Aegis Senior Inn of Kent.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 21 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-05-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in May 2025. The report does not specify deficiencies cited or violations identified during the visit.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The facility failed to ensure that one Care Manager (Staff E) completed Home Care Aide (HCA) certification as required. Staff E had been employed for 823 days since hire on 01/10/2023 without obtaining the required HCA certification, placing all 33 residents at risk of unmet care needs from staff with incomplete training.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-112A-0105 and WAC 388-78A-2474: The facility failed to ensure that one Care Manager (Staff E) completed Home Care Aide (HCA) certification as required. Staff E had been employed for 823 days since hire on 01/10/2023 without obtaining the required HCA certification, placing all 33 residents at risk of unmet care needs from staff with incomplete training.
2024-10-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“Facility failed to implement hourly safety checks on a resident as stated in the individualized care plan and service agreement. This resulted in the resident remaining outdoors in direct sun exposure for an extended period, causing blisters to develop on the resident's feet.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: Facility failed to implement hourly safety checks on a resident as stated in the individualized care plan and service agreement. This resulted in the resident remaining outdoors in direct sun exposure for an extended period, causing blisters to develop on the resident's feet.
2023-11-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in King County.
Other memory care facilities in King County with similar care offerings.
Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.