Arizona · Tucson

Villas at King Road, The, Villa a.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(520) 690-2281
Peer rank
Top 36% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Tucson
A 10-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Last citation
Jun 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Villas at King Road, The, Villa a

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Villas at King Road, The, Villa a
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
27th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J1
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D1
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

6
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2026-06-03
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Villas at King Road, The, Villa a, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2025-06-03
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-07-23
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-06-27
Complaint Investigation
High Risk · 1 finding
High Risk
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. \'a7 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to document the suspected abuse, maintain the documentation in subsection (J)(3) for at least 12 months after the date of the report in subsection(J)(2), and include the dates, times, and description of the suspected abuse, a description of any injury to the resident related to the suspected abuse, and any change to the resident's physical, cognitive, functional, or emotional condition, the names of witnesses to the suspected abuse, and actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse and maintain a copy of the documentation required in subsection (J)(5) for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated. Findings include: 1. A review of documentation revealed the facility had reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. \'a7 46-454, to believe abuse had occurred on the premises. The document included all the requirements in R9-10-803.J.1-6 except for "the actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse from occurring in the future". 2. In an interview, E2 and E3 acknowledged the document did not include "the actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse from occurring in the future".

2024-02-09
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2023-11-22
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 1 finding
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager accepted and retained an individual when the primary condition for which the individual needed assisted living services was a behavioral health issue, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a direct health or safety risk to residents and if the facility was unable to meet the needs of R2. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a document titled "Diagnoses and Doctor's Orders," dated July 28, 2022. The document included a section titled, "Diagnoses:," which identified "Schizoaffective d/o Unspecified." Evidence of any other type of medical diagnosis of R2 was not available for review. 2. A review of R2's service plan (dated October 23, 2023) for directed care services revealed a section titled, "Medical Diagnosis/Health Problems:," which indicated "Depression, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Hypothyroidism." The service plan indicated [R2] was "unable to reliably use [R2's] call button if [R2] in need of assistance...due to cognitive deficits." However, the service plan did not indicate if the cognitive deficit was linked to R2's listed diagnoses or another medical condition. Additionally, R2's service plan revealed R2 was largely independent of all activities of daily living, and required only behavioral care, medication administration, and required mainly Monitoring, cues or "Set-up/Standby" assistance with instrumental activities of daily living. The service plan also indicated R2 "requires a caregiver with [R2] while outside due to wandering risk," however the plan does not link the behavior to a medical diagnosis rather than a behavioral diagnosis. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R2's medical record did not contain evidence which indicated the primary condition R2 needed assisted living services was other than a behavioral health issue.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.