Atria Rancho Mirage
RCFE
A Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) is a non-medical residential care home licensed by California CDSS under Health & Safety Code §1560. Residents receive assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, meals, and medication management in a home-like setting. RCFEs are not hospitals or skilled nursing facilities — they do not provide round-the-clock medical care.
34560 Bob Hope Drive · Rancho Mirage, 92270
Quick facts
Inspection comparison
Updated May 1, 2026Compared to 89 California RCFE facilities of similar size, over the last 36 months.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division. View raw inspection records →
Peer comparison
Percentile vs 89 similar California CA / rcfe_general / xl beds facilities · higher = better
Weighted citations per bed
Repeat deficiencies as share of total
Deficiencies per inspection
Tick mark at 50% = peer median
Citation severity over time
stableWeighted severity score per month · 24 months
Weighted score (24mo)
0
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility
California Title 22 requirements for this facility, with the specific regulation and a suggested question for each.
What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
Because this facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards:
- 12 hours initial dementia training — 6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks.
- 8 hours annual dementia in-service — required every year thereafter.
- Administrator CE — the administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle.
Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour: Ask how dementia training records are kept — families may request documentation.
How many staff must be on duty overnight?22 CCR §87415
Based on 142 licensed beds:
One awake caregiver on duty, one on-call caregiver physically on premises, and one additional on-call caregiver.
Violation pattern to watch for:A facility that documents a staff member as "on call" but with that person physically off-site — when the law requires on-premises presence — is in violation of this section.
Ask on tour: Ask the facility to walk you through their overnight staffing plan and confirm whether on-call staff are on premises or off-site.
What health conditions can this facility legally accept or refuse?22 CCR §87612–87615
Restricted — allowed with physician order + care plan
- Supplemental oxygen
- Insulin and injectable medications
- Indwelling or intermittent catheters
- Colostomy / ileostomy
- Stage 1 and Stage 2 pressure injuries
- Wound care (non-complex)
- Incontinence
- Contractures
Prohibited — facility must refuse or discharge
- Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injuries
- Feeding tubes (PEG, NG, or J-tube)
- Tracheostomies
- Active MRSA or communicable infections requiring isolation
- 24-hour skilled nursing needs
- Total ADL dependence with inability to communicate needs
A hospice waiver (HSC §1569.73) can allow continued care for residents on hospice who would otherwise fall into a prohibited category.
Ask on tour: Ask whether your loved one's specific care needs are restricted or prohibited, and what the facility's process is if needs change after admission.
What must this facility report to the state — and how fast?22 CCR §87211 / WIC §15630
- ImmediateElopement, fire, epidemic outbreak, or poisoningImmediately
- 2 hoursAbuse with serious bodily injury2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report — to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement
- 24 hrsAbuse without serious bodily injuryWithin 24 hours
- Next dayDeath of a residentPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- Next dayInjury requiring medical treatment beyond first aidPhone by next working day; written within 7 days
- WrittenBankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction, or utility shutoff noticeWritten notice to CDSS and residents — $100/day penalty (max $2,000) for failure
Your enforcement lever:Incidents that aren't reported on time are themselves a separate violation. If you believe a reportable event wasn't filed, you can submit a complaint directly to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS).
How does CDSS enforce these rules?22 CCR §87755–87777 / HSC §1569.58
- 1Notice of DeficiencyWritten citation with a correction deadline. Facility must submit a Plan of Correction.
- 2Civil PenaltyStarts at $50/day for non-serious; $150/day for serious deficiencies — immediately, with no grace period. Repeats escalate to $150 first day + $50/day, then $1,000 first day + $100/day.
- 3Suspension of AdmissionsFacility cannot accept new residents until violations are corrected.
- 4Temporary Suspension or RevocationEmergency suspension for imminent danger; full revocation after administrative hearing.
- 5Exclusion OrderAdministrator and operator can be barred from all CDSS-licensed facilities — not just this one.
