California · Sacramento

Love and Comfort II.

RCFE6 bedsDementia-trained staff(916) 832-3626
Peer rank
Top 93% of California memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Sacramento
A 6-bed RCFE with 28 citations on file.
Licensed beds
6
Last inspection
Jun 2025
Last citation
Jun 2025
Operated by
Love and Comfort LLC
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 68 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
1st%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
3rd%
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
18th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

15 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

15
reports on file
28
total deficiencies
19
severe (Type A)
2025-06-26
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Love and Comfort II, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

Read raw inspector notes

On 6/26/25 at 1:20pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted a follow up Plan of Correction (POC) inspection to ensure all previous deficiencies have been corrected and all plans of correction have been completed. LPA observed all deficiencies and plans of correction have been completed. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and POC clearance letters were provided.

2025-06-19
Other Visit
Type A · 7 findings
Type A22 CCR §87303(e)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(e)(2)

F (41 degree C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degree C). This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA recording of hot water temperature of 126 degrees F. which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87309(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87309(a)

unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations of sharp knives being stored in unsecured drawer and cleaning supplies not being locked in the under sink cabinet.

Type A22 CCR §87555(b)(26)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(b)(26)

LPA observed a mojority of nonperishable food supplies were expired and discarded in LPAs presence and the facility did not have a one week supply of nonperishable foods which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87465(a)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(a)(2)

directly or make arrangements for this service. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff and resident statements and documentation of missed medical appointments for R1 that the licensee has not been assisting in arranging transportation and supervision for R1 which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87303(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(a)

handle on sliding door emergency exit, multiple screen doors in need of repair, broken closet door which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87303(d)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(d)

to residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87411(c)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87411(c)

include any documented training in 2024 or 2025. which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On 6/19/25 at 1:45pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced Case Management Deficiencies inspection to ensure deficiencies in facility operation observed during a change of ownership pre-licensing inspection haven been corrected. LPA conducted a walk through of the facility and observed the floor in bedroom #1 is in process of being repaired. LPA also observed the closet in bedroom #1 is still broken and not operating as designed, emergency exit is missing handle and several curtain rods are still broken and in need or repair. Hot water temperature has been corrected but no written plan of correction provided. Sharp knives, medications and cleaning supplies have been secured but no written plan of correction provided. LPA has still observed presence of rodents in facility drawers including observed nesting and rodent feces in resident bedrooms. no documentation of pest control provided. LPA still observes lights not operable throughout the facility. no written plan of correction received for proving or making transportation available for resident medical appointments. Per staff statements, no training has been conducted at the facility since the last inspection by LPA. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, The following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. Immediate civil penalties will be issued due to failing to correct citations and failing to complete the plans of correction identified in the previous licensing report. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.

2025-06-06
Other Visit
Type A · 9 findings
Type A22 CCR §87303(e)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(e)(2)

F (41 degree C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degree C). This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA recording of hot water temperature of 126 degrees F. which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87309(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87309(a)

unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations of sharp knives being stored in unsecured drawer and cleaning supplies not being locked in the under sink cabinet.

Type A22 CCR §87465(h)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(h)(2)

multiple medications being stored in an unsecured cabinet in the hallway which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87555(b)(27)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(b)(27)

health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87555(b)(26)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(b)(26)

LPA observed a mojority of nonperishable food supplies were expired and discarded in LPAs presence and the facility did not have a one week supply of nonperishable foods which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87465(a)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(a)(2)

directly or make arrangements for this service. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff and resident statements and documentation of missed medical appointments for R1 that the licensee has not been assisting in arranging transportation and supervision for R1 which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type A22 CCR §87303(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(a)

handle on sliding door emergency exit, multiple screen doors in need of repair, broken closet door, furniture with broken glass, broken patio furnitre and flooring in need or repair replacement which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87303(d)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(d)

to residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87411(c)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87411(c)

