Beehive Homes of Maple Grove.
Beehive Homes of Maple Grove is Grade C, ranked in the top 49% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Jan 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Beehive Homes of Maple Grove has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Beehive Homes of Maple Grove's record and state requirements.
The most recent Minnesota Department of Health inspection on January 8, 2025 found zero deficiencies across all regulatory standards — can you walk us through the specific dementia care policies and procedures that MDH reviewed during that visit?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
MDH records show one complaint was filed during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and can you share the written response or corrective action plan the facility provided to the family and to MDH?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This community holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minnesota Statutes chapter 144G — can you show us the written dementia care program that describes how staff are trained to support residents with memory loss, and confirm that program is available for family review?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-01-08Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection on January 6-8, 2025, Minnesota Department of Health surveyors found that Beehive Homes of Maple Grove violated one or more state requirements related to food services and minimum facility requirements. The facility received state correction orders and was instructed to document how it would correct the violations, though no fines were assessed at the time of the survey.
Full inspector notes
correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of the violations; h owever, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Beehive Homes Of Maple Grove February 19, 2025 Page 2 resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Kelly Thorson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: kelly.thorson@state.mn.us Telephone: 320-223-7336 Fax: 1 -866-890-9290 JMD PRINTED: 02/19/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 35125 01/08/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 14901 WEAVER LAKE ROAD BEEHIVE HOMES OF MAPLE GROVE MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Minnesota Department of Health is CORRECTION ORDER(S) documenting the State Correction Orders using federal software. Tag numbers have In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section been assigned to Minnesota State 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The issued pursuant to a survey. assigned tag number appears in the far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute number and the requires compliance with all requirements corresponding text of the state Statute out provided at the Statute number indicated below. of compliance is listed in the "Summary When Minnesota Statute contains several items, Statement of Deficiencies" column. This failure to comply with any of the items will be column also includes the findings which considered lack of compliance. are in violation of the state requirement after the statement, "This Minnesota INITIAL COMMENTS: requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the SL35125016-0 Time Period for Correction. PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF On January 6, 2025, through January 8, 2025, the THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH survey at the above provider. At the time of the CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO survey, there were 39 resident(s); all of whom FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS were receiving services under the Assisted Living WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. Facility with Dementia Care license. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 480 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements; required food services (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 0RXY11 If continuation sheet 1 of 20 PRINTED: 02/19/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 35125 01/08/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 14901 WEAVER LAKE ROAD BEEHIVE HOMES OF MAPLE GROVE MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 4626. (b) For an assisted living facility with a licensed capacity of ten or fewer residents: (1) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0033, item A, the facility may share a certified food protection manager (CFPM) with one other facility located within a 60-mile radius and under common management provided the CFPM is present at each facility frequently enough to effectively administer, manage, and supervise each facility's food service operation; (2) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0545, item A, kick plates that are not removable or cannot be rotated open are allowed unless the facility has been issued repeated correction orders for violations of Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1565 or 4626.1570; (3) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0685, item A, the facility is not required to provide integral drainboards, utensil racks, or tables large enough to accommodate soiled and clean items that may accumulate during hours of operation provided soiled items do not contaminate clean items, surfaces, or food, and clean equipment and dishes are air dried in a manner that prevents contamination before storage; (4) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1070, item A, the facility is not required to install a dedicated handwashing sink in its existing kitchen provided it designates one well of a two-compartment sink for use only as a handwashing sink; (5) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, parts 4626.1325, 4626.1335, and 4626.1360, item A, existing floor, wall, and ceiling finishes are allowed provided the facility keeps them clean and in good condition; (6) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part STATE FORM 6899 0RXY11 If continuation sheet 2 of 20 PRINTED: 02/19/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 35125 01/08/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 14901 WEAVER LAKE ROAD BEEHIVE HOMES OF MAPLE GROVE MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 2 0 480 4626.
2023-12-22Complaint Investigation1 · Substantiated Finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a staff member abused a resident by slapping her foot and leg while she slept, forcefully moving her during care without explanation, covering her face with bedding without consent, and making demeaning comments; video and audio recordings captured these incidents on two separate occasions during one shift. The investigation included interviews with staff, family, and the accused, as well as review of facility records and recordings, and the facility terminated the staff member's employment after reviewing the evidence. The Minnesota Department of Health substantiated the abuse finding under state maltreatment law.
“MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding”
Full inspector notes
Finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused a resident when she slapped the resident while providing care. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. While in the resident’s room and providing cares for the resident, the AP treated the resident in a humiliating and disparaging manner including how she touched and communicated with the resident. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted family members. The investigation included review of facility records, resident records, staff records and audio and video tapes. Also, the investigator observed staff to staff interactions, staff and leadership interactions and staff and resident interactions. An equal opportunity employer. The resident resided in an assisted living memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses include Alzheimer’s, dementia and insomnia. The resident’s service plan included assistance with assistance with medications, bathing, dressing and incontinence care. The resident’s assessment indicated the need for cueing for most activities including eating and rest but was able to ambulate without assistance. A video and audio recording device placed in the room by the resident’s family captured interactions between the AP and the resident. The video recordings included two separate occasions when the AP was in the room with the resident to provide cares during the course of one shift. The first recording showed the AP enter the resident’s room and, while straightening the bed covers, the resident walked into view room towards the couch. The audio recorded the AP yell at the resident to wait. The resident replied she was going to sit down the AP yelled again “you wait!” The same recording showed the AP walk over to the resident, grasp the resident’s hand, quickly pull her to the side of the bed, and then forcefully push the resident onto the bed without asking the resident to lay down or explaining what she was doing. The AP then took the resident’s legs, lifted them up quickly, and dropped the resident’s legs onto the bed. As the AP finished the cares and prepared to leave the room, she placed the bed sheet and blanket up over the resident’s face and walked out of the room. The AP did not ask the resident if she wanted her face covered in this manner. Later the same shift, a second video and audio recording showed the AP enter the resident room while the resident lay in bed sleeping. As the AP approached the bed, she slapped the resident’s foot and then the resident’s leg, which caused the resident to flinch both times. The resident sat up partway in bed and said “you [the AP] cannot do this” and reached out her hand. The AP pushed the resident’s hand away and said, “You just make more work for people” and “you peed all over.” Next the same recording showed the AP initiate cares by abruptly pulling the resident’s pants and briefs down to just above her knees without explaining what she was doing. The AP tapped the resident’s arms, then her chest, and said “come on” while making an up motion with her arms. The AP inserted her thumbs into the resident’s hands and attempted to pull the resident up out of bed. The AP stopped midway through the transfer stating her thumbs hurt and pulled her hands away from the resident. At this point, the resident remained on the bed and the AP pulled the sides of the brief apart and put the brief on the floor. Then the AP offered her hands to the resident to help her get up. The AP pulled hard on the resident to get her off the bed and the resident said, “I can’t.” The AP put her arm under the resident’s arm to stand her up and then walked the resident over to the couch naked from the waist down. The AP placed the resident on the couch, still naked from the waist down, without offering anything to cover her up. During an interview, a member of the management team stated the facility reviewed the recording. The facility discontinued the AP’s employment as the recording showed the AP treated the resident in an unacceptable way while providing cares. During an interview with the AP, she stated that her care was very compassionate and did not feel she did anything wrong. The AP also stated she was very sorry if she had done anything wrong. The AP also stated she cared for the resident like she cared for her own grandmother. During an interview, the resident’s family member stated he/she reviewed the recording and found it very upsetting to see the resident treated in this manner. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. Substantiated: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, Subdivision 19. “Substantiated” means a preponderance of evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred. Abuse: Minnesota Statutes section 626.5572, subdivision 2. "Abuse" means: (a) An act against a vulnerable adult that constitutes a violation of, an attempt to violate, or aiding and abetting a violation of: (1) assault in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.221 to 609.224; (2) the use of drugs to injure or facilitate crime as defined in section 609.235; (3) the solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution as defined in section 609.322; and (4) criminal sexual conduct in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.342 to 609.3451. A violation includes any action that meets the elements of the crime, regardless of whether there is a criminal proceeding or conviction. (b) Conduct which is not an accident or therapeutic conduct as defined in this section, which produces or could reasonably be expected to produce physical pain or injury or emotional distress including, but not limited to, the following: (1) hitting, slapping, kicking, pinching, biting, or corporal punishment of a vulnerable adult; (2) use of repeated or malicious oral, written, or gestured language toward a vulnerable adult or the treatment of a vulnerable adult which would be considered by a reasonable person to be disparaging, derogatory, humiliating, harassing, or threatening; Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, due to advanced dementia Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes the Action taken by facility: The facility terminated the AP’s employment and provided education to other caregivers on how to treat residents. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult’s right to be free from maltreatment. You may also call 651-201-4200 to receive a copy via mail or email The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. If the maltreatment is substantiated against an identified employee, this report will be submitted to the nurse aide registry for possible inclusion of the finding on the abuse registry and/or to the Minnesota Department of Human Services for possible disqualification in accordance with the provisions of the background study requirements under Minnesota 245C. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Hennepin County Attorney Maple Grove City Attorney Maple Grove Police Department PRINTED: 12/27/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 35125 10/31/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 14901 WEAVER LAKE ROAD BEEHIVE HOMES OF MAPLE GROVE MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On October 31st, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL351255916C/#HL351258564M. For HL351255916C/#HL351258564M. the following correction order is issued: 2360. 02360 144G.91 Subd.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown in the free view.
1 older inspection (2023–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Hennepin County.
Other memory care facilities in Hennepin County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.