Aegis Living Shoreline.
Aegis Living Shoreline is Ranked in the top 29% of Washington memory care with 4 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Dec 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Aegis Living Shoreline has 4 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-12-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in December 2025. The report does not indicate what specific findings or deficiencies, if any, were cited during this inspection. To obtain details about the facility's compliance status, families should request the full inspection report directly from Washington DSHS.
“The facility failed to ensure 5 of 6 sampled staff members met long-term care worker training requirements, including dementia/mental health specialty training, CPR/first aid certification, and continuing education requirements. Staff A lacked dementia/MH training, Staff B and F lacked CPR/first aid certificates, and Staff C and G did not complete required 12-hour continuing education between their birthdates.”
“The facility failed to ensure Washington State name and date of birth background checks were renewed within the required two-year validity period for 2 of 3 sampled staff members (Staff D and I), with BGI checks expired as of November 2022 and September 2022 respectively.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2474: The facility failed to ensure 5 of 6 sampled staff members met long-term care worker training requirements, including dementia/mental health specialty training, CPR/first aid certification, and continuing education requirements. Staff A lacked dementia/MH training, Staff B and F lacked CPR/first aid certificates, and Staff C and G did not complete required 12-hour continuing education between their birthdates. WAC 388-78A-2466: The facility failed to ensure Washington State name and date of birth background checks were renewed within the required two-year validity period for 2 of 3 sampled staff members (Staff D and I), with BGI checks expired as of November 2022 and September 2022 respectively.
2025-06-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-04-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in April 2024. The report does not detail specific findings, deficiencies cited, or compliance outcomes. Families should contact DSHS directly or request the full inspection report for details about this facility's performance.
“The facility failed to ensure an approved tuberculosis testing method was used for 1 of 5 sample staff members within three days of hire. Staff A was hired on 10/30/2023 but was not screened using either an intradermal (Mantoux) test or blood test (IGRA), placing 99 residents at risk for infection.”
“The facility failed to ensure proper medication services for 2 of 9 sample residents. Resident 5 missed 18 doses of a prescribed daily medication, and Resident 9 regularly refused two medications with staff documenting refusals without contacting the resident's primary care physician for discontinue orders or clinical advice, placing residents at risk of harm.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2481: The facility failed to ensure an approved tuberculosis testing method was used for 1 of 5 sample staff members within three days of hire. Staff A was hired on 10/30/2023 but was not screened using either an intradermal (Mantoux) test or blood test (IGRA), placing 99 residents at risk for infection. WAC 388-78A-2210: The facility failed to ensure proper medication services for 2 of 9 sample residents. Resident 5 missed 18 doses of a prescribed daily medication, and Resident 9 regularly refused two medications with staff documenting refusals without contacting the resident's primary care physician for discontinue orders or clinical advice, placing residents at risk of harm.
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

