California · Corona

Estancia del Sol.

RCFE135 bedsDementia-trained staff(951) 268-9697
Facility · Corona
A 135-bed RCFE with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
135
Last inspection
Sep 2025
Last citation
Nov 2023
Operated by
Estancia Msl Llc;msl Community Management Llc
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Estancia del Sol

© Google Street View

Approximate location
Peer Comparison

Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
66th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
58th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Estancia del Sol has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jul 2024as of Jun 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D3
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
Cited Jun 2023+
Plain language

Elopements, fires, epidemic outbreaks, and poisonings must be reported immediately. Abuse with serious bodily injury requires a 2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report to CDSS, Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement. Abuse without serious bodily injury must be reported within 24 hours. A resident death requires a phone call by the next working day and a written report within 7 days. Injuries requiring medical treatment beyond first aid, and bankruptcy/foreclosure/utility shutoff notices, must also be reported. Incidents not reported on time are a separate violation — families may file a complaint directly with CDSS.

Ask on tour

When was the last incident report filed with CDSS, and may I see your incident log summary for the past 12 months?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Estancia del Sol's record and state requirements.

01 /

Five complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

The facility holds 135 licensed beds but does not carry a formal memory-care designation in CDSS licensing data — what specialized dementia-care programming, if any, does the facility offer, and can you provide documentation of staff competency assessments for dementia care?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The most recent inspection on 2025-09-11 resulted in deficiency notices — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

9 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

9
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2025-09-11
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A state inspector conducted a routine annual inspection of the facility and found no violations. The inspector reviewed the physical plant, food service, staffing, and resident care records, and confirmed the facility is clean, in good repair, and maintaining safe conditions for its current 118 residents.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lisa Hunt and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (135) current census (118). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Lisa Hunt to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated office for residents/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care . Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (10) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (10) resident medications and (5) hospice files. LPA also reviewed (10) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt.

2025-05-19
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Mary Rico

Plain-language summary

An investigator looked into complaints that staff weren't following hand hygiene procedures and weren't treating residents with dignity and respect. Staff interviews, training records, and observations during the facility tour all showed proper hand hygiene practices were in place, and seven of eight residents interviewed said they were treated with respect and dignity. The investigator found no violation of state regulations.

Read raw inspector notes

For the allegation, Staff do not follow hand hygiene procedures. During staff interviews 6 out of the 6 staff stated they follow all hygiene procedure. During record review, LPA verify the facility staff have been properly train for hygiene procedure. During facility tour, LPA observed staff using proper hygiene procedures. For the allegation, Staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect. During staff interviews 6 out of the 6 staff stated they treat their resident with dignity and respect. During resident interviews 7 out of the 8 clients stated they are treated with respect and dignity. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the three (3) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt.

2025-04-23
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced inspection, regulators found that in June 2023, a staff member gave a resident three times the prescribed medication dose instead of reducing it to half the normal amount, and facility staff acknowledged the error. The facility received a Type A deficiency citation for this medication mistake. An exit interview was conducted with the administrator to discuss the findings.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA Rico arrived at the facility to deliver findings on the compliant control 56-AS-20231107145012. LPA met with Administrator Lisa Hunt and granted entry to the facility. During the investigation, Community Care Licensing Department discovered that on 6/28/2023, S2 administered R1’s medication incorrectly. R1’s medication was supposed to be lowered to half of the normal dosage, but instead S2 increased R1’s dosage three (3) times the prescribed amount. Facility staff (2) admitted they committed a medication by providing R1 more medication that what was prescribed. Due to R1 medication error, the facility will be issue a deficiency. During today’s visit, one (1) Type A deficiencies to the facility were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC809, LIC809D, Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt.

2025-04-23
Complaint Investigation
Mixed
No findings
Inspector · Mary Rico

Plain-language summary

Inspectors investigated two complaints at the facility. Staff failed to notice a change in one resident's condition during a room check between 8:30 AM and 8:45 AM, and the facility was cited for this violation. A separate complaint about incorrect medication dosing that allegedly led to a resident's stroke could not be substantiated based on medical documentation.

Read raw inspector notes

The facility staff failed to observe R1’s change of condition when they were in R1’s bedroom completing the resident check between 8:30 AM and 8:45 AM. Based on the evidence discovered during the investigation, the allegation listed above is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because of the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D were discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt, along with a copy of the appeal rights. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On 6/28/2023, S2 administered R1’s medication incorrectly. R1’s medication was supposed to be lowered to half of the normal dosage, but instead S2 increased R1’s dosage three (3) times the prescribed amount. Thirty-six (36) hours later R1 suffered a stroke and was transported to receive medical care. Based upon investigation, medication documentation did not substantiate that R1 stroke was due to the inaccurate medication dosage. The allegation listed above is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt.

2024-11-08
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Mary Rico

Plain-language summary

A routine annual inspection was conducted on May 02, 2026, and no violations were found. The facility was clean and in good repair, with proper staffing, food service, and medical records; bedrooms, bathrooms, and common areas all met requirements. The inspector reviewed resident files, medication records, and staff certifications and found everything in order.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lisa Hunt and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (135) current census (119). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Lisa Hunt to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated office for client/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care . Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (6) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (6) resident medications and (6) hospice files. LPA also reviewed (6) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt.