See how these rules have been applied to this specific facility:
View state inspection record and citationsQuestions to ask on your tour
Based on Atria Rancho Mirage's state inspection record.
Seven complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
The November 20, 2025 inspection cited one deficiency — can you provide your corrective-action plan for the cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
The facility is licensed for 142 beds but does not hold a formal memory-care designation from CDSS — what assessments do you perform to determine whether a resident with dementia can be safely accommodated in a non-designated setting?
License number 331880734 shows current active status — can you provide families with a copy of the most recent inspection report and deficiency notice from the November 20, 2025 visit?
State records
California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing- License number
- 331880734
- License type
- RESIDENTIAL CARE ELDERLY
- License status
- LICENSED
- License expires
- Not yet indexed
- Licensed beds
- 142
- Operator
- Aoc Ca Opco Gp Ptr,gp of Aoc Rancho Mirage; Atria
Inspections & citations
15
reports on file
1
total deficiencies
InspectionNovember 20, 2025· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Antonine Richard
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation on November 20, 2025, looked into three allegations: that untrained caregivers were dispensing medication when medication technicians were absent, that staff were mismanaging residents' medications and causing refusals, and that medication records were being backdated or forged. The investigator interviewed the administrator, medication technicians, caregivers, and residents; reviewed medication training records and medication administration records from 2025; and inspected the medication room, finding no evidence to support any of the allegations.
View full inspector notes
Allegation #1: Staff are not trained to dispense medication. The complaint alleged that when a med tech calls out, untrained caregivers dispense medication to residents. On November 20, 2025, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Richard interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and stated that the staff who assisted the residents with medication had been trained and held certificates to assist with medication. The LPA interviewed two Med Techs (MT1, MT2), who denied the allegation and stated that all the staff who assist the residents with medication are properly trained. They also noted that the caregivers do not have access to the Medication Carts. Additionally, the LPA interviewed four staff members (S1-S4), all of whom denied the allegation and asserted that they have not been trained and have not dispensed any medications to residents. Their duty is caregiving; only Med Techs give medications. The LPA also interviewed eight residents (R1-R8), all of whom expressed satisfaction with how the facility's staff administers their medications and stated that they have no issues with them. There is no specified time when a caregiver provides them with their medications. Furthermore, on November 20, 2025, the LPA reviewed the facility training medication documents from 2023, 2024, and 2025 for all Med Tech members who assist residents with their medications. Report Continued on LIC9099C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Based on the interview, the records, and the information reviewed, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: Staff are mismanaging residents' medication . The complaint alleged that staff members are mismanaging residents' medications, resulting in numerous errors that lead residents to refuse their medications. On November 20, 2025, LPA Richard interviewed A1, who denied the allegations and stated that only Med Techs assist with and manage the residents' medications. The LPA also interviewed two Med Techs (MT1 and MT2), who both denied the allegations. They stated that they follow the procedures outlined in the facility's internal training, which occurred from October 3, 2024, to September 14, 2025. They explained that if a resident refuses their medication, the Med Tech records it in the electronic medication administration record (E-Mar), contacts the family member and the physician, and disposes of the medication. Additionally, if medication is spilled by either staff or residents, they must contact the pharmacy to obtain a replacement and document this action in the E-Mar. Report Continued On LIC9099C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On November 20, 2025, the LPA interviewed eight residents (R1-R8). Of these, five residents denied any issues with medication management. The caregiver never gave them any medication except Med Tech. On the same day, the LPA reviewed the MAR records of eight residents from 2025 and found no discrepancies in their medications. The LPA also reviewed the Med Techs' medication training, and all had completed it. The MT1 also explained to LPA how the processes of refused and/or spilled medications work. Based on the interview, the records, and the information reviewed, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Allegation #3: Staff are not keeping accurate records of medication distribution. The complaint alleged that staff were backdating and forging their names on the residents' electronic Medication Administration Records (e-MAR) and on the hard-copy log for narcotics. On November 20, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., LPA Richard, Med Tech Martinez, and Santana inspected the medication room to review the resident supply and the medication cart. Upon examining a randomly selected resident's medication supply and records, LPA found the medication record to be accurate. Report Continued on LIC9099C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The information documented in the electronic record matched the number of pills dispensed to the residents. Additionally, LPA reviewed the residents' medication records and found that all were signed on the day the medications were administered. Based on the interview, the records, and the information reviewed, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the administrator, Nathan Boese.
