Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.

StarlynnCare
Minnesota · St. Louis Park

Towerlight On Wooddale Avenue.

Towerlight On Wooddale Avenue is Grade C, ranked in the top 48% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Dec 2024.

ALF · Memory Care130 licensed beds · largeDementia-trained staff
3601 Wooddale Avenue South · St. Louis Park, MN 55416LIC# ALRC:371
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Facility · St. Louis Park
Towerlight On Wooddale Avenue
© Google Street Viewoperator? submit a photo →
A 130-bed ALF · Memory Care with one citation on file (Jun 2024).
Last inspection · Dec 2024 · citedSource · MDH
Licensed beds
130
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Dec 2024
Last citation
Jun 2024
Operated by
Phone
§ 01 · Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

§ 02 · Peer Comparison

Ranked against 138 Minnesota facilities.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
25th
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
100th
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
30th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Towerlight On Wooddale Avenue has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

§ 03 · The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

10weighted score · 24 mo
Last citation: JUN 2024. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
JUN 2024
Jun 2024May 2026

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G1
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
§ 06 · Full Inspection Record

Every MDH visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

2
reports on file
1
total deficiencies
2024-12-05
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

During a routine inspection on December 2-5, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health found violations of state statutes at this facility and issued correction orders; no immediate fines were assessed. The facility must document in its records how it corrected these violations and what changes it made to prevent future noncompliance, though submission of a plan for approval is not required.

Full inspector notes

correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of the violations; h owever, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Towerlight on Wooddale Avenue January 8, 2025 Page 2 Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jess Schoenecker, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Jess.Schoenecker@state.mn.us Telephone: 651-201-3789 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 01/08/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 28790 12/05/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 3601 WOODDALE AVENUE SOUTH TOWERLIGHT ON WOODDALE AVENUE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Minnesota Department of Health is CORRECTION ORDER(S) documenting the State Correction Orders using federal software. Tag numbers have In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section been assigned to Minnesota State 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The issued pursuant to a survey. assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute number and the requires compliance with all requirements corresponding text of the state Statute out provided at the Statute number indicated below. of compliance is listed in the "Summary When Minnesota Statute contains several items, Statement of Deficiencies" column. This failure to comply with any of the items will be column also includes the findings which considered lack of compliance. are in violation of the state requirement after the statement, "This Minnesota INITIAL COMMENTS: requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the SL28790016-0 Time Period for Correction. On December 2, 2024, through December 5, PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH conducted a full survey at the above provider. At STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF the time of the survey, there were 65 residents; CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO 59 receiving services under the Assisted Living FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS Facility with Dementia Care license. WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 470 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements 0 470 SS=F (11) develop and implement a staffing plan for LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 9SQN11 If continuation sheet 1 of 18 PRINTED: 01/08/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 28790 12/05/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 3601 WOODDALE AVENUE SOUTH TOWERLIGHT ON WOODDALE AVENUE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 470 Continued From page 1 0 470 determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to meet the scheduled and reasonably foreseeable unscheduled needs of each resident as required by the residents' assessments and service plans on a 24-hour per day basis; and (iii) ensures that the facility can respond promptly and effectively to individual resident emergencies and to emergency, life safety, and disaster situations affecting staff or residents in the facility; (12) ensure that one or more persons are available 24 hours per day, seven days per week, who are responsible for responding to the requests of residents for assistance with health or safety needs. Such persons must be: (i) awake; (ii) located in the same building, in an attached building, or on a contiguous campus with the facility in order to respond within a reasonable amount of time; (iii) capable of communicating with residents; (iv) capable of providing or summoning the appropriate assistance; and (v) capable of following directions; This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee's written staffing plan failed to include an evaluation completed by a registered nurse at least twice a year. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a STATE FORM 6899 9SQN11 If continuation sheet 2 of 18 PRINTED: 01/08/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.

2024-06-17
Complaint Investigation
1 · Substantiated Finding

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that facility staff neglected a resident by failing to identify and report a serious infection on the resident's left great toe, despite being assigned to monitor the resident's skin condition daily; the infection progressed to a bone infection (osteomyelitis) and the toe required partial amputation. Staff documented performing skin checks multiple times daily but never documented or reported concerns about the toe, even though hospital records later showed visible tissue death, ulceration, and signs of infection that should have been apparent during bathing and care. The Minnesota Department of Health substantiated neglect and found the facility responsible for the maltreatment.

