Carlton Plaza of San Leandro.
Carlton Plaza of San Leandro is Ranked in the bottom 5% on citation frequency among California peers with 23 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.




Large Memory Care RCFE in San Leandro with Recent Type A Citation, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 93 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Carlton Plaza of San Leandro has 23 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
23 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
23 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Carlton Plaza of San Leandro's record and state requirements.
State records show one Type A deficiency (actual harm) — what was the nature of this citation, what corrective actions were implemented, and what systems are now in place to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Fifteen complaints have been filed with CDSS during the inspection period — what were the subjects of these complaints, how many were substantiated, and what changes resulted from substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility was cited under §87705 or §87706 for dementia-care requirements — what specific issue did this citation address, and how has staff training or supervision been modified in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
18 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-29Other VisitType A · 1 finding
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having McKesson Perineal & Skin Cleanser fluid unlocked and accessible to R1's room which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 4/29/2026 at 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. Brown conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on 4/24/2026. LPA met with Angela Turin, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. S1 submitted an incident report that stated that R1 ingested a small amount of Mckesson Perineal & Skin Cleanser fluid. The incident report states that the incident happened on 4/20/2026 at around 10:51 pm. S1 stated that S2 was conducting a routine visit in R1's room when they observed R1 removing the cleanser down her mouth and S2 observed R1 having a facial expression that appeared to be a "bad taste." S1 stated S3 called Poison Control around 10:55 pm and poison control told S3 to give R1 water and to monitor R1. S1 stated that R1 was monitored throughout the night by S3 and the hospice nurse and resident remained at baseline. S1 stated that R1 was also monitored the following day and stayed at baseline. S1 stated that they contacted the responsible parties. S1 stated that staff removed all of the hazardous items from R1's room and notified hospice. R1 was not resulted in any ill side effects due to this incident. LPA interviewed Staff (S1). LPA was unable to interview R1 at this time since R1 was sleeping during the visit. LPA obtained and reviewed the following documents: R1's appraisal needs and services plan, LIC602 (Physicians report), and MAR (Medication Administration Record)-March & April. LPA also reviewed R1's hospice care plan. Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Angela. A copy of the appeal rights and this report was provided.
2026-04-21Other VisitType A · 4 findings
“Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in R4 being financially abused by previous staff member (W2) which posed an immediate personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on interviews and photos, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in R2 sustaining bruises on both arms while being showered by W3 which posed an immediate personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on interviews and observations made by LPAs, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in R17s room smelling of urine which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on observations made by LPAs, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in R4s room having moldy and expired foods while R4 was on full care and bed bound which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Pg 2 On the allegation of staff physically abused resident resulting in bruises LPA’s conducted interviews with residents, staff, witnesses, and obtained photos. On 3/21/2025 LPA’s interviewed R2 Who stated that sometimes when staff bathe them, they are too rough. LPA‘s interviewed W6 who states that they noticed bruising on R2 when they came to visit them. W6 states that when they asked R2 what happened they stated that W3 had left the bruises because they were being too rough while bathing them. W6 states that they were informed the bruises were a result of W3 grabbing R2 too tightly. W6 states that a police report was not made because W3 had already been fired. LPA‘s obtained photographs that showed R2 had sustained bruising on both forearms. LPAs observed that the bruising is consistent with being grabbed, therefore, the allegation of staff physically abused resident resulting in bruises is substantiated. On the allegation of staff financially abused resident the department conducted interviews, obtained documentation, and conducted a financial audit. During the investigation LPA’s interviewed R4 who stated that in late 2024 they were being financially abused. LPA’s interviewed S2 through S12. S1, S2, S11, and W1 stated that they had all heard of a resident having been financially abused by the previous Resident Liaison (W2) however they were not sure if it was true. LPA interviewed the previous executive director who stated that they had reported possible financial abuse to the San Leandro police department, but nothing further came of the investigation. LPA‘s requested