InspectionSeptember 29, 2025No deficiencies
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection conducted in May 2026, during which inspectors found the facility well-maintained, with clean buildings and grounds, properly stored medications and cleaning supplies, adequate staffing, and current staff training and certifications. The kitchen had sufficient food supplies, fire safety systems were current, emergency plans were in place, and resident files contained all required documentation. No violations were found.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon and Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced annual required visit. Upon entry, LPA was greeted by Nathan Boese, Executive Director, and informed them of the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit, there were (17) staff members and (113) residents present. Facility Overview: The facility is a two story building with (110) bedrooms and (126) bathrooms. Second floor is designated for memory care unit. The facility has fenced swimming pool and a hot tub. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility has infection control plan in file. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. The outdoor area was free of hazards. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Hot water temperature was 106°F. LPA reviewed annual inspection report conducted by fire marshal dated January 8, 2025 with passing inspection. Fire extinguishers located at hallways have current inspection tags. Food Service: The facility’s kitchen was clean and equipped to prepare food. The facility maintained the required two-day supply of perishable foods and a seven-day supply of non-perishable foods. Continued on LIC809-C...... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise clients during the visit. The administrator holds a current administrator’s certificate. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for four staff members, confirming criminal clearances, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. Five resident files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All resident medications were securely locked in a medication room. LPA reviewed medications for four (4) residents, confirming that all medications were listed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and accounted for. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last fire drill conducted on September 22, 2025, which met department requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed and provided.
Other visitSeptember 20, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Yolanda Delgado
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection conducted without advance notice. Inspectors reviewed resident records, employee files, food safety, medication storage, facility cleanliness, emergency preparedness, and fire safety equipment, and found the facility to be in full compliance with state requirements.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Yolanda Delgado and Armando Perez arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. Upon arrival LPAs was greeted by facility staff and granted entry. LPAs began inspection with introduction, visit purpose and provided the facility with LPA identification and business card. Resident record review began- Six (6) records were reviewed. LPAs reviewed for admission agreement, medical assessment and TB test results, consent forms, identification and emergency information, appraisal needs and service plans, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. This facility is meeting documentation requirements. Physical Plant and Safety of Environment/Operational Requirements- LPAs toured the facility inside and outside. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature for the clients. Lighting is sufficient for safety and comfort. Water temperature measured 109.0 degrees F. Laundry facilities and a locked cabinet is present for storing laundry soap and other chemicals. All outdoor and indoor passageways are free of obstruction. A medication room is provided for medications and sharp objects. LPAs verified there is a telephone working at this location. Food Service- Food supply meets the requirement of one week supply of nonperishable and 2 day supply of perishables food on hand. A menu is posted, foods are dated to assure safety. Food prep areas are clean and organized. LPA began review of employee records- Six (6) records were reviewed. LPAs reviewed employee record for first aid certification, fingerprint clearance, personnel/job application, health screening and TB test results, criminal record statement, employee rights, training verification, and current administrator certification. CPR and requirements have been met. (Continued on next page) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (Continued on from page 1) The facility employs enough staff to maintain cleanliness and meet the needs of the clients in care. Administrator certification is present and current. LPAs made observation throughout the inspection process to assess if the facility remains in conformity with the State Fire Marshall regulations. The facility has not exceeded its capacity limitation and the structure remains unchanged according to the approved floor plan. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be operational. Fire extinguishers are tested or replaced annually and were last done so on 12/8/2023. The facility is conducting emergency disaster drills. The last disaster drill was conducted on 09/18/2024. LPA allocated time to prepare this report for delivery. Based on the information received during this visit today, there are no deficiency is being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. This report was reviewed with and a copy provided to the facility representative provided at the time of the exit interview.