Substantiated FindingMinn. Stat. §MN-SUBST
Verbatim citation text · Minn. Stat. §MN-SUBST

MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding

Full inspector notes

Finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): It is alleged: The facility neglected the resident when staff failed to identify a toe infection. The infection progressed and the resident’s toe was amputated. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. Facility staff failed to document, report, and assess necrotic (dead) tissue on the resident’s left great toe. An infection in the resident’s bone had already developed and the toe required partial amputation to manage the tissue death and bone infection. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigation included review of the resident records, death record, hospital records, facility incident reports, personnel files, staff schedules, and related facility policy and procedures. Also, the investigator observed staff interactions with residents. The resident resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included peripheral autonomic neuropathy and legal blindness. The resident’s service plan included assistance with bathing/showering, toileting, dressing, monitoring skin condition, nail care, transfers, walking, medication management, laundry, housekeeping, and coordination of care. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was oriented to person/place/time, but vulnerable to falls and required an assist of two for transfers and an assist of one for activities of daily living. The resident experienced numbness and tingling to his left hand and both legs from the knees down due to the neuropathy. The resident’s progress notes indicated the resident was seen by in-house podiatry for foot/nail care approximately two months before hospitalization. Podiatry recommended a follow-up in 9-12 weeks, or sooner if problems arose. The residents medical record contained no further documentation regarding the condition of the resident’s feet until a note nearly two months later, when the resident was hospitalized after a fall. The note indicated hospital staff informed the facility the resident was diagnosed with osteomyelitis, a bone infection, to his left great toe and required a partial amputation. The resident’s service plan indicated unlicensed staff (ULP) were to monitor the resident’s skin while doing cares and report concerns to nursing. The resident’s service record the month before his hospitalization indicated unlicensed staff signed off on skin condition monitoring three times a day every day that month. The following month the resident’s service record indicated staff completed skin condition monitoring one to three times a day until his hospitalization. Staff did not document concerns regarding the resident’s feet, nor was there documentation of concerns reported to nursing. The resident’s nursing assessment three months prior to resident’s hospitalization indicated the resident had no skin concerns that needed treatment or monitoring. There were no further nursing assessments completed between this time and the resident’s hospitalization. A photograph taken at the hospital of the resident’s left foot before the toe amputation showed a circular, black lesion at the tip of the resident’s left great toe, which encompassed the entire center section of the toe. The toe was reddened and swollen. The surrounding skin on the foot was flaky and flushed. The skin of the toe was peeling off and the toenail was yellowed and misshapen. The resident’s hospital documentation indicated hospital staff discovered an ulceration on the tip of his left great toe. The resident’s x-ray findings were consistent with changes related to osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone), and he was placed on intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Small areas of necrosis (tissue death) were noted on four of the resident’s five right toes. The resident underwent a partial amputation of his left great toe and was discharged to a transitional care unit (TCU) after six days in the hospital. The resident returned to the facility after his discharge from the TCU. When interviewed, a supervisor said no concerns regarding the resident’s toe were reported to her. The supervisor said staff were unaware of problems with the resident’s toe until hospital staff told them the resident’s great toe needed to be partially amputated. The supervisor said staff were expected to check the resident’s skin and feet during showering/bathing. Staff reported to the supervisor that the resident complained of pain, but she did not recall the location of his pain. When interviewed, a nurse said while she prepared for the resident’s return from the TCU, she could find no documentation by the facility regarding the resident’s toe prior to his hospitalization. When interviewed, a family member said the family found out about the resident’s infected toe when he was hospitalized after falling at the facility. The family member said the resident was numb from the knees down, so he would not have been able to feel pain in his feet. Family members were surprised when hospital staff removed the resident’s stockings, and his toe was black. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. Substantiated: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, Subdivision 19. “Substantiated” means a preponderance of evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, deceased. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Not Applicable. the Action taken by facility: The facility provided and documented wound care as prescribed after the resident returned from the TCU. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance. To view a copy of the Statement of Deficiencies and/or correction orders, please visit: https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/regulation/directory/provcompselect.html If you are viewing this report on the MDH website, please see the attached Statement of Deficiencies. You may also call 651-201-4200 to receive a copy via mail or email. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Hennepin County Attorney St. Louis Park City Attorney St. Louis Park Police Department PRINTED: 06/20/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 28790 05/14/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 3601 WOODDALE AVENUE SOUTH TOWERLIGHT ON WOODDALE AVENUE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ******ATTENTION****** ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER CORRECTION ORDER In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are issued pursuant to a complaint investigation. Determination of whether a violation is corrected requires compliance with all requirements provided at the statute number indicated below. When a Minnesota Statute contains several items, failure to comply with any of the items will be considered lack of compliance. INITIAL COMMENTS: #HL287901751C/#HL287902580M and #HL287907468C/#HL287909645M. On May 14, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a complaint investigation at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued. At the time of the complaint investigation, there were 71 residents receiving services under the provider's Assisted Living with Dementia Care license. The following correction order is issued for #HL287907468C/#HL287909645M, tag identification 2360. 02360 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment 02360 Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.