) regarding wheelchair safety checks. A damaged wheelchair with a broken leg rest strap was provided to the resident, and staff failed to report the equipment damage to the Care Director or nurse as instructed in the ISP.”
“The facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 newly hired care staff (Staff C and Staff G) completed national fingerprint background checks within 120 days of hire. Staff C was hired on 06/07/2024 with fingerprints rejected on 07/16/2024 with no completion documentation. Staff G was hired on 01/16/2024 with fingerprints rejected on 01/16/2024 and 07/19/2024, yet continued working directly with residents without final clearance.”
“The facility failed to provide 3 of 6 sampled assisted living residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) with appropriate equipment to access lockable storage in their apartments, placing them at risk of financial exploitation, theft, and loss of privacy.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to implement the Individualized Service Plan for a Memory Care resident (Resident 8) regarding wheelchair safety checks. A damaged wheelchair with a broken leg rest strap was provided to the resident, and staff failed to report the equipment damage to the Care Director or nurse as instructed in the ISP. WAC 388-78A-24681-2: The facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 newly hired care staff (Staff C and Staff G) completed national fingerprint background checks within 120 days of hire. Staff C was hired on 06/07/2024 with fingerprints rejected on 07/16/2024 with no completion documentation. Staff G was hired on 01/16/2024 with fingerprints rejected on 01/16/2024 and 07/19/2024, yet continued working directly with residents without final clearance. WAC 388-78A-3010-8-e: The facility failed to provide 3 of 6 sampled assisted living residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) with appropriate equipment to access lockable storage in their apartments, placing them at risk of financial exploitation, theft, and loss of privacy.
2024-01-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The facility failed to appoint a qualified designee for the Administrator of Record. The General Manager (Staff A) was serving as designee but did not meet the required qualifications by experience as specified in WAC 388-78A-2524 through 388-78A-2527, while the Administrator of Record (Staff C) worked primarily at a different facility and was not present for day-to-day operations.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2560: The facility failed to appoint a qualified designee for the Administrator of Record. The General Manager (Staff A) was serving as designee but did not meet the required qualifications by experience as specified in WAC 388-78A-2524 through 388-78A-2527, while the Administrator of Record (Staff C) worked primarily at a different facility and was not present for day-to-day operations.
2023-09-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.