North Point Village, Assisted Living & Memory Care.
North Point Village, Assisted Living & Memory Care is Ranked in the bottom 10% on citation severity among Washington peers with 16 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Sep 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
North Point Village, Assisted Living & Memory Care has 16 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
16 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
16 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
11 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-09-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection in September 2025, the facility was evaluated against Washington's Specialized Dementia Care standards. No deficiencies were cited.
“The facility failed to ensure that residents received their medications as prescribed. Resident 1 did not have out-of-parameter blood pressure and heart rate measurements reported to the Health & Wellness Specialist as required by physician orders. Resident 2 did not receive the full 5-day course of azithromycin (only 3 days administered). Resident 13 did not start doxycycline until 6 days after being prescribed and did not receive the full prescribed course.”
“The facility failed to follow their fall program policy and procedures for tracking and trending resident falls during the Weekly at Risk Meeting. Six residents (Residents 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, and 12) had falls that were not properly tracked, resulting in falls not being reviewed to decrease further risk.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2210: The facility failed to ensure that residents received their medications as prescribed. Resident 1 did not have out-of-parameter blood pressure and heart rate measurements reported to the Health & Wellness Specialist as required by physician orders. Resident 2 did not receive the full 5-day course of azithromycin (only 3 days administered). Resident 13 did not start doxycycline until 6 days after being prescribed and did not receive the full prescribed course. WAC 388-78A-2600: The facility failed to follow their fall program policy and procedures for tracking and trending resident falls during the Weekly at Risk Meeting. Six residents (Residents 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, and 12) had falls that were not properly tracked, resulting in falls not being reviewed to decrease further risk.
2025-07-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-05-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in May 2025, but the outcome information is not provided in the available documentation. To obtain details about whether the complaint was substantiated or what findings resulted, families should contact Washington DSHS Residential Care Services directly for the complete investigation report.
“The facility employed a staff member (Concierge) with a disqualifying criminal conviction who had unsupervised access to residents. Background checks from 03/05/2019 and 03/25/2025 showed a 'disqualify' status, but the staff member was allowed to work with vulnerable adults present in the reception area.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2470: The facility employed a staff member (Concierge) with a disqualifying criminal conviction who had unsupervised access to residents. Background checks from 03/05/2019 and 03/25/2025 showed a 'disqualify' status, but the staff member was allowed to work with vulnerable adults present in the reception area.
2025-04-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in April 2025 and the outcome was not available in the information provided. Without details on what was alleged or what was found during the investigation, no determination regarding substantiation or violation can be summarized.
“A medication technician's Washington state name and date of birth background check was expired, allowing medications to be passed without valid credentials.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2466(1)(a)(b): A medication technician's Washington state name and date of birth background check was expired, allowing medications to be passed without valid credentials.
2025-02-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 5 findings
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough detail from the source text to write an accurate summary. The document header indicates this is a complaint investigation from February 2025, but the narrative section is blank or incomplete, so I cannot determine what was alleged, what was found, or what the outcome was. Please provide the full complaint narrative and investigation findings so I can summarize the inspection results for families.
“Staff lacked required training, background check completion, and TB testing. The facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate Tuberculin screening testing completed within three days of employment for 7 of 15 staff members.”
“Staff lacked required orientation and credentials. The facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate orientation and training requirements completed.”
“Staff were missing orientation training as required by regulation.”
“Updated background checks were not completed for staff as required.”
“The facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate Tuberculin screening testing completed within three days of employment for 7 of 15 staff members (Staff F, G, H, J, L, N, O), placing residents at risk of care being provided by staff with potential communicable disease transmission.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2474(a)(b)(c), WAC 388-78A-2462(2)(a), WAC 388-78A-2480(1)(2): Staff lacked required training, background check completion, and TB testing. The facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate Tuberculin screening testing completed within three days of employment for 7 of 15 staff members. WAC 388-78A-2474(2)(a)(b)(c), WAC 388-78A-2480, WAC 388-78A-2305(2): Staff lacked required orientation and credentials. The facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate orientation and training requirements completed. WAC 388-78A-2474(2)(a)(b)(c): Staff were missing orientation training as required by regulation. WAC 388-78A-2462(2)(a): Updated background checks were not completed for staff as required. WAC 388-78A-2480: The facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate Tuberculin screening testing completed within three days of employment for 7 of 15 staff members (Staff F, G, H, J, L, N, O), placing residents at risk of care being provided by staff with potential communicable disease transmission.
