Fieldstone Memory Care of Marysville.
Fieldstone Memory Care of Marysville is Ranked in the top 34% of Washington memory care with 4 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Dec 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Fieldstone Memory Care of Marysville has 4 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Fieldstone Memory Care of Marysville's record and state requirements.
This community holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you walk us through the written dementia care program that qualifies you for that designation, and explain how it differs from a standard assisted living license?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS records show 4 inspection reports on file with 4 deficiencies total — can you provide copies of the corrective action plans submitted to the state for those deficiencies, and confirm whether DSHS has accepted each plan as complete?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Three complaints were filed with DSHS during the inspection period on record — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what changes did the facility make in response to the findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-12-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Fieldstone Memory Care of Marysville was conducted from August 11 through September 15, 2025, examining allegations that a resident appeared overly sedated, was locked in their room without meals, was restricted from visitors, and had unexplained wounds. The investigator found no violations: the resident was alert during the visit, had access to meals and was observed eating lunch, was permitted visitors, and the wounds were healing skin tears from falls with documented nursing care. No citations were written.
“Named resident was not allowed to have private visits with visitors of their choice in their room. ALF staff required some visitors to only visit in common areas, with no written visitor restrictions or no-contact orders in place.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78a-2660(1)(4): Named resident was not allowed to have private visits with visitors of their choice in their room. ALF staff required some visitors to only visit in common areas, with no written visitor restrictions or no-contact orders in place. WAC 388-78a-2660(1)(4): ALF staff notified the resident's spouse/power of attorney when the resident had certain visitors at the spouse's request, violating the resident's right to privacy and choice of visitors despite no protective orders being in place.
2025-07-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced inspection on May 14-16, 2025, the department found that Fieldstone Memory Care of Marysville failed to ensure staff completed required training, including dementia and mental health specialty training for one staff member, CPR certification for two staff members, first aid certification for three staff members, annual continuing education for one staff member, and facility orientation for one staff member. These training gaps placed all 60 residents at risk for compromised care and safety. The facility was cited for non-compliance with Washington training and certification requirements.
“The facility failed to ensure staff completed required training including specialty training for dementia and mental health within 120 days of hire, CPR and first aid certification within 30 days of hire, and 12 hours of continuing education annually. Specifically, Staff A did not complete dementia/mental health training within 120 days; Staff B and F lacked current CPR training; Staff B, D, and F lacked first aid training; Staff F completed only 10 hours instead of 12 hours of continuing education; and Staff D did not receive facility orientation.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2474: The facility failed to ensure staff completed required training including specialty training for dementia and mental health within 120 days of hire, CPR and first aid certification within 30 days of hire, and 12 hours of continuing education annually. Specifically, Staff A did not complete dementia/mental health training within 120 days; Staff B and F lacked current CPR training; Staff B, D, and F lacked first aid training; Staff F completed only 10 hours instead of 12 hours of continuing education; and Staff D did not receive facility orientation.
2024-12-01Complaint InvestigationType C · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I cannot write a meaningful summary because the inspection document does not contain the specific details of what complaint was investigated or what findings resulted. To help families, I would need information about the nature of the complaint, what was inspected, and whether any violations were found. Please provide the full narrative section of the inspection report.
“The facility failed to ensure memory care residents had access to their rooms without staff assistance. Memory care resident rooms were found to be locked, preventing residents unable to use a key from accessing their rooms at all times.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2381: The facility failed to ensure memory care residents had access to their rooms without staff assistance. Memory care resident rooms were found to be locked, preventing residents unable to use a key from accessing their rooms at all times.
2024-10-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted at this facility. A failed provider practice was identified and a citation was written by the Washington Department of Social and Health Services. The specific details of the violation are not provided in this summary.
“Assisted Living Facility staff allowed two individuals who were not on the approved visitor list to enter a cognitively impaired resident's room and witnessed one of these unauthorized visitors leave with three of the resident's belongings, failing to implement the negotiated service agreement.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: Assisted Living Facility staff allowed two individuals who were not on the approved visitor list to enter a cognitively impaired resident's room and witnessed one of these unauthorized visitors leave with three of the resident's belongings, failing to implement the negotiated service agreement.
Other facilities in Snohomish County.
Other memory care facilities in Snohomish County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
