Presbyterian Homes of Blooming.
Presbyterian Homes of Blooming is Ranked in the top 50% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Feb 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 138 Minnesota facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month MDH inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Presbyterian Homes of Blooming has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Presbyterian Homes of Blooming's record and state requirements.
The facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minnesota Statute chapter 144G with 111 licensed beds — can you walk us through the written dementia care program and explain how care plans are individualized for residents with memory loss?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Minnesota Department of Health records show one complaint on file — can you share what that complaint involved, whether it was substantiated, and what corrective actions the facility implemented in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent MDH inspection on September 18, 2025 found zero deficiencies across all regulatory standards — can you explain the facility's internal quality assurance process and how staff prepare for state inspections to maintain compliance?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-02-11Complaint InvestigationSubstantiated Finding · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a staff member financially exploited six residents by taking their debit cards, credit cards, and cash to make unauthorized purchases and fraudulent charges totaling thousands of dollars; the staff member admitted to the theft during interviews with law enforcement. For one resident, missing cash and a check were later found in her room, and for another resident, suspicious account activity was determined to be unrelated identity theft from outside the facility. The staff member was placed on administrative leave during the investigation.
“MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP) financially exploited residents (resident 1, resident 2, resident 3, resident 4, resident 5, resident 6, resident 7, resident 8) when she took resident debit cards, credit cards, and cash to make personal purchases with them. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment of resident 1, resident 2, resident 4, resident 5, resident 6, and resident 7. The AP admitted she stole resident credit and debit cards, and made fraudulent charges to the accounts of resident 1, resident 2, resident 4, resident 5, resident 6, and resident 7, to law enforcement. Resident 3’s missing cash and check were found in her room approximately two weeks after they were reported missing. Law enforcement determined the fraudulent activity to the saving’s account of resident 8 were a result of identity theft of another person in another state and was not related to the fraudulent activity that occurred at the facility. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted law enforcement. The investigation included review of resident records, resident financial records, facility internal investigations, facility incident reports, personnel files, staff schedules, law enforcement reports, and related facility policy and procedures. Resident 1 Resident 1 resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included type two diabetes, chronic heart failure, and difficulty walking. The resident’s service plan included assistance with toileting, laundry, and bathing. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was alert, oriented, used a walker for walking, and was independent with her finances. A facility internal investigation document indicated resident 1 notified facility staff her debit card was missing. The following day, facility staff assisted resident 1 by calling her bank, reviewed surveillance video footage, contacted law enforcement, and placed the AP on administrative leave. The document indicated law enforcement notified the facility the AP admitted to taking resident 1’s debit card to the law enforcement officer during an interview with the AP. The document indicated $3,838.39 was fraudulently charged to resident 1’s debit card. Resident 1’s debit card statement indicated 17 fraudulent charges were placed on resident 1’s account, three of which were in person attempts at a local coffee shop and store. The remaining attempts were online purchases. The facility staff schedule indicated the AP was scheduled to work from 3:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and was not assigned to resident 1’s care on the day resident 1’s debit card was noted to be missing by resident 1. Facility video surveillance footage showed the AP entering resident 1’s room, and exiting two minutes later on the day resident 1 noted her debit card missing. An email from the law enforcement detective to the facility, included photos of the AP at the store on the date and at the time a fraudulent charge was placed to resident 1’s debit card from the same store. Facility notes from an investigative interview with the AP indicated the AP stated she entered resident 1’s room to answer resident 1’s call light. The AP stated she assisted resident 1 to pull up her pants in the bathroom and left. The AP stated she did not see anything laying out in resident 1’s apartment and asked if any other staff were being questioned about resident 1’s missing debit card. The same document, dated six days later, indicated a second interview was completed by facility staff with the AP. The AP was questioned about the date she was noted on camera at the store while she was scheduled to be on shift at the facility. The document indicated the AP stated she went to her car to eat and take her break, but staff had noted her to be gone for 45 minutes. The document indicated the AP stated she had left the facility and went to the store to get medicine for herself. The document indicated facility staff had record the AP left the facility and returned to the building 45 minutes later. The document indicated it took seven minutes to drive back to the facility from the store. An email received from law enforcement indicated the AP admitted to taking and using resident 1’s card during two interviews completed by law enforcement. Resident 2 Resident 2 resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included dementia and bone cancer. The resident’s service plan included assistance with medication administration, laundry, grooming and bathing. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident used a walker for walking, had severe cognitive impairment, and had a family member manage her finances. A facility internal investigation document indicated the facility was notified resident 2’s credit card was missing, and law enforcement was contacted. The document indicated 31 known fraudulent charges to resident 2’s account that totaled $571.19 at the time the incident was reported. The document indicated the fraudulent charges started one month earlier. The facility staff schedule indicated the AP was scheduled to work at the facility and assigned to care for resident 2 the day fraudulent charges started on resident 2’s credit card. An email received from law enforcement indicated the AP admitted to taking and using resident 2’s card during two interviews completed by law enforcement. Resident 3 Resident 3 resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included hypertension, osteoporosis, and anemia. The resident’s service plan included assistance with medication administration. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was independent with activities of daily living, alert, oriented, and made her own financial decisions. A facility internal investigation document indicated resident 3’s family notified the facility that resident 3 was missing $400 in cash and a check written out to resident 3 for $600. The document indicated the cash and check were found in resident 2’s room two weeks later. Resident 4 Resident 4 resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, physical debility and history of falls. The resident’s service plan included assistance with homemaking, medication administration, and bathing. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was independent walking with a walker, was alert and oriented, and had a family member manage his finances. A facility internal investigation document indicated resident 4’s family member notified the facility of fraudulent charges to resident 4’s debit card and credit card accounts, that occurred approximately two months prior. Resident 4’s bank statement indicated 10 fraudulent transactions on resident 4’s bank account that totaled $551.61. The facility staff schedule indicated the AP worked at the facility the day the fraudulent charges started on resident 4’s bank account. Resident 4’s service delivery record indicated the AP assisted resident 4 with his shower the day before fraudulent charges started on his bank account. An email received from law enforcement indicated the AP admitted to taking and using resident 4’s cards during two interviews completed by law enforcement. Resident 5 Resident 5 resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included cirrhosis of the liver and edema. The resident’s service plan included daily assistance with his leg wraps. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was independent with activities of daily living, was alert and oriented, and managed his own finances with help from a family member. A facility internal investigation document indicated resident 5 notified facility staff his credit card and wedding ring were missing for four to five days. The document indicated there was $1000.00 of known fraudulent charges to resident 5’s credit card. The facility staff schedule indicated the AP was assigned to care for resident 5 for two shifts during the time frame resident 5 stated his credit card and wedding ring went missing. An email received from law enforcement indicated the AP admitted to taking and using resident 5’s card during two interviews completed by law enforcement. Resident 6 Resident 6 resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, anemia, and anxiety. The resident’s service plan included assistance with incontinence care, homemaking, bathing, and transfers. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was alert and oriented, used a wheelchair independently, and managed her own finances.
2025-09-18Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection of Pres Homes of Bloomington on September 18, 2025, found violations in infection control program, fire protection and physical environment, and appropriate care and services. The facility was assessed a total fine of $2,000.00 and issued correction orders requiring documentation of how the violations were corrected. The facility has 15 calendar days to request reconsideration or a hearing if it wishes to challenge these findings.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities .The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag". The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statemen tof Deficiencies "column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement ,"This MN Requiremen its not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordanc ewith Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .4, fines and enforcemen tactions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Leve l1: no fines or enforcement; Leve l2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcemen tmechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcemen tmechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcemen tmechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcemen tmechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0. Therefore ,in accordanc ewith Minn. Stat. §§ 144G0. 1 to 144G9. 999, the following fines are assessed pursuan tto this survey: An equal opportunity employer . Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Pres Homes Of Bloomington October 28, 2025 Page 2 0510 - 144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program - $500.00 0775 - 144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physica lEnvironment - $500.00 2310 - 144g.91 Subd. 4 (a) - Appropriate Care And Services - $1,000.00 Therefore ,in accordanc ewith Minn. Stat. §§ 144G0. 1 to 144G9. 999, the total amount you are assesse dis $2,000.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to . appeal DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 0, Subd .5(c), the licensee must documen tactions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however ,plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: x Identify how the area(s) of noncomplianc ewas corrected related to the resident(s)/ employees() identified in the correction order. x Identify how the area(s) of noncomplianc ewas corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. x Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTIO ONRDER RECONSIDERATI PORNOCESS In accordanc ewith Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 2, Subd .2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope ,and any fine assesse dthrough the correction order reconsideration process T. he request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request ,please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm REQUESTIN AG HEARING Alternatively ,in accordanc ewith Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assesse da fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuan tto Minn. Stat. § 144G2. 0, Subd .14 and Subd .18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Departmen tof Health within 15 busines sdays of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. To submit a hearing request ,please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm Pres Homes Of Bloomington October 28, 2025 Page 3 To appea lfines via reconsideration p, lease follow the procedure outlined above .Please note that you may request a reconsideration or a hearing ,but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing ,please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process .Please fill out this anonymou sprovider feedback questionnaire at your convenienc eat this link: https:/ / forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHV.a Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processe sand communication with providers .If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire p, lease contact Susan Winkelmann at susanw. inkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this documen tfor your records .It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organizations’ Governing Body. If you have any questions ,please contact me. Sincerely, Jess Schoenecke Sr,upervisor State Evaluation Team Email :jesss. choenecker@state.mn.us Telephone 6: 51-201-3789 Fax :1-866-890-9290 JMD PRINTED: 10/28/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 24062 09/18/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 9889 PENN AVENUE SOUTH PRES HOMES OF BLOOMINGTON BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER(S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." issued pursuant to a survey. The state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL24062016-0 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On September 15, 2025, through September 18, STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO conducted a full survey at the above provider and FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS the following correction orders are issued. At the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. time of the survey, there were 90 residents receiving services under the Assisted Living THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Facility with Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE On September 18, 2025, an immediate correction STATUTES. order was issued for tag identification 2310. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS During the course of the survey, the licensee USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND took action to mitigate the imminent risk. REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL Noncompliance remained and the scope and ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 level remain unchanged. SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 480 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements; required food services LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 TODM11 If continuation sheet 1 of 27 PRINTED: 10/28/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 24062 09/18/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 9889 PENN AVENUE SOUTH PRES HOMES OF BLOOMINGTON BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Hennepin County.
Other memory care facilities in Hennepin County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.