potential documentation of financial abuse on 3/21/2025 . Previous Executive Director stated that they did not have record of any proof of financial abuse. On 6/12/2025 LPA’s return to the facility and again requested documentation of financial abuse and the executive Director was able to produce a document stating the name of employee of former resident liaison (W2) on an official bank document for R4. LPA’s then requested a financial audit of R4’s bank accounts on 8/06/2025. The financial audit revealed that W2 had been getting direct transfers from R4’s bank account to their personal account. Therefore, the allegation of staff financially abused resident is substantiated. Report Continues on LIC9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Pg 3 On the allegation residents rooms are malodorous LPA’s toured the facility on 3/21/2025. While touring the facility on 3/21/2025, LPA’s observed on the second floor a strong smell of human urine. LPA’s briefly spoke to a staff member passing by name unknown, who stated that urine is a common odor in that part of the facility. LPA’s were able to locate the odor in R17’s room. LPA observed that R17 utilizes a catheter and that urine was spilling onto the floor. LPA’s interviewed R17 who states that staff do not come to assist in cleaning the urine and that they are charged extra if they need their floors cleaned. During the course of the investigation LPAs also conducted interviews with S1 and S6. S1 states that staff should be cleaning the floors and also S1 stated that rooms are cleaned on an annual schedule however if a resident has an accident on the floor that they need to come down to the front desk to ask for their room to be cleaned. S6 states that they have noticed lingering urine odors before. Therefore, the allegation of resident's rooms are Malodorous is substantiated On the allegation, staff did not ensure food is properly disposed LPA’s toured the facility and made observations. On 8/21/2025 LPA’s observed in R4’s room food with mold and expired in their refrigerator. The food observed was covered in saran wrap, and in dishes provided during tray service. At the time of the Observation, LPA’s observed R4 was bed bound and on full care. LPA‘s interview S1 who stated that R4 was currently receiving tray service and incontinence care. LPAs found through interviews that staff are expected to deliver the trays and then return a few hours later to retrieve the dishes and trays after meal times. LPAs also interviewed S2 and S10 who stated that they have noticed staff not removing trays as required and food leftovers not being disposed of properly. Therefore, the allegation of staff did not ensure food is properly disposed is substantiated. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On the allegation of “Questionable Death” the Department obtained copies of the death report for R1. After a review it was found that R1 passed away from ventricular arrhythmia and coronary artery disease. LPA’s also reviewed R1’s medical records and physicians reports and observed that R1 had related pre-existing conditions. Therefore the allegation of Questionable Death is unsubstantiated On the allegation of “Staff do not ensure residents showering needs are being met” LPAs interviewed R2, R3, R4, R7, and R8 . R2 and R7 both stated that their showering needs are being met. LPAs also reviewed shower logs and care plans. LPAs observed that showers are being provided and care plans are being followed in regards to showering needs therefore the allegation Staff do not ensure resident's showering needs are being met is unsubstantiated Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-12-04Other VisitType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
This was a follow-up investigation into a complaint that staff were not meeting residents' needs. Inspectors found that staff were not checking on residents every two hours as required—residents reported that staff only came around when called via call button or Alexa. The facility was cited for this violation.
“Based on interviews and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having a malfunctioning broiler which posed a personal rights and potential health and safety risk to persons in care.”
“Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in not having sufficient in numbers to meet the needs of residents care. which poses a personal rights and potential health and safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continued from LIC9099 Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident needs are met Interviews with residents revealed that staff were not making rounds every two (2) hours. Residents also stated during interview, staff only check on them when the call button is pressed or when Alexa is used to contact the front desk for assistance . Based on LPA's information obtained during investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview conducted with Evelyn Jenson. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.
2025-09-03Annual Compliance VisitType A · 7 findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection conducted on September 3, 2025, along with a follow-up to an earlier inspection on August 21, 2025. Inspectors found several issues: an unlocked shed containing a gasoline tank, three staff members with expired first aid certifications, improperly stored food container lids in the kitchen, broken call buttons, incomplete and unavailable resident and personnel records, and one resident's care plan that had not been updated. The facility was given until September 10, 2025 to submit corrected documents and address these deficiencies.
