California · Corona

Amistad Assisted Living and Memory Care Home.

RCFE · Memory Care6 bedsDementia-trained staff
Facility · Corona
A 6-bed RCFE · Memory Care with 9 citations on file.
Licensed beds
6
Last inspection
Apr 2026
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Perpetual Inspirations
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Amistad Assisted Living and Memory Care Home

© Google Street View

Approximate location
Peer Comparison

Compared to 152 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
28th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
66th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Amistad Assisted Living and Memory Care Home has 9 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

9 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 19 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2025
Jul 2024as of Jun 2026

Finding distribution

8 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G8
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
Cited Mar 2025+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Amistad Assisted Living and Memory Care Home's record and state requirements.

01 /

The facility has 9 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

The April 15, 2026 inspection found deficiencies — can you walk families through the specific corrective actions taken since that visit and provide copies of the deficiency notice and your written response?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

California Title 22 §87705 requires a written dementia-care program — can you provide that written program and explain how it addresses the care needs of residents with memory impairment in this 6-bed home?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

8
reports on file
9
total deficiencies
8
severe (Type A)
2026-04-15
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

The facility received a required annual inspection and passed without any violations. Inspectors verified that the building is clean and safe with functioning smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms, adequate staffing coverage 24 hours a day, sufficient food and supplies, and proper storage of medications and hazardous materials.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mary Rico and Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with House Manager Rose Macadangdang and was granted entry to the facility. The Licensee Noelia Garica was also contacted regarding today's visit. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (2). LPA was accompanied by House Manager Rose Macadangdang to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated space for resident /staff files. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (2) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (2) resident medications and (1) hospice files. LPA also reviewed (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to House Manager Rose Macadangdang.

2025-10-16
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

This was a follow-up inspection on April 27, 2026, to check whether the facility had fixed a problem found during an earlier visit in October 2025 related to how it handles medical and dental care. The administrator had made the necessary corrections, and the follow-up confirmed the issue was resolved.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to verify clearance of Plan of Correction from visit on 10/8/2025. LPA Rico met with Administrator Christopher Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. The following deficiency was cleared during the time of the visit: The Licensee was cited on 10/8/20245 for 87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(d)(3) . During today's visit and based on record review and interview, LPA Rico observed that the Administrator made the corrections. Therefore, the POC was cleared at today’s visit.

2025-10-09
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During a health and safety inspection on October 9, 2025, inspectors found that the facility did not properly document a resident's as-needed medications—the documentation was missing the time, reason, and result of each dose. Additionally, the medications in the resident's packaging did not match what was listed in the facility's medication records, and because this was a repeat problem within the past year, the facility will be issued a civil penalty.

Type A22 CCR §87608(d)(3)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87608(d)(3)

Based on interviews and record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not documenting R1's PRN which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mary Rico and Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to conduct a Health and Safety check of the residents in care at the facility. LPA Rico met with Administrator Christopher Garcia and explained the reason for the visit. The Health and Safety check included overall observation of the facility inside, and outside, including food supply, medications, physical plant, and the residents. On 9/25/2025 the Administrator was cited for not providing proper documentation to R1's PRN medication. Today 10/9/2025 LPA Rico audit R1's medication and observed PRN medication was not documented properly. The PRN medication did not include the time, reason and result. Due to repeated violation within the 12 months, a civil penalty will be issued. In addition, the facility had documented R1's routine medication was provided, but the current medication on bubble pack did not match R1's MAR. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, one (1) deficiency were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809)(LIC809D)(LIC421FC) was discussed and provided to Administrator Christopher Garcia. Along with a copy of Appeal Rights and Civil Penalty.

2025-09-25
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

An unannounced case management visit found that the facility had cameras installed in resident bedrooms, which violates privacy and safety standards. The facility was cited for this deficiency and given information about appeal rights. No other violations were found during the inspection.

Type A22 CCR §87209(a)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87209(a)(2)

Based on interviews and record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not having a camera inside R1 bedroom which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced case management visit pertaining to complaint control number (56-AS-20250311155200). LPA met with Administrator Christopher Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Rico conducted a facility and review facility documents. During the visit, LPA observed cameras in the resident’s bedrooms which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care. During today’s visit,one (1) deficiency s was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), LIC809D, the appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator Christopher Garcia.

2025-09-25
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Citation on file
Inspector · Mary Rico

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that staff were not properly trained to help residents with daily care tasks like hygiene and dressing, leaving at least one resident in soiled bedding and clothing; staff also failed to properly document and manage medications, including leaving pills loose without original packaging. The facility changed its visitor hours without approval from the licensing agency. All six complaints were substantiated, and the facility was cited for violations.

Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.

Read raw inspector notes

related to assisting with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and did not have a copy of R1 care plan to meet their medical and dental needs. For the allegation, Facility staff leave residents in soiled bedding. During staff interviews, the Administrator stated that they wash residents’ bedding, it often becomes soiled again due to residents wearing soiled clothing. During the facility tour, LPA observed wet bedding and a soiled bedding in the living room couch. For the allegation, Facility staff are not assisting residents with personal hygiene. All staff interviewed stated they have been unable to assist R1 with personal hygiene due to R1’s behaviors. Based on record review the facility staff are incompetent to provide care for R1, LPA found that facility staff had not completed training related to assisting with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with residents with dementia. For the allegation, Facility staff are mismanaging residents' medication. During a medication audit, LPA observed that R1’s PRN medication was not documented on R1’ MAR, that would include resident’s response, reason for administration, and date/time. Additionally, LPA observed loose medication in R1’s container box without original packaging. During staff interviews, the Administrator admitted that PRN medication documentation had not been completed and were unaware of loose medication. For the allegation, Facility staff changed their visitor hours policy. During the facility tour and record review, LPA observed that the posted visitor hours were 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., which did not match the facility’s approved Plan of Operation submitted to Community Care Licensing. The original visitor hours were listed as 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. During staff interviews, the Administrator admitted to changing the facility’s visitor hours. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the six (6) allegations listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegations are valid because of the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. During today’s visit, six (6) deficiencies was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D were discussed and provided to Administrator Christopher Garcia, along with a copy of the appeal rights.

