Cogir of Bothell.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 35 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-12-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-11-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in November 2025, but the outcome section is marked as not applicable, which means insufficient information is available in this document to determine whether a violation was found or what the investigation's result was.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The ALF failed to ensure all staff had current CPR certifications as required by their policy. Staff were not adequately trained to respond to emergencies when a resident was found unresponsive on the floor.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2474 (2)(d): The ALF failed to ensure all staff had current CPR certifications as required by their policy. Staff were not adequately trained to respond to emergencies when a resident was found unresponsive on the floor.
2024-06-01Annual Compliance VisitType B · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection conducted in June 2024 found no deficiencies cited at this facility. The home met Washington DSHS standards for specialized dementia care at the time of the visit.
Read full citation text (3)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to complete an ongoing assessment for a new skin issue (pressure wound) and change to diet order for one sampled resident, placing the resident at risk for worsening skin breakdown, aspiration, or choking.”
“The facility failed to identify and document in the Negotiated Service Agreement clearly defined roles and responsibilities of the hospice provider for wound care management and failed to document interventions to monitor risks related to medication (Eliquis) for sampled residents, placing them at risk for not receiving necessary care and services.”
“The facility failed to ensure proper management of food and maintain on-site food service facilities in compliance with food service regulations, and failed to ensure a resident involved in food preparation obtained a food worker card as required.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2100: The facility failed to complete an ongoing assessment for a new skin issue (pressure wound) and change to diet order for one sampled resident, placing the resident at risk for worsening skin breakdown, aspiration, or choking. WAC 388-78A-2140: The facility failed to identify and document in the Negotiated Service Agreement clearly defined roles and responsibilities of the hospice provider for wound care management and failed to document interventions to monitor risks related to medication (Eliquis) for sampled residents, placing them at risk for not receiving necessary care and services. WAC 388-78A-2305: The facility failed to ensure proper management of food and maintain on-site food service facilities in compliance with food service regulations, and failed to ensure a resident involved in food preparation obtained a food worker card as required.
2023-12-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in December 2023 and no violation was found.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to implement their COVID-19 policy requiring all staff to wear masks while in the community during an outbreak. This placed residents at risk of exposure to a communicable virus.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2600: The facility failed to implement their COVID-19 policy requiring all staff to wear masks while in the community during an outbreak. This placed residents at risk of exposure to a communicable virus.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.