ComplaintMarch 20, 2024· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Sara Martinez
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
An investigator looked into a complaint that staff would not change a resident's diaper. Based on interviews and review of records, the investigator found insufficient evidence to prove this happened.
View full inspector notes
Therefore based on interviews and record review, the allegation “Staff will not change resident’s diaper” has been deemed UNSUBTATIANED at this time. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Executive Director Monique Moreira.
InspectionFebruary 29, 2024No deficiencies
Inspector: Crystal Colvin
Plain-language summary
An inspector made an unannounced visit to obtain signatures on an amended case management report from January 2023. No violations were found during the visit.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to obtain signatures for an amended case management report deficiency page dated 1/12/23. LPA met with Executive Director Monique Moreira and advised them of the purpose of today’s visit. No other citations were noted on today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Monique Moreira and a copy of this report and amended LIC809D from 1/12/23 was provided.
Other visitSeptember 25, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Kathleen Banrasavong
Plain-language summary
An unannounced annual inspection found the facility in compliance with all state regulations. The inspector reviewed resident and staff records, toured the facility, and checked food service, emergency preparedness, infection control, medication storage, and safety systems—all were in order. The facility houses 125 residents with 26 staff members present at the time of inspection.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kathleen Banrasavong arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by facility staff and granted entry. LPA began inspection with introduction and visit purpose. Upon arrival LPA learned that one-hundred twenty-five (125) residents live at this facility. There are twenty-six (26) staff members present. The Administrator, Monique Moreira conducted the tour. The Business Director, Sandra Zendejas completed the tour. Client Records/Incident Reports/Clients Rights Information: LPA reviewed client records. Five (5) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed for identification and emergency information, admission agreement, medical assessment, and TB test results, needs and service plans, placement, functional assessment, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. Personnel Records/Training/ Staffing/ Administration: LPA reviewed employee records. Five (5) record were reviewed. LPA reviewed employee records for first aid certification, criminal record clearance or an exemption, health screening and TB test results, employee rights, training verification, and current administrative organization. (Continued on LIC809C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (Continuation from LIC809) Food Service: Food prep areas are clean and organized. Food supply meets the requirement of one (1) week supply of nonperishable and two (2) day supply of perishables. Emergency food and water supply is present. There is a locked location for sharps in the kitchen. Physical Plant and Safety of Environment/Operational Requirements: LPA toured the facility inside and outside. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair. The facility is maintained at 78 degrees for the resident’s comfort. Lighting is sufficient for safety. Water temperature measured at 108.0 degrees F. Laundry is done in the designated laundry room on the first floor. All outdoor and indoor passageways are free of obstruction. Emergency lighting is available. There is a telephone working at this location. The LIC 610, emergency disaster plan is maintained. There are no firearms at this facility. There is not a fireplace at this facility. There is a gated pool at the facility, that is surrounded by a 5-foot gate and latch. The facility had their last annual fire inspection by Fire Master on 11/16/2022. LPA reviewed the facility’s last disaster drills, which met the department's requirements. Infection Control: The LPA observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms and kitchen had hand hygiene supplies and hand washing signs. LPA observed PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan which met department requirements. (Continued on LIC809C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (Continuation from LIC809) Medications/Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored. There is a locked pushcart allocated for medication storage in the Medication Room. Centrally stored medication and destruction logs are maintained separately. LPA reviewed medication logs and observed if they were dispensed accurately. LPA made observation throughout the inspection process to assess if the facility remains in conformity with the State Fire Marshall regulations. The fire extinguishers throughout the facility were last serviced and tagged on 11/22/22. According to the fire inspection, there are nineteen (19) fire extinguishers throughout the facility. Pursuant to the Title 22 of The California Code of Regulations Division 6, there are zero (0) deficiencies observed. An exit interview was conducted, this LIC 809 was reviewed with, and a copy of this report was provided to the Business Manager, Sandra Zendejas.
