River Grove Memory Care.
River Grove Memory Care is Grade B−, ranked in the top 31% of Oregon memory care with 6 OR DHS citations on record; last inspected Sep 2024.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 118 Oregon facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
River Grove Memory Care has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to River Grove Memory Care's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on September 4, 2024 is part of a record showing 148 deficiencies across 152 reports — can you walk us through the three most common deficiency categories found historically, and show us the written corrective action plans the facility submitted to Oregon DHS for those issues?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 148 complaints on file, what documentation does River Grove maintain internally to track complaint resolution, and can families review a summary of how complaints were investigated and what changes resulted?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
River Grove holds an Oregon DHS Memory Care Endorsement — can you provide a copy of the facility's written dementia care program that satisfies the endorsement requirements, and explain how staff competency in dementia care is documented and verified?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every OR-DHS visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-01-26Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that staff failed to intervene when a resident's condition changed. The facility did not take appropriate action to address the resident's health decline. This constitutes a licensing violation related to resident monitoring and care response.
“Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
2025-01-02Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. This was a licensing violation. No additional details about specific unmet needs are provided in the available information.
“Failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents
2024-10-08Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging the facility failed to provide a safe environment. The investigation found a licensing violation related to this allegation. The facility was required to take corrective action to address the safety deficiency.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2024-09-04Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-03-01Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated regarding failure to provide a safe environment. The outcome field shows N/A, which means the investigation status or substantiation determination is not specified in the available information. Families should contact Oregon DHS Long-Term Care Licensing for clarification on whether the complaint was substantiated and what corrective actions, if any, were required.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2024-02-15Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system. The complaint was substantiated as a licensing violation.
“Failed to provide a safe medication administration system”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
2024-01-04Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to properly plan care for a resident. The investigation did not result in a substantiated violation or unsubstantiated finding recorded in the available documentation.
“Failed to properly plan care”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to properly plan care
2023-11-02Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
42 older inspections from 2019 are not shown in the free view.
42 older inspections (2019–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Lane County.
Other memory care facilities in Lane County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.