California · Carmichael

Sunrise Assisted Living of Carmichael.

RCFE · Memory Care66 bedsDementia-trained staff
Facility · Carmichael
A 66-bed RCFE · Memory Care with 5 citations on file.
Licensed beds
66
Last inspection
May 2026
Last citation
Sep 2025
Operated by
Ms Carmichael Sh Llc; Sunrise Senior Living Mgt
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Sunrise Assisted Living of Carmichael

© Google Street View

Approximate location
Peer Comparison

Compared to 56 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
33rd%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
35th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Sunrise Assisted Living of Carmichael has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Save for comparison:
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Sunrise Assisted Living of Carmichael's record and state requirements.

01 /

The facility has 3 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

13 complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The most recent inspection was conducted on July 25, 2025 — can you provide families with a copy of the inspection report and walk through any deficiencies that were cited during that visit?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

13 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

13
reports on file
5
total deficiencies
2
severe (Type A)
2026-05-27
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived on 05/27/2026 to conduct the annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed five resident (5) and five staff files (5). All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork. Facility was clean and well organized. Facility is current on fire drills. All required posting were observed. Staff training contained the required initial training. LPA and Administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, hallways, and common areas. The food supply is within compliance, 2 days of perishable and 7 days worth of non-perishable food items. Grab bars were present at the toilet and in the shower. All exits were unobstructed. The disaster drill is current. The administrator's certificate is current. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. LPA observed cleaning products and other toxins to be locked away. LPA observed the area used for medication to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detector are operational. Fire extinguisher is ready for emergency use. Water temperature is within compliance. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. LPA requested a copy of the LIC500, LIC610E and current liability insurance to be sent to the Department by end of the month. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was printed and given to facility.

2025-09-24
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Type A · 2 findings
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility's executive director gave a resident an antibiotic medication (Cefadroxil 500mg) without a physician's order for it and without current medication training, violating the facility's own policy requiring physician orders and proper staff training before any medications are given to residents. The facility could not provide documentation of either the medication order or the executive director's current medication training. The complaint was substantiated.

Type A22 CCR §87465(a)(4)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(a)(4)

Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility assisted resident (R1) with a self-administered medication without a physician’s order, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87208(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87208(a)

Based on records reviewed, the facility did not ensure that a staff administering medications received training in accordance with the facility's Plan of Operation, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

move in. LPA reviewed R1’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records, Medication Order Summary Report, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) which did not indicate the facility had a medication order for Cefadroxil 500mg capsules and there was no entry for the medication. Interview with ED indicated that they do not typically pass medications, however, they did one time when R1 moved into the care home. Interviews with S1, staff (S3), and witness indicated that ED provided R1 with their Cefadroxil 500mg capsules. Interviews with S1, S3, and staff (S4) indicated that typically the nurses and med techs pass medications. Interviews with S1, S2, and witness indicated that there were no medication orders for R1’s Cefadroxil 500mg capsules. According to facility’s Plan of Operation, “a resident may self-administer his or her own medications only when there is proper documentation from the physician”. The Plan of Operation also indicated that the facility is to “maintain a current residents with self-medication orders form in the Wellness Center”. To date, the facility was unable to provide LPA with a medication order for R1’s Cefadroxil 500mg capsules. Interview with ED indicated that they have taken medication training as they are the ED of the care home. Interviews with S2, S4, and witness indicated that the facility has a policy to complete medication training if staff are going to be passing medications to residents in care. Interviews with S4, witness, and Business Office Coordinator indicated that the facility has required Medication Management training that staff are to complete if they will be passing medications. Upon review of ED’s training documentation that was provided, the ED does not have current medication management training. According to the facility’s Plan of Operation, “team members administering medications must fall under one (1) of the following areas: A licensed health care professional, has successfully completed a state approved medication training course, has completed a Sunrise medication training program, if a state approved medication training course is not required”. To date, the facility was unable to provide LPA with the ED’s current medication training documentation. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.