include any documented training in 2024 or 2025. which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On 6/6/25 at 10:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced Case Management Deficiencies inspection to address deficiencies in facility operation observed during a change of ownership pre-licensing inspection. LPA Gould observed the following deficiencies during today's inspection: Hot water temperature was recorded at 126 degrees F. Sharp knives and cleaning supplies unsecured and accessible to residents. medications not locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed rodent activity including droppings and chewed through food storage. Facility did not have an adequate nonperishable food supply - expired foods. lights not functioning throughout the facility. All light fixtures must be operable. remove lock from kitchen fridge. missing handle on sliding door emergency exit. replace/repair multiple screen doors. fix/replace closet door in bedroom #4. repair/replace curtain rod bedrooms 3 &1 discard broken hutch in bedroom #3 (broken glass) repair/replace floor boards in bedroom 1 and any other areas in the home. remove/replace broken patio chairs. remove/replace broken patio umbrella secured with pile of broken concrete. Staff members require annual training documentation. facility not arranging or assisting with transportation to medical appointments. Continued on LIC 9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, The following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. Immediate civil penalties will be issued due to repeated violations within a 12 month span. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.

2025-05-09
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding
Type A22 CCR §87555(b)(27)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(b)(27)

Based on observation the kitchen was no free of cockroaches which poses an immediate health, safety and/or personnel rights risk.

Read raw inspector notes

On 5/9/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams conducted a case management visit. PA met with caregiver Eliesa Qiolele and together discussed the report. LPA called the licensee Ratu Vunimatana two times and sent a text but Vunimatana did not answer. LPA had Qiolele sign the report. LPA conducted a visit on 4/22/25 and observed a cockroach running down the wall. Licensee had until 4/30/25 to send an invoice showing they had pest control come out to treat the cockroaches. LPA spoke with Ratu Vunimatana the licensee on the phone on 5/8/25 and Vunimatana stated that they had not called the pest control company to come out and treat the facility and would get it done soon. However, the date that it was due in the plan of correction was 4/30/25. LPA cleared the plan of correction in error on 5/8/25 and notified Vunimatana on 5/9/25. The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 9099-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal rights were printed and a copy was given to the caregiver Eliesa Qiolele at this time. Exit Interview

2025-04-22
Complaint Investigation
Type A · 3 findings
Type A22 CCR §87555(b)(27)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(b)(27)

Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above because cochroaches were found which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/23/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee agrees to hire pest control with in one week from poc due date. Licensee agrees to send a plan of pest control including the date and time of treatment by POC due date. Licensee agrees to send receipt to LPA within a week of the POC due date. Holly.williams@dss.ca.gov

Type B22 CCR §87303(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(a)

Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above because the cabinet doors in the kitchen are falling off and need repair. 2 out of the 12 cabinets doors which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care POC Due Date: 04/29/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee agrees to repair kitchen cabinets by POC due date.

Type B22 CCR §87303(e)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87303(e)(2)

Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above because the temperature of the water did not fall within the acceptable range which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/29/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee agrees to get the water in an acceptable range and send a picture to the LPA by POC due date.

Read raw inspector notes

On 4/22/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Williams met with facility licensee Ratu Vunimatana. A brief interview was conducted with Vunimatana. LPA Williams reviewed five resident files (R1-R5) and two staff files (S1-S2). Census is 5 and Hospice waiver for 1. The facility is cleared for one bedridden and 5 non-ambulatory residents. LPA Williams toured the facility with Eliesa Qiolele and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. In the kitchen LPA observed broken cabinets that were falling off when opened. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 74 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The facility's water temperature measured 103.1 degrees Fahrenheit, which is not within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. LPA Williams observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and working carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Williams observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA observed in the kitchen a cockroach crawling down the wall. LPA Williams observed a locked cabinet for the storage of medication. LPA Williams observed locked [Continued on 809-C] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 809-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal rights were printed and a copy was given to the licensee at this time. Exit Interview

2025-03-14
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Holly Williams
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit LPA Williams called the licensee and sent a text to the facility administrator Ratu Vunimatana but LPA Williams has not received a response. LPA Williams will use the staff member that always signs reports for Vunimatana named Eliesa Qiolele. The plan of correction (POC) states licensee agrees to submit to LPA Williams in 24 hours a new and correct eviction notice and within 48 hours have them signed by the resident responsible parties. Licensee agrees to adhere to the Stipulation, Waiver and Order Vunimatana was supposed to correct the eviction letter and send them to all the resident’s responsible parties. There are 2 resident that do not have responsible parties and that is R4 and R5. R2’s responsible party (RP1) called LPA Williams today and RP1 said that the phone number for Vunimatana is disconnected and would like to know the new number. LPA Williams asked if RP1 has received an eviction notice from Vunimatana and RP1 said no why what is going on? RP1 said that they have never received any letter from Vunimatana. LPA Williams asked R1’s responsible party on 3/12/25 and they said they received the letter on 3/3/25 which was not corrected at the time. On 3/12/25 Vunimatana sent a text to LPA Williams and stated that Vunimatana is resending the corrected eviction letter to get it signed by R2's responsible party. A civil penalty in the amount of $100 per day for a total of 7 days for a total of $700. Vunimatana had 24 hours to correct the written eviction notice and within 48 hours have the notices signed. LPA Williams has not received a corrected notice and 2 of the responsible parties have not received the corrected notice. An exit interview was held with Qiolele. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Qiolele.