2023-11-13
Other Visit
Type B · 1 finding
Inspector · Ryan Gardner

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced annual inspection, the facility was found to be clean, safe, and properly staffed, with adequate food supplies and appropriate medication storage. One violation was cited: an uncovered tray of Jello was found in the refrigerator during the kitchen tour. Staff files and resident care records were reviewed and found to be in order.

Type B22 CCR §87555(b)(23)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(b)(23)

Based on interview and observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above evidenced by not covering individual Jello containers in the refrigerator which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 11/20/2023 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 The licensee has agreed to read regulation 87555 entirely and send LPA a self-certified letter that the regulation was read and understood. The licensee has agreed to dispose of the uncovered Jello. The licensee has agreed to conduct training on the regulation with staff and send LPA documented proof of staff attendance. The POC is due by 11/20/2023.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lisa Hunt and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of one-hundred thirty-five (135) non-ambulatory residents, one-hundred thirty-five (135) residents may be bedridden. The current census is one-hundred twenty-five (125) residents. LPA was accompanied by Administrator to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to interior and exterior passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperature in the bathrooms to be at 114.6 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Postings such as the facility license, personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications are kept inside the medication rooms inaccessible to the residents. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for the residents in care. During kitchen tour, LPA found a tray of Jello uncovered in the refrigerator. The facility will be issued a type B deficiency for not covering the Jello in the refrigerator. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed eight (8) residents files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed eight (8) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. Medications/MARs records were audited and appeared to be dispensed and logged appropriately. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) and LIC809D were discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt, along with a copy of the appeal rights.

2023-11-13
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Ryan Gardner

Plain-language summary

During a routine annual inspection and health and safety check, an inspector found an uncovered tray of Jello in the refrigerator and cited the facility for this violation. The facility met with the administrator to discuss the finding at the end of the visit. No other deficiencies were identified during the inspection.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to conduct a Health and Safety check at the facility. The Health and Safety check was completed at same time as the annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lisa Hunt and explained the reason for the visit. The Health and Safety check included overall observation of the facility inside and outside, including food supply, medications, physical plant, and residents in care. During kitchen tour, LPA found a tray of Jello uncovered in the refrigerator. The facility was issued a type B deficiency on the LIC809 annual inspection for not covering the Jello in the refrigerator. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited on the annual inspection per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt at the conclusion of the visit.

2023-06-20
Other Visit
Type B · 2 findings
Inspector · Javina George

Plain-language summary

This was an unannounced inspection following a complaint about care and supervision. Staff gave a resident the wrong breathing machine during dinner—a nebulizer instead of the oxygen concentrator the resident needed—and the resident became visibly unwell before other staff corrected the error; the staff member who made the mistake said the tubing got tangled and she panicked, and she did not report the incident to management or the hospice agency as required. The facility has since trained all staff on the difference between the two machines and provided the responsible staff member with counseling.

Type B22 CCR §87468.2(a)(4)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87468.2(a)(4)

the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. Based on observation and interviews this requirement is not met as evidenced by:

Type B22 CCR §87211(a)(D)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87211(a)(D)

the resident within seven days of the occurrence... (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... This requirement is not net as evidenced by: the licensee failed to report the incident in which staff did not

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced case management deficiencies visit in correlation to complaint control number 18-AS-20200513115313 . The following deficiencies are being cited: Neglect/lack of care and supervision-staff failed to meet resident's needs: Resident #1 (R1) was prescribed to use both a nebulizer machine and oxygen concentrator. During dinner R1 was seated at the bar area and observed by Staff #2 (S2) described R1 as “bluish, coughing choking”. S2 helped R1 back to their room, and informed S1 about R1s condition. S1 responded to R1s room to administer oxygen, which was later confirmed to have been the nebulizer. Staff 3 and 4 were making rounds when they observed that R1 was hooked up to the wrong machine. R1 admitted that there was a “mix up with the machine”. R1 also stated the mix up was with the “wires” and “the hose”. S1 stated that the “wires” and “the hose” were tangled and that it was the first time attempting to connect R1 up to the oxygen machine and must have switched it. S1 admitted to picking up the nebulizer machine and setting it on the table. “I remember panicking”. S1 confirmed that she had intended to put R1 on oxygen. S3 and S4 properly connected R1 to the oxygen machine. Hospice was then called to come out to the facility due to R1 having a “change in condition.” It was also determined that S1 failed to notify facility staff and the hospice agency of the mishap. S1 has received verbal and written counseling and the facility provided all staff training on the difference between an oxygen and nebulizer treatment. In addition the incident described/noted above, the facility failed to follow reporting requirements. The information about the incident of R1 not being hooked up to their oxygen machine as needed, but to their nebulizer was withheld as it was not reported. A deficiency is being cited as the facility did not report the incident as required. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to Lisa Hunt, Executive Director.

2023-06-20
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Javina George

Plain-language summary

A complaint was investigated at this facility, but the inspector found insufficient evidence to determine whether the alleged violation occurred or not. An exit interview was conducted with the executive director to discuss the findings.

Read raw inspector notes

A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Lisa Hunt, Executive Director.

2 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.