Mukilteo Memory Care.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Mukilteo Memory Care's record and state requirements.
The facility holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you walk us through the specific dementia-focused policies and staff competency records required under that contract, and are those documents available for families to review on the tour?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS records show 8 deficiencies across 8 inspection reports, with the most recent inspection on January 1, 2025 — can you provide copies of the corrective action plans submitted to DSHS for those deficiencies, and explain how the facility tracks completion of each corrective measure?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Six complaints were filed with DSHS Residential Care Services during the inspection period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what specific changes to policies or operations did the facility implement in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-07-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-05-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in the source text to write an accurate summary. The narrative section is blank, and the conclusion indicates either a failed provider practice was cited or no citation was written, but doesn't specify what was investigated or what was found. To provide families with a meaningful summary, I would need details about what complaint was investigated and what the inspection discovered.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to follow their policy requiring physician evaluation within two days after staff reported a resident's change of condition (significant pain and difficulty ambulating following a fall).”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2600: The facility failed to follow their policy requiring physician evaluation within two days after staff reported a resident's change of condition (significant pain and difficulty ambulating following a fall).
2025-01-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-05-01Complaint Investigation4 findings
“The facility failed to implement a negotiated service agreement to provide monitoring and supervision of a resident with a history of resident-to-resident altercations, resulting in additional altercations.”
“The facility failed to ensure that staff had required credentials to provide care and administer medications to residents.”
“The facility failed to ensure medication systems were in place to promote safe medication services when staff intentionally discarded medications for 14 residents.”
“The facility failed to report to the Department when staff threw medications in the garbage, placing residents at risk for harm.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The facility failed to implement a negotiated service agreement to provide monitoring and supervision of a resident with a history of resident-to-resident altercations, resulting in additional altercations. —: The facility failed to ensure that staff had required credentials to provide care and administer medications to residents. —: The facility failed to ensure medication systems were in place to promote safe medication services when staff intentionally discarded medications for 14 residents. —: The facility failed to report to the Department when staff threw medications in the garbage, placing residents at risk for harm.
2024-02-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The Assisted Living Facility failed to ensure resident records were documented correctly related to medication systems. The facility did not properly secure medications, resulting in a loss of medication that was later found in the medication cart.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The Assisted Living Facility failed to ensure resident records were documented correctly related to medication systems. The facility did not properly secure medications, resulting in a loss of medication that was later found in the medication cart.
2023-11-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The ALF caregivers were not fit tested for N95 respirators and the facility did not implement the Respiratory Protection Program.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The ALF caregivers were not fit tested for N95 respirators and the facility did not implement the Respiratory Protection Program.
2 older inspections from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.