Rosegate.
Rosegate is Ranked in the bottom 4% on citation severity among California peers with 23 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Dec 2025.
40-Bed Memory Care Residence in San Leandro, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 26 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Rosegate has 23 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
23 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
23 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Rosegate's record and state requirements.
State records show 3 Type A deficiencies (actual harm citations) — what were the specific circumstances of each, what harm occurred, and what corrective actions were implemented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Five complaints were filed with CDSS during the period on file — what were the subjects of those complaints, and which were substantiated by investigators?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Although the facility advertises memory care, CDSS has no formal memory care designation on record — can you explain what specific dementia care training staff receive and how compliance with Title 22 §87705 and §87706 is maintained?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
13 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-12-18Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On December 18, 2025, the state conducted a required annual inspection of the facility and found no violations. The inspector reviewed the building, checked safety equipment including smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, inspected medications and food storage, and reviewed staff and resident records. The facility was in compliance with all requirements.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 12/18/2025 at 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. Brown arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Licensee Allen Leung and Back up Administrator Jeffrey Tong and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility with Backup Administrator Jeffrey Tong including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and back yard. The facility consists two floors and twenty-two (22) rooms. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 73 degrees F. The hot water temperature of a random sample of residents rooms were measured at 113.5, 112.3, and 110.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 3/19/2025. Emergency Disaster Plan was last reviewed on 2/18/2025. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Fire drill was last conducted on 10/8/2025. Continued on LIC809-C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from LIC809. LPA reviewed five (5) staff and six (6) resident records. LPA reviewed a sample of medication. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCLD by 12/25/2025: LIC610D: Emergency disaster plan LIC500: (Personnel Record) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted with Allen and Jeffrey and a copy of this report provided.
2025-11-05Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On November 5, 2025, inspectors returned to check whether the facility had corrected a deficiency from the previous month related to auditory devices (equipment to help residents hear announcements). The facility had not completed the required training or installed the necessary devices, so the state assessed a $200 civil penalty and will continue assessing daily penalties until the problem is fixed.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 11/5/2025 at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a POC (proof of correction) inspection. LPA met with House Manager, Irene DeLeon and informed her the reason for the visit. Facility has the following deficiency that was not cleared and deficiency was issued on 10/31/2025 from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 : - 87468.2(4); LPA has not received proof of an in-service training, replacement of the auditory device in the main entrance or installation of additional auditory devices in the side gate. Civil penalty of $200 is assessed for the period of 11/4/2025 to 11/5/2025 for failure to correct for each deficiency 87468.2(4). Total civil penalties in the amount of $200 is being assessed today. Facility is subject to ongoing civil penalties until deficiency is corrected. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, LIC421FC, and appeal rights provided.
2025-10-31Other VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced visit on October 31, 2025, inspectors found that a staff member left a cart with cleaning chemicals and disinfectants in a hallway where residents could access them, and the facility was not sending required incident reports to the state licensing agency. The facility was cited for these violations and notified that failure to correct them could result in penalties.
“Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility had a cleaning solution car that was unlocked and accessible to which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.”
“Based on record reviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not reporting R1's elopement and all other unusual incidents to licensing which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/31/2025 at 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Y. Brown and L. Fontanilla arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit. LPAs met with Administrator, Jeffrey Tong. While LPAs Y. Brown and L. Fontanilla were conducting a complaint investigation (15-AS-20251027194916) on 10/31/2025, LPAs observed 1. a staff member leaving a cart in the hallway that contained chemicals and disinfectants that were accessible to residents 2. the facility do not send incident reports to CCL The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided
2025-10-31Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation found that a resident with dementia who requires a walker and cannot leave unassisted wandered away from the facility on August 19, 2025, walked several blocks, fell on the street, and was taken to the hospital by ambulance (no injuries were noted). Staff did not have adequate supervision in place to prevent this, and the family was not notified by the facility before learning about the incident from another source. Both allegations were substantiated.
“Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to provide sufficient supervision when R1 eloped and was found on the ground 3-4 blocks away and was sent to the hospital which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.”
“Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section above by not notifying R1's RP immediately which poses a potential risk to the health and safety of clients under care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continued from LIC9099. Allegation: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident wandering away from facility. Finding: Substantiated During the interview with S1, S1 stated that they were made aware of the elopement of R1. S1 stated that they were not at the facility when the staff realized that they could not find R1. S1 stated that R1 eloped from the facility on 8/19/2025. S1 stated that they were made aware that R1 was found several blocks from the facility with their walker and had fallen down on the street and a bystander flagged an ambulance which took R1 to the hospital. S1 stated that they received a call from S2 about the situation. During the interview with S2, S2 stated that they were not at the facility at the time of the situation but was made aware of the situation from a staff member who called them. S2 stated that when they arrived at the facility, the staff at the facility stated that they have been looking for R1 for several hours but could not find R1. S2 stated that R1's responsible party called the facility and let S2 know where R1 was found. S2 stated that the hospital called W1 and let them know how R1 got there. During record review, LPAs observed that R1 is unable to leave the facility unattended. S1 and S2 stated that R1 returned back to the facility the same night. During record review, LPAs observed that R1 was discharged back to the facility the same night and no injuries was noted in the discharge summary. Allegation: Staff did not inform resident's responsible party of incident. Finding: Substantiated During interview with S2, S2 stated that they notified S1 while the situation was happening and received a call from R1's responsible party before the facility could call. S2 stated that while they were looking for R1, they were going to call R1's responsible party after they found R1. Continued on LIC9099-C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from LIC9099-C. A review of R1's Physician's Report dated 4/10/2025 indicates that R1 has Dementia, uses a walker due to unsteady gait and is not able to leave the facility unassisted. R1 was found by a bystander on East 14 which is approximately 3-4 blocks from the facility. R1 fell and was taken to the hospital with no noted injuries. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with co-administrator and Appeal Rights was provided.
2025-05-07Annual Compliance VisitType A · 5 findings
Plain-language summary
On May 7, 2025, inspectors conducted an unannounced visit and found several issues: a resident's bedroom had limited space to access the bathroom (which staff rearranged during the visit), oxygen was in use in another resident's room without proper warning signage, a laxative medication was left unlocked and accessible in a shared bedroom, and one resident's admission paperwork was incomplete and signed late. The facility was cited for these deficiencies and notified of potential penalties if they are not corrected.
“Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having large enough to allow for easy passage between furniture and any resident assistant devices such as wheelchairs or walkers in R1's shared bedroom which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having "Oxygen in Use" signage posted in appropriate area which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.”
“Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having unlocked medication, including but not limited to Equate ClearLax Laxative which was unlocked over-the-counter medication in the resident’s room, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.”
“Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having R1's admission agreement signed within 7 days of admission to the facility which poses an health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having required documents in R1's file including but not limited to Pre-Admission Appraisal which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 05/07/2025 at 1:30pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) L. Alexander and Y. Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit. LPAs met with Administrator, Jeffrey Tong. While LPAs L. Alexander and Y. Brown was conducting a complaint investigation (15-AS-20250430190433 ) on 05/07/2025. During tour of the facility, LPAs observed that Resident (R) R1's space to get to the bathroom was limited. LPAs brought this issue to S1 and S1 rearranged the room to accommodate better space so that R1 can move around to bathroom if needed. LPA's observed that there was oxygen in use in R2's room but there was no "Oxygen in Use" signage posted. LPA's observed at 11:54am in shared bedroom for R2 and R3 there was a bottle of Equate ClearLax laxative unlocked. LPA's observed during file review at 12:05pm that R1's admission agreement was signed 12 days after they were admitted and R1's file was incomplete and missing documents. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided
2025-05-07Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility's call system for residents to request help from staff was not working—multiple residents said they had to search for someone when they needed assistance, and inspectors observed that only a few residents had call pendants and no functioning call system in the facility. Inspectors also found that shared bedrooms had no chairs or only one chair, though staff began bringing chairs to rooms during the inspection. Both allegations were substantiated.
