Tuscany Villa Senior Living.
Tuscany Villa Senior Living is Ranked in the top 37% of California memory care with 6 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Jan 2026.
Memory Care Licensed Facility in Downtown Livermore, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 26 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Tuscany Villa Senior Living has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Tuscany Villa Senior Living's record and state requirements.
State records show one Type A deficiency, indicating actual harm to a resident — what was the nature of this citation, what corrective actions were taken, and what safeguards are now in place to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility was cited under §87705 or §87706 for dementia care standards — which specific requirement was not met, and how has the facility changed its dementia-care practices in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
One complaint was investigated by CDSS during the period on file — what was the subject of that complaint, and was it substantiated?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-01-28Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
On January 28, 2026, inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection and found the facility's safety features, cleanliness, and staffing records in order. However, inspectors discovered that one resident had been receiving a lower dose of Melatonin (3 mg instead of the prescribed 5 mg), which the family corrected during the visit. The facility was cited for this medication error.
“Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not giving resident medication as prescribed by the physician which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/09/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Family dropped a bottle of Melatonin 5mg during inspection. Executive Director (ED) has agreed to conduct training on medication intake and administration. ED will provide staff sign in sheet and training materials to CCLD by POC date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 1/28/2026 at 9:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Janice Gombio and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Freezer’s temperature was registered at 0 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 40 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 112.9 degrees F in a resident's bathroom. Grab bars and non-skid mats were observed. There were adequate lights in each room. Centrally stored medications were locked in medication cart. First Aid kit is complete. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 1/6/2026. LPA reviewed 5 residents and 5 staff files starting at 10:10AM. Residents and staff files were complete. Staff are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications during inspection. At 4:00PM, LPA observed physician's order for R3's Melatonin was for 5 mg. However, facility had a bottle of Melatonin 3 mg and had been administering to R3. Family dropped off the correct dosage of Melatonin during inspection. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
2025-02-20Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced visit on February 20, 2025, inspectors found that two residents who require assistance to leave the facility were able to exit unattended when the front door was propped open and no staff were at the front desk; the residents were located at a nearby grocery store and returned safely to the facility. Staff and the residents' medical records confirmed that both residents cannot leave unassisted. The facility was cited for this violation and notified that failure to correct it may result in civil penalties.
“This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having two residents leaving the facility unassisted which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 2/20/2025 at 4:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit in regards to an incident report. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Janice Gombio and Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso. While LPA was at the facility for another visit, ED provided LPA a copy of a recent incident report. Based on the incident report dated 2/20/2025, at around 1:35PM on 2/19/2025 staff went to the front lobby and noted the front door was propped open. Staff immediately searched the area and conducted a head count of residents. It was noted that two residents (R1 and R2) were not in the building. Staff searched for residents and called 911. R1 and R2 was found by staff and police at a nearby grocery store. R1 and R2 returned back to the facility with staff. During visit, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed R1 and R2's file including physician's report and incident report. R1 and R2's physician's report stated that R1 and R2 cannot leave the facility unassisted. Interview with staff revealed that the front door delayed egress door was propped open and there was no staff at the front desk during that time. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.
2025-01-28Annual Compliance VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection on January 28, 2025, the facility was found to have proper food storage temperatures, adequate safety equipment including fire extinguishers and smoke detectors, and secure medication storage. However, three residents did not have current care plans documenting their needs and services on file, a violation that must be corrected.
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having current reappraisals for 3 of 4 residents which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/24/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Executive Director has agreed to obtain signed copies of residents' (R1, R2, R4) reappraisal with dates and submit copies to CCLD by POC date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 1/28/2025 at 9:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Janice Gombio and Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Freezer’s temperature was registered at 0 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 37 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 114.4 degrees F in a resident's bathroom. Grab bars and non-skid mats were observed. There were adequate lights in each room. Centrally stored medications were locked in medication cart. First Aid kit is complete. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 1/20/2025. There were no bodies of water observed. LPA reviewed 4 residents and 4 staff files starting at 11:25AM. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications during inspection. At 12:30PM, LPA observed R1, R2, and R4 does not have current reappraisal needs and service plans on file. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
2024-01-26Annual Compliance VisitType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection on January 26, 2024 found that two residents did not have current medical assessments and service plans on file, one resident had run out of prescribed medications (including a seizure medication and a dementia medication that had not been given for several days), and one staff member lacked required health screening documentation. The facility's physical conditions—including temperature controls, safety equipment, lighting, grab bars, and fire systems—met standards. The facility was cited for these deficiencies and given an opportunity to correct them.
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having health screening documents for S4 which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/16/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator has agreed to obtain health screening for S4 and submit a copy of health screening to CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having R2's prescribed medications available which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 01/29/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator has agreed to notify R2's doctor regarding missed medications. Administrator will request for refills for the two medications again and submit document proof to CCLD by POC date.”
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having current medical assessments and reappraisals for resident(s) which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 02/16/2024 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Administrator has agreed to obtain current medical assessment for R1 and R2 and current reappraisal for R2. Administrator will submit copies to CCLD by POC date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On 1/26/2024 at 10:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Janice Gombio and Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 31 non-ambulatory residents of which 12 residents may be under hospice care. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Freezer’s temperature was registered at 0 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 40 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 115.7 degrees F in a resident's bathroom. Grab bars and non-skid mats were observed. There were adequate lights in each room. Centrally stored medications were locked in medication cart. First Aid kit is complete. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detector was observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 1/4/2024. Indoor and outdoor passages were free of obstruction. LPA reviewed 5 residents and 5 staff files starting at 1:10PM. LPA interviewed 3 residents starting at 12:00PM. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications starting at 5:20PM. LPA interviewed 3 staff starting at 5:50PM. At 2:00PM, LPA observed R1 and R2 does not have current medical assessments and R2 does not have current reappraisal needs and service plans on file. At 3:30PM, LPA observed S4 does not have health screening on file. (Continue on LIC809C...) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 At 5:40PM, LPA observed R2 ran out of medications (Primidone 250mg and Donepezil HCI 5mg). LPA was informed that R2 have not taken Donepezil for a few days. Staff stated that medications were ordered last week. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
4 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
4 older inspections from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
Other facilities in Alameda County.
Other memory care facilities in Alameda County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.