The Watermark at Bellevue.
The Watermark at Bellevue is Ranked in the top 7% of Washington memory care with 1 DSHS citation on record; last inspected Nov 2024.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
The Watermark at Bellevue has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2024-11-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection in November 2024, the facility was evaluated against Washington's standards for specialized dementia care in assisted living. No deficiencies were cited.
“Facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 sampled staff (Staff B, D, G, H, and J) were screened for tuberculosis within required timeframes. Staff B was screened 43 days after hire instead of within 3 days. Staff D was screened 182 days after hire with no second-step test documentation. Staff G's previous test was 14 months old (2 months past the 12-month allowance) and lacked second-step test documentation. Staff H's documentation was incomplete. This failure placed all residents at risk of potential exposure to tuberculosis.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2483: Facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 sampled staff (Staff B, D, G, H, and J) were screened for tuberculosis within required timeframes. Staff B was screened 43 days after hire instead of within 3 days. Staff D was screened 182 days after hire with no second-step test documentation. Staff G's previous test was 14 months old (2 months past the 12-month allowance) and lacked second-step test documentation. Staff H's documentation was incomplete. This failure placed all residents at risk of potential exposure to tuberculosis. WAC 388-78A-2483: Facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 sampled staff (Staff S and Staff T) were screened for tuberculosis. Staff S, hired on 10/02/2024 as Program Director, had no documentation of TB test within three days of hire; previous chest x-ray was 195 days before hire. This failure placed all residents at risk of potential exposure to tuberculosis.
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.