SCRIBER GARDENS LLC.
SCRIBER GARDENS LLC is Ranked in the bottom 15% on citation severity among Washington peers with 6 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Dec 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 21 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
SCRIBER GARDENS LLC has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-12-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in December 2025. The report does not specify what findings or deficiencies, if any, were cited during the inspection. Families should contact Washington DSHS directly for the complete inspection details and any corrective actions required.
“The facility failed to develop and implement a safe intermittent nursing service system related to nurse delegation services for 4 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, and 6). This failure placed residents at risk for medication-related complications and compromised health status.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2320: The facility failed to develop and implement a safe intermittent nursing service system related to nurse delegation services for 4 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, and 6). This failure placed residents at risk for medication-related complications and compromised health status.
2025-04-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in April 2025, but the document provided does not include the complaint details, findings, or outcome. To provide families with accurate information about what was investigated and what was found, the full inspection narrative would be needed.
“The Assisted Living Facility failed to include in their assessment that the named resident was able to leave the facility on their own unsupervised. This omission in the full assessment topics contributed to the resident leaving the facility and going missing.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2090(6)(d): The Assisted Living Facility failed to include in their assessment that the named resident was able to leave the facility on their own unsupervised. This omission in the full assessment topics contributed to the resident leaving the facility and going missing.
2025-01-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
“The facility failed to report to the department's Complaint Resolution Unit hotline when one resident had five unwitnessed falls, four of which resulted in injuries. This pattern of frequent falls with injuries placed the resident at risk for continued falls and was not reported as required.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2630(1)(a): The facility failed to report to the department's Complaint Resolution Unit hotline when one resident had five unwitnessed falls, four of which resulted in injuries. This pattern of frequent falls with injuries placed the resident at risk for continued falls and was not reported as required.
2024-10-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in October 2024, but the outcome information was not provided in the documentation available. Without details on whether violations were found or substantiated, a summary of findings cannot be completed at this time.
“The facility failed to develop and implement a system to identify and manage infections. Specifically, the facility did not determine whether 4 of 5 residents displaying signs of sickness had a communicable disease after another resident and staff member tested positive for COVID-19.”
“The facility failed to report communicable diseases in accordance with WAC 246-100. The facility did not report positive COVID-19 cases to the local health department or the Department of Social and Health Services hotline despite having a resident test positive for COVID-19 at the hospital.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2610(2)(a): The facility failed to develop and implement a system to identify and manage infections. Specifically, the facility did not determine whether 4 of 5 residents displaying signs of sickness had a communicable disease after another resident and staff member tested positive for COVID-19. WAC 388-78A-2610(2)(f): The facility failed to report communicable diseases in accordance with WAC 246-100. The facility did not report positive COVID-19 cases to the local health department or the Department of Social and Health Services hotline despite having a resident test positive for COVID-19 at the hospital.
2024-06-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in June 2024, but the document provided does not contain specific findings, allegations, or outcomes. To provide families with accurate information about what was investigated and what was found, the full narrative details from the DSHS report would be needed.
“The assisted living facility had nonfunctioning call pendants that failed to transmit alerts to staff pagers, resulting in residents experiencing long wait times for assistance. Two of three sampled residents had intermittently nonfunctioning call pendants, and testing showed 2 of the call pendants were not transmitting alerts properly.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2930(1)(b)(i): The assisted living facility had nonfunctioning call pendants that failed to transmit alerts to staff pagers, resulting in residents experiencing long wait times for assistance. Two of three sampled residents had intermittently nonfunctioning call pendants, and testing showed 2 of the call pendants were not transmitting alerts properly.
2024-04-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Snohomish County.
Other memory care facilities in Snohomish County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
