Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.

StarlynnCare
Minnesota · Bloomington

Meadow Woods Assisted Living.

Meadow Woods Assisted Living is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Oct 2025.

ALF · Memory Care116 licensed beds · largeDementia-trained staff
1301 East 100th Street · Bloomington, MN 55425LIC# ALRC:42
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Facility · Bloomington
A 116-bed ALF · Memory Care with no citations on file.
Last inspection · Oct 2025 · cleanSource · MDH
Licensed beds
116
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Oct 2025
Last citation
None on record
Operated by
Phone
§ 01 · Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

§ 02 · Peer Comparison

Ranked against 138 Minnesota facilities.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
100th
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
100th
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
100th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Be first to know if Meadow Woods Assisted Living's inspection record changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

§ 03 · The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

No citations in the last 36 months.

0weighted score · 24 mo
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jun 2024May 2026

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.
§ 05 · Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Meadow Woods Assisted Living's record and state requirements.

01 /

The most recent inspection on October 17, 2025, found zero deficiencies across all standards — can you walk us through how the community maintains compliance with Minnesota's Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care requirements under Minn. Stat. ch. 144G, and what internal auditing processes are in place?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

Two complaints were filed with the Minnesota Department of Health during the inspection period on file — can you share whether those complaints were substantiated, and provide documentation of any corrective measures the facility implemented in response?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

With 116 licensed beds and a dementia care designation, how does Meadow Woods organize its memory care programming — can you describe the written policies that govern dementia-specific activities, resident supervision, and staff competency expectations?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

§ 06 · Full Inspection Record

Every MDH visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

3
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
2025-10-17
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A routine inspection of Meadow Woods Assisted Living on October 17, 2025 found a violation of fire protection and physical environment requirements under Minnesota law, resulting in a $500 fine. The facility must document what actions it has taken to correct this violation and ensure the problem does not affect other residents or occur again in the future. The facility has the right to request reconsideration or a hearing about the violation within 15 business days if it wishes to contest the finding.

Full inspector notes

correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessar yto ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTIO ONRDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities .The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag". The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statemen tof Deficiencies "column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requiremen tis not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Leve l1: no fines or enforcement; Leve l2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; An equal opportunity employer . Letter ID: IS7N REVISE 0D9/13/2021 Meadow Woods Assisted Living Novembe r10, 2025 Page 2 Leve l4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0. Therefore ,in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G0. 1 to 144G9. 999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0775 - 144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physica lEnvironment - $500.00 Therefore ,in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G0. 1 to 144G9. 999, the total amount you are assesse dis $500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to . appeal DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 0, Subd .5(c), the licensee must docum ent actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: x Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/ employees( ) identified in the correction order. x Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. x Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTIO ONRDER RECONSIDERATI OPRNOCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 2, Subd .2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope ,and any fine assesse dthrough the correction order reconsideration process .The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm REQUESTIN AG HEARING Alternatively ,in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assesse da fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuan tto Minn. Stat. § 144G2. 0, Subd .14 and Subd .18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating Meadow Woods Assisted Living Novembe r10, 2025 Page 3 factor. To submit a hearing request, please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm To appea lfines via reconside ration, please follow the pr ocedur e outlined above. Plea se note that you may request a reconsideration or a hearing, but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process .Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: https:/ / forms.office.com/g/ Bm5uQEpHV.a Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processe sand communication with providers . If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire ,please contact Susan Winkelmann at susanw. inkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records . It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organizations’ Governing Body. If you have any questions ,please contact me. Sincerely, Jess Schoenecke rS, upervisor State Evaluation Team Email: JessS. choenecker@state.mn.us Telephone :651-201-3789 Fax :1-866-890-9290 KKM PRINTED: 11/10/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 20264 10/17/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1301 EAST 100TH STREET MEADOW WOODS ASSISTED LIVING BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER(S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." issued pursuant to a survey. The state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL20264016 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On October 13, 2025, through October 17, 2025, STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO full survey at the above provider and the FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS following correction orders are issued. At the time WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. of the survey, there were one hundred-eight (108) residents receiving services under the THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR license. VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 480 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements; required food services LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 WY4O11 If continuation sheet 1 of 9 PRINTED: 11/10/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.

2025-02-25
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

The Minnesota Department of Health investigated a complaint that the facility neglected a resident by failing to provide proper catheter care, but found the allegation was not substantiated. The facility had contracted with a home care agency to manage the resident's catheter changes and supplies, while facility staff were responsible only for emptying the catheter bag; when staff noticed no urine output in the bag, they immediately notified the nurse and the resident was sent to the emergency department for evaluation. No violations were found, and no corrective action was required.