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having a filled gasoline tank in an unlocked shed outside assessible to residents which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/04/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Maintenance staff immediately locked the shed. Deficiency cleared during visit.”
“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the call button was not signaling on the second floor common restroom and having damaged floors in residents room which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/10/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agrees to test all call buttons to ensure they are in working conditions and contact CCLD by POC date. Administrator agrees to make repairs to damaged floors, review regulation and notify CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the personnel records were not readily available upon demand and were incomplete which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/10/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agrees to review all staff records and develop a plan to ensure staff records are available and review regulation and notify CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility not ensuring proper food storage which poses a potential health risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/10/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agrees to ensure food containers are properly stored, review regulation and notify CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility did not update R6's appraisal needs and services plan based on a change of condition which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/10/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agrees to review all residents appraisal needs and services plan and update them as necessary and notify CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three (3) staff members had expired first aid certificates which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/10/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agrees to ensure all required staff have updated first aid certifications and notify CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that resident records were not readily avaiable upon demand and were observed to be incomplete which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/10/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator agrees to review all resident records and develop a plan to ensure resident records are available and review regulation and notify CCLD by POC date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 9/3/2025 at 9:30 am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Y. Brown and A. Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct the annual continuation that was conducted on 8/21/2025. LPAs met with Executive Director Evelyn Jenson and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for one-hundred nineteen (119) total capacity. One-hundred fifteen may be non-ambulatory and eighty-four (84) may be ambulatory residents. Hospice waiver approved for eighteen (18). LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to a random sample of residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and outside courtyard. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 74 degrees F. LPA's returned to conduct file review. LPAs reviewed five (5) residents records. LPAs reviewed six (6) staff records. MAR was also reviewed. Report continues on LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES WERE OBSERVED DURING VISIT: On 8/21/2025 LPA's observed unlocked shed with filled gasoline tank. Personnel records were not readily available upon request and were observed incomplete. On 8/21/2025 LPA's observed that three (3) staff members had expired first aid certification. On 8/21/2025 LPA's observed that the food container lids were not properly placed and stored in the kitchen LPA's observed that R6 appraisal needs and services plans were not updated. On 8/21/2025 LPA's observed that the facilities call buttons were in disrepair LPA's observed that resident records were not readily available upon request and were incomplete. Two (2) technical violations were issued during the visit. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL by 09/10/2025: LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan - Reviewed Current Administrator’s Certificate The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
2025-08-21Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On August 21, 2025, state inspectors conducted an unannounced annual inspection of the facility and found it in compliance with basic safety and operational standards. The inspectors toured multiple areas including resident rooms and bathrooms, verified adequate lighting and temperature control, confirmed grab bars and non-slip mats were installed, and checked that food and medication supplies were properly maintained. The inspection is ongoing and inspectors will return to complete their review.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 8/21/2025 at 9:30 am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Y. Brown and A. Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPAs met with Executive Director Evelyn Jenson and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for one-hundred nineteen (119) total capacity. One-hundred fifteen may be non-ambulatory and eighty-four (84) may be ambulatory residents. Hospice waiver approved for eighteen (18). LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to a random sample of residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and outside courtyard. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 74 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a sample of resident bathrooms were measured at 109.1, 109.2, and 110.3, 110.4, and 108.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. LPAs reviewed a sample of medication. LPAs will return at a later time to continue Annual Required Inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2025-03-05Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that a staff member hit a resident in the chest three times in December 2024; however, the investigation found no evidence to support this allegation. Staff interviews, a physical examination of the resident the following day that showed no injuries, police records, and lack of video documentation all indicated the complaint could not be substantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Continued from LIC9099. staff. R1 stated during interview that S4 did not say anything just hit her 3xs in the chest. On December 10, 2024, facility staff was interviewed. S2 stated S4 worked the overnight shift through a registry. S2 also stated the appropriate agencies were notified of the allegation. S3 stated S4 had only worked two (2) shifts with the facility. S3 had received positive feedback from other staff when S4 worked the previous shift. S3 stated he immediately removed S4 from the registry database after receiving the allegation. The day following the allegation S3 went to R1’s room. S3 stated there was not any observation of swelling, bruises, or abrasions on R1. S5 stated during interview that the night of the allegation S4 was assigned to R1. S5 also stated R1 is a 2-person assist with toileting, therefore, both (S4 and S5) went into R1’s room that night together to assist R1, which R1 refused. R1 was asleep when they entered the room. S4 stated he was not aware of any allegation towards him during interview. Review of R1’s individual service plan dated November 10, 2024, indicates R1 has a pendent to push in care of an emergency. Based on record review of the San Leandro Police Department report dated November 30, 2024, there was no evidence of injury or in-room or hallway cameras that would have captured any portion of the incident. Based upon the information obtained and the interviews conducted during the investigation, the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report was given .
