Aegis of Queen Anne at Rodgers Park.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 23 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2024-12-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in December 2024. No deficiencies were cited during this visit.
Read full citation text (2)Hide full citation text
“The Assisted Living Facility failed to complete assessments specifically focused on a resident's identified vulnerabilities and related issues, including mobility device safety considerations. This failure placed the resident at risk of harm or injury from the mobility device.”
“Non-licensed staff members applied prescribed ointment to a resident's open wound, violating the facility's policy that wound care must be performed only by licensed staff. The resident's pressure wound progressed from Stage 2 to Stage 3, requiring hospitalization.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2100: The Assisted Living Facility failed to complete assessments specifically focused on a resident's identified vulnerabilities and related issues, including mobility device safety considerations. This failure placed the resident at risk of harm or injury from the mobility device. WAC 388-78A-2600: Non-licensed staff members applied prescribed ointment to a resident's open wound, violating the facility's policy that wound care must be performed only by licensed staff. The resident's pressure wound progressed from Stage 2 to Stage 3, requiring hospitalization.
2024-09-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“A staff caregiver told a resident who called for help with toileting that she was busy and the resident could be incontinent in their brief to be cleaned up later. The resident was not assisted to the bathroom for approximately 34 minutes after the initial call.”
“The facility failed to assure that a caregiver had completed the required 70 hours of Basic Long Term Care training, placing residents at risk of harm from untrained care staff.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: A staff caregiver told a resident who called for help with toileting that she was busy and the resident could be incontinent in their brief to be cleaned up later. The resident was not assisted to the bathroom for approximately 34 minutes after the initial call. —: The facility failed to assure that a caregiver had completed the required 70 hours of Basic Long Term Care training, placing residents at risk of harm from untrained care staff.
2024-08-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in August 2024. The outcome section indicates no determination was finalized or is not specified in this document. For specific findings, please contact Washington DSHS Residential Care Services directly or request the complete inspection report.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to document repeated attempts to contact the physician for medication refills per facility policy. While the facility stated multiple attempts were made to communicate with the MD after a patch medication ran out on 07/22/2024, these attempts were not documented in the resident's record as required by facility policy.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2410: The facility failed to document repeated attempts to contact the physician for medication refills per facility policy. While the facility stated multiple attempts were made to communicate with the MD after a patch medication ran out on 07/22/2024, these attempts were not documented in the resident's record as required by facility policy.
2024-05-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.