Sunrise of Redmond.
Sunrise of Redmond is Ranked in the top 22% of Washington memory care with 3 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Oct 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Sunrise of Redmond has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-10-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in October 2025, but the outcome documentation does not specify whether the complaint was substantiated or unsubstantiated. No details about the nature of the complaint or findings are available in this summary.
“The assisted living facility failed a second Fire Marshal inspection. The facility did not have its building approved by the Washington State Fire Marshal as required for licensure, placing all 91 residents at risk of harm, injury, and potential fire hazards related to unsafe environmental conditions.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2040(2): The assisted living facility failed a second Fire Marshal inspection. The facility did not have its building approved by the Washington State Fire Marshal as required for licensure, placing all 91 residents at risk of harm, injury, and potential fire hazards related to unsafe environmental conditions. WAC 388-78A-2040(2): The facility failed a third Fire Marshal inspection with four areas of non-compliance including: no documentation of fire alarm/detection system maintenance and testing, no emergency/standby power system service reports, no fire/smoke damper inspection records, and multiple fire doors that did not latch properly. All 98 residents were placed at risk. WAC 388-78A-2040(2): The facility failed a fourth Fire Marshal inspection. No paperwork was provided showing the facility identified and established a schedule for inspection of fire doors. All 104 residents were placed at risk of harm, injury, and potential fire hazards related to unsafe environmental conditions.
2025-05-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2023-11-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in the source material you've provided to write an accurate summary. The document shows only "Complaint Investigation (11/2023)" with outcome listed as "N/A," but contains no narrative details about what was alleged, what was found, or whether any violation was substantiated. To provide families with meaningful information, I would need the actual findings from the investigation report.
“The facility failed to ensure proper nurse delegation for insulin administration. The registered nurse delegator did not observe the initial delegation of insulin administration for staff and did not complete required weekly performance evaluations for the first four weeks after initial delegation as mandated by WAC 246-840-930.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2320(3)(a)-(e): The facility failed to ensure proper nurse delegation for insulin administration. The registered nurse delegator did not observe the initial delegation of insulin administration for staff and did not complete required weekly performance evaluations for the first four weeks after initial delegation as mandated by WAC 246-840-930.
2023-09-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in September 2023. The report does not specify findings or deficiencies; no details about compliance status are provided in the available documentation.
“The facility failed to document in resident records the potential medication side effects and caregiver instructions related to routine blood thinner (aspirin) therapy for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 4, 6, and 7). The residents received aspirin therapy without documented staff instructions about potential side effects such as bleeding, bruising, and other serious complications.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2140: The facility failed to document in resident records the potential medication side effects and caregiver instructions related to routine blood thinner (aspirin) therapy for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 4, 6, and 7). The residents received aspirin therapy without documented staff instructions about potential side effects such as bleeding, bruising, and other serious complications. WAC 388-78A-2140: The facility failed to document in the resident record the various responsibilities of medication assistance and catheter care for Resident 5. The Individual Service Plan lacked a family medication plan, alternate medication plan if family was unavailable, defined care tasks for staff assistance in catheter care and medication administration, and a schedule delineating when facility staff versus private home care aides provided services.
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



