Prestige Senior Living Auburn Meadows.
Prestige Senior Living Auburn Meadows is Ranked in the bottom 1% on citation severity among Washington peers with 7 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Oct 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 14 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Prestige Senior Living Auburn Meadows has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Prestige Senior Living Auburn Meadows's record and state requirements.
The most recent DSHS inspection on April 1, 2025 identified 3 deficiencies — can you walk us through what those deficiencies were, and show us the written corrective action plan the facility submitted to resolve each one?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
One complaint was filed with DSHS during the inspection period on record — was that complaint substantiated, and if so, what specific changes did the facility make in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This community holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that describes how staff support residents with memory loss, and confirm that all staff working in the memory care neighborhood have completed the training required under that contract?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-10-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Prestige Senior Living Auburn Meadows in Auburn found that the facility failed a third Fire Marshal inspection and could not provide required fire alarm correction documentation, placing all 94 residents at risk due to failure to meet state fire safety regulations. The facility was cited for not maintaining a building approved by the Washington State Fire Marshal, as required for licensure. The facility's Director of Operations stated they were unaware of the noncompliance and committed to working with maintenance to develop and complete a plan of correction.
“The assisted living facility failed to ensure its building was approved by the Washington State Fire Marshal. The facility failed a third Fire Marshal inspection and was unable to provide a fire alarm correction report, placing all 94 residents at risk of harm, injury, and potential fire hazards.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2040: The assisted living facility failed to ensure its building was approved by the Washington State Fire Marshal. The facility failed a third Fire Marshal inspection and was unable to provide a fire alarm correction report, placing all 94 residents at risk of harm, injury, and potential fire hazards.
2025-04-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 6 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine unannounced inspection of Prestige Senior Living Auburn Meadows on January 28-31, 2025 found that three staff members hired between April and August 2024 had not received required tuberculosis screening within three days of employment, and two staff members had not been submitted for national fingerprint background checks before working with residents, placing all 82 residents at risk. The facility's executive director stated they were unaware of these screening gaps. The facility submitted a plan of correction to address both deficiencies.
“The facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 staff members (Staff B, Staff C, and Staff D) were screened for tuberculosis within three days of employment, placing all 82 residents at risk of exposure to TB, an infectious disease.”
“The facility failed to submit national fingerprint background check requests for 2 of 6 staff members (Staff B and Staff D) prior to unsupervised contact with residents, placing all 82 residents at risk of potential abuse or neglect by caregivers with unknown backgrounds.”
“The facility failed to complete full assessments addressing required elements for 3 of 9 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 4, and Resident 5), placing them at risk of harm from unidentified care needs and changes in condition.”
“Resident 1's assessment lacked documentation of current prescribed medications, diagnosed conditions, delusional ideations, and history of medication over-dose and pocketing, with no staff guidance provided.”
“Resident 4's assessment lacked documentation of seizure disorder details, seizure management instructions, current seizure medications, and potential medication side effects.”
“Resident 5's assessment lacked documentation of observable behaviors related to diagnosed conditions and guidance for staff to monitor and document potential side effects from antipsychotic medication.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2480: The facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 staff members (Staff B, Staff C, and Staff D) were screened for tuberculosis within three days of employment, placing all 82 residents at risk of exposure to TB, an infectious disease. WAC 388-78A-24642: The facility failed to submit national fingerprint background check requests for 2 of 6 staff members (Staff B and Staff D) prior to unsupervised contact with residents, placing all 82 residents at risk of potential abuse or neglect by caregivers with unknown backgrounds. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-a: The facility failed to complete full assessments addressing required elements for 3 of 9 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 4, and Resident 5), placing them at risk of harm from unidentified care needs and changes in condition. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-b-i: Resident 1's assessment lacked documentation of current prescribed medications, diagnosed conditions, delusional ideations, and history of medication over-dose and pocketing, with no staff guidance provided. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-b-ii: Resident 4's assessment lacked documentation of seizure disorder details, seizure management instructions, current seizure medications, and potential medication side effects. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-b-iii: Resident 5's assessment lacked documentation of observable behaviors related to diagnosed conditions and guidance for staff to monitor and document potential side effects from antipsychotic medication.
2023-10-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.