PETERS CREEK RETIREMENT COMMUNITY.
PETERS CREEK RETIREMENT COMMUNITY is Ranked in the top 26% of Washington memory care with 6 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Sep 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 38 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
PETERS CREEK RETIREMENT COMMUNITY has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to PETERS CREEK RETIREMENT COMMUNITY's record and state requirements.
Peters Creek holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you walk us through the written dementia care program that qualifies the community for this designation, and show us how staff document dementia-specific interventions in resident care plans?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent DSHS inspection on September 1, 2025 cited two deficiencies — what were those deficiencies, and can you provide copies of the corrective action plans submitted to DSHS and documentation showing the corrections have been completed?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 70 licensed beds and a dementia care contract, how does the facility ensure that memory care residents receive specialized supports distinct from general assisted living services, and can you show families the policies that define those differences?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-09-01Annual Compliance VisitType B · 6 findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced follow-up inspection on August 14, 2025, the facility was found not in compliance with continuing education requirements: three of three sampled staff members had not completed their required annual continuing education hours, with one staff member completing none of the required twelve hours. This deficiency placed all 46 residents at risk of receiving care from inadequate trained staff. The facility had been cited for this same violation on July 9, 2025 and had committed to correcting it by August 12, 2025.
“Three certified nursing assistants and home care aides (Staff F, Staff X, and Staff Y) failed to complete required 12 hours of continuing education training by their annual birthdays. Staff F completed only 11 of 12 hours, Staff X completed only 6 of 12 hours, and Staff Y completed 0 of 12 hours. This was an uncorrected deficiency previously cited on 07/09/2025.”
“Facility failed to ensure staff maintained valid CPR and first-aid certifications as required within thirty days of hire.”
“Facility failed to ensure caregivers completed required continuing education and CPR/first aid training as mandated for staff hired after January 7, 2012.”
“Dishwasher staff (Staff J) failed to wash hands between handling dirty dishes and clean dishes, violating proper hand sanitation guidelines for food service workers.”
“A counter height two-drawer refrigerator in the main kitchen failed to maintain food at proper temperature, with hardboiled eggs at 46.8°F, cucumbers at 47.4°F, and tomatoes at 44.8°F, all exceeding the 41°F requirement.”
“Facility failed to ensure staff followed proper food safety guidelines including hand sanitation by dishwasher staff and proper cold holding temperatures in kitchen refrigeration units.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-112A-0611: Three certified nursing assistants and home care aides (Staff F, Staff X, and Staff Y) failed to complete required 12 hours of continuing education training by their annual birthdays. Staff F completed only 11 of 12 hours, Staff X completed only 6 of 12 hours, and Staff Y completed 0 of 12 hours. This was an uncorrected deficiency previously cited on 07/09/2025. WAC 388-112A-0720: Facility failed to ensure staff maintained valid CPR and first-aid certifications as required within thirty days of hire. WAC 388-78A-2474: Facility failed to ensure caregivers completed required continuing education and CPR/first aid training as mandated for staff hired after January 7, 2012. WAC 246-215-02310: Dishwasher staff (Staff J) failed to wash hands between handling dirty dishes and clean dishes, violating proper hand sanitation guidelines for food service workers. WAC 246-215-03510: A counter height two-drawer refrigerator in the main kitchen failed to maintain food at proper temperature, with hardboiled eggs at 46.8°F, cucumbers at 47.4°F, and tomatoes at 44.8°F, all exceeding the 41°F requirement. WAC 388-78A-2305: Facility failed to ensure staff followed proper food safety guidelines including hand sanitation by dishwasher staff and proper cold holding temperatures in kitchen refrigeration units.
2024-03-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.