Bonaventure of Lacey.
Bonaventure of Lacey is Ranked in the top 41% of Washington memory care with 13 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Jan 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Bonaventure of Lacey has 13 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
13 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
13 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-01-01Complaint Investigation6 findings
“The facility failed to take appropriate action to ensure resident safety and implement appropriate interventions after a resident had multiple falls in memory care that resulted in hospitalization with multiple injuries.”
“The facility failed to take appropriate action when a resident fell and experienced severe hip pain the next day, delaying hospital transport for 3 days, which resulted in a hip fracture.”
“The facility failed to complete a focused assessment on an aggressive resident when there was a change in behavior and failed to protect other residents from harm and abuse by the aggressive resident.”
“The facility failed to notify law enforcement when there was physical abuse and assault with multiple incidents involving residents in the memory care unit.”
“The facility failed to protect a resident from being harmed by another resident on multiple occasions, resulting in bite wounds, bruising, and psychological harm, violating the resident's right to remain free of abuse and harm.”
“The facility failed to report physical abuse to law enforcement when a resident was injured by another resident.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The facility failed to take appropriate action to ensure resident safety and implement appropriate interventions after a resident had multiple falls in memory care that resulted in hospitalization with multiple injuries. —: The facility failed to take appropriate action when a resident fell and experienced severe hip pain the next day, delaying hospital transport for 3 days, which resulted in a hip fracture. —: The facility failed to complete a focused assessment on an aggressive resident when there was a change in behavior and failed to protect other residents from harm and abuse by the aggressive resident. —: The facility failed to notify law enforcement when there was physical abuse and assault with multiple incidents involving residents in the memory care unit. —: The facility failed to protect a resident from being harmed by another resident on multiple occasions, resulting in bite wounds, bruising, and psychological harm, violating the resident's right to remain free of abuse and harm. —: The facility failed to report physical abuse to law enforcement when a resident was injured by another resident.
2025-09-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
“The facility failed to monitor residents' well-being and take appropriate actions for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4). Residents sustained injuries that were not investigated and residents were not monitored after injury, placing them at risk for unmet care needs and lack of response for decline in residents' condition.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2120: The facility failed to monitor residents' well-being and take appropriate actions for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4). Residents sustained injuries that were not investigated and residents were not monitored after injury, placing them at risk for unmet care needs and lack of response for decline in residents' condition.
2025-06-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“Facility had orders to utilize a fall mat for when a resident slid off bed, but the fall mat was observed not being used.”
“Resident was not receiving their prescribed medication and the prescriber was not notified of the non-administration.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility had orders to utilize a fall mat for when a resident slid off bed, but the fall mat was observed not being used. —: Resident was not receiving their prescribed medication and the prescriber was not notified of the non-administration.
2024-03-01Annual Compliance Visit1 finding
“Facility failed to follow policy and complete an Occurrence Report when they became aware of an allegation of sexual abuse in the community. Facility also failed to document investigation and investigative actions.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility failed to follow policy and complete an Occurrence Report when they became aware of an allegation of sexual abuse in the community. Facility also failed to document investigation and investigative actions.
2024-01-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in the source material to write a summary. The document references a complaint investigation from January 2024 but provides no narrative details about what was alleged, what was found, or what outcome resulted. To summarize this for families, I would need the actual investigation findings and conclusions.
“The facility failed to complete their plan of correction by the attestation date as required.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-3152(1)(6)(a)(b): The facility failed to complete their plan of correction by the attestation date as required.
2023-10-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“Facility failed to keep actual worked staff schedules on-site for department review, making it impossible to evaluate staffing adequacy. This resulted in care needs not being met due to insufficient staffing.”
“Facility was out of compliance for long wait times and insufficient staff assistance during meal times. Main entrée and desserts ran out during dinner service.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility failed to keep actual worked staff schedules on-site for department review, making it impossible to evaluate staffing adequacy. This resulted in care needs not being met due to insufficient staffing. —: Facility was out of compliance for long wait times and insufficient staff assistance during meal times. Main entrée and desserts ran out during dinner service.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Thurston County.
Other memory care facilities in Thurston County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.