2025-03-14
Other Visit
Type A · 6 findings
Inspector · Mary Rico

Plain-language summary

An unannounced annual inspection found the facility's physical spaces—bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas—were generally clean and properly equipped, though inspectors detected a strong urine odor in the kitchen/dining area. Record reviews identified six violations, including missing criminal clearance and health screening documents for one staff member, and missing training documentation for that staff member and the administrator. The facility has sufficient staff and food supplies for the one resident currently in care.

Type A22 CCR §87303(a)(1)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(a)(1)

Based on observation LPA Rico observed which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/17/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Administrator stated they will ensure the facility odorless and will send LPA Rico the in-service documentation.

Type A22 CCR §87412(g)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87412(g)

Based on (interview) and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having Administrator and S1 records which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/17/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Administrator stated they will send LPA Rico proof personnel records are maintianed at the facility.

Type A22 CCR §87412(a)(11)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87412(a)(11)

Based on (observation) and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having a copy of S1 Health Screening which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/17/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Administrator stated they will send a copy of S1 Health Screening to LPA Rico.

Type A22 CCR §87355(j)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87355(j)

Based on (observation) and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having S1 criminal clearance which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/17/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Administrator stated they will send a copy of S1 criminal clearance to LPA Rico.

Type A22 CCR §87411(c)(6)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87411(c)(6)

Based on (observation) and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in by S1 and Administrator not having documentation of their trainings which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/17/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Administrator stated they will send a copies of staff training to LPA Rico.

Type A22 CCR §87705(b)(1)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87705(b)(1)

Based on (observation) and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having dementia training for S1 and the Administrator and which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/17/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The Administrator stated they will send copies of staff training to LPA Rico.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Christopher Garcia and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (1). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Christopher Garcia to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a space office for resident/staff files. Furthermore, during facility tour, LPA observed a strong odor of urine in the kitchen/dining area. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Record Review: LPA reviewed (1) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA audit (1) resident medications and (1) hospice file. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification. During record review, LPA Rico observed the facility did not have S1 criminal clearance letter and Health Screening. In addition, S1 and the Administrator did not have staff training and dementia training documents. Furthermore, LPA Rico advised for the Administrator to receive technical support, the Administrator agreed for referral. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, (6) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Christopher Garcia. Along with appeal rights.

2024-03-07
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Ryan Gardner

Plain-language summary

This was a pre-licensing inspection of a new memory care home for six non-ambulatory residents. The inspector found the bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas clean and properly equipped, with working safety devices, adequate supplies, and all required postings in place. The facility met all licensing requirements with no deficiencies.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner conducted an announced visit to complete the Pre-licensing inspection. LPA met with Administrator Christopher Garcia for a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) resident may be bedridden. The fire clearance was approved by the fire department on 1/30/2024. The facility has four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. There are four (4) resident bedrooms, a kitchen, a living room, a dining area, a laundry room, a backyard, and an attached garage. LPA toured the interior and exterior areas of the facility. The following were inspected: Resident Bedrooms : All bedrooms have the required bedding and furniture, such as clean mattresses/linens, mattress covers, nightstands, dressers, chairs, and lighting. Resident Bathrooms : The bathrooms appliances were operating in safe and sanitary condition. The water temperature was measured by LPA, the thermometer read at 115.3 degrees F. Kitchen and Dining Areas : Utensils and dishware are in good repair and ready for resident use. The kitchen appliances and countertops were free of debris and in good repair. The refrigerator was measured at 40 degrees F and the freezer was measured at 0 degrees F. The sharps were locked in the kitchen cabinet. Medication: The medications will be locked in the kitchen cabinet. Common Sitting Areas/Activities : There is adequate seating in the common areas for the residents. The facility has a supply of activities for the residents. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Laundry Room/Linens and Hygiene Supplies: An adequate supply of linens and hygiene supplies were available for each resident. The laundry room contains chemicals in the cabinet. Backyard : There are no bodies of water in the backyard. There is a covered area with seating for the all the residents. All passageways were free from obstruction. Fire extinguisher, carbon monoxide, firearms : There are two (2) charged fire extinguishers in the facility. LPA observed operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. The home does not have any firearms and or ammunition. Postings: LPA observed required postings including the visitation polices, emergency/disaster plans, complaint procedures, labor laws, and personal rights. First aid and working telephone: The facility is equipped with a complete first aid kit and manual. The facility has a working telephone for resident use. LPA observed that the physical plant is clean, in good repair, and to be hazard-free during today’s visit. LPA has determined that the facility meets the operational requirements for licensure. The Pre-licensing inspection is complete, and the facility has no deficiencies. The facility has satisfied all requirements in accordance with Title 22, California Code of Regulations. The required Comp III presentation was completed. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Christopher Garcia.

2024-02-27
Complaint Investigation
No findings
Inspector · Nicole Rouse

Plain-language summary

This was a pre-licensing interview for a new six-bed memory care home conducted on February 27, 2024. The applicant and administrator confirmed they understand California's licensing laws and regulations covering facility operations, admissions, staffing, emergency preparedness, complaint reporting, and other requirements. No violations were identified.

Read raw inspector notes

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Interview Method: Telephone interview On 2/27/2024, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readiness

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.