Arizona · Tucson

River Rose Senior Care LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(619) 578-8416
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 50% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Tucson
A 10-bed Care Facility with 6 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Oct 2024
Last citation
Feb 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

River Rose Senior Care LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of River Rose Senior Care LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
19th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
32nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: FEB 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
FEB 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

6 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J1
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D5
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
6
total deficiencies
2026-02-26
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 6 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for River Rose Senior Care LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a copy of the document provided to an emergency responder and documentation of the actions required by subsection B of this section for a period of two years after the date of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a gap in the dates of services provided to R1. In an interview, E1 reported R1 threw a table and was sent to the hospital for evaluation on January 8, 2026. E1 further reported R1 was sent out to the hospital again on February 13, 2026.   2. During the inspection, the compliance officer requested to review the document provided to the emergency responders. 3. E1 reported E1 did not have a copy of the documentation required. E1 provided a form that was not completely filled out and reported the medication administration record was accidentally sent with R1 to the hospital on February 13, 2026. 4. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.

High RiskA.A.C. § RR9-10-803.K.3
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.K.3

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to provide written notification to the Department of a resident’s elopement, within 24 hours of the elopement being discovered. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for the other residents residing in the assisted living facility. Findings Include: 1. The Compliance Officer reviewed an incident report dated February 5, 2026, which indicated R1 eloped on February 5, 2026. 2. No evidence was provided that the Department was notified of the elopement.   3. In an interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-807.D.10A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.D.10
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.D.10

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a residency agreement was signed and dated by the manager before or at the time of an individual's acceptance by the assisted living facility, for one of two resident records reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a residency agreement. However, the residency agreement did not include the manager’s signature and date signed. 2. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-808.A.5A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.5
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.5

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan that, when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the resident or resident’s representative, the manager, and the nurse or medical practitioner who reviewed the service plan, for one of two resident records reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of R1’s medical records revealed an initial service plan dated January 8, 2026, that included medication administration. The service plan had a signature of the resident’s representative; however, it did not include the date signed. Further review revealed it did not include the signature of the manager or the nurse who reviewed the service plan.  2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no further information was provided.

R9-10-811.C.13A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C.13
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C.13

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident’s medical record contained documentation of medication administered to the resident that included the date and time of administration; the name, strength, dosage, and route of administration; and the name and signature of the individual administering the medication for one of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication could not be verified as administered against a medication order. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed an unsigned service plan, dated January 8, 2026, which included medication administration. 2. A review of R1’s medical record revealed signed medication orders dated January 22, 2026, which included daily administration orders for amlodipine, aspirin, atorvastatin, carvedilol, losartan, and Quetiapine.   3. Further review of R1’s medical record revealed no evidence of a medication administration record (MAR) or documentation of the administration of R1’s medication, which included the date and time of administration; the name, strength, dosage, and route of administration; and the name and signature of the individual administering the medication.   4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1. E1 reported the MAR was accidentally sent with R1 to the hospital, on February 13, 2026.

R9-10-819.D.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.D.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.D.2

Based on record review and interview, when a resident had an emergency that resulted in the resident needing emergency services, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the incident as required. Finding include: 1. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a gap in the dates of services provided to R1. In an interview, E1 reported R1 threw a table and was sent to the hospital for evaluation on January 8, 2026. E1 further reported R1 was sent out to the hospital again on February 13, 2026, for throwing a stool at E2.   2. The compliance officer requested to review an incident report regarding the incidents that occurred on January 8, 2026 and on February 13, 2026. E1 reported incident reports were unavailable for review, for the two incidents requested. 3. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.

2024-10-17
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.