Overlake Terrace.
Overlake Terrace is Ranked in the bottom 5% on citation severity among Washington peers with 11 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Feb 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Overlake Terrace has 11 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
11 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
11 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-02-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 9 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in February 2025. The report does not specify what findings, if any, were cited during this visit. To learn the specific results of this inspection, you would need to request the complete inspection report from Washington DSHS.
“The facility failed to provide lockable storage for 3 of 8 assisted living residents (Residents 3, 4, and 10). Each sleeping room must have a lockable drawer, cupboard, or other secure space measuring at least one-half cubic foot with a minimum dimension of four inches.”
“The facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 housekeeping utility cart (third-floor cart) with hazardous chemicals was locked while unattended and in resident areas. A housekeeping cart on the third floor was observed unlocked with cleaning chemicals in view, placing all 64 residents at risk of injury from hazardous chemicals.”
“The facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 memory care resident's (Resident 6) apartment was free of unlocked hazardous chemicals. An unlocked cabinet in Resident 6's apartment contained liquid laundry detergent and hand sanitizer, placing residents at risk of ingestion or skin and eye contact.”
“The facility failed to ensure that 2 of 4 staff (Staff A and Staff C) completed required dementia and mental health specialty training as required for staff serving residents with those primary special needs.”
“The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 staff (Staff E) completed required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with hands-on skill development and first aid training.”
“The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 staff (Staff D) completed 12 hours of Department approved continuing education training between their August 2023 birthday and August 2024 birthday as required.”
“The facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure all staff completed required training, including specialty training for dementia and mental health, CPR/first aid, and continuing education, necessary to provide care and services for residents with special needs.”
“The facility failed to ensure all staff completed required training to perform their job duties and responsibilities, placing all residents at risk of unmet care needs.”
“The facility's hazardous material policy regarding locking housekeeping carts did not ensure staff consistently secured hazardous chemicals in resident areas, placing residents at risk of exposure.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-3010(8)(e): The facility failed to provide lockable storage for 3 of 8 assisted living residents (Residents 3, 4, and 10). Each sleeping room must have a lockable drawer, cupboard, or other secure space measuring at least one-half cubic foot with a minimum dimension of four inches. WAC 388-78A-3100(1): The facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 housekeeping utility cart (third-floor cart) with hazardous chemicals was locked while unattended and in resident areas. A housekeeping cart on the third floor was observed unlocked with cleaning chemicals in view, placing all 64 residents at risk of injury from hazardous chemicals. WAC 388-78A-3100(2): The facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 memory care resident's (Resident 6) apartment was free of unlocked hazardous chemicals. An unlocked cabinet in Resident 6's apartment contained liquid laundry detergent and hand sanitizer, placing residents at risk of ingestion or skin and eye contact. WAC 388-78A-2474(2)(c): The facility failed to ensure that 2 of 4 staff (Staff A and Staff C) completed required dementia and mental health specialty training as required for staff serving residents with those primary special needs. WAC 388-78A-2474(2)(d): The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 staff (Staff E) completed required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with hands-on skill development and first aid training. WAC 388-78A-2474(2)(e): The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 staff (Staff D) completed 12 hours of Department approved continuing education training between their August 2023 birthday and August 2024 birthday as required. WAC 388-78A-2600(1)(b): The facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure all staff completed required training, including specialty training for dementia and mental health, CPR/first aid, and continuing education, necessary to provide care and services for residents with special needs. WAC 388-78A-2100(2)(a): The facility failed to ensure all staff completed required training to perform their job duties and responsibilities, placing all residents at risk of unmet care needs. WAC 388-78A-3090(1)(c): The facility's hazardous material policy regarding locking housekeeping carts did not ensure staff consistently secured hazardous chemicals in resident areas, placing residents at risk of exposure.
2025-01-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in the narrative you've provided to write an accurate summary. The document appears to be a header or index entry rather than a completed inspection or investigation report with findings. To provide families with a meaningful summary, I would need details about what complaint was filed, what was investigated, and what the outcome was. Could you provide the full narrative section of the report?
“The facility failed to implement safe medication service for a resident by not clarifying physician orders and verifying pharmacy entries when the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) showed incorrect orders. A resident received Eliquis 2.5 mg three days before the physician-ordered start date, resulting in hospitalization for worsening rectal bleeding.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2210: The facility failed to implement safe medication service for a resident by not clarifying physician orders and verifying pharmacy entries when the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) showed incorrect orders. A resident received Eliquis 2.5 mg three days before the physician-ordered start date, resulting in hospitalization for worsening rectal bleeding.
2024-01-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
“Facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 sampled staff (Staff U and Staff X) completed Nurse Delegation (ND) training and on-going oversight for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 9, Resident 15, Resident 16, and Resident 18) who required medication and/or insulin administration. Staff U's NAR credential was in pending status when delegated, and there was no documentation of required weekly supervision for insulin administration.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2320: Facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 sampled staff (Staff U and Staff X) completed Nurse Delegation (ND) training and on-going oversight for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 9, Resident 15, Resident 16, and Resident 18) who required medication and/or insulin administration. Staff U's NAR credential was in pending status when delegated, and there was no documentation of required weekly supervision for insulin administration. WAC 388-78A-2320: Initial citation for failure to ensure nurse delegation training and on-going oversight for staff (Staff S, Staff T, Staff U, Staff V, and Staff W) providing nursing services to residents. WAC 388-78A-2320: Second citation for failure to ensure nurse delegation training and on-going oversight for Staff U and Staff X who administered medications and insulin to residents.
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



