Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.

StarlynnCare
Minnesota · Vadnais Heights

Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights.

Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Aug 2025.

ALF · Memory Care160 licensed beds · largeDementia-trained staff
1260 East County Road East · Vadnais Heights, MN 55110LIC# ALRC:867
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Facility · Vadnais Heights
Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights
© Google Street Viewoperator? submit a photo →
A 160-bed ALF · Memory Care with no citations on file.
Last inspection · Aug 2025 · cleanSource · MDH
Licensed beds
160
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Aug 2025
Last citation
None on record
Operated by
Phone
§ 01 · Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

§ 02 · Peer Comparison

Ranked against 138 Minnesota facilities.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
100th
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
100th
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
100th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Be first to know if Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights's inspection record changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

§ 03 · The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

No citations in the last 36 months.

0weighted score · 24 mo
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jun 2024May 2026

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.
§ 05 · Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights's record and state requirements.

01 /

The most recent inspection on October 13, 2022 found zero deficiencies across all regulatory standards — can you walk us through how the facility maintains compliance with Minnesota's Assisted Living with Dementia Care requirements under chapter 144G, and what internal audit processes are in place?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

One complaint was filed with the Minnesota Department of Health during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and can you share the facility's written response or corrective action documentation if remediation was required?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

With 160 licensed beds and a dementia care designation, how does the facility document and demonstrate staff competency in dementia-specific care techniques, and can prospective families review recent training records or competency assessment summaries?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

§ 06 · Full Inspection Record

Every MDH visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

2
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
2025-08-06
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A standard inspection of Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights on August 6, 2025 found violations in fire protection and physical environment requirements, resulting in two correction orders and a total fine of $1,000. The facility must document how it corrected these deficiencies and implement changes to prevent future noncompliance.

Full inspector notes

correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement; Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights September 17, 2025 Page 2 § 144G.20; Level 5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0775 - 144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment - $500.00 St - 0 - 0780 - 144g.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment -$500.00 Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, t he total amount you are assessed is $1,000.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm REQUESTING A HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating Gable Pines at Vadnais Heights September 17, 2025 Page 3 factor. To submit a hearing request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm To appeal fines via reconsideration, please follow the procedure outlined above. P lease note that you may request a reconsideration o r a hearing, but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Casey DeVries, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Casey.DeVries@state.mn.us Telephone: 651-201-5917 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 AH PRINTED: 09/17/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 32419 08/06/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1260 EAST COUNTY ROAD EAST GABLE PINES AT VADNAIS HEIGHTS VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55110 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER(S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The issued pursuant to a survey. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL32419016-0 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On August 4, 2025, through August 6, 2025, the STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF survey at the above provider and the following FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS correction orders are issued. At the time of the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. survey, there were 124 residents; 63 receiving services under the Assisted Living Facility with THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 775 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical 0 775 SS=F environment LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 JNWM11 If continuation sheet 1 of 22 PRINTED: 09/17/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.

2023-12-29
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

The Minnesota Department of Health investigated a complaint that an unlicensed staff member abused and neglected a resident during care and after a fall. The investigation determined that abuse was not substantiated because, although the staff member's actions were disrespectful and unprofessional, they did not meet the legal definition of abuse, and the facility immediately terminated this employee and re-educated all staff on appropriate care. Neglect was also not substantiated because the resident's care plan was followed, staff promptly assessed the resident after the fall, and the resident returned to baseline health.