“Based on observation and interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having a working signal system including but not limited to a pendant call button for all residents which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. This requirement is not met as evidence by:”
“Based on observation and interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having bedroom furniture including but not limited to having chairs in each room, lights sufficient for reading, and a chest of drawers for all residents which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Allegation: Facility does not have a call system for residents to seek assistance from staff Finding: Substantiated On 05/07/2025 LPAs interviewed Residents (R) R2, R3, R4 and R5 all stated that the call system does not work and that they have to find someone for assistance. LPAs interviewed Staff (S) S1 and S2 that stated they have a call system with an pendant to where a resident wears around their neck, presses the button and the button sends an alert to a voice system that calls the room number. S1 stated that the caregiver will go to the call system and re-set the system for that particular resident. LPA's toured the facility and observed that there were not any functioning call system and that only a few residents had the call pendant. S2 stated that only a few residents have a call pendant if they feel that they can press and use the pendant. Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident was provided a chair Finding: Substantiated On 05/07/2025 LPAs toured the facility and observed that there were one (1) to zero (0) chair in each shared resident bedroom. S1 and S2 observed that there were not any chairs and started bringing chairs to the rooms. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
2025-03-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
Inspectors visited on March 6, 2025 to review the facility's shower facilities and discuss what changes will be needed to handle the current number of residents and support a planned change of ownership. The facility was told it must obtain building permits from the city or county and submit them to the state along with a plan explaining the construction timeline, how residents will be accommodated during work, and updated floor plans. Once construction is complete, the facility must request a state inspection of the new bathrooms.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 03/06/2025 at 02:00 PM Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger and Y. Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management. LPAs met with Jeffrey Tong, Administrator. LPAs came to discuss the number of showers present at the facility and what alterations will be needed to accommodate their current capacity of residents and what will be needed for a change of ownership. The facility was informed that they will need to obtain building permits from city/county and submit them to CCLD will a letter of explanation that includes a expected timeline of construction, how the facility will accommodate the residents during construction, along with an updated floor plan. Once construction has been completed the facility will contact CCLD to inspect the new bathroom. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.
2025-01-23Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On January 23, 2025, the facility received a routine annual inspection with no violations found. The inspector checked the building's safety features, reviewed resident and staff records, examined medication storage and food supplies, and toured multiple areas including bedrooms and bathrooms—all met requirements. Lighting, temperature, grab bars, fire safety equipment, and emergency supplies were in proper working order.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 1/23/25 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Jeffrey Tong, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to 5 residents’ rooms, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 70 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a hall bathroom was measured at 105.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 2/22/24. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 2/16/24. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Fire drill was last conducted on 1/13/25 LPA reviewed 5 residents records and 5 staff records, and all were complete. LPA also reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-11-25Other VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During a case management visit on November 25, 2024, inspectors found that the facility had nine residents with COVID-19 but failed to report the outbreak to local public health authorities. Inspectors also observed that with 21 non-ambulatory residents, the facility had only one accessible bathroom for them, creating an inadequate bathroom-to-resident ratio. The facility was cited for these violations.
“Based on observation and interview, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not reporting to Local Public Health or CCLD of positive COVID-19 cases.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by only having one shower for twenty-one (21) nonambulatory residents which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 11/25/2024 at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Patricia Manalo and Jill Clancy-Czuleger, arrived to do a Case Management visit. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Jeffrey Tong, and explained the reason for the visit. While LPAs was at the facility for another visit, LPAs observed the following deficiency: At 9:00 AM, LPAs was informed that there are nine (9) residents that are COVID-19 positive. At around 10:00 AM, while touring the facility, LPAs found that the facility did not report the outbreak to Local Public Health. At 10:30 AM, while touring the facility for a change of ownership inspection, LPAs observed that there are four bathrooms total in the facility. Two are on the second floor of which one is in a private room, and the other is only accessible to ambulatory residents. The other two are on the first floor and only one is accessible to non-ambulatory residents. The facility currently has 29 residents, 8 are ambulatory and 21 are non-ambulatory which means there is only one bathroom for 21 non-ambulatory residents. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.
2024-10-31Other VisitType A · 6 findings
Plain-language summary
During a pre-licensing inspection on October 31, 2024, inspectors found several deficiencies: water temperature was too hot at 123.6 degrees, chemicals were stored unlocked where residents could access them, and required safety signs and compliance posters were missing. Additionally, residents' care plans and medical records were not current, including physicians' reports for residents with dementia. The facility was notified of these findings and given an opportunity to correct them.
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having the water temperature mesured at 123.6 degrees which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having chemicals left in unlocked shower/storage room which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having PUB 475 which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having signs outside of resident rooms that had Oxygen stored which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having updated meical assessments for residents with dementia which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having needs and services plan for four residents and having out dated ones for 16 residents, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/31/2024 at 8:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J Clancy-Czuleger and P Manalo while at the facility for a pre-licensing observed the following deficiencies: water temperature is 123.6 degrees Chemicals were observed unlocked in storage/shower room there is not a compliance poster posted rooms that have oxygen stored do not have signs posted residents do not have updated needs and services plans residents with dementia do not have updated physicians reports Deficiency is cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulation (see 809D). Failure to submit proof of correction and any repeat violation within twelve-month period may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights, and copy of this report provided via e-mail.
