Cogir at The Narrows.
Cogir at The Narrows is Ranked in the top 49% of Washington memory care with 12 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Feb 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Cogir at The Narrows has 12 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
12 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
12 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-02-01Complaint Investigation2 findings
“The assisted living facility failed to ensure staff received facility orientation training. Newly hired staff were inadequately trained on how to provide care to residents.”
“The assisted living facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse. Staff witnessed verbally abusing a resident, but the facility did not properly investigate this allegation.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The assisted living facility failed to ensure staff received facility orientation training. Newly hired staff were inadequately trained on how to provide care to residents. —: The assisted living facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse. Staff witnessed verbally abusing a resident, but the facility did not properly investigate this allegation.
2026-01-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
“The facility failed to ensure one sampled staff member (Staff C) completed a valid Washington State name and date of birth background check every two years as required. The previous background check expired on 08/02/2025, and a new one was not completed until 10/31/2025, more than two months after expiration. This placed all 93 residents at risk by allowing care services from staff with an unknown background.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2466: The facility failed to ensure one sampled staff member (Staff C) completed a valid Washington State name and date of birth background check every two years as required. The previous background check expired on 08/02/2025, and a new one was not completed until 10/31/2025, more than two months after expiration. This placed all 93 residents at risk by allowing care services from staff with an unknown background.
2025-04-01Complaint Investigation3 findings
“The Assisted Living Facility failed to ensure that named residents received their medication as prescribed.”
“The Assisted Living Facility failed to ensure residents always had access to their own rooms without staff assistance. Residents in memory care were locked out of their rooms during the day and could not access bathrooms in their rooms.”
“The facility failed to determine a need for further action when a named resident had an accident that could adversely affect their well-being.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The Assisted Living Facility failed to ensure that named residents received their medication as prescribed. —: The Assisted Living Facility failed to ensure residents always had access to their own rooms without staff assistance. Residents in memory care were locked out of their rooms during the day and could not access bathrooms in their rooms. —: The facility failed to determine a need for further action when a named resident had an accident that could adversely affect their well-being.
2024-09-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in September 2024. The report does not indicate what specific findings or deficiencies, if any, were cited during this visit. For detailed results, families should request the full inspection report from Washington DSHS.
“The facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 sampled staff were fit tested for N95 respirators as required by their infection control policy. Staff C, Staff D, and Staff E were not among the six staff members who received fit testing, placing all residents, staff and visitors at risk of exposure to communicable pathogens.”
“The designated smoking area was not maintained 25 feet away from the building entrance as required by Washington State law (RCW 70.160.075). Residents and staff were observed smoking within 25 feet of the main door and near resident room windows, exposing all occupants to tobacco smoke.”
“The facility failed to provide annually signed Negotiated Service Agreements to 3 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 5, 6, and 8). This placed residents at potential harm by not having an agreed upon care plan in place.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2610: The facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 sampled staff were fit tested for N95 respirators as required by their infection control policy. Staff C, Staff D, and Staff E were not among the six staff members who received fit testing, placing all residents, staff and visitors at risk of exposure to communicable pathogens. WAC 388-78A-2040: The designated smoking area was not maintained 25 feet away from the building entrance as required by Washington State law (RCW 70.160.075). Residents and staff were observed smoking within 25 feet of the main door and near resident room windows, exposing all occupants to tobacco smoke. WAC 388-78A-2150: The facility failed to provide annually signed Negotiated Service Agreements to 3 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 5, 6, and 8). This placed residents at potential harm by not having an agreed upon care plan in place.
2023-08-01Complaint Investigation3 findings
“The assisted living facility failed to have the door key readily available when first responders arrived at the facility, causing a delay in emergency response.”
“The facility failed to provide care and services as agreed upon in the negotiated service agreement for a named resident.”
“The assisted living facility failed to ensure records of a former named resident were available for review by the department.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The assisted living facility failed to have the door key readily available when first responders arrived at the facility, causing a delay in emergency response. —: The facility failed to provide care and services as agreed upon in the negotiated service agreement for a named resident. —: The assisted living facility failed to ensure records of a former named resident were available for review by the department.
Other facilities in Pierce County.
Other memory care facilities in Pierce County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.



