Cogir of Edmonds.
Cogir of Edmonds is Ranked in the top 48% of Washington memory care with 5 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Oct 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 36 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Cogir of Edmonds has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-10-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in October 2025, but the document provided does not include the specific allegations, findings, or outcome details needed to summarize what was investigated or whether any violations were found. To provide families with accurate information about this facility's compliance, the full investigation narrative and determination would be needed.
“The assisted living facility failed to take appropriate life-saving measures when a resident was found unresponsive outside the facility. Staff did not remain near the resident or follow 911 operator instructions for CPR, resulting in delayed life-saving intervention by paramedics.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2120(4): The assisted living facility failed to take appropriate life-saving measures when a resident was found unresponsive outside the facility. Staff did not remain near the resident or follow 911 operator instructions for CPR, resulting in delayed life-saving intervention by paramedics.
2025-09-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in September 2025. The report provided does not include specific findings or deficiencies; no violations were cited.
“The facility failed to maintain hot water temperatures between 105°F and 120°F in sinks and bathing fixtures. Observed temperatures ranged from 122.3°F to 129.7°F across multiple locations including resident rooms and common areas, placing all 59 residents at risk for burns and injury.”
“The facility failed to implement policies and procedures for bed side rails for 2 residents in the Memory Care Unit. Bed rails were installed but not documented in service plans with monitoring instructions, placing residents at risk for improper equipment use, injury, and entrapment.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2950(6): The facility failed to maintain hot water temperatures between 105°F and 120°F in sinks and bathing fixtures. Observed temperatures ranged from 122.3°F to 129.7°F across multiple locations including resident rooms and common areas, placing all 59 residents at risk for burns and injury. WAC 388-78A-2600(1)(b): The facility failed to implement policies and procedures for bed side rails for 2 residents in the Memory Care Unit. Bed rails were installed but not documented in service plans with monitoring instructions, placing residents at risk for improper equipment use, injury, and entrapment.
2025-04-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in April 2025. The outcome of the investigation was not available in the provided information.
“The assisted living facility failed to notify local law enforcement when a resident reported suspected sexual assault. Staff did not make an immediate report to the appropriate law enforcement agency as required, placing the resident and others at risk of further abuse.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2630: The assisted living facility failed to notify local law enforcement when a resident reported suspected sexual assault. Staff did not make an immediate report to the appropriate law enforcement agency as required, placing the resident and others at risk of further abuse.
2024-03-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2023-12-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information to write a summary. The document shows this was a complaint investigation in December 2023, but no outcome (substantiated, unsubstantiated, or deficiency cited) or narrative findings are provided. Please share the complete investigation report including the outcome and what was found.
“The assisted living facility failed to provide a written notification of transfer to a resident, placing the resident at risk by not informing them of their rights regarding discharge and transfer.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2660: The assisted living facility failed to provide a written notification of transfer to a resident, placing the resident at risk by not informing them of their rights regarding discharge and transfer.
Other facilities in Snohomish County.
Other memory care facilities in Snohomish County with similar care offerings.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.