2025-07-25
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A state inspector conducted the required annual inspection of this facility and found no violations. The inspector checked bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, outdoor areas, emergency equipment, medication storage, and resident and staff files, and confirmed that the facility met all state requirements. The home maintains safe conditions including proper food storage, locked access to medications and hazardous materials, and working fire safety equipment.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the facility unannounced and met with the Executive Director, Jessica Sanders, to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed three (3) bedrooms in Terrace Club Memory Care, three (3) bedrooms in Reminiscence Memory Care, and five (5) common area bathrooms. LPA observed apartments to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition, properly maintained, and the hot water temperature was observed to be 113.9 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required (2) two-day perishable and (7) seven-day non-perishable food supply on hand. LPA observed knives, cleaning products and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the outdoor area and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris and there appeared to be no potential safety hazards to the residents in care. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are operational. Fire extinguishers and first aid kits are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medications to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and also reviewed five (5) staff files. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.

2025-07-23
Complaint Investigation
No findings
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

A complaint alleged the facility failed to provide lice treatments on three dates in May 2025; however, inspection found that staff provided treatments on those dates and additional treatments afterward, cleaned the resident's room, and by May 22 had eliminated all active lice. No violation was found.

Read raw inspector notes

May 17, 2025, May 18, 2025, and May 20, 2025 to provide R1 with lice elimination treatments to their hair. According to R1's progress notes and email correspondence between the ED and RCD, R1 received lice elimination treatments to their hair on May 17, 2025, May 18, 2025, and May 22, 2025. On May 21, 2025, with the assistance of S1, LPA observed R1's head and did not observe any active lice; however, did appear as though there may be a few eggs remaining. Facility staff agreed to complete an additional treatment. LPA did not observe any fleas, lice, or other pests in R1's room. R1's progress notes indicated that on May 22, 2025, R1 had "3 head lice treatments given with no traceable lice now". Progress notes and interviews with facility staff indicated that R1's room was cleaned on May 17, 2025. Interview with Maintenance Director indicated that they completed a deep cleaning of R1's room on May 22, 2025 using a lice treatment. Maintenance Director provided LPA a receipt for the lice treatment purchased on May 22, 2025. LPA was unable to observe R1 on a second occasion as R1 moved out of the facility on May 31, 2025. Based on interviews conducted, documentation reviewed, and observations, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. No deficiencies are being cited.

2025-03-20
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

On March 20, 2025, state licensing staff conducted a follow-up inspection after an allegation that a staff member had forcefully grabbed a resident's arms during toileting assistance on March 6, 2025. The facility's internal investigation found the allegation unsubstantiated: a skin check of the resident showed only minor marks from a blood draw and tourniquet that morning, interviews with other staff did not corroborate the allegation, and staff explained they typically provide incontinence care at the resident's bedside rather than in the restroom. The facility conducted training on abuse reporting and proper care techniques for residents with dementia, and no violations were cited.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, March 20, 2025, and met with the Senior Executive Director, Janelle Odishoo, to follow-up on an SOC341 received by the department on March 12, 2025. LPA also received the facility's internal investigation findings on March 14, 2025. According to the SOC341, on March 11, 2025, the Senior Executive Director received a report from staff (S5) alleging that abuse had been reported to them from staff (S2) regarding resident (R1). S2 alleged that, during the AM shift, they witnessed staff (S1) forcefully grab R1's arms when assisting them onto the toilet on March 6, 2025. S1 had not reported the allegation to their supervisor at the time of the event. S1 was placed on leave pending an internal investigation. According to interview with the Senior Executive Director and documentation obtained, staff (S4) and staff (S6) conducted a head to toe skin check of R1 as well as all other residents residing in Reminiscence Care. All residents in Reminiscence Care have advanced stages of Dementia. S4 and S6 observed that R1 had a small bruise on their hand from a TB blood draw conducted that morning as well as some slight redness on their upper arm from the tourniquet. There were no other residents with any unusual or unexplained bruising, skin tears, or discoloration of skin. S4 and S5 interviewed S1 and S2 who provided written statements that had discrepancies regarding the incident. S4 and S5 interviewed all staff in Reminiscence Care and no interviews corroborated with S2's statement. According to interviews with staff that routinely provide care for R1, staff provide incontinence care at bedside as opposed to in the restroom, due to R1's behavioral expressions. S4 notified R1's family and physician. S4 conducted an in-service training for all three shifts regarding abuse reporting requirements, internal event reporting requirements, techniques used for ADL care and transferring for residents with dementia and behavioral expressions. LPA obtained a copy of the in-service training documentation. The facility's internal investigation was completed on 3/12/25 with Unsubstantiated findings. S1 will be re-instated to their position and returning to work March 23, 2025. LPA toured facility observing residents receiving care and participating in today's event. No concerns were observed. During today's visit, no citations are being issued. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.

