Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.

StarlynnCare
Minnesota · Richfield

Havenwood of Richfield.

Havenwood of Richfield is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Mar 2025.

ALF · Memory Care110 licensed beds · largeDementia-trained staff
245 West 76th Street · Richfield, MN 55423LIC# ALRC:1033
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Facility · Richfield
Havenwood of Richfield
© Google Street Viewoperator? submit a photo →
A 110-bed ALF · Memory Care with no citations on file.
Last inspection · Mar 2025 · cleanSource · MDH
Licensed beds
110
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Mar 2025
Last citation
None on record
Operated by
Phone
§ 01 · Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

§ 02 · Peer Comparison

Ranked against 138 Minnesota facilities.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
100th
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
100th
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
100th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Be first to know if Havenwood of Richfield's inspection record changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

§ 03 · The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

No citations in the last 36 months.

0weighted score · 24 mo
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jun 2024May 2026

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.
§ 05 · Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Havenwood of Richfield's record and state requirements.

01 /

The most recent inspection on March 26, 2025 found zero deficiencies across 3 reports on file — can you walk us through your internal quality assurance process and show us documentation of how you maintain compliance between state surveys?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

One complaint appears in the MDH record — was that complaint substantiated, and can you share the facility's own corrective action plan or response documentation related to that complaint?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

Minnesota Statute chapter 144G requires assisted living facilities with dementia care to have written policies specific to dementia services — can you provide a copy of your dementia care program and explain how staff competency in dementia care is verified and documented?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

§ 06 · Full Inspection Record

Every MDH visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

2
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
2025-03-26
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On August 6, 2025, Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at Havenwood of Richfield to check on corrections from a previous survey completed in May 2025; the facility was found to be in substantial compliance. The survey identified that certain requirements were not fully met, including food service documentation and resident grievance posting procedures, though the specific details of these findings were not completed in the inspection report. At the time of the survey, 94 residents were living at the facility, including 56 receiving dementia care services.

Full inspector notes

STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 33959 08/06/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 245 WEST 76TH STREET HAVENWOOD OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 000} Initial Comments {0 000} *****ATTENTION****** ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER FOLLOW UP SURVEY INITIAL COMMENTS SL33959017-2 On August 6, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on May 16, 2025. At the time of the survey, there were 94 residents; 56 receiving services under the Assisted Living with Dementia Care license. As a result of the follow-up survey, the licensee is in substantial compliance. {0 480} 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum {0 480} SS=F requirements; required food services (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. (b) For an assisted living facility with a licensed capacity of ten or fewer residents: (1) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0033, item A, the facility may share a certified food protection manager (CFPM) with one other facility located within a 60-mile radius and under common management provided the CFPM is present at each facility frequently enough to effectively administer, manage, and supervise each facility's food service operation; (2) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0545, item A, kick plates that are not removable or cannot be rotated open are allowed unless the facility has been issued repeated correction orders for violations of Minnesota LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 M8IK13 If continuation sheet 1 of 9 PRINTED: 09/09/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 33959 08/06/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 245 WEST 76TH STREET HAVENWOOD OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 480} Continued From page 1 {0 480} Rules, part 4626.1565 or 4626.1570; (3) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0685, item A, the facility is not required to provide integral drainboards, utensil racks, or tables large enough to accommodate soiled and clean items that may accumulate during hours of operation provided soiled items do not contaminate clean items, surfaces, or food, and clean equipment and dishes are air dried in a manner that prevents contamination before storage; (4) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1070, item A, the facility is not required to install a dedicated handwashing sink in its existing kitchen provided it designates one well of a two-compartment sink for use only as a handwashing sink; (5) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, parts 4626.1325, 4626.1335, and 4626.1360, item A, existing floor, wall, and ceiling finishes are allowed provided the facility keeps them clean and in good condition; (6) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1375, shielded or shatter-resistant lightbulbs are not required, but if a light bulb breaks, the facility must discard all exposed food and fully clean all equipment, dishes, and surfaces to remove any glass particles; and (7) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1390, toilet rooms are not required to be provided with a self-closing door. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey. STATE FORM 6899 M8IK13 If continuation sheet 2 of 9 PRINTED: 09/09/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 33959 08/06/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 245 WEST 76TH STREET HAVENWOOD OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 550} Continued From page 2 {0 550} {0 550} 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting {0 550} SS=F maltreatment All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. The notice must also have the contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care and the Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities and must have information for reporting suspected maltreatment to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center. The notice must also state that if an individual has a complaint about the facility or person providing services, the individual may contact the Office of Health Facility Complaints at the Minnesota Department of Health. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey. {0 810} 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and {0 810} SS=F physical environment (b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. The plans shall include but are not limited to: (1) location and number of resident sleeping rooms; (2) staff actions to be taken in the event of a fire or similar emergency; (3) fire protection procedures necessary for residents; and (4) procedures for resident movement, evacuation, or relocation during a fire or similar STATE FORM 6899 M8IK13 If continuation sheet 3 of 9 PRINTED: 09/09/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 33959 08/06/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 245 WEST 76TH STREET HAVENWOOD OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 810} Continued From page 3 {0 810} emergency including the identification of unique or unusual resident needs for movement or evacuation. (c) Staff of assisted living facilities shall receive training on the fire safety and evacuation plans upon hiring and at least twice per year thereafter. (d) Fire safety and evacuation plans shall be readily available at all times within the facility. (e) Residents who are capable of assisting in their own evacuation shall be trained on the proper actions to take in the event of a fire to include movement, evacuation, or relocation. The training shall be made available to residents at least once per year. (f) Evacuation drills are required for staff twice per year per shift with at least one evacuation drill every other month. Evacuation of the residents is not required. Fire alarm system activation is not required to initiate the evacuation drill. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey. {01060} 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation {01060} SS=F (a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. An emergency relocation is not a termination. (b) In the event of an emergency relocation, the facility must provide a written notice that contains, at a minimum: (1) the reason for the relocation; STATE FORM 6899 M8IK13 If continuation sheet 4 of 9 PRINTED: 09/09/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B.

