Brookdale Silver Lake.
Brookdale Silver Lake is Ranked in the bottom 5% on citation severity among Washington peers with 8 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Nov 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 21 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Brookdale Silver Lake has 8 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
8 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
8 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-11-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 4 findings
“The facility failed to ensure that one staff member (Staff A, Executive Director) had a Washington State name and date of birth background check submitted within one business day after their date of hire on 08/04/2024. The check was not submitted until 29 days after hire, placing all residents at risk.”
“The facility failed to ensure that one staff member (Staff F, Resident Care Partner) had a valid Washington State name and date of birth background check renewed every two years. The renewal was completed 13 days late on 03/16/2024, leaving the staff member without a cleared background check.”
“The facility failed to ensure that two staff members (Staff A and Staff C) completed approved tuberculosis testing requirements. Staff A provided only a chest x-ray without documentation of a positive TB test, and Staff C's two-step Mantoux test was read 24 hours after administration instead of within 48-72 hours.”
“The facility failed to ensure that three staff members (Staff A, B, and D) were screened for tuberculosis within three days of hire, placing all residents at risk for exposure to a communicable disease.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2468: The facility failed to ensure that one staff member (Staff A, Executive Director) had a Washington State name and date of birth background check submitted within one business day after their date of hire on 08/04/2024. The check was not submitted until 29 days after hire, placing all residents at risk. WAC 388-78A-2466: The facility failed to ensure that one staff member (Staff F, Resident Care Partner) had a valid Washington State name and date of birth background check renewed every two years. The renewal was completed 13 days late on 03/16/2024, leaving the staff member without a cleared background check. WAC 388-78A-2481: The facility failed to ensure that two staff members (Staff A and Staff C) completed approved tuberculosis testing requirements. Staff A provided only a chest x-ray without documentation of a positive TB test, and Staff C's two-step Mantoux test was read 24 hours after administration instead of within 48-72 hours. WAC 388-78A-2480: The facility failed to ensure that three staff members (Staff A, B, and D) were screened for tuberculosis within three days of hire, placing all residents at risk for exposure to a communicable disease.
2024-11-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in November 2024. The outcome field indicates no substantiated violation was found. No details of the complaint or facility response are provided in this summary document.
“The facility failed to follow its policies and procedures for accounting for residents. Staff did not ensure the named resident was checked and included in headcount, resulting in the resident leaving the facility through a furnace room exit door that had come off.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2600 (2) (i): The facility failed to follow its policies and procedures for accounting for residents. Staff did not ensure the named resident was checked and included in headcount, resulting in the resident leaving the facility through a furnace room exit door that had come off.
2024-01-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in January 2024. The report does not specify what findings or deficiencies, if any, were cited during the inspection. Families should contact the facility or DSHS directly for detailed inspection results.
“The ALF failed to store food safely by leaving multiple food items uncovered in the walk-in cooler and on preparation tables, including cooked elbow pasta, muffins, flour, sugar, cereal, and French onions. Staff were unaware that food needed to remain covered and dated once opened or in the cooler, creating a risk of cross-contamination and foodborne illness.”
“One of six staff members (Staff F) did not have a current background check every two years. Staff F's background check expired on 01/24/2022 and had not been renewed, resulting in the facility allowing someone with a potentially disqualifying background to access residents.”
“One of six staff members (Staff B, a caregiver hired on 04/04/2023) did not complete facility orientation prior to providing care. Staff B's orientation was not completed until 09/18/2023, more than five months after hire, which exceeded the seven-day timeframe, placing residents at risk for compromised care and safety.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 246-215-03306(1)(d), WAC 388-78A-2305(1): The ALF failed to store food safely by leaving multiple food items uncovered in the walk-in cooler and on preparation tables, including cooked elbow pasta, muffins, flour, sugar, cereal, and French onions. Staff were unaware that food needed to remain covered and dated once opened or in the cooler, creating a risk of cross-contamination and foodborne illness. WAC 388-78A-2466(1)(a): One of six staff members (Staff F) did not have a current background check every two years. Staff F's background check expired on 01/24/2022 and had not been renewed, resulting in the facility allowing someone with a potentially disqualifying background to access residents. WAC 388-78A-2474(3), WAC 388-112A-0200(1): One of six staff members (Staff B, a caregiver hired on 04/04/2023) did not complete facility orientation prior to providing care. Staff B's orientation was not completed until 09/18/2023, more than five months after hire, which exceeded the seven-day timeframe, placing residents at risk for compromised care and safety.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Snohomish County.
Other memory care facilities in Snohomish County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