2024-05-23
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

During a routine annual inspection on May 23, 2024, the facility's bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas were found to meet all state requirements for cleanliness, safety, and proper maintenance. The inspector verified that hazardous items were locked away, emergency equipment was functional, and the facility had adequate food supplies on hand. No violations were identified.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/23/24 and met with the Resident Care Director, Doreen Ntale, to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed five (5) bedrooms in Terrace Club Memory Care, three (3) bedrooms in Reminiscence Memory Care, and five (5) common area bathrooms. LPA observed apartments to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition, properly maintained, and the hot water temperature was observed to be 114.7 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required (2) two-day perishable and (7) seven-day non-perishable food supply on hand. LPA observed knives, cleaning products and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the outdoor area and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris and there appeared to be no potential safety hazards to the residents in care. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are operational. Fire extinguishers and first aid kits are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA continued reviewing resident and staff documents from previous visit. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.

2024-05-17
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

An inspector conducted a routine annual inspection on May 17, 2024, reviewing five resident files and five staff files. No violations were found during this visit. The inspection is ongoing and the inspector will return to complete the annual review.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/17/24 and met with the Doreen Ntale, Resident Care Director, to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection. During today's visit, LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and five (5) staff files. As a result of today's visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA will return at a later time to complete annual inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.

2024-05-16
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found no violations regarding hygiene, phone calls, food, or dental care. Staff provide bathing assistance multiple times weekly, residents can make and receive calls, meals are adequate with snacks available, and dental services are arranged through the facility or private providers. The facility maintains required food supplies and offers varied meal options.

Read raw inspector notes

Allegation: Staff are not ensuring that resident's hygiene needs are being met while in care. Interviews with the Reminiscence Coordinator (RC), Terrace Club Coordinator (TCC), staff (S1), and R1’s responsible party indicated that R1 is scheduled for assistance with bathing one time per week. RC and TCC indicated that if R1 refuses showering then care staff will offer on another day or another caregiver with try to encourage bathing. S1 stated that care staff check with R1 daily to find out if R1 would like to take a shower. R1’s responsible party indicated that care staff will try different strategies to encourage R1 to take showers. Interview with R1 indicated that care staff will provide them assistance when needed. Interview with witness indicated that R1 appeared well groomed. LPA observed R1 on 1/18/24 and 2/27/24 and R1 appeared to be well groomed and wearing clean clothing. According to facility’s Documentation Survey Reports dated November 2023, December 2023, and January 2024 indicated that bathing has been provided to R1 by care staff every 2-3 days. The Documentation Survey Reports also indicated that R1 is receiving grooming and dressing assistance from care staff at least twice daily. Allegation: Staff are not allowing resident to make and receive private phone calls while in care. According to the Superior Court of Sacramento documentation dated 12/21/23, R1 is to receive and make all phone calls through a Grandpad provided by R1’s responsible party. Prior to R1 receiving the Grandpad in February 2024, RC and TCC indicated that, when incoming calls were received for R1, they would instruct callers to contact R1’s responsible party to screen calls, due to a restraining order that was granted for 5 years, dated 9/11/20, restricting all contact with R1’s family member. Interview with R1 indicated that they can receive and make phone calls. R1 indicated that they receive phone calls from family and friends. R1 stated that they don’t use the phone to call out unless it is something important. Allegation: Staff are not ensuring that resident is provided with a sufficient amount of food while in care. Interview with RC indicated that R1 mostly eats meals in the dining area. Interview with S1 indicated that R1 will order their food, eat it, forget they ate, and order more food. S1 stated that the facility keeps snacks on hand as well when residents want a snack. R1’s responsible party indicated that R1 is eating three meals per day. Interviews conducted with R1 indicated that the food is good and that they get enough to eat at the care home. LPA toured the kitchen area with the Dining Services Coordinator (DSC) and the facility has the required 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable food supply on hand. LPA was provided the food menus **********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C************************************************ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 for January-May 2024 indicating a variety of food options for the residents in care. The facility has a binder indicating any special diets in the care home. DSC indicated that they have food delivered to the care home twice per week. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident's dental needs were met while in care. Interview with RC and TCC indicated that the facility has a dental hygienist come to the facility frequently to provide services to the residents in care. RC and TCC indicated that R1’s responsible party was notified when the dental hygienist was in the facility. Interview with R1’s responsible party indicated that, the next time the dental hygienist is at the care home, they will have R1 seen for services. Email correspondence between the facility and R1’s responsible party indicated that R1’s responsible party would like to be contacted the next time the facility offers dental services. Interview with R1 indicated that they have gone to the dentist with their private caregiver since residing at the care home. Based on interviews conducted, documentation obtained, and observations, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.