2024-12-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have sufficient detail in the source material provided to write an accurate summary. The narrative shows only that a complaint investigation occurred in December 2024 but contains no information about what was alleged, what was found, or what the outcome was. To provide families with useful information, I would need the actual findings from the investigation report.
“The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for 2 of 9 residents sampled. Resident 1 did not receive ketoconazole shampoo on five scheduled dates (08/04, 08/14, 08/18, 08/21, and 08/25/2024) due to reasons including being out of timeframe, not being a shower day, and the medication remaining unopened. Resident 4 did not receive pilocarpine tablets on August 1, 2024 because the medication was not ordered from the pharmacy in time.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2210: The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for 2 of 9 residents sampled. Resident 1 did not receive ketoconazole shampoo on five scheduled dates (08/04, 08/14, 08/18, 08/21, and 08/25/2024) due to reasons including being out of timeframe, not being a shower day, and the medication remaining unopened. Resident 4 did not receive pilocarpine tablets on August 1, 2024 because the medication was not ordered from the pharmacy in time. WAC 388-78A-2210: The resident did not receive a requested suppository as ordered, resulting in an emergency room visit for rectal bleeding. Review of the medication administration record showed the resident's medications were not administered as ordered.
2024-11-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 2 findings
“The facility failed to ensure care and services listed in the negotiated service agreement were implemented for Resident 1. The resident was scheduled to receive two showers per week with two staff members, but only received two showers in August 2024. Additionally, the facility failed to use pillows to position the resident's heels off the mattress as required, resulting in a pressure sore to the heel.”
“The facility failed to ensure a consistently operational telephone was available for communication between residents, families, and staff. Twelve residents in A Cottage experienced repeated telephone service failures including dropped calls, busy signals, and inability to place or receive calls, preventing contact with family members and placing residents at risk.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to ensure care and services listed in the negotiated service agreement were implemented for Resident 1. The resident was scheduled to receive two showers per week with two staff members, but only received two showers in August 2024. Additionally, the facility failed to use pillows to position the resident's heels off the mattress as required, resulting in a pressure sore to the heel. WAC 388-78A-2930: The facility failed to ensure a consistently operational telephone was available for communication between residents, families, and staff. Twelve residents in A Cottage experienced repeated telephone service failures including dropped calls, busy signals, and inability to place or receive calls, preventing contact with family members and placing residents at risk.
2024-05-01Annual Compliance VisitType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in May 2024 and found the facility in compliance with Washington DSHS Specialized Dementia Care standards. No deficiencies were cited during this visit.
“The facility failed to ensure that three staff members (Staff AA, BB, and CC) received tuberculosis testing within three days of employment. This is a recurring deficiency previously cited on 12/05/2023 and 01/30/2024.”
“The facility failed to ensure that three food service employees (Staff S, T, and U) had current food worker cards for food sanitation compliance, placing residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2484: The facility failed to ensure that three staff members (Staff AA, BB, and CC) received tuberculosis testing within three days of employment. This is a recurring deficiency previously cited on 12/05/2023 and 01/30/2024. WAC 388-78A-2305: The facility failed to ensure that three food service employees (Staff S, T, and U) had current food worker cards for food sanitation compliance, placing residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.
2024-04-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2023-12-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in December 2023, but the outcome of that investigation is not specified in the available information, so no determination about whether a violation was found can be stated.
“The facility failed to provide resident records to a resident representative within the required 24-hour timeframe upon request. Records were sent after the initial 24-hour request period had exceeded.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
RCW 70.129.030(2)(a) and WAC 388-78A-2660(1): The facility failed to provide resident records to a resident representative within the required 24-hour timeframe upon request. Records were sent after the initial 24-hour request period had exceeded.
2023-11-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
“The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed. A medication technician gave one resident another resident's medications without verifying the recipient's identity, resulting in the wrong resident receiving the wrong medication and requiring hospitalization due to dangerous blood pressure changes.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2210(2)(a): The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed. A medication technician gave one resident another resident's medications without verifying the recipient's identity, resulting in the wrong resident receiving the wrong medication and requiring hospitalization due to dangerous blood pressure changes.
Other facilities in Spokane County.
Other memory care facilities in Spokane County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.