2025-02-05
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that a resident with dementia fell and sustained fractured ribs and spinal injuries while adjusting his pants in his apartment; the facility had implemented fall precautions and safety checks as required by the resident's care plan, and the Minnesota Department of Health determined there was no evidence of neglect. The investigation included interviews with staff, the resident, and family, as well as review of medical records and care procedures. No further action was taken by the state.

Full inspector notes

Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The facility and the alleged perpetrator neglected the resident when they failed to provide fall precautions after the resident previously had unwitnessed falls in his apartment. The resident then fell again and sustained injuries to his back and ribs that required hospitalization. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The facility and the alleged perpetrator (AP) followed the care plan, performed safety checks, and implemented fall precautions as directed. There was not a preponderance of evidence to support that the actions of the facility staff met the definition of neglect. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including nursing staff. The investigation included review of the resident record, the facility internal incident reports, personnel files, employee training files, and facility policy and procedures. The investigator also toured the facility and observed staff members interacting with residents. The resident resided in an assisted living facility memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses included dementia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The resident’s service plan included assistance with all activities of daily living, routine safety checks, and medication administration. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident had a history of unwitnessed falls with injury, as well as impaired cognition with poor decision making and required supervision. The resident required hands-on assistance from one staff member for ambulation with a two-wheeled walker. Records reviewed indicated that one evening while the alleged perpetrator (AP) was in the resident’s apartment assisting with routine evening cares, they turned away from the resident to continue preparations, when the resident reached down to adjust his pants and began to lose his balance. The resident attempted to reach for his walker but missed and fell backwards landing on the heating register, injuring his back and ribs. The resident was assessed and transported to a local hospital for treatment of fractured ribs and spinal injuries. During investigative interviews, multiple staff members stated they were aware of the resident’s fall history and were informed of all additional fall precautions prior to initiating care of the resident. During an interview with the AP she stated that on the evening of the incident she recalled being in the resident’s room and as she was gathering supplies and turning down his bed, she witnessed the resident standing with his walker in the living room, bending down to adjust his pants. As he lost his balance, he attempted to reach out for his walker but fell backwards onto the windowsill. During an interview, the resident stated that he has fallen on occasion but does not recall details about this incident. During the interview, he remembered sustaining an injury to his ribs but was not able to recall details of the fall. He also stated that the facility completes safety checks on him often throughout the day. During an interview, the resident’s emergency contact stated that they were contacted and informed of the incident and that they had no concern with care provided at the facility. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: Yes Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes Action taken by facility: The nursing staff identified fall vulnerabilities in the nursing assessments and addressed precautions in the care plan to identify potential or actual risk for falls and injury. Additional training and review of proper transfer and ambulation procedures was completed with facility care team staff. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 02/10/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 33959 01/13/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 245 WEST 76TH STREET HAVENWOOD OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On January 13, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL339599905C/#HL339596605M. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 7Y3F11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1

1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.

1 older inspection (20222023) are available with a premium membership.

§ 07 · Nearby

Other facilities in Hennepin County.

Other memory care facilities in Hennepin County with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.