Cedar Ridge Place.
Cedar Ridge Place is Grade C−, ranked in the bottom 47% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Apr 2024.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Cedar Ridge Place has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Cedar Ridge Place's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on April 4, 2024 recorded one complaint on file — can you describe what that complaint involved, whether it was substantiated by MDH, and what steps Cedar Ridge took in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Your license designates this facility as an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care under Minnesota Statute chapter 144G — can you walk us through the specific dementia-care policies and training protocols you maintain to meet that designation?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 28 licensed beds and a dementia care designation, what documentation can you provide on a tour that shows how care plans are individualized for residents with memory loss and how often those plans are reviewed?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2024-04-04Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A standard licensing survey was conducted April 2-4, 2024, at Cedar Ridge Place following a change of ownership, with 20 residents receiving dementia care services at the time. A correction order was issued for failure to comply with Minnesota Food Code requirements for food preparation and serving. No immediate fines were assessed, and the facility has a set time period to document corrective actions taken.
Full inspector notes
correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of the violations ; however, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In ac cordanc e with Minn. Stat. § 144G .30, Subd . 5(c), the lice ns ee mus t doc um ent ac tion s taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the · resident( s)/ employee( s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s · resident( s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the · specific statute( s). An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Cedar Ridge Place April 24, 2024 Pag e 2 CORRECTIO ONRDER RECONSIDERATIO PNROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order( s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https: / / forms. web. health. state. mn. us/ form/ HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/ or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your con venien ce at this lin k : https: / / forms. office.com/ g/ Bm5uQEpHVa. Your inpu t is im port ant to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan. winkelmann@state. mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jessica Sellner, Supervisor State Rapid Response Team Email: jessica.sellner@state. mn.us Telephone: 320-223-7370 Fax: 1-800-337-9238 PMB PRINTED: 04/ 24/ 2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 31139 04/ 04/ 2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 7115 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CEDAR RIDGE PLACE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ******ATTENTION****** ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING CORRECTION ORDER( S) In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 144G. 08 to 144G. 95, these correction orders are issued pursuant to a survey. Determination of whether violations are corrected requires compliance with all requirements provided at the Statute number indicated below. When Minnesota Statute contains several items, failure to comply with any of the items will be considered lack of compliance. INITIAL COMMENTS: SL#31139015 On April 2, 2024 to April 4, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a CHOW (change of ownership) survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued. At the time of the survey and investigation, there were 20 residents receiving services under the provider' s Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license. 0 480 144G. 41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum 0 480 SS= F requirements (13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: LABORATORY DIRECTOR' S OR PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE' S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 K1M911 If continuation sheet 1 of 8 PRINTED: 04/ 24/ 2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 31139 04/ 04/ 2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 7115 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CEDAR RIDGE PLACE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to comply with Minnesota Food Code, Chapter 4626. This had the potential to affect all #20 residents residing at the facility. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident' s health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident' s health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents) . The findings include: Please refer to the additional documentation included in the Food and Beverage Establishment Inspection Reports dated April 2, 2024. TIME PERIOD FOR CORRECTION: Twenty-One (21) days. 0 800 144G. 45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and 0 800 SS= F physical environment (4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance with a maintenance and repair program. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: STATE FORM 6899 K1M911 If continuation sheet 2 of 8 PRINTED: 04/ 24/ 2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 31139 04/ 04/ 2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 7115 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CEDAR RIDGE PLACE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 800 Continued From page 2 0 800 The licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident' s health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident' s health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents) . The findings include: On April 4, 2024, at 11:00 a. m. , survey staff toured the facility with the interim community director (ICD)-E.
2023-10-18Complaint Investigation1 · Substantiated Finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation on October 18, 2023 found that Cedar Ridge Place's Emergency Preparedness Plan was incomplete and not posted in a visible location, lacking required content such as staff roles, evacuation procedures, arrangements with other facilities to receive residents, transportation plans, and an updated communication directory. Multiple staff members, including unlicensed personnel and nursing leadership, were unaware of the plan or where to find it. The facility was ordered to correct these violations within seven days.
“MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding”
Full inspector notes
findings which problems are pervasive or represent a systemic are in violation of the state requirement failure that has affected or has the potential to after the statement, "This Minnesota affect a large portion or all of the residents). requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators' findings is the Findings include: Time Period for Correction. STATE FORM 6899 12NG11 If continuation sheet 2 of 4 PRINTED: 10/25/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 31139 10/18/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 7115 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CEDAR RIDGE PLACE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 680 Continued From page 2 0 680 During an interview on October 18, 2023, at 11:00 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF a.m. unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C stated he did THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH not know the location of the licensee's EPP. STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO During an interview on October 18, 2023, at 12:30 FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS p.m. ULP-E stated she did not know what the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. EPP was or where to find it. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO During an interview on October 18, 2023, at 1:00 SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR p.m. registered nurse (RN)-B and director of VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE clinical (DC)-F stated the licensee was working STATUTES. on their EPP and confirmed the licensee's EPP lacked the following required content: THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND -documentation/completion of annual review of REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL the EPP ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 -up-to-date staff roles, succession planning, and SUBDIVISION 1-3. delegation of authority documentation -identification of a qualified person to act in the absence of the administrator -policy/procedure for supplies (food, water, medical supplies, pharmaceutical supplies) identified, including supplies for transporting refrigerated medications, supplies used for resident identification as noted in the licensee's EPP -policy/procedure for a system to track the location of on-duty staff and residents -policy/procedure to address safe evacuation from the facility including consideration of care/treatment needs of residents, staff responsibilities, a transportation plan, identification of evacuation location(s), primary/alternate communication means with external sources of assistance -development of arrangements with other facilities/providers to receive residents in the event of limitations/cessation STATE FORM 6899 12NG11 If continuation sheet 3 of 4 PRINTED: 10/25/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 31139 10/18/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 7115 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CEDAR RIDGE PLACE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 680 Continued From page 3 0 680 of operations of the facility -identification of a transportation plan/resources with written agreements -updated communication plan (to include names and contact information of all staff, entities providing services under agreement, resident's physicians, resident's families or representatives, other facilities, volunteers, and the Minnesota Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care) and documentation of annual review of the communication plan -a method for sharing information and medical documentation for residents -a means to release resident information -a means of providing information about the general condition and location of residents In addition, the licensee failed to post the EPP prominently as required. TIME PERIOD FOR CORRECTION: Seven (7) Days STATE FORM 6899 12NG11 If continuation sheet 4 of 4
Other facilities in Hennepin County.
Other memory care facilities in Hennepin County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.