GARDEN COURTE ALZHEIMER COMMUNITY.
GARDEN COURTE ALZHEIMER COMMUNITY is Ranked in the top 50% of Washington memory care with 15 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
GARDEN COURTE ALZHEIMER COMMUNITY has 15 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
15 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
15 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to GARDEN COURTE ALZHEIMER COMMUNITY's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on August 1, 2024 found 11 deficiencies across 10 reports on file — can you walk us through the corrective action plans you implemented for those deficiencies and share documentation showing how each item was resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Eight complaints were filed with DSHS Residential Care Services during the period covered by these inspection reports — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what changes did the facility make in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This community holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you explain what specific dementia care protocols and training requirements that contract mandates, and show us written policies that document how staff meet those requirements on all shifts?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
9 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-06-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 4 findings
“Facility failed to identify and document preventative fall interventions on Temporary Service Plans (TSPs) and notify floor staff for implementation. Despite 45 previous fall interventions documented for R1, no new preventative interventions were added to the TSP following a fall on 01/13/2025.”
“Facility failed to identify and document preventative fall interventions on Temporary Service Plans (TSPs) and notify floor staff for implementation. Despite 10 previous fall interventions documented for R2, no new preventative interventions were added to the TSP following a fall on 01/16/2025.”
“Facility failed to identify and document preventative interventions on Temporary Service Plans and notify floor staff so they may be implemented following resident falls with injury.”
“Facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation as to how an injury of unknown origin may have been sustained, failed to determine if potential abuse was suspected or ruled out, and failed to document investigative findings.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility failed to identify and document preventative fall interventions on Temporary Service Plans (TSPs) and notify floor staff for implementation. Despite 45 previous fall interventions documented for R1, no new preventative interventions were added to the TSP following a fall on 01/13/2025. —: Facility failed to identify and document preventative fall interventions on Temporary Service Plans (TSPs) and notify floor staff for implementation. Despite 10 previous fall interventions documented for R2, no new preventative interventions were added to the TSP following a fall on 01/16/2025. —: Facility failed to identify and document preventative interventions on Temporary Service Plans and notify floor staff so they may be implemented following resident falls with injury. —: Facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation as to how an injury of unknown origin may have been sustained, failed to determine if potential abuse was suspected or ruled out, and failed to document investigative findings.
2025-01-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“Facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse by staff to the Department as required. The facility conducted its own investigation but did not make the mandatory report to the regulatory agency.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse by staff to the Department as required. The facility conducted its own investigation but did not make the mandatory report to the regulatory agency.
2024-11-01Complaint Investigation4 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Garden Courte Alzheimer Community between October 2023 and January 2024 found that the facility failed to follow its own policies for handling suspected abuse allegations, failed to verify staff references before hiring, failed to ensure required dementia care training for staff, and failed to protect residents' right to be free from abuse, resulting in a deficiency citation. The investigation examined four current residents and one former resident's records and included interviews with staff, residents, and family members.
“The facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to maintain or enhance quality of life for residents including resident decision-making rights, and failed to train staff on policies and procedures related to suspected abandonment, abuse, neglect, exploitation, or financial exploitation of residents.”
“The facility failed to verify staff work references prior to hiring and failed to maintain required documentation of contacting work references and professional licensing boards.”
“The facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect by staff persons.”
“The facility failed to ensure completion of specialized training consistent with chapter 388-112A WAC for staff serving residents with dementia as their primary special need.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2600: The facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to maintain or enhance quality of life for residents including resident decision-making rights, and failed to train staff on policies and procedures related to suspected abandonment, abuse, neglect, exploitation, or financial exploitation of residents. WAC 388-78A-2450: The facility failed to verify staff work references prior to hiring and failed to maintain required documentation of contacting work references and professional licensing boards. WAC 388-78A-2660: The facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect by staff persons. WAC 388-78A-2660: The facility used restraints on residents in violation of resident rights protections. WAC 388-78A-2510: The facility failed to ensure completion of specialized training consistent with chapter 388-112A WAC for staff serving residents with dementia as their primary special need.
2024-10-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“Facility failed to follow policies and store medication properly, which resulted in a resident entering a staff office and ingesting another resident's medications.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility failed to follow policies and store medication properly, which resulted in a resident entering a staff office and ingesting another resident's medications.
2024-09-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in the source material you've provided to write a meaningful summary. The inspection record shows a complaint investigation occurred, but the narrative section is blank and the conclusion section contains only template language without specific findings about what was investigated or what was found. To write an accurate summary for families, I would need details about: what the complaint alleged, what the inspectors found during their investigation, and whether any violations or failed practices were substantiated. Could you provide the complete inspection narrative?
“The facility failed to ensure staff members locked the wheels on residents' wheelchairs during transfers to prevent avoidable injuries. This failure placed Resident 4 and Resident 5 at risk for sustaining avoidable injuries.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2703: The facility failed to ensure staff members locked the wheels on residents' wheelchairs during transfers to prevent avoidable injuries. This failure placed Resident 4 and Resident 5 at risk for sustaining avoidable injuries. WAC 388-78A-2703: The facility failed to ensure staff locked the wheels on a resident's wheelchair during a transfer to prevent avoidable injuries. Staff C was observed not locking the wheelchair wheels during a transfer and stated he routinely skips this safety measure for convenience.
2024-08-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A follow-up inspection of Garden Courte Alzheimer Community on June 27 and July 2, 2024, found that fire safety doors were being propped open, violating fire code requirements and placing all 88 residents at risk. The facility had received a prior deficiency citation for the same violation and had issued multiple staff reminders about the prohibition, but inspectors still observed the doors propped open during the unannounced visit. The facility was cited for failure to comply with fire safety regulations.
“Fire safety doors were observed propped open using rubber stoppers and wooden wedges in multiple locations including the medication technician offices, resident rooms, and administrative areas. Staff were found using door stoppers despite facility policies, training, and previous citations prohibiting this practice, creating fire and safety hazards for 88 residents.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2040: Fire safety doors were observed propped open using rubber stoppers and wooden wedges in multiple locations including the medication technician offices, resident rooms, and administrative areas. Staff were found using door stoppers despite facility policies, training, and previous citations prohibiting this practice, creating fire and safety hazards for 88 residents.
2024-06-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-01-01Annual Compliance Visit3 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation conducted from October 2023 through January 2024 at this Alzheimer's care facility found that the facility failed to follow its own policies and procedures for reporting suspected abuse, failed to verify staff references before employment, and failed to ensure staff received required dementia care training. Citations were issued for these violations and the facility's failure to protect residents' right to be free from abuse. The facility was required to submit a plan of correction to regain compliance with licensing regulations.
“The facility failed to verify staff references prior to employment.”
“The facility failed to ensure required training for staff working in a dementia care unit.”
“The facility failed to implement facility policies and procedures when suspected abuse was reported for 2 residents, placing these residents at risk for ongoing harm and all 80 residents at risk of harm due to staff not following facility and state policies when suspected abuse had been reported.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2600: The facility failed to implement facility policies and procedures when suspected abuse was reported for 2 residents, placing these residents at risk for ongoing harm and all 80 residents at risk of harm due to staff not following facility and state policies when suspected abuse had been reported. —: The facility failed to verify staff references prior to employment. —: The facility failed to ensure required training for staff working in a dementia care unit.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Thurston County.
Other memory care facilities in Thurston County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