Full inspector notes

Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The facility neglected the resident when proper catheter care was not provided. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The facility was not responsible for the maltreatment. While it was true the resident had an indwelling foley catheter the facility was not responsible for the maintenance or changing of the catheter as this was managed by a home care agency. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted a family member and a home care agency staff. The investigation included review of the resident record(s), provider record, facility nursing notes, hospital record, related facility policy and procedures. Also, the investigator made a visit to the facility staff interactions with facility residents. The resident resided in an assisted living memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, benign prostatic hyperplasia, history of urinary tract infections, indwelling foley catheter, and dementia. The resident’s service plan included the resident was independent with mobility in his wheelchair, required stand by assistance with transfers in and out of bed, cues for dressing, and medication administration. The resident’s assessment indicated the facility coordinated care with outside home health provider. The home health agency was responsible for catheter management including changing of the catheter. However, the unlicensed caregivers to change out catheter bag and clean per homecare orders. One morning the resident displayed facial grimacing with bed mobility and an unlicensed caregiver noticed there was no urine output in the resident’s catheter bag and immediately notified nursing. The resident’s medical provider was at the facility that morning, the facility updated the medical provider, and the send the resident into the emergency department for evaluation. The progress notes indicated the resident had been found on the floor the night before and, at the time, there were no apparent injuries aside from some back pain. The hospital emergency department record indicated the resident fell the previous evening and medical imagine indicated the indwelling foley catheter was not properly placed. During an interview, nurse #1 stated the facility contracted with an outside home care agency managed catheter change, provided the supplies for the catheter, and managed any concerns with the catheter. The unlicensed caregivers emptied the catheter bag five times a day, but the facility did not monitor urine intake or output on the resident nor was it care planned to do so. Nurse #1 stated it was possible the catheter was displaced because of the fall. During an interview, an unlicensed caregiver stated she observed the resident’s catheter bag was empty upon entering to give medications, so she notified the nurse immediately. During an interview, nurse #2 stated the resident lying in bed and resident complained of back pain and voice was a lower tone. Nurse #2 attempted to roll the resident, but his face grimaced and she noticed catheter bag contained no urine. Nurse #2 stated the medical provider, who was in the facility, was updated and the resident was sent to the emergency department. During an interview, a homecare employee stated the resident received services to manage foley catheter care. The homecare employee stated homecare agency managed catheter supplies, scheduled and as needed catheter changes, along with skin checks. Due to medical diagnosis the catheter change was difficult but could be completed at the facility by the homecare agency and it was not usually necessary for this to be done in a clinic or hospital. The homecare employee stated the resident had a history of pulling at the catheter tubing and frequent urinary tract infections. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: NA Action taken by facility: No action taken. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 02/26/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 20264 02/06/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1301 EAST 100TH STREET MEADOW WOODS ASSISTED LIVING BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On February 6, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL202642501C/#HL202647303M. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 IZZC11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1

2024-03-20
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation of Meadow Woods Assisted Living was completed on March 13, 2024, to review whether the facility's policies and practices complied with Minnesota state laws governing assisted living facilities with dementia care. No correction orders were issued, indicating no violations were found.

Full inspector notes

STATE LICENSING COMPLIANCE REPORT Report #: HL Date Concluded: March 18, 2024 202645095C Name, Address, and County of Facility Investigated: Meadow Woods Assisted Living 1301 E 100th St Bloomington, Mn 55425 Hennepin County Facility Type: Assisted Living Facility with Evaluator’s Name: Dementia Care (ALFDC) Michele Larson, RN Special Investigator Kathy Barnhardt, RN Special Investigator The Minnesota Department of Health conducted a complaint investigation to determine compliance with state laws and rules governing the provision of care under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 144G. The purpose of this complaint investigation was to review if facility policies and practices comply with applicable laws and rules. No maltreatment under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 626 was alleged. To view a copy of the correction orders, if any, please visit: https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/regulation/directory/provcompselect.html, or call website, please see the attached state form. PRINTED: 03/20/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 20264 03/13/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1301 EAST 100TH STREET MEADOW WOODS ASSISTED LIVING BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On March 13, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL202645095C. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 FOME11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown in the free view.

1 older inspection (20232023) are available with a premium membership.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.