2024-08-16Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a resident who needs help turning over and moving in bed was incorrectly classified as "non-ambulatory" instead of "bedridden"—a distinction that matters for fire safety and proper care level. The facility's nurse practitioner did not know the correct classification rule and has agreed to update the resident's medical record. The resident has been placed in a skilled nursing facility better suited to their care needs.
“(a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance ... Prior to accepting or retaining...(2)Bedridden persons This requirement is not met as evidence by:”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
LPA spoke with S1 who assists R1. S1 states that R1 is not able to adjust or move by thyself while in bed and needs assistance. LPA also contacted the nurse practitioner that signed the physicians report that lists R1 as non-ambulatory. The nurse practitioner stated that R1 is not able to adjust or move by thyself while in bed. The nurse practitioner stated that they changed R1 from bedridden to non-ambulatory because they observed R1 able to sit up unassisted in a wheelchair. LPA explained that for fire clearance if a person requires assistance with turning or repositioning in bed they are to be deemed bedridden. The nurse practitioner said that they did not know that and that they will update the physicians report back to bedridden. Facility located a SNF for R1 to go to and has arranged transport for 8/16/2024. R1 is scheduled to move to Marina Garden Nursing Center in Alameda. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
2024-02-07Other VisitType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection on February 7, 2024, the facility's physical plant, furnishings, kitchen equipment, hygiene supplies, food storage, outdoor spaces, and activity supplies were all found to be adequate and in order. The inspector identified three deficiencies: staff and resident records were not stored at the facility, and one staff member on file was not actually associated with the facility—the facility was assessed a $500 civil penalty for these record-keeping violations.
“Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having staff files at the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/09/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The facility agrees to reloacte all of the staff files to the facility. Proof of correction will be sent to CCLD by POC date”
“Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having S1 criminal records clearance transfered to the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/09/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The facility agrees to transfer S1 to the facility by POC date. Immediate $500 civil penalty issued on today's date”
“Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not keeping the resident records at the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/09/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The facility agrees to relocate all of the resident records to the facility by POC date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 02/07/24 at 1:15 pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to do an annual inspection. LPA meet with Administrator Jeffrey Tong and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA inspected the facility inside out. There is no body of water. Physical plant is consistent with the facility sketch received by Central Application Bureau (CAB) and approved by the fire department. LPA inspected the living room, dining area, kitchen, bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, side and backyards. Bedrooms were observed appropriately furnished with adequate lighting and drawers. Facility has sufficient towels, extra bed sheets and comforters. Equipment and supplies for residents' personal hygiene are available and on site. Dinner and silver wares were observed sufficient for residents' use. Food supplies checked and observed good for seven days of non-perishables. Facility was observed equipped with refrigerator, microwave, dishwasher, washer and dryer. Cabinet for knives, cleaning supplies, and central storage for medications were observed with locks. Activity supplies were available. Outdoor activity space was observed furnished with tables, chairs and shade. The facility has a mitigation plan. At 2:00 pm LPA reviewed 5 residents records. At 2:45 pm, LPA reviewed 3 staff records and 2 of 3 were associated to the facility. The following deficiency was observed during the visit: The staff records are not stored at the facility The resident records are not stored at the facility A staff member is not associated to the facility Continued on LIC 809-C... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ....Continued from LIC 809 Deficiency is cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulation (see 809D). A $500.00 civil penalty is assessed on this day. Failure to submit proof of correction and any repeat violation within twelve-month period may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights, LIC421BC, and copy of this report provided via e-mail.
2023-12-18Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine unannounced visit, inspectors verified that a staff member listed on the facility's roster is not actually employed at or present at the facility. The administrator was directed to remove this person from the official roster and submit updated documentation to the state. No other violations were noted during the visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit on this date to verify if an individual is currently employed at the facility. Based on evidence obtained during today’s visit, the LPA has verified the individual is not present, employed, or residing at the facility. LPA has advised the administrator to disassociate the individual from their roster and submit an updated LIC 500. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email.
4 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
4 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.