Spring Ridge Retirement, LLC.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
on file.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Spring Ridge Retirement, LLC's record and state requirements.
Spring Ridge holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you walk us through the specific dementia care protocols that meet the contract requirements, and show us the written policies that describe how staff provide memory care supports?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent DSHS inspection on July 1, 2023 found 7 deficiencies across 6 reports — can you provide the corrective action plans the facility submitted in response to those deficiencies, and explain what changes were made to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Five complaints were filed with DSHS Residential Care Services during the inspection period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated by investigators, and what documentation can you share about how the facility addressed substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2024-12-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted, and no violation was found. The facility's practices were determined to be compliant with Washington residential care requirements.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to protect the rights of residents by restricting the identified resident's freedom regarding visitors and meals in response to bed bug infestation, confining the resident to their apartment without proper justification.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2660: The facility failed to protect the rights of residents by restricting the identified resident's freedom regarding visitors and meals in response to bed bug infestation, confining the resident to their apartment without proper justification.
2024-10-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“The facility failed to investigate medication errors or ensure safe medication practices for residents, as documented in the Statement of Deficiencies.”
“The facility failed to investigate the causes of a respiratory outbreak or manage the spread of infection among residents.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The facility failed to investigate medication errors or ensure safe medication practices for residents, as documented in the Statement of Deficiencies. —: The facility failed to investigate the causes of a respiratory outbreak or manage the spread of infection among residents.
2024-09-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at the facility on January 11, 2024 found that the facility failed to maintain required documentation of showers for three residents over the December 2023 and January 2024 period, despite service plans requiring two showers per week for each resident. Review of resident records, shower schedules, and staff interviews revealed no shower sheets or progress note entries showing whether showers were given, refused, or attempted, and the facility administrator acknowledged not knowing whether residents received their scheduled showers. The facility cited deficiencies related to failure to provide or document required personal care services according to negotiated service agreements.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The assisted living facility failed to provide showers as agreed upon in the Negotiated Service Agreements for 3 of 3 sampled residents. Residents 1, 2, and 3 were not receiving the required 2 showers per week with appropriate documentation, placing them at risk for developing skin issues, poor hygiene, and decreased quality of life.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The assisted living facility failed to provide showers as agreed upon in the Negotiated Service Agreements for 3 of 3 sampled residents. Residents 1, 2, and 3 were not receiving the required 2 showers per week with appropriate documentation, placing them at risk for developing skin issues, poor hygiene, and decreased quality of life.
3 older inspections from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Pierce County.
Other memory care facilities in Pierce County with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.