2025-03-06
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Holly Williams
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit LPA Williams with facility administrator on the telephone Ratu Vunimatana and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Williams asked Ratu Vunimatana to come to the facility but they refused stating they were at an appointment and said that Eliesa Qiolele can sign for Vunimatana. Vunimatana sent LPA Williams eviction letters of 4 of the clients that were sent on February 27, 2025. LPA Williams reviewed these letters of eviction and observed that they are inaccurate. Halfway down on the second page of the eviction letter it states that the effective date of the eviction is September 18, 2024 and the eviction notice is signed on 2/27/25 which is past the 24 hour time limit of the Stipulation, Waver and Order. Within 24 hours of the date February 6, 2025 when the respondent received the order of this Stipulation, respondent shall give a 60 day written notice to each clients responsible party. LPA Williams interviewed all residents in care and all but 1 received the eviction letter and signed however, the residents responsible parties were suppose receive the eviction letter. During todays visit LPA Williams interviewed residents in care regarding concerns of the change of ownership applicant taking over the facility without department approval. None of the residents interviewed corroborated that this has occurred. This facility is being cited per H&S Section 1569.50 (a)(1)(3). An exit interview was held with Qiolele. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Qiolele.

2024-08-28
Other Visit
Type A · 2 findings
Inspector · Holly Williams
Type A22 CCR §87202(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87202(a)

Based on observation and interview, the main egress was locked, which prevents residents or staff from escaping in event of a fire, which is a violation of this facility's fire clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety, and/or personal rights risk.

Type A22 CCR §87411(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87411(a)

Based on interview and record review, staff were not able to supervise a resident and allowed the resident to enter the community without supervision, despite their LIC 602 stating that they could not do so, which poses an immediate health, safety, and/or personal rights risk.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Vincent Moleski and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Stephen Richardson arrived unannounced at Love and Comfort on 8/28/24. LPA Vincent Moleski spoke with facility administrator Ratu Vunimatana over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. On arriving LPAs Moleski and Williams and LPM Richardson observed both gates in the front of the facility were locked with dead bolt and chain. LPA Williams interviewed a staff member (S1) and they said that the gates are locked all the time. LPAs received an incident report on 8/6/24 stating that a resident (R1) went out to smoke on 8/5/24 and never came back. S1 said that S1 went out with R1 to sweep inside and outside of the gate. Caregiver S1 walked to the other side of the yard and R1 went out of the gate. S1 said that they went to look for the resident R1 on 8/5/24 throughout the surrounding areas and did not find the resident. LPA Williams and Moleski reviewed resident notes and observed documentation dated 8/5/24 indicating that R1 at 9:50 AM opened the gate and went out in his wheel chair. LIC602 states that R1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. R1 has still not returned, according to S1. This facility is being cited per 22 CCR sections 87411(a) and 87202(a). LPA assessed civil penalties for fire clearance violations and lack of supervision. Civil penalties are being assessed for $500 for each citation. An exit interview was held with Vunimatana, who said that staff member Eliesa Qiolele could sign this report in his absence. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Qiolele.

