Trustwell Living at Ridgeview Place.
Trustwell Living at Ridgeview Place is Ranked in the bottom 11% on citation severity among Washington peers with 7 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 36 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Trustwell Living at Ridgeview Place has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-01Annual Compliance VisitType B · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in April 2026 with no deficiencies cited. The facility met Washington DSHS requirements for specialized dementia care services.
“The facility failed to provide meal service that enhanced residents' dignity and respect for 3 of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in extended wait times (15-30 minutes) for meal service and placing residents at risk of decreased quality of life.”
“The facility failed to ensure one staff member (Staff C) completed orientation and safety training prior to providing resident care, with training completed 405 days after hire date despite the staff member having worked 11 days providing care.”
“The facility failed to obtain written consent from 2 of 2 residents (Residents 1 and 3) who had video monitoring equipment installed in their private rooms, resulting in residents not being afforded the opportunity to provide consent or decline monitoring.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2660: The facility failed to provide meal service that enhanced residents' dignity and respect for 3 of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in extended wait times (15-30 minutes) for meal service and placing residents at risk of decreased quality of life. WAC 388-78A-2474: The facility failed to ensure one staff member (Staff C) completed orientation and safety training prior to providing resident care, with training completed 405 days after hire date despite the staff member having worked 11 days providing care. WAC 388-78A-2474: The facility failed to ensure one staff member (Staff D) maintained a valid Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and first-aid card, with the staff member's certification expired as of 11/14/2025 while continuing to provide resident care. WAC 388-78A-2474: The facility failed to ensure two staff members (Staff D and F) completed required continuing education hours, with Staff D having no documented CE credits and Staff F having only 6.75 hours instead of the required 12 hours for the applicable period. WAC 388-78A-2690: The facility failed to obtain written consent from 2 of 2 residents (Residents 1 and 3) who had video monitoring equipment installed in their private rooms, resulting in residents not being afforded the opportunity to provide consent or decline monitoring.
2026-02-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information from the source text to provide a summary. The document header indicates a complaint investigation from February 2026, but the narrative section is blank and contains no findings, allegations, or outcomes. To write an accurate summary for families, I would need the details of what was investigated and what was found or substantiated.
“The facility failed to ensure a current Washington state name and date of birth background check was on file for one caregiver (Staff B). The staff member's background check had expired and was not renewed within the required two-year period, placing residents at risk of receiving care from potentially disqualified staff.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2466(1)(a)(b): The facility failed to ensure a current Washington state name and date of birth background check was on file for one caregiver (Staff B). The staff member's background check had expired and was not renewed within the required two-year period, placing residents at risk of receiving care from potentially disqualified staff.
2026-01-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
“The facility failed to update a resident's negotiated service agreement following a change in condition after a resident-to-resident altercation on 11/11/2025. The resident experienced a significant change in physical and emotional functioning, confining themselves to their room and refusing to leave for meals or activities, but no updates were made to address these changes or provide appropriate interventions.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2130(3)(a)(b): The facility failed to update a resident's negotiated service agreement following a change in condition after a resident-to-resident altercation on 11/11/2025. The resident experienced a significant change in physical and emotional functioning, confining themselves to their room and refusing to leave for meals or activities, but no updates were made to address these changes or provide appropriate interventions.
2025-12-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in December 2025 at this facility. No outcome or finding details were provided in the available report documentation. Families seeking specific information about this complaint should contact Washington DSHS directly for the complete investigation results.
“The facility failed to ensure that infection control interventions were implemented during a COVID outbreak. Three staff members (Staff C, D, and E) were observed wearing surgical masks instead of recommended N95 respirators while providing care to residents with confirmed COVID-19, including in common areas where positive residents could not be isolated due to cognitive status. Staff had not been fit-tested for N95 respirators despite facility policy requiring their use.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2610(1)(2)(c)(d): The facility failed to ensure that infection control interventions were implemented during a COVID outbreak. Three staff members (Staff C, D, and E) were observed wearing surgical masks instead of recommended N95 respirators while providing care to residents with confirmed COVID-19, including in common areas where positive residents could not be isolated due to cognitive status. Staff had not been fit-tested for N95 respirators despite facility policy requiring their use.
2025-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
# Summary of Washington DSHS Complaint Investigation A complaint investigation was conducted in March 2025 at a Washington memory care facility holding a Specialized Dementia Care contract. The investigation outcome was not substantiated, meaning no violation was found based on the complaint allegations. No further details about the specific complaint or findings were provided in the available documentation.
“A caregiver (Staff B) worked unsupervised with residents for 3 weeks without completing a Department background authorization form or having any background information on file, putting residents at risk of exposure to an unvetted staff member.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2464(1)(2): A caregiver (Staff B) worked unsupervised with residents for 3 weeks without completing a Department background authorization form or having any background information on file, putting residents at risk of exposure to an unvetted staff member.
Other facilities in Spokane County.
Other memory care facilities in Spokane County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