Full inspector notes

Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP), an unlicensed facility staff, abused a resident when he roughly handled the resident during cares. In addition, the resident was neglected after being found on the ground and the facility failed to assess the resident for injuries. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated. While the alleged perpetrator’s (AP) actions were disrespectful and unprofessional, the actions of the AP did not meet the definition of abuse. The Minnesota Department of Health also determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the resident fell which resulted in bruising, the resident’s plan of care was followed at the time of the incident. When the resident was found on the floor, facility staff immediately assessed the resident, and the resident returned to her baseline health condition. An equal opportunity employer. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigation included review of the resident’s medical record, video footage, personnel files, and facility policies and procedures. Also, the investigator toured the facility and observed interactions between staff and residents. The resident resided in an assisted living memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses included Alzheimer’s disease, cervicobrachial syndrome (pain and stiffness of the cervical spine with symptoms in the shoulder and upper extremity), and diabetes. The resident’s service plan included assistance with medication administration and assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, mobility, and toileting. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was orientated to person and required direction and reminders from staff. ABUSE Facility management was informed of a concern regarding the AP’s care of the resident. Video footage of the AP’s interactions with the resident was provided to management staff. Video footage reviewed identified the AP acting in a quick and aggressive manner when assisting the resident on multiple occasions. The AP did not explain or inform the resident of his actions prior to assisting the resident and ignored the resident’s complaints of pain. Upon management’s investigation into the concern and review of video footage, the AP was immediately terminated. During an interview, the AP denied abusing the resident. During an interview, a family member stated she monitored the resident’s room on the camera and saw the two incidents involving the AP. The family member reported the incidents to facility management. Facility management told the family they terminated the AP and reported the incident to law enforcement. During an interview, facility management confirmed the AP was immediately terminated following their review of the video footage. Facility management indicated they also re-educated all staff on appropriate care and treatment of residents. NEGLECT The resident’s medical record identified the resident fell and staff assisted the resident back to bed. Video footage of the fall identified the resident was at the end of her bed and fell to the floor. Three facility staff entered the room and walked over to the resident. Two of the facility staff assisted the resident to a seated position. The two staff members used a transfer belt and assisted the resident off the floor, while the third staff member positioned the wheelchair behind the resident. Staff asked the resident if she was okay, and the resident stated she hit her head. One of the staff members checked the resident’s head for injury and assisted the resident back into bed. Review of the resident’s medical record indicated nursing staff assessed the resident after the fall and instructed staff to monitor for further injury. Multiple staff members interviewed were unable to recall the incident. During an interview, a family member stated facility staff responded to the resident quickly after the resident fell. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse and neglect were not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Abuse: Minnesota Statutes section 626.5572, subdivision 2. "Abuse" means: (a) An act against a vulnerable adult that constitutes a violation of, an attempt to violate, or aiding and abetting a violation of: (1) assault in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.221 to 609.224; (2) the use of drugs to injure or facilitate crime as defined in section 609.235; (3) the solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution as defined in section 609.322; and (4) criminal sexual conduct in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.342 to 609.3451. A violation includes any action that meets the elements of the crime, regardless of whether there is a criminal proceeding or conviction. (b) Conduct which is not an accident or therapeutic conduct as defined in this section, which produces or could reasonably be expected to produce physical pain or injury or emotional distress including, but not limited to, the following: (1) hitting, slapping, kicking, pinching, biting, or corporal punishment of a vulnerable adult; (2) use of repeated or malicious oral, written, or gestured language toward a vulnerable adult or the treatment of a vulnerable adult which would be considered by a reasonable person to be disparaging, derogatory, humiliating, harassing, or threatening Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, due to cognitive impairment. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes. Action taken by facility: The facility terminated the AP after the incident and provided education to facility staff. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: The facility was found to be in noncompliance. To view a copy of the Statement of Deficiencies and/or correction orders, please visit: https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/regulation/directory/provcompselect.html If you are viewing this report on the MDH website, please see the attached Statement of Deficiencies. You may also call 651-201-4200 to receive a copy via mail or email cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 01/11/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 32419 10/30/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1260 EAST COUNTY ROAD EAST GABLE PINES AT VADNAIS HEIGHTS VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55110 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ******ATTENTION****** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER CORRECTION using federal software. Tag numbers have ORDER been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the far 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The issued pursuant to a complaint investigation. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether a violation is corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When a Minnesota Statute contains several are in violation of the state requirement items, failure to comply with any of the items will after the statement, "This Minnesota be considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. #HL324198139C/#HL324194804M PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF #HL324193515C/#HL324197184M THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF On October 30, 2023, the Minnesota Department CORRECTION.

1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.

1 older inspection (20222023) are available with a premium membership.

§ 07 · Nearby

Other facilities in Ramsey County.

Other memory care facilities in Ramsey County with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.