Peoples Senior Living LLC.
Peoples Senior Living LLC is Ranked in the top 5% of Washington memory care with 2 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Jun 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 14 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Peoples Senior Living LLC has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Peoples Senior Living LLC's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on April 1, 2025 identified 4 deficiencies across 4 reports — can you walk us through the corrective action plan for each deficiency and show documentation that the issues have been resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS has three complaints on file for this facility — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what specific changes did you make in response to the findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Your DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract requires specific supports for residents with dementia — can you provide a written copy of your dementia care program and explain how staff training aligns with the contract requirements?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-06-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to provide showers as promised in one resident's care agreement, documenting only three showers in March 2025 when two per week were required, which placed the resident at risk for skin infections and discomfort. The facility attributed the gap to a recent change in tracking systems and cited lack of documentation for some showers. A deficiency was cited and the facility submitted a plan to correct the issue and implement monitoring to prevent future non-compliance.
“The facility failed to provide showers as listed in the negotiated service agreement for one resident. The resident was entitled to two showers weekly with assistance but only received three showers in March 2025 (out of eight possible), placing the resident at risk for skin infections and discomfort.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to provide showers as listed in the negotiated service agreement for one resident. The resident was entitled to two showers weekly with assistance but only received three showers in March 2025 (out of eight possible), placing the resident at risk for skin infections and discomfort.
2025-04-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-05-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-01-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
I cannot write a summary because the document does not contain the actual complaint findings or narrative details—it only shows checkbox options without indicating which were selected or what was investigated. To provide families with accurate information about what was found during this complaint investigation, I would need the substantive details describing the complaint allegation and the inspection outcome.
“Facility staff were limiting a resident's access to using the phone and having private conversations. The regulation requires assisted living facilities to provide nonpay telephones with reasonable access and privacy by residents.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2930: Facility staff were limiting a resident's access to using the phone and having private conversations. The regulation requires assisted living facilities to provide nonpay telephones with reasonable access and privacy by residents.
Other facilities in Pierce County.
Other memory care facilities in Pierce County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.