Fields Senior Living at Spokane Valley.
Fields Senior Living at Spokane Valley is Ranked in the bottom 19% on citation severity among Washington peers with 7 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Mar 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Fields Senior Living at Spokane Valley has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was completed in March 2026, but the outcome field does not indicate whether the complaint was substantiated or unsubstantiated, and no narrative details of findings are provided in the available information.
“The facility failed to provide assistance specified in the negotiated service agreement to a memory care resident with dementia. The resident required assistance with personal hygiene and changing briefs but staff did not respond to the resident's call light for assistance, resulting in an unmet care need and risk of injury.”
“The facility failed to verify work references prior to hiring for 3 of 8 staff members, failed to provide facility orientation to 4 of 8 staff members, and failed to provide job-specific orientation to 7 of 8 staff members. This placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and injury due to inadequately trained staff.”
“Staff onboarding and training documentation was incomplete, with reference checks completed after employment ended for some staff and orientation records missing for multiple employees.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to provide assistance specified in the negotiated service agreement to a memory care resident with dementia. The resident required assistance with personal hygiene and changing briefs but staff did not respond to the resident's call light for assistance, resulting in an unmet care need and risk of injury. WAC 388-78A-2450(2)(b)(h)(iii)(v): The facility failed to verify work references prior to hiring for 3 of 8 staff members, failed to provide facility orientation to 4 of 8 staff members, and failed to provide job-specific orientation to 7 of 8 staff members. This placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and injury due to inadequately trained staff. WAC 388-78A-2466(1)(a)(b)(2): Staff onboarding and training documentation was incomplete, with reference checks completed after employment ended for some staff and orientation records missing for multiple employees.
2025-06-01Annual Compliance VisitType B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection conducted in June 2025 found no deficiencies cited at this facility. The inspection verified compliance with Washington DSHS Specialized Dementia Care requirements for residential care services.
“The facility failed to provide treatment for skin concerns for 1 of 9 residents (Resident 2), including a rash on the arm and a wound on the buttock that was not properly documented or treated after initial identification.”
“The facility failed to complete a character, competence and suitability review for 1 of 5 staff members (Staff C) after a background check showed a non-disqualifying criminal charge.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2120: The facility failed to provide treatment for skin concerns for 1 of 9 residents (Resident 2), including a rash on the arm and a wound on the buttock that was not properly documented or treated after initial identification. WAC 388-78A-24701: The facility failed to complete a character, competence and suitability review for 1 of 5 staff members (Staff C) after a background check showed a non-disqualifying criminal charge.
2025-05-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in May 2025, but the narrative provided does not include details about what was alleged, what was examined, or what was found. To provide families with an accurate summary of the inspection outcome, the full findings and conclusions from the investigation report are needed.
“The facility hired a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 03/03/2025 who did not have a current Washington state LPN license until 03/25/2025. The facility failed to verify that staff had required licenses that were current and in good standing prior to hiring, resulting in residents receiving care from an unlicensed individual.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2450(2)(c): The facility hired a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 03/03/2025 who did not have a current Washington state LPN license until 03/25/2025. The facility failed to verify that staff had required licenses that were current and in good standing prior to hiring, resulting in residents receiving care from an unlicensed individual.
2025-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in March 2025, but the document provided does not include the specific complaint details, findings, or outcome. To help families understand what was investigated and whether any violations were found, please provide the full narrative section of the DSHS report.
“The facility failed to ensure that nurse delegated tasks were performed by qualified and trained staff. Three medication technicians (Staff C, D, E) had not received training or competency checks from a facility nurse delegator since their hire, impacting 6 of 8 sampled residents who required nurse-delegated tasks such as blood glucose testing.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2320: The facility failed to ensure that nurse delegated tasks were performed by qualified and trained staff. Three medication technicians (Staff C, D, E) had not received training or competency checks from a facility nurse delegator since their hire, impacting 6 of 8 sampled residents who required nurse-delegated tasks such as blood glucose testing.
Other facilities in Spokane County.
Other memory care facilities in Spokane County with similar care offerings.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.