ComplaintMay 22, 2023· MixedType B1 deficiency
Inspector: Rayshaun Nickolas
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a staff member accepted two checks from a resident who has difficulty leaving the building—one for $150 that the staff member said was repayment for items purchased at the resident's request, and another $100 check written to the staff member's boyfriend—in violation of facility policy; the staff member was terminated as a result. A separate allegation that the same staff member was rude to the resident could not be substantiated due to lack of corroborating evidence.
View full inspector notes
, a check was written to one (1) individual for $100.00. The ED stated that R1 rarely leaves their apartment and cannot leave the building unassisted. The ED stated that due to finding this check, the RP began to look for other questionable checks that cleared R1's bank account. The ED stated that the RP discovered that on November 11, 2020, another check was written for $150.00 to staff # 1 (S1). ED stated that on March 1, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., they and a manager at the facility spoke with S1 regarding the cashed check for $150.00. The ED stated that S1 confirmed receiving a $150.00 check from R1. The ED stated that S1 stated the $150.00 was a repayment for purchasing items at R1’s request, using S1's own money. The ED stated that they asked S1 if they were aware of the facility’s policy about not accepting money from residents, and S1 confirmed that they were aware of the policy. The ED asked S1 if they knew the name of the individual who received the other check for $100.00. The ED stated that S1 stated they knew someone with the same first name; however, the last name of the individual they know is different. The ED stated that the other check for $100.00 was written to S1’s boyfriend. The ED confirmed that S1’s boyfriend did not live in the facility or work at the facility. The ED stated that S1 denied that they asked for any money at any time. The ED and manager went to speak to R1. ED stated that R1 denied knowingly giving anyone in the community a check. The ED stated that R1 denied asking anyone in the community to purchase items for R1 at the store. The ED stated that for violating the facility’s policy, S1 is no longer an employee. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report (LIC 9099), LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were discussed and provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Allegation #2 “Facility staff do not treat resident with dignity”. The allegation alleged that a facility staff member was very rude to R1. Department staff interview with the ED revealed that the ED denied this allegation. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. A finding of Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided.
Regulation
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(3) (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money ...
Inspector finding
This requirement was not met, as evidenced by the following: Based on interviews, the facility did not ensure that R1’s checkbook was safeguarded from S1, which posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights violation to persons in care.
ComplaintMay 9, 2023· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Stephanie Torres
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation looked into allegations that staff failed to provide activities and meet care needs for a resident. Staff said the resident was offered activities but chose to stay in their room, and was offered help changing clothes but declined further assistance; the resident did not participate in interviews to provide their account. The investigator found the complaints unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
View full inspector notes
allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. It was also alleged facility staff failed to provide R1 with planned activities. Staff interviews revealed R1 was encouraged to come out of their bedroom to participate in activities; however, the resident refused to leave their room. An interview was attempted with R1, however, they declined to answer any questions. Therefore, due to insufficient information, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Lastly, it was alleged facility staff did not ensure R1's care needs were met while in care. It was reported R1 was left in the same clothing worn the day prior, and not assisted to change. Staff interviews revealed R1 was assisted to change partially, however, declined further assistance from staff on or around April 04, 2023. R1 declined to be interviewed. Therefore, due to insufficient information, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. This report was reviewed with Moreira and a copy was provided.
Other visitMarch 17, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Chinwe Nwogene
Plain-language summary
State inspectors conducted an unannounced visit on March 17, 2023, to review how the facility was handling an eviction process and ensure it followed state regulations. They interviewed staff and the resident, reviewed files and records, and found no violations.