2024-12-18Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
This was a follow-up inspection on December 18, 2024, to verify that the facility had fixed problems found during a previous visit in November. The facility had corrected issues with insects and dirty kitchen surfaces, but inspectors found that food was not being stored safely—including raw chicken and uncovered fruit left improperly in refrigerators.
“Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above with having improperly stored food in the kitchen refridgerators which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 12/18/2024 at 2:00PM Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) A Gomez J Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to conduct a POC visit in relation to the deficiencies issued on 11/14/2024. LPAs met with Executive Director, Evelyn Jensen and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed for 199 residents of which 115 may be non-ambulatory. On 11/14/2024 LPA A Gomez conducted a case management visit and cited for the following: 87555(b)(27) : On 11/14/2024 LPA observed insects in the kitchen. POC is now clear. 87303(a)(1) : On 11/14/2024 LPA observed dirty floors and surfaces in the kitchen. POC is now clear. On 12/18/2024 LPAs observed the following Deficiency: Food is not being properly stored in the kitchen. LPAs observed open raw chicken, uncovered peaches, and other improperly stored foods in the refrigerators. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
2024-12-18Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that staff gave a resident the wrong medication, causing the resident's blood pressure to drop dangerously. Although a nurse recognized the error and monitored the resident, another nurse advised waiting to call an ambulance until the resident showed signs of further decline rather than calling immediately. The facility was found to have violated regulations and must submit corrections.
“Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not calling medical attention for the resident until an hour after the error had occurred and did not call for transported until two hours after the error had occurred which posed an health and safety risk to the resident.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
...Continued from 9099 Once S1 realized his error, he reported to front desk after 3-5 minutes. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (S3) responded to monitor R1. Although other measures were attempted to raise R1’s blood pressure, S3 knew it would not drastically help. Further, S3 said she knew R1’s blood pressure would significantly drop and R1’s condition would decline. However, the advice from another nurse (S4) was for S3 to continue monitoring R1 and to call an ambulance only when R1 began showing signs of decline. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) were found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided via email.
2024-11-20Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the third floor was housing more non-ambulatory residents than the facility is approved for—eight residents when the limit is six. The facility was assessed a $250 penalty for this repeat violation and must submit a plan to correct the problem.
“Based in interviews and records reviewed, the facility has 8 non-ambulatory residing on the 3rd floor but only 6 are approved which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
...continued from LIC9099C. Third floor of the facility has too many non-ambulatory residents. LPA and S1 reviewed the LIC602's for fifty-one (51) residents that reside on the third floor, The Ambulation Details Report revealed that there's a today of 8 non-ambulatory residents on the the third floor. The facility has two (2) non-ambulatory residents over the approved capacity of six (6) based on the LIC602s, therefore the allegation is substantiated. An immediate civil penalty of $250 is hereby assessed for a repeat violation . Deficiency is cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on 9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections by plan of correction due dates and any repeat violation within 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, Appeal Rights, and a copy of this report provided to ED.
