AEGIS OF MADISON.
AEGIS OF MADISON is Ranked in the bottom 9% on citation frequency among Washington peers with 9 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Mar 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 36 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
AEGIS OF MADISON has 9 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
9 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
9 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
7 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
I don't have sufficient narrative detail from the source document to write an accurate summary. The document shows only header information indicating a March 2026 investigation but contains no description of what was investigated, what was found, or what outcome resulted. To provide a useful summary for families, I would need the actual findings and conclusions from the complaint investigation.
“The facility failed to verify work references prior to hiring for 4 of 4 staff members (Staff B, C, D, and E). Staff B had no application or resume on file, Staff C had only one of two employers checked, and Staff D and E had references checked without documentation of dates. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving care from staff without verified work history.”
“The facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 staff (Staff B, D, and E) completed required facility orientation and training before working with residents. Staff B had no documentation of orientation, Staff D received orientation after already working with residents, and Staff E completed orientation 14 days after starting work with residents. This placed residents at risk of receiving care from untrained staff.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2450: The facility failed to verify work references prior to hiring for 4 of 4 staff members (Staff B, C, D, and E). Staff B had no application or resume on file, Staff C had only one of two employers checked, and Staff D and E had references checked without documentation of dates. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving care from staff without verified work history. WAC 388-78A-2474: The facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 staff (Staff B, D, and E) completed required facility orientation and training before working with residents. Staff B had no documentation of orientation, Staff D received orientation after already working with residents, and Staff E completed orientation 14 days after starting work with residents. This placed residents at risk of receiving care from untrained staff.
2025-10-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough detail from the source text to write an accurate summary. The document shows only "Investigations (10/2025)" with no narrative content describing what was investigated, what was found, or what the outcome was. Please provide the full inspection narrative so I can summarize the complaint investigation findings for families.
“Resident 1 did not receive insulin injections (Humalog Kwikpen and Basagler Kwikpen) as prescribed at 9:00 PM on 07/21/2025 due to no nurse being available at the facility. Resident 1 also missed blood sugar check documentation.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2210: Resident 1 did not receive insulin injections (Humalog Kwikpen and Basagler Kwikpen) as prescribed at 9:00 PM on 07/21/2025 due to no nurse being available at the facility. Resident 1 also missed blood sugar check documentation. WAC 388-78A-2210: Resident 2 did not receive a fentanyl pain patch applied as prescribed on 07/20/2025 due to no nurse being available at the facility.
2025-05-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The facility failed to have medication available for the named resident, resulting in three missed doses of ordered blood pressure medication.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The facility failed to have medication available for the named resident, resulting in three missed doses of ordered blood pressure medication.
2025-02-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-11-01Annual Compliance Visit2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in November 2024. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.
“The facility failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered for a resident with diabetes. Insulin was administered when blood glucose levels were below 100 mg/dL on 18 occasions in August 2024 and 2 occasions in September 2024, contrary to the prescription order to hold if blood glucose <100. This placed the resident at risk for compromised safety and health complications.”
“The facility failed to identify and secure hazardous chemicals and equipment. Unsecured chemical bottles (Pledge stainless steel polish, ammonia glass cleaner, peroxide multi-surface spray) were found in an unlocked cabinet in the Sky Lounge accessible to all residents, and an oxygen tank was found unsecured in a resident room. This placed 84 residents at risk for harm and poisoning.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2305: The facility failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered for a resident with diabetes. Insulin was administered when blood glucose levels were below 100 mg/dL on 18 occasions in August 2024 and 2 occasions in September 2024, contrary to the prescription order to hold if blood glucose <100. This placed the resident at risk for compromised safety and health complications. WAC 388-78A-3100: The facility failed to identify and secure hazardous chemicals and equipment. Unsecured chemical bottles (Pledge stainless steel polish, ammonia glass cleaner, peroxide multi-surface spray) were found in an unlocked cabinet in the Sky Lounge accessible to all residents, and an oxygen tank was found unsecured in a resident room. This placed 84 residents at risk for harm and poisoning.
2024-03-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“The facility failed to follow medication policy and procedures when a resident returned from leave with narcotics not accounted for, and when the facility dispensed routine medications in nine envelopes for the resident's leave.”
“The facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician when it gave the wrong dose of pain medication on two consecutive days to a named resident.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The facility failed to follow medication policy and procedures when a resident returned from leave with narcotics not accounted for, and when the facility dispensed routine medications in nine envelopes for the resident's leave. —: The facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician when it gave the wrong dose of pain medication on two consecutive days to a named resident.
2024-02-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The assisted living facility posted and emailed a photo of a resident without written consent from the resident or their collateral contact, violating the resident's right to privacy.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The assisted living facility posted and emailed a photo of a resident without written consent from the resident or their collateral contact, violating the resident's right to privacy.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
Quail Park Memory Care Residences of West Seattle
Seattle
Aegis of Queen Anne at Rodgers Park
Seattle
Vineyard Park at Queen Anne Manor
Seattle
IDA CULVER HOUSE BROADVIEW
SEATTLE
Aegis Living Lake Union
Seattle
Empress Senior Living at Laurelhurst
Seattle
Aegis Living Ballard
Seattle
Cogir of Northgate Memory Care
Seattle
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.