View full inspector notes
On March 17, 2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Chinwe Nwogene and Kathleen Banrasavong arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a case management visit regarding an eviction process taking place. During the visit, staff and resident were interviewed, resident file and facility record was reviewed to make sure the eviction process is in compliance with Title 22, California Code of Regulations. No deficiencies noted at the time of visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided to Monique Moreira.
InspectionJanuary 23, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Jesse Gardner
Plain-language summary
This was a routine administrative meeting where state licensing staff confirmed that the management team listed at the facility in 2019 is still in place and current. The facility was asked to submit updated personnel records by a specified deadline, and staff contact information was provided for ongoing regulatory communication.
View full inspector notes
An office meeting was held on this date with Deborah Mullen, Licensing Program Manager, Jesse Gardner, Licensing Program Analyst, and Nicole Wentworth, Regional Vice President. The meeting was to discuss the current management team in place at Gladwell Rancho Mirage. During the meeting it was confirmed that the managing members identified on the Administrative Organization form submitted June 26, 2019 are still current. Wentworth was asked to submit a current Personnel Report (LIC500) to the office by January 27, 2023. Wentworth was given LPA Stephanie Torres' contact information who is the current assigned LPA. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided to Nicole Wentworth.
ComplaintJanuary 17, 2023· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Rayshaun Nickolas
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation looked into three allegations: inadequate staffing, poor food quality and quantity, and improper staff training for resident transfers. Interviews with staff and file reviews of training records did not find evidence to support any of these allegations, though residents could not recall details from the time period in question. The complaints were determined to be unsubstantiated.
View full inspector notes
Allegation #2 “Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of the residents”. LPA interviews with facility staff revealed that the facility has enough staff to meet the client's needs. LPA interviews with clients revealed that the clients could not remember if there was enough staff working at the facility in July 2020. Investigation into this incident reveals insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Allegation #3 “Facility is not providing food of the quality and quantity to meet the resident's needs”. The allegation alleges that the food is not of good quality. The allegation further alleges that the bread is stale, the eggs are powdered, and the food is terrible. LPA interviews with staff revealed that the clients are provided food of good quality and quantity. LPA interviews with clients revealed that the clients could not remember the quality and quantity of food in July 2020. LPA file reviews revealed that the facility contracts with Crandall Dietitian Services which creates the facility’s food menus. Investigation into this incident reveals insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Allegation #4 “Staff are not properly trained”. The allegation alleges that the facility’s staff are not properly trained to do transfers. LPA file reviews of staff training records revealed that facility’s staff were properly trained. Based on the investigation, the above findings are Unsubstantiated. A finding of unsubstantiated means although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
ComplaintJanuary 12, 2023No deficiencies
Inspector: Jesse Gardner
Plain-language summary
An inspector made an unannounced visit to follow up on required paperwork and found that the interim administrator who started in mid-November 2022 was not properly documented in the state's system, even though she works at the facility several days a week. The facility was cited for this administrative record-keeping issue and was given until January 17, 2023 to submit updated documentation to the state.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jesse Gardner arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to follow up on information that the Department needed. LPA met with Business Director Sandra Zendejas and toured the facility. LPA advised Zendejas that an updated LIC500 is needed by CCL and to provide to LPA by January 17, 2023. Upon review of the facility roster found in Guardian, LPA noted that Assistant Executive Director (Interim Administrator) April Princesa was not associated to Gladwell Rancho Mirage. Princesa began employment in mid November, 2022, and is at the facility on Tuesday, and Wednesday's, and some weeks it rotates to Wednesday, Thursday's. Princesa was not on property at the time of visit. Deficiency was cited per Title 22. No other citations were noted on today's visit. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed and provided along with the LIC809-D, LIC421-BG, and Appeal Rights.