2024-11-14Other VisitType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A state inspector visited this facility on November 14, 2024 following a priority complaint and found the home generally safe, with working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, properly stored medications, and adequate food supplies. However, the inspector cited violations for small black flying bugs observed in the kitchen food area and dirty, sticky kitchen floors. The facility was given a deadline to correct these deficiencies.
“Based on observation of the kitchen the Facility did not comply with the section above by the kitchen having small flying insects which poses a potential health and personal rights risk to residents in care.”
“Based on observation of the kitchen the Facility did not comply with the section above by the kitchen having a dirty/sticky floor which poses a potential health and personal rights risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 11/14/2024 at 5:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of a priority 1 complaint. LPA met with Executive Director, Evelyn Jensen and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the bedrooms, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and outdoor area. Hot water temperature was measured at 107.8 and 107.6 degrees F in random bathrooms. 7-day of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were sufficient. Refrigerator temperature was observed at 39 degrees F. Resident's medications were kept locked in the med room. Smoke detectors are interconnected with the sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detector observed. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and last serviced on 11/3/2024. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. LPA cited for the following: LPA observed small black flying bugs in kitchen area/ food area LPA observed Kitchen floors dirty and sticky. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
2024-10-07Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an inspection on October 7, 2024, state regulators found that the facility had more than the allowed number of non-ambulatory residents on the third floor, in violation of fire safety requirements. The facility was cited for failing to reduce the number of these residents to 6 as required. The administrator was informed of the violation and given information about appeal rights.
“Based on observation, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 12 and not 6 non-ambulatory residents are living on the third floor of the facility, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/7/2024 at 3:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) James Sampair and David Doidge conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies inspection. Upon entry into facility, the LPAs explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Evelyn Jensen. This visit was prompted by the Licensee's failure to reduce the number of non-ambulatory residents living on the third floor of the facility to 6 in accordance with the fire clearance. The facility was cited for this infraction. Exit interview conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided to the Administrator.
2024-09-16Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection was conducted on September 16, 2024, and the facility was found to meet most requirements, with adequate safety features including working fire extinguishers, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, grab bars, and proper medication storage. One violation was noted during the inspection. The administrator maintains required on-site hours, and the facility maintains adequate food supplies and is kept clean and well-maintained.
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two (2) of two (2) fountains which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 09/23/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 To fill bodies of water with rock and send a picture to LPA”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 9/16/2024 at 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) David Doidge and James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct the Required Annual Inspection. Upon entry, LPAs stated the purpose of the visit to Daisy Monteon Executive Assistant at 10:40 AM. LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Centrally stored medications were locked in medication carts located in med rooms. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 09/01/2024. Temperature in the facility was measured at 74.0 degrees Fahrenheit at 10:51 AM. Water temperature is 112 degrees Fahrenheit. The LPAs observed required postings in the facility, including the Complaint Poster, Ombudsman and Personal Rights posters, and the Theft and Loss Policy. An administrator is on site more than the minimum of 20 hours a week to oversee the proper business operations. Grab bars for each toilet and shower were installed. Non-skid mats were observed. There were adequate lights in each room. Resident rooms were observed to be cleaned and fully furnished. Indoor and outdoor passages were free of obstruction. One week of nonperishable and 2 days of perishable food supplies were available. Facility orders food twice a week. 1 B-type citation issued. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-05-23Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found valid violations at this facility, with evidence supporting the allegations made. Due to the nature of the violations, the state assessed a $500 immediate penalty and provided details of the specific deficiencies to the facility's executive director.
“Based on review of facility records, there are 19 nonambulatory residents living on the 3rd floor, but the facility is licensed for a capacity of only 6 nonambulatory residents for the 3rd floor, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
.... Continued from LIC9099 The complaint is substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations as listed on the LIC 9099-D. Additionally, due to the severity of the deficiency, a $500.00 immediate civil penalty is assessed today. Exit interview conducted with Executive Director and a copy of this report was provided.