2024-01-24
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

This was a complaint investigation into allegations of emotional abuse and mistreatment of residents. Interviews with residents and staff found no evidence to support the complaint—residents reported being treated well, and neither staff nor residents interviewed said they had witnessed any abuse. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated and no violations were cited.

Read raw inspector notes

Interviews conducted with residents (R1, R2, & R3) indicated that care staff treat them well. R1, R2, and R3 stated that they have never witnessed staff mistreating residents in care. R2 indicated that they have never witnessed staff emotionally abusing any residents and that they would say something if they saw something. R3 stated that they have never witnessed any type of abuse from staff towards residents in the care home. Interviews with staff (S1 & S2) indicated that they have never witnessed staff emotionally abusing residents in care. Interview with staff (S3) indicated that they have never witnessed any type of abuse from staff towards residents in care. S3 indicated that they have never witnessed staff mistreating residents. S2 indicated that residents are treated respectfully and with dignity. Based on interviews conducted, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.

2023-12-20
Complaint Investigation
Mixed
Type A · 1 finding
Inspector · Angela Hood

Plain-language summary

This was a complaint investigation that found medication management problems at the facility. Inspectors found that medication counts did not match records for three residents on two separate dates in 2023, and a resident prescribed insulin did not receive the injection before a meal on August 27, 2023 as ordered—the facility had no nurse on duty during the morning shift that day. However, inspectors found insufficient evidence to substantiate other allegations about how non-nursing staff assisted with insulin injections, so no additional violations were cited for those practices.

Type A22 CCR §87465(a)(4)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(a)(4)

Based on medication counts and records reviewed, the facility did not ensure that residents (R1, R2, & R3) were receiving medications as prescribed, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

LPA observed two (2) medications for R2 that were off count and were under the amount documented and one (1) medication that was over the amount documented. LPA observed that R3 had one (1) medication that was off count and over the documented amount. There were several of R1, R2, and R3's medications that were not observed during the first medication count conducted. During a visit conducted on 12/14/23, LPA conducted a medication count for R1, R2, and R3 comparing the residents' medication lists on file with medication centrally stored for the residents. LPA observed one (1) medication for R1 that was off count in relation to what was documented and was over the amount documented. LPA observed one (1) medication for R2 that was off count and was over the documented amount. No medication refusals were provided for either medication counts conducted on 10/25/23 and 12/14/23. According to R1's medication list, R1 is prescribed to receive Insulin before meals. Interviews conducted with staff (S3, S4, & S5) indicated that they were on duty during the brunch event the facility held on 8/27/23. S3, S4, and S5 recall that there were no nurses on duty during the morning shift on 8/27/23. The nurse scheduled (S2) came in after the brunch event. According to the schedule provided to LPA, S2 was the only nurse scheduled on 8/27/23. S2 was scheduled for the PM shift starting at 2pm. S3 indicated that R1's responsible party was concerned that R1 had not received their insulin injection prior to mealtime as prescribed. Interview with S3 indicated that they spoke with S4 regarding R1's responsible party's concern regarding the insulin medication. Interview with S4 and S5 indicated that they assisted each other with providing insulin injections using the hand-over-hand method for any residents requiring insulin injections. S4 and S5 both recall that R1's insulin medication may have been given late during the brunch event on 8/27/23. Based on interviews conducted, a medication count, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 facility has a total of 5 nurses that work at the facility. ED indicated that there are only two Med Techs that have been used for insulin injections in an emergency situation. Interviews with staff (S1 & S2) indicated that the nurses at the facility can assist residents with insulin injections. Interviews also indicated that the Med Techs who are trained to assist residents with injections use the hand-over-hand method. S1 stated that the residents understand how to do their own injections with hand-over-hand assistance from a Med Tech. S2 stated that some residents require more assistance with injections than the hand-over-hand method and a nurse would provide the assistance. The facility provided LPA with training documentation indicating that the two staff (S4 & S5) utilized to assist with hand-over-hand injections have completed medication training. The facility also provided documentation indicating that the 5 vocational nurses have current licenses through the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians. Based on interviews conducted and documentation reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.

