Cascade Park Gardens, L.L.C..
Cascade Park Gardens, L.L.C. is Ranked in the top 14% of Washington memory care with 2 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Jul 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Cascade Park Gardens, L.L.C. has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Cascade Park Gardens, L.L.C.'s record and state requirements.
The facility holds a Washington DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that describes the specialized interventions, environment modifications, and daily routines used for residents with cognitive impairment?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS records show 5 deficiencies across 4 inspection reports, with the most recent inspection on January 1, 2025 — can you share the corrective action plans submitted to DSHS for those deficiencies and explain what changes were made to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Three complaints were filed with DSHS during the inspection period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what documentation can you provide showing how the facility responded to any substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-07-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Cascade Park Gardens found that the facility failed to obtain signed negotiated service agreements from residents or their representatives for 2 of 4 residents sampled, with both agreements remaining unsigned and undated. The facility cited a deficiency under state licensing rules requiring annual signed agreements, as this failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and lack of resident autonomy. The facility has committed to correcting this violation and implementing a monitoring system to ensure continued compliance.
“The facility failed to ensure that negotiated service agreements were signed by residents or their representatives on an annual basis. Two sampled residents (R1 and R2) had unsigned negotiated service agreements, placing residents at risk for unmet care needs and lack of resident autonomy.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2150: The facility failed to ensure that negotiated service agreements were signed by residents or their representatives on an annual basis. Two sampled residents (R1 and R2) had unsigned negotiated service agreements, placing residents at risk for unmet care needs and lack of resident autonomy.
2025-01-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-01-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in this document to write a meaningful summary. The form shows a complaint investigation was conducted, but the "Narrative" and detailed findings are blank or marked "N/A." To summarize what was actually found—whether a violation occurred or the complaint was unsubstantiated—I would need the inspection narrative or conclusion section to be completed. Please provide the full inspection report with the findings details.
“A resident's food intake was not being monitored or assisted as required by the negotiated service agreement.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: A resident's food intake was not being monitored or assisted as required by the negotiated service agreement.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Pierce County.
Other memory care facilities in Pierce County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.