2024-05-03Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An inspector made an unannounced visit on May 3, 2024, after the department received a priority complaint, and observed all 143 residents at the facility in bedrooms, common areas, dining rooms, and outdoors. Residents appeared comfortable and safe, eating meals and spending time with family and friends, and the inspector found no health or safety deficiencies. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 05/03/24 at 9:05AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger conducted an unannounced Health and Safety check due to the department receiving a priority 1 complaint. During the health and safety check, LPA observed a total 143 residents at the facility. LPA toured facility with Executive Director, including but not limited to bedrooms, kitchen, dining rooms, activities rooms, bathroom, outdoor garden and common areas. LPA observed residents comfortable in their surroundings, eating their breakfast meals and relaxing in common areas with family and friends. Residents in care appear to be safe and there are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. No deficiencies cited during the health and safety check. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-04-26Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On April 26, 2024, the state conducted an unannounced inspection following a report that a resident made a sexually inappropriate comment to a staff member on March 10, 2024. When staff investigated, they could not clearly understand what the resident said, and police who responded also could not determine what was said; the staff member was removed from showering this resident and no further inappropriate statements have occurred. No violations were found.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 04/26/2024 at 3:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Alexander conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on 04/03/2024. LPA met with Executive Director, Evelyn Jensen and explained the purpose of the visit. S1 stated that S2, the "Care Partner" for R1, reported to S3 that on 03/10/24 R1 said something that was sexual in nature to S2 after he asked R1 if they were ready for their shower. S1 stated that S3 went to R1 to speak with them but couldn't make out what R1 was saying. S1 stated that they called 911 and San Leandro PD was dispatch (Ref. 2024-12242). S1 stated that the police came to investigate the 911 call and when the police arrived to speak with R1 they also could not make out any understanding of what R1 was saying. S1 indicated that S2 was immediately taken off the care shower schedule for R1. S1 indicated that R1 is refusing care from the other Care Partners but R1 is not making any sexual natured statements neither. No deficiencies issued during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
2024-02-23Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated after a resident received the wrong medication on February 13, 2024; the staff member who gave the medication was immediately removed from the schedule and the facility provided training documentation showing that all medication technicians completed retraining on medication safety procedures. The facility was cited for this error and must submit a correction plan.
“Based on record review the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in administering medication to the correct resident, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 2/23/2024 at 2:40pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Hall conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on 2/14/2024. LPA met with Sheila Rodriguez, Director of Sales and Mark Tabanera, Med Tech Manager, and explained the purpose of the visit. Incident report dated 2/13/2024, stated that a Resident 1 (R1) was given the wrong medication. The staff that administered the medication immediately notified the Medication Manager and was pulled from the schedule. Staff 2 (S2) also stated Staff 3 (S3) will complete medication management retraining. The incident report as well as S2 stated that all Med Techs completed an in-service training on six rights, three checks, and name alert protocol. LPA obtained a copy of the training documentation with signatures. Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and this report provided.
2024-02-22Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated at the facility, but inspectors found no preponderance of evidence to support the allegation. This means the complaint could not be proven or disproven based on the available information from interviews and records review.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Based on interviews conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email.
2023-10-13Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection on October 13, 2023, inspectors found the facility met all requirements, with no deficiencies cited. The facility had adequate lighting and temperature controls, grab bars and safety mats in bathrooms, secure medication storage, sufficient food supplies, and complete resident and staff records.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 10/13/23 at 11:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Nancy Randhawa and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 199. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to 3 residents’ apartments, bathrooms, multiple activity rooms, kitchen, common area and courtyard. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observe lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Hallway temperature was maintained at 74 degrees F. The hot water temperature in a residents’ shared bathroom were measured at 107.3 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps and toxic are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed 5 residents records and 5 staff records and all were complete. LPA reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.
7 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.
7 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
Other facilities under this operator
Carlton Senior Living, Llc — as recorded on state license extracts. Each facility still has its own inspection history.