2023-12-07
Complaint Investigation
Mixed
Type B · 1 finding
Inspector · Kevin Mknelly

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that a resident developed kidney problems, dehydration, and weight loss; the facility appropriately arranged hospital care and continued care as planned, but hospital records could not be reviewed to fully assess what happened during the hospitalization. The investigation also found that the facility had a visitation restriction in place prohibiting a specific visitor based on a conservator's direction, which violated the resident's rights—the restriction was not based on legal grounds and did not appear to affect the resident's well-being.

Type B22 CCR §87468.1(a)(11)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87468.1(a)(11)

This requirement was not met based on statements and records. This posed a potential risk to R1.

Read raw inspector notes

noted changes in function of increased pain. Constipation was noted noted in Progress notes on 3/15/23. Again, R1's activity, function and food intake were unchanged. On 3/18/23, R1 was observed to be experiencing: lethargic, low food intake, weakness, finger injured swollen. The facility initiated medical evaluation. The facility staff were notified on 3/19/23 by the hospital, that R1's "kidneys do not look good." (R1 had a prior history of kidney disease.) On 3/25/23, progress notes noted a call from hospital that R1 was now experiencing dehydration. When R1 returned to the facility on 4/29/23, that R1's weight was then 142 lbs. LPA made repeated attempts to obtain Hospital records. The hospital records were not released to this LPA. Therefore, conditions at hospital admission nor the course of R1's care while hospitalized could not be confirmed. Care plan and care notes showed care provided as agreed to. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview with administrator. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 However, the Sunrise Service Plan, provided to LPA, regarding R1 states (the friend) is not allowed on Sunrise property- call the sheriff and Conservator if (the friend) comes to Sunrise. As R1’s Service Plan states such a visitation restriction and it was based on a direction from R1’s Conservator, who did not have legal ground to set such limitations, this allegation is substantiated. R1 was allowed other visitors and progress notes did not note requests for the friend nor was there a change noted to R1’s overall emotional status as a result of the lack of (the friend) visitation. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed with Barbara Barrob . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided.

2023-07-06
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Kevin Mknelly

Plain-language summary

On July 6, 2023, inspectors conducted a routine annual inspection of the facility, touring common areas, bedrooms, and the physical plant, and reviewing resident and staff files. No violations were found—the facility was clean and safe, water temperature was properly maintained, emergency equipment was in place, staffing was adequate, and all required documentation was complete and current.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 7/6/23 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing CARE inspection tool. LPA met with the Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the interior of the facility together with Executive Director to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, 6 resident bedrooms as well as the rest of the physical plant. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. The residence was found to be clean, safe, sanitary and in good condition. Water temperature checked and water maintained in required range. Stairwells have required evac chair. Facility has required food supplies. There are appropriate staff present to meet the needs of residents. LPA reviewed resident files and staff files. 6 Resident files reviewed are complete and current for documents checked. 7 Staff files reviewed were complete for documents checked. LPA received a copy of liability insurance. As a result of this inspection, no deficiencies are noted. Report reviewed with Tania Langland. Copy of this report.

2023-06-16
Complaint Investigation
Mixed
Type B · 1 finding
Inspector · Kevin Mknelly

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found the facility free of hazards and determined that a resident's falls were not caused by staff failing to maintain a safe environment. While the resident is at risk for falling, the evidence does not show the facility was responsible for the falls that occurred. No violation was found.

Type B22 CCR §87465(a)(3)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(a)(3)

use of these devices, and shall assist such persons with their utilization as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1's hearing aid batteries not managed. This possed a potential risk to the resident

Read raw inspector notes

Inspections during this investigation found the facility to be free of hazards. R1 was found to be a fall risk and has experienced falls. However, the reported falls were not attributed to staff failure to manage the residents environment to be a reason for the falls. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview with administrator.

7 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.

7 older inspections from 2021 are not shown in the free view.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Nearby cities · same county

More options in neighboring cities

Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.