2024-04-11
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Ruth Wallace
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted unannounced required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with direct care staff and explained purpose of visit. Administrator's Certification Pending.. LPA and direct care staff toured the interior and exterior of the facility including common areas, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, staff room, kitchen, dining room, laundry area, and backyard. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair and to have sufficient furniture and lighting throughout. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. LPA observed locked sharps locked cabinet designated for medications. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid flooring in all bathrooms. LPA observed locked toxins. Fire extinguishers were last inspected 1/4/2024. The facility conducts fire/disaster drills with residents on 1/5/2024. Smoke/monoxide alarms are working order. LPA observed a complete First Aid kit on site and measured the hot water at 109.6 *F in the bathroom. LPA observed all doors to have alarms. LPA observed seating on patio and two gates that were locked and accessible. LPA reviewed three resident files and three staff files, including criminal record clearances. A review of staff records indicates all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are Fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA verified staff training for staff file reviews. LPA requested the following updated documents for community care licensing to be submitted via email by April 16, 2024: LIC 308 Designation of Administrator, LIC 500 - Personnel Report, LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan, Copy of Administrator's Certificate, and Copy of Liability Insurance. ruth.wallace@dss.ca.gov Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted with direct care staff. Copy of reports and (LIC 811 Confidential Names) left at facility.

2024-04-09
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding
Inspector · Pang Lee
Type A22 CCR §1569.38(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §1569.38(a)

This requirement was not meet as evidence by: Base on observation and interview the licensee did not comply with the section above by not ensuring that the accusation was posted in a conspicuous location and copies to residents, which pose an immedicate health and saftey to residents in care. LPAs stated that he was unaware that it needs to be posted since he has not review the accusation.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee and (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit on 04/09/2024 at 8:00 AM, LPAs met with direct care staff Eliesa Qiolele and explained the purpose of today’s visit. LPA Lee called and spoke to administrator, Ratu Vunimatana and informed this LPA that the noticed was not sent to the (LTCO), residents and their responsible party. LPAs toured and inspected the physical plant with direct care staff to ensure there are no safety hazards to residents. LPAs observed 2 facility staff and the census is 6 with 1 resident in the hospital. The purpose of today’s visit is to ensure the instructions provided in the Health and Safety Code Section 1569.38 are being followed according to the accusation. The instructions include, but not limited to, the requirement to notify the residents and Local Ombudsman (LTCO) within 10 days and to post a notice in a conspicuous location advising that an action is pending. The accusation was served on 03/29/2024. Licensee was previously informed that CCL shall receive copies of the notifications to all residents and/or responsible parties and that civil penalties could be assessed if licensee fails to follow the requirements. During the visit, LPAs did not observe the noticed and accusation posted in a conspicuous location. Per administrator, Ratu it was stated that he has received the accusation and has not reviewed the documents and was not aware that it needed to be posted in a conspicuous area. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report LIC 809 and LIC 809-D was provided to care staff Eliesa Qiolele.

2024-03-22
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding
Inspector · Pang Lee
Type A22 CCR §87244(c)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87244(c)

Based on file review and interviews, the licensee did not ensure to notify the department and get approval prior to issuing (C1) the 3-day and 30-day eviction. As a result, the facility did not follow the eviction procedures. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to C1.

Read raw inspector notes

On 03/22/2024 at 1:18 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Lee met with direct care staff, Eliesa Quolele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Lee called administrator Ratu Vunimatana and spoke to administrator via telephone and explained the purpose of today visit. The census is 6 with 1 facility staff present during today’s visit. LPA Lee reviewed staff criminal record clearances and a review of staff records indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. For today's visit the administrator was not present. During today's visit client 1 (C1)'s Alta Regional Service Coordinator, John Munzo was present for the visit. The purpose of today's visit, is in response to a 3-day eviction and a 30-day eviction notice. The department received a 3-day eviction and a 30-day eviction noticed from administrator on 02/27/2024. It was learned that on 02/02/2024 (C1) slapped (C2) in the face when (C2) was sleeping. The facility staff called the police and (C1) was then taken to Sutter Hospital for further evaluation. On 02/05/2024 (C1) was then transferred to Heritage Oaks Hospital. On 02/27/2024, administrator called (C1) responsible party to ask for (C1)’s responsible party’s email address to email (C1)’s 30-day eviction notice. On 02/28/24, the administrator emailed both (C1)’s Alta Regional Service Coordinator and the CCLD (C1)'s eviction notice. It was also learned that the administrator did not notify the department and get approval prior to issuing (C1) the 30-day eviction. Upon reviewing the 30-day eviction it was not a lawful eviction, as a result, the facility did not follow the eviction procedures. LPA Lee reviewed client file and record review revealed that LIC 603 Preplacement Appraisal Information and a Pre-Placement Questionnaire was completed; however, there was no date documented; therefore, it is unclear when the Pre-placement was completed. The following deficiency was observed and cited form California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this LIC 809 report, LIC 809-D and appeal rights were given to care staff Eliesa Quolele.