InspectionSeptember 23, 2022No deficiencies
Inspector: Crystal Colvin
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced annual inspection focused on infection control, the facility was found to have proper infection prevention measures in place, including available hand sanitizer and soap, posted guidance on cough etiquette and social distancing, adequate personal protective equipment supplies, and staff training on COVID-19 symptoms and safety procedures. The facility confirmed it is conducting daily health screenings for residents and screening all staff and visitors for COVID-19 symptoms before entry. This inspection occurred while the facility had an active COVID-19 outbreak.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of completing the facility's Annual Inspection. LPA Colvin met with Community Business Director Sandra Zendeias, and Administrator Monique Moreira (via telephone) and advised of the purpose of the visit, and that the Annual Inspection will be limited to Infection Control only. LPA Colvin did not conduct a tour of the community, as the facility has an active COVID-19 outbreak at this time. Below is a summary of inspection: Infection Control: LPA Colvin went over COVID-19 best practices for infection control and prevention with Community Business Director Sandra Zendeias, and reviewed the facility's Mitigation Plan. Residents have hand sanitizer available to them, and the bathrooms were stocked with hand soap and paper towels, and hand washing guides are posted. Upon entering the facility, LPA Colvin observed postings for cough etiquette, social distancing, and infection control. Community Business Director Sandra Zendeias and Administrator confirmed plenty of PPE supplies (such as masks, gowns, gloves). LPA Colvin went over the various recommended training for facility staff with Community Business Director Sandra Zendeias in relation to COVID-19 and confirmed that staff have been trained on various aspects of infection control, recognition of symptoms of COVID-19, and donning/doffing PPE. Community Business Director Sandra Zendeias confirmed that all staff have been fit tested, and that they will be re-fit tested annually. LPA Colvin also inquired about if the facility is still screening their residents daily for COVID-19 symptoms, which includes checking their temperature. Community Business Director Sandra Zendeias confirmed that staff are continuing to monitor residents’ symptoms, and that both staff and visitors are screened for COVID-19 symptoms prior to entering the facility, which LPA Colvin confirmed through being screened upon entry as well. LPAs Colvin additionally observed a sign-in log for visitors, where their temperature is recorded as well as answers to screening questions. Administrator stated New Administrator Packet was previously sent to Licensing. LPA Colvin to follow up. An exit interview was conducted with Community Business Director Sandra Zendeias and a copy of this report was provided.
ComplaintSeptember 29, 2021No deficiencies
Inspector: Jesse Gardner
Plain-language summary
An inspector conducted a routine annual inspection focused on infection control and found no COVID-19 cases at the facility. The facility had adequate hand hygiene supplies, cleaning materials, and face coverings, with a designated staff member responsible for tracking health issues and maintaining infection control practices. The facility met the standards reviewed during the inspection.
View full inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jesse Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection with an emphasis on infection control. LPA Gardner met with Executive Director Jonathan Karp. Present in the facility during time of visit were forty-eight (48) staff as well as eighty-nine (89) clients. There are currently no cases of COVID-19 within the facility. During today's visit, LPA Gardner toured the facility and made observations pertaining to the facility's infection control measures. LPA Gardner observed sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning and disinfecting provisions, and proper use of face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE and overall infection control. During the inspection LPA Gardner discussed infection control practices and procedures with Mr. Karp. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, was reviewed with and provided to Mr. Karp.
ComplaintJuly 30, 2021· UnsubstantiatedNo deficiencies
Inspector: Amy Goldenberg
Unsubstantiated — the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) investigated and did not find a violation.
Plain-language summary
An investigation into a complaint at this facility found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. While the complaint may have been valid, inspectors could not gather enough documentation or witness accounts to confirm what was reported. The facility's executive director has been notified of the investigation findings.
View full inspector notes
Based on the aforementioned, there is not enough available evidence to corroborate or refute the allegation. We have found the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid: there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. A copy of this report is being reviewed with and a copy is being furnished to Executive Director Jonathan Karp.
Federal summary
CMS Care CompareNot a CMS-certified facility
California RCFEs (residential care facilities for the elderly) are licensed by the state, not by CMS. CMS data only applies to skilled nursing facilities or to CCRCs that operate a licensed SNF wing.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.