Oregon · Grants Pass

Pacific Living Centers of Grants Pass at Heidi.

ALF · Memory Care15 bedsDementia-trained staff
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Endorsed Memory Care Community
Peer rank
Top 3% of Oregon memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Grants Pass
A 15-bed ALF · Memory Care with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
15
Last inspection
Oct 2024
Last citation
Oct 2024
Operated by
Phone
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Pacific Living Centers of Grants Pass at Heidi

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Pacific Living Centers of Grants Pass at Heidi
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 38 Oregon facilities with a similar number of beds.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.

Severity rank
100th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
92nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month OR-DHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Pacific Living Centers of Grants Pass at Heidi has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2024. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2024
Aug 2024as of Jul 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A2
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

1
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2024-10-21
Annual Compliance Visit
OR-cited · 2 findings

Plain-language summary

During a kitchen inspection on October 21, 2024, the facility was found to not meet food sanitation rules in several ways: sanitizer solution was not tested for correct strength, cooked food temperatures were not consistently checked, plates delivered to residents were uncovered, and refrigerated foods were stored improperly with raw eggs and thawing chicken placed above ready-to-eat foods. A bowl of cut melon that had been sitting uncovered since 7:30 a.m. was measured at a temperature above 41 degrees Fahrenheit, and the facility had no system in place to ensure hot foods stayed at 135 degrees or above or cold foods stayed at 41 degrees or below during serving. The facility also failed to follow licensing rules for memory care facilities as required by state regulations.

OR-citedOAR §C0240
Verbatim citation text · OAR §C0240

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was handled, and the kitchen was maintained, in accordance with the Food Sanitation Rules OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observations of the facility kitchen, food storage areas, food preparation, and food service with Staff 1 (Regional Director of Operations) on 10/21/24 revealed: * The were no testing strips available to ensure the sanitizing solution was at the correct ratio. There was no documented evidence the sanitizer solution was tested to ensure correct ratios. * There was no evidence cooked food temperatures were consistently monitored. * Plates delivered to residents rooms were not covered. * Spills, splatters, and debris were noted inside draws and cabinets. * Eggs and thawing chicken were stored in the refrigerator over ready to eat foods. An uncovered bowl of cut melon was observed on the kitchen counter. At 10:45 am, Universal Staff serving food stated the melon had been cut for breakfast around 7:30 am that morning. The temperature of the melon was taken and in excess of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). There was no system in place to ensure hot foods were maintained at 135° F or above and cold foods maintained at 41° F or below when being served. The food handling and storage findings were reviewed with Staff 1 on 10/21/24. She acknowledged the findings.

OR-citedOAR §Z0142
Verbatim citation text · OAR §Z0142

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Refer to C 240 OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:

Read raw inspector notes

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was handled, and the kitchen was maintained, in accordance with the Food Sanitation Rules OAR 333-150-000. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observations of the facility kitchen, food storage areas, food preparation, and food service with Staff 1 (Regional Director of Operations) on 10/21/24 revealed: * The were no testing strips available to ensure the sanitizing solution was at the correct ratio. There was no documented evidence the sanitizer solution was tested to ensure correct ratios. * There was no evidence cooked food temperatures were consistently monitored. * Plates delivered to residents rooms were not covered. * Spills, splatters, and debris were noted inside draws and cabinets. * Eggs and thawing chicken were stored in the refrigerator over ready to eat foods. An uncovered bowl of cut melon was observed on the kitchen counter. At 10:45 am, Universal Staff serving food stated the melon had been cut for breakfast around 7:30 am that morning. The temperature of the melon was taken and in excess of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). There was no system in place to ensure hot foods were maintained at 135° F or above and cold foods maintained at 41° F or below when being served. The food handling and storage findings were reviewed with Staff 1 on 10/21/24. She acknowledged the findings. Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow licensing rules for Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities. Findings include, but are not limited to: Refer to C 240. Refer to C 240 OAR 411-057-0140(2) Administration Compliance (2) The licensee of a memory care community must comply with both the licensing rules for the facility and Chapter 411, Division 57. This Rule is not met as evidenced by:

1 older inspection from 2021 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.