2024-01-09
Other Visit
Type B · 1 finding
Inspector · Pang Lee
Type B22 CCR §87405(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87405(a)

Based on interviews, records review and observations, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The licensee did not ensure that administrator is at the facility for sufficient number of hours, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights to person in care.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Pang Lee arrived at the facility on 01/09/2024 at 3:51 PM to conduct an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit. LPA Lee met with direct caregiver Eliesa Quolele, who then called administrator, Ratu Vunimatana to inform that CCLD was present. LPA Lee spoke to the administrator via telephone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to verify the plan of correction that was required to be completed on 10/12/2023 for deficiencies that were previously cited on a prior visit conducted on 10/06/2023. Current census was 5. Based upon this inspection, LPA Lee observed the following: I. The deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87355(e)(1) has been cleared. It was learned that on 10/13/2023 administrator sent the POC to LPA Jamie Ivey Canady and not LPA Pang Lee. The license did comply with the terms of the POC by POC. A POC letter was generated and provided to the licensee. II. The deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87405(a) has not been cleared. The license not complied with the terms of the POC by POC due date. A POC letter was not generated and provided to the licensee. As a result of this case management, the facility is not in compliance with Title 22 Regulation, and the deficiencies can be found on the LIC 809 D page. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of these LIC 809 reports, LIC 809-D page, and Appeals rights were provided to the facility.

2023-12-29
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Tung Truong
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit on 12/29/2023. Upon LPAs arrival, facility staff Eliesa Quolele was present and contacted Administrator Ratu Vunimatana who advised that he is sick and is unable to come to the facility. LPA spoke with Administrator Ratu Vunimatana over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. This visit is to deliver a civil penalty regarding “staff failing to seek timely medical attention for resident's change in condition.” Administrator gave permission for staff to sign today's report. On December 08, 2022, the Department received a complaint alleging, “staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident's change in condition.” The investigation revealed the resident (R1) began refusing food and medication in July of 2022. It was also learned the facility made two failed attempts to contact R1’s primary care physician (PCP) for the change in condition. The first PCP contact attempt was in September of 2022, and the second attempt was in October of 2022. R1 was sent to the hospital in August of 2022 and early October of 2022 for agitation although there was no mention of R1’s nutrition intake. By mid-October 2022, R1 was refusing all medication. However, facility staff did not pursue following up with R1’s PCP. Additionally, R1’s responsible party was not informed of R1’s health condition change. Hospital notes indicated R1 was diagnosed with Anorexia and depleted fat stores. R1 was also cachectic and had lost 60 pounds since March 31, 2021. At the time of the November 3, 2022, hospitalization, R1 weighed 126 pounds and their body mass index (BMI) was 21. Furthermore, medical notes reported R1 had a scaphoid abdomen, decreased fat stores, and temporal wasting. [Continued on 809-C, Page 2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 On February 07, 2023, a medical professional noted R1 was very thin with evidence of poor nutrition. It was also noted R1’s refusal of food and medication was a serious concern, and R1 should have received timely medical attention for failure to thrive. A facility staff reported on February 09, 2023, that R1 should have been transferred to a higher level of care facility before October 2022 due to health condition changes. As a result, on March 09, 2023, the Department substantiated the allegation “staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident's change in condition” and the licensee was cited for violating the California Code of Regulations Title 22, section 87464(f)(1) Basic Services, which states, “Basic Services shall at a minimum include: care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).” The Licensee failed to obtain timely medical attention for R1 and retained R1 after acknowledging R1’s change in health condition required a higher level of care facility. This posed an immediate safety risk to R1. The licensee was informed that a civil penalty was still being determined and may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code section 1569.49. The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code section1569.49(f), in the amount of $10,000 is warranted for a violation that resulted in R1 sustaining serious bodily injuries while under the care of this facility. The Welfare and Institutions Code section 15610.67 defines serious bodily injury as “an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery or physical rehabilitation.” This is evidenced by the licensee’s failure to ensure proper care and supervision for R1, resulting in R1 sustaining significant weight loss and hospitalization in the intensive care unit. There was a substantial risk of death or impairment of bodily function due to client refusing food and medication. [Continued on 809-C, Page 3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Today, 12/29/2023, the Department will be issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code section 1569.49 for a violation that the Department constitutes as serious bodily injury in the amount of $10,000. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500 was previously issued on March 09, 2023, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $9,500. A copy of the LIC 421D was given to Eliesa Quolele and originals were signed. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report issued. Appeal rights provided. Staff Eliesa Quolele signed on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page 2 of LIC 421D.

2023-10-06
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Type A · 2 findings
Inspector · Pang Lee
Type A22 CCR §87255(e)(1)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87255(e)(1)

Based on interviews and records review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The licensee allowed an excluded individual to facilitate operations regarding residents, which poses/posed a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Type B22 CCR §87405(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87405(a)

Based on interviews, records review and observations, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The licensee did not ensure that administrator is at the facility for sufficient number of hours, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights to person in care.

Read raw inspector notes

It was also learned that on 09/06/2023 resident responsible party (RP1) received a phone call from administrator, Ratu Vunimatana stating administrator was going to put (RP1) on a three-way call with (E1) regarding payment that was owed for (R2.) On 09/28/2023, it was learned (OA2) stated that (OA2) have spoken to (E1) regarding (R1) and that’s how (R1) got placed at Love and comfort II. During today’s visit it was learned from administrator that administrator did call (E1) to assist with finding a new placement for (R1). The licensee was aware that (E1) was excluded since licensee also received a copy of the stipulation order and still knowingly allows, person in the facility and facilitate operations in regarding to residents. The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations that the facility allowed an excluded person to facilitate operations: Based on interviews and recorded review, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Allegation: Administrator is not present It was alleged that the facility administrator is not present in the facility. This investigation consisted of records reviewed and interviews with staff, residents, and outside agency. Interviews revealed that the administrator is not in the facility often and that administrator is at the facility three times a week and when administrator is present in the facility administrator doesn’t stay long in the facility. 3 out 3 residents stated that resident doesn’t not see administrator in the facility as well. On 09/28/2023, it was learned that an outside agency (OA1) who comes to the facility to support a resident about once or twice a week shared that (OA1) only see administrator about 4-5 times per month. Furthermore, on 08/24/2023 a telephone call and email to administrator confirmed with LPA Lee that the facility LIC 500 Personnel Report, administrator’s scheduled day and time at the facility is as follows: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday from 8:00 AM to 3:00 PM. During the complaint visit LPA Lee visited the facility on 08/21/2023 from 11:15 AM to 3:15 PM, 08/24/2023 from 1:10 PM to 2:05, 08/29/2023 from 9:40 AM to 10:30 AM, and 09/28/2023 from 12:58 PM to 2:30 PM and LPA Lee did not observed administrator present at the facility per LIC 500 Personal Report. The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations that the facility administrator is not present: Based on observations, interviews and recorded review, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. This facility is cited per 22 CCR Section 87355(e)(1). An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $100 per day for one day, for a total of $100, was assessed. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the 9099 report, 9099-D page, and appeals right document were provided to the facility.

2023-09-28
Other Visit
Type B · 1 finding
Inspector · Pang Lee
Type B22 CCR §80087(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §80087(a)

Based on observation and interview the facility is not in good repair. Resident door #3 has been broken for one month and 21 days as of today.

Read raw inspector notes

On 09/28/2023 at 2:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived at facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with direct care staff, Eliesa Qiolele and explained the purpose of the visit. The census is 6 with 2 care staff. Administrator Ratu Vunimatanu was not present during today's visit. The purpose of this case management is due to learn deficiencies during complaint investigation with complaint control number 27-AS-20230814135530. LPA Lee toured the facility and checked on residents’ welfare. On 08/29/2023 during complaint visit LPA Lee observed the resident door #3 has a hole. It was learned that resident 1 (R1) kicked (R1) door causing a hole on 08/07/2023. On 08/29/2023, it was learned from care staff that administrator is aware of the hole in resident door #3 and will replace it. During today's visit 09/28/2023 at 2:30 PM, LPA Lee observed resident door #3 still have a big hole. The hole has not been repaired or replace. The following deficiency was observed and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the appeals rights, LIC 809 report, and LIC 809-D page was